Peter Klevius on Origin of Mosques - and Sex Trapped Princesses

Only Peter Klevius interdisciplinary* science analysis of highly intelligent mongolic females having children with kurgan males, explains why the spoked wheel invention spread from Siberia to the rest of the world, and why Tocharian is related to Uralic Samojedic. * Peter Klevius masters interdisciplinary science studies better than most because of high IQ, protected from "peer review" bias, and only focusing on what he is best at, i.e. low hunging scientific fruits. Peter Klevius intelligence was perhaps best described by the Finnish neuroscientist, J. Juurmaa, who in the 1990s wrote: "Teidän ajatuksen kulku on ilmavan lennokas ja samalla iskevän ytimekäs" which translated to English would mean something like: "Your train of thought is airy and lively and at the same time punchy to the point." This he wrote in a long letter answering Peter Klevius question about the effects on the visual cortex on individuals who have been blind from birth. ...

According to Peter Klevius, the cradle of humans (like of most s.c. "African animals") was the volatile tropical SE Asian archipelago. Small Homos spread during low sea level via mainland tropics, while others got bigger in the cooler but fat and protein rich north. This formula explains the "puzzling mess" of hybrids and phenotypes. Today we (HSS) are all one remaining species because the big skulled "mongoloid" (cold adapted) flat faces spread and mixed all over.  The world's tallest healthy man Väinö Myllyrinne moving around with ease. Peter Klevius and Svante Pääbo agree: There was a significant boost in modern human (HSS) intelligence.  According to Peter Klevius, this was due to the latest brain shrinking during high sea level that forced some humans back into the jungle, where the evolutionary pressure again favoured better packed neuronal circuits. When this latest brain update during low sea level entered mainland Asia, it became more pronounc...

*  'Mind' is here to be understood as the latest state of the individual's (or humankind's) adaptation to sensory input imprinted via the thalamus in a way that makes any new input pattern obliged to hit (roughly/dynamically) the same original association pattern. For this process to work no "qualia" is possible other than as obscure concepts in language. In fact, to understand the mind one has to separate it from language. Or more precisely, one has to understand language as sensory input in general - compare Peter Klevius stone example (1992) - but realize its capability of irrational illusions. There's no table in the brain to support a toddler learning to walk - s/he is just adapted to it as part of her/his surroundings. Same with a sunset etc. The neuronal circuit is just a chaotic "film" emulsion where different association patterns have become familiar to the individual. And scanning the brain shows just that, i.e. a chaotic p...