Sexist pseudoscience (e.g. David Feinberg & Co) & Islam boosting unhealthy sex segregation
The ridiculous "scientific" claim that women (biologically) prefer deep-voiced men is but too symptomatic of today's senseless oppression and self-oppression of girls/women. (see What's sex segregation?). Culturally, perhaps, due to hundred years of sex segregated brainwashing via Freud/Hollywood etc, but not biologically. And yes, biologically a woman (in general) is more receptive for sex during the period of ovulation, although that doesn't, in any sense, mean that she necessarily wants sex or, even less so, needs sex. Freud was very wrong! Just like the simple fact that although the average man (biologically) is almost always prepared (heterosexually attracted) for sex, he isn't necessarily culturally, and doesn't have to biologically - rape is cultural. And there simply doesn't exist any evidence of "sublimation" of sex. Freud was very wrong again! So why not, instead, look at the motives behind biased "science"!!
Has sex become the excuse for sex segregation?
Please note that Klevius has no opinion on if people don't have sex at all or if they want to have lots of it, as long as its really fairly consented without pushing. One might remember, though, that although the wonderful sneezings one gets from accidental inhaling of pepper while cooking, doesn't necessarily mean one continues to do it elsewhere too, does it! But read more abt heterosexual attraction, its potential in analysis of sex segregation, as well as how it became denied by feminists and replaced by dillo "relationsship", rapetivism, and exaggerated emphasis on "differences"! There seems to be an almost fanatic and completely unfounded urge among some people to preach for more sex, especially regarding girls! But may I suggest that we let them freely decide for themselves if they do not want or if they want to have sex before, during or after marriage (see sexless marriage)! Instead we might support them by being more honest.
For an understanding of how confused and trapped in its own prejudices this kind of "research" is see Out of Africa as "pygmies" and back again as global "Mongoloids". There is a remarkable lack of understanding abt sex and kinship in a evolutionary setting. It's almost like naive TV-documentaries "explaining" animals' behavior through heavy Hollywood ignorance filters. It really seems that there has been an almost total lack of understanding of the simple fact that those animals, just like humans, evolved in distinctive and biologically well elaborated kin groups, where these kinds of "preferences" weren't, in most cases, even possible. But when a naive individualist eye catches a group, s/he assumes it's just a bunch of free individuals acting in accordance with a lousy, sexist Hollywood script.
As long as we have no problem with greater variances within the sexes than between, we have all the reasons in the world to question the motives of those claiming "necessary" or "good" differences that are, in fact, pure chauvinism.
Isn't it a true pity that, now when we have arrived at the point where the free individual eventually could be successfully combined with restored kinship ties (even friendship), unrestricted by racism/sexism), we instead open the door for sexist, social-fascist, detaching institutions that deny the negative human rights of the individual.
Return of the patriarchs (also see A Human Rights Guide to Historical Islam)
In a dynamic global world sex segregation is inevitably doomed in the long run. But forces fighting for, or timidly following, this backwardness ranges from bin Laden and pan-Arabic Islamist Saudi oil billionaires to Hollywood hens strikingly resembling their counterparts from the 1950s! This misleading of children into segregation is plain child abuse!
No wonder that such a backward and sexist ideology as pan-Arabic Koran Islam fits so well in many a confused mind! (see What's true Islam?). It's perhaps logical then that many main critics seem to emerge either from outside Europe, or among immigrants who don't want the ideology they escaped to follow them!
But naive and/or greedy nations and leaders don't hesitate to boost sex segregated and oppressing pan-Arabic Koran-Islam if they think they can benefit in any sense from it. Look e.g. at the weird Russia-Chechnya deal!
PS. Although Klevius has a reasonably deep voice he doesn't like women who "like deep voiced men"! But he loves deep-voiced women/men as much as he does love high pitch women/men!
Ever thought abt why more feminism has led to less progress for girls/women? According to a brand new report from Sweden's official social board, Swedish girls, compared to boys, have never been so unhappy since mid 1980s,i.e. since difference feminism really got momentum (see Heroic women vs feminism). Ironically this sad development has occured in the shadow of an almost fanatic (many innocent accused and families unnecessarily destroyed) interest in "child abuse/sexual abuse WITHIN the family" campaign, while the worst and most frequent abuse happens OUTSIDE most families, at schools and other public spheres (see posting below on how Linda, 13, was sexually abused to death at her school). Most of the perpetrators can't even be described due to political/legal correctness, or sentenced because of age and/or political correctness, which fact, of course, boosts even more of the same in an environment of already too detached (from their families) youth. Did I mention that the Swedish rape figures now are skyrocketing while it's considered (by cowardice teachers, social workers etc) totally OK that girls are heavily harrassed and named whores etc. in feminist Sweden! Good job?! If you have already read Mary Wollstonecraft's Education of Daughters (1787) you may read abt the "Swedish girl problem" in Klevius paper Angels of Antichrist (1996).
Klevius' sites/blogs still seem to be the only ones (exciting but also sad) clearly addressing this issue (sex segregation) fully, coherently, and with an unbiased, non-profit, informed, interdisciplinary approach. See Klevius definition of feminism!
And yet, the semen is already delivered - not only among the millions of Klevius-visitors, but more so because of an inevitable and fast growing global consciousness among the masses. An irony, isn't it, that Islamists initially thought abt Internet as an ally for the spreading of Islam, whereas it now turns out that the Islamic Internet striptease perhaps revealed too much of true Islam.
Klevius music link of today: Stupid girls
Has sex become the excuse for sex segregation?
Please note that Klevius has no opinion on if people don't have sex at all or if they want to have lots of it, as long as its really fairly consented without pushing. One might remember, though, that although the wonderful sneezings one gets from accidental inhaling of pepper while cooking, doesn't necessarily mean one continues to do it elsewhere too, does it! But read more abt heterosexual attraction, its potential in analysis of sex segregation, as well as how it became denied by feminists and replaced by dillo "relationsship", rapetivism, and exaggerated emphasis on "differences"! There seems to be an almost fanatic and completely unfounded urge among some people to preach for more sex, especially regarding girls! But may I suggest that we let them freely decide for themselves if they do not want or if they want to have sex before, during or after marriage (see sexless marriage)! Instead we might support them by being more honest.
For an understanding of how confused and trapped in its own prejudices this kind of "research" is see Out of Africa as "pygmies" and back again as global "Mongoloids". There is a remarkable lack of understanding abt sex and kinship in a evolutionary setting. It's almost like naive TV-documentaries "explaining" animals' behavior through heavy Hollywood ignorance filters. It really seems that there has been an almost total lack of understanding of the simple fact that those animals, just like humans, evolved in distinctive and biologically well elaborated kin groups, where these kinds of "preferences" weren't, in most cases, even possible. But when a naive individualist eye catches a group, s/he assumes it's just a bunch of free individuals acting in accordance with a lousy, sexist Hollywood script.
As long as we have no problem with greater variances within the sexes than between, we have all the reasons in the world to question the motives of those claiming "necessary" or "good" differences that are, in fact, pure chauvinism.
Isn't it a true pity that, now when we have arrived at the point where the free individual eventually could be successfully combined with restored kinship ties (even friendship), unrestricted by racism/sexism), we instead open the door for sexist, social-fascist, detaching institutions that deny the negative human rights of the individual.
Return of the patriarchs (also see A Human Rights Guide to Historical Islam)
In a dynamic global world sex segregation is inevitably doomed in the long run. But forces fighting for, or timidly following, this backwardness ranges from bin Laden and pan-Arabic Islamist Saudi oil billionaires to Hollywood hens strikingly resembling their counterparts from the 1950s! This misleading of children into segregation is plain child abuse!
No wonder that such a backward and sexist ideology as pan-Arabic Koran Islam fits so well in many a confused mind! (see What's true Islam?). It's perhaps logical then that many main critics seem to emerge either from outside Europe, or among immigrants who don't want the ideology they escaped to follow them!
But naive and/or greedy nations and leaders don't hesitate to boost sex segregated and oppressing pan-Arabic Koran-Islam if they think they can benefit in any sense from it. Look e.g. at the weird Russia-Chechnya deal!
PS. Although Klevius has a reasonably deep voice he doesn't like women who "like deep voiced men"! But he loves deep-voiced women/men as much as he does love high pitch women/men!
Ever thought abt why more feminism has led to less progress for girls/women? According to a brand new report from Sweden's official social board, Swedish girls, compared to boys, have never been so unhappy since mid 1980s,i.e. since difference feminism really got momentum (see Heroic women vs feminism). Ironically this sad development has occured in the shadow of an almost fanatic (many innocent accused and families unnecessarily destroyed) interest in "child abuse/sexual abuse WITHIN the family" campaign, while the worst and most frequent abuse happens OUTSIDE most families, at schools and other public spheres (see posting below on how Linda, 13, was sexually abused to death at her school). Most of the perpetrators can't even be described due to political/legal correctness, or sentenced because of age and/or political correctness, which fact, of course, boosts even more of the same in an environment of already too detached (from their families) youth. Did I mention that the Swedish rape figures now are skyrocketing while it's considered (by cowardice teachers, social workers etc) totally OK that girls are heavily harrassed and named whores etc. in feminist Sweden! Good job?! If you have already read Mary Wollstonecraft's Education of Daughters (1787) you may read abt the "Swedish girl problem" in Klevius paper Angels of Antichrist (1996).
Klevius' sites/blogs still seem to be the only ones (exciting but also sad) clearly addressing this issue (sex segregation) fully, coherently, and with an unbiased, non-profit, informed, interdisciplinary approach. See Klevius definition of feminism!
And yet, the semen is already delivered - not only among the millions of Klevius-visitors, but more so because of an inevitable and fast growing global consciousness among the masses. An irony, isn't it, that Islamists initially thought abt Internet as an ally for the spreading of Islam, whereas it now turns out that the Islamic Internet striptease perhaps revealed too much of true Islam.
Klevius music link of today: Stupid girls
Comments