Was "a major RAF incident" a false flag against Iran, and do MI5/MI6 spread "unfounded and malicious speculations", while warning the public "not to speculate"?

Western secret services are steered by rogue state and $-embezzling (since 1971) US - which means the priority is US and not the people, and that US end goal is to stop China's success, which constitutes the main challenge against US continuing its criminal parasitizing  and coercion against the rest of the world.

Could Iran's Khorramshahr-4 missile, which reaches 4000 km - hence covering all of Europe except Portugal, and was proven by reaching Diego Garcia - have something to do with the removal of B1 bombers from UK?

Donald Trump: We didn't move the bombers far.

Peter Klevius: Portugal?

 

$-freeloader* US

* 1971 US stole the world dollar and since then has continued parasitizing on other countries who have been forced to pay the gains from what was meant to be a steady world dollar for all pegged to gold. US criminally unpegged it without paying its share but keeping the entire control over it. And US committed this the world's biggest financial fraud ever, instead of going bankruptcy.

The American (sic)* Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language:

* Amerigo Vespucci never visited North America where US is located! So why are real Americans conflated with US people? Because $-thief (1971-) US wants to colonize them all.

Authoritarian: Characterized by or favoring absolute obedience to authority, as against individual freedom.
"an authoritarian regime."
Tending to tell other people what to do in a peremptory or arrogant manner. synonym: dictatorial.
     Similar: dictatorial Characteristic of an absolute ruler or absolute rule; having absolute sovereignty; -- of governments or rulers.
 "an authoritarian regime"
 Similar: autocratic dictatorial despotic tyrannical 

Peter Klevius: Fits US, not China!

US utilizes the Achilles heal of Western "democracy" while bragging about a "freedom of speech" that has no connection to the state. People can say whatever in US because it has no effect whatsoever, while China is the very opposite, i.e. extremely vulnerable to US led anti-China propaganda as well as the will of the Chineses people, which was convincingly revealed during Covid when the government for economical reason was reluctant to lock down, but change its mind in front of the public concern of the elderly - in old Confucian tradition.  And when the public later demanded a quicj opening up, then the government immediately change its plan of a more stepwise strategy. 

West's political schizophrenia* is a result of tensions between a permanent civil service and changing governments.

* I.e. what Peter Klevius called politicized bureaucracy as a hangover from previous long term government (aka 'deep state') and described in Angels of Antichrist (1996).

The brutal US dictatorship supported the Uyghur islamist terrorists who attacked civilians in China at a scale far worse than in Israel 2023 ehrn Hamas attacked IDF people while an other group (al-Aqsa islamists - a wing of the West supported Fatah against Hamas - probably committed the worst atrocities against civilians.

United States atrocity crimes

Throughout its history, the US has either directly committed or being complicit in violations of international criminal law known as atrocity crime which includes acts of genocide and ethnic cleansing, both within the modern borders of its territory and abroad, as well as war crimes and crimes against humanity. The detailed list at the international level mainly includes killings of members of a specific group of people, which is one of the elements of the definition given by the United Nations, however this definition is including acts with mental or other physical elements not widely covered by this list. The list is also including other cases widely considered war crimes. The list at the national level attempts to include all those cases described in the 1948 UN convention on genocide

 

Shouldn't UK stop being what Argentina's president calls "an arrogant parasite", and Peter Klevius says also applies to US*?

* Throughout its history, the US has either directly committed or being complicit in violations of international criminal law known as atrocity crime which includes acts of genocide and ethnic cleansing, both within the modern borders of its territory and abroad, as well as war crimes and crimes against humanity.

HMS Arrogant bombing civilians in Ekenäs in Finland 1854.

 After all, US parasites on UK's "special relation", which dumb UK politicians just swallow, no matter what US does.

And why is the least authoritarian and most democratic* country, meritocratic China, called "authoritarian"?

* Meritocratic and grassroot connected post-Mao China's leadership has constantly scored people's approval rating around qualified majority - even when surveyed anonymously. No Western "democracy" can compete. And at the same time China has lifted most people out od poverty as well as being the world leder in alternative tech and high tech infrastructure.

US "democracy" gives most  power to a clown, and in UK people had to choose between two political clowns (Binhead and Farage).  

Although the approval rating of the larghest "democracy"*, i.e. Indian government, led by PM Narendra Modi, is 60% in a recent survey, its performance since 1948 pales compared to China's since much worse starting point at 1979.

* India is classified as a flawed democracy and has experienced significant democratic backsliding under PM Modi, with increasing harassment of opposition and restrictions on civil liberties. Recent assessments have even categorized India as a hybrid regime, indicating a decline in democratic norms and practices.

Is BBC's Sinophobic and deliberately disinforming mediafascist Evan Davis  complicit to US war crimes and support of genocide? 

 

 

 

 Russians raised the victory flag over the Reichstag in Berlin May 2, 1945, while US/UK later in the night were still bombing civilians in Kiel with napalm.

 

 In the night of May 2 (and morning May 3) 1945 when Russian soldiers in the daytime had already raised the victory flag over the Reichstag in Berlin, UK continued to bomb a defenseless Kiel with napalm, firebombs etc.

After having firebombed defenseless civilians with some thousand bomb-planes together with US at the very end of the war, Churchill's plan 'Operation Unthinkable' was to attack the Russian liberators.

How evil was it to plan to jump on Russians after they had made the by far biggest victory contribution and sacrificed nearly 30 Million Russians against European fascism?! UK lost 0.4 Million which should also be compared with the enormous amount of firebombed civilian deaths in attacks that had little or nothing to contribute, but was the result of Germanphobic hate spread mainly via BBC's propaganda deliberately and murdering innocent German civilians.

Churchill's plan 'Operation Unthinkable' (May 1945 after the Russians had taken Berlin and Germany had capitulated) included a surprise attack on the victorious Russian soldiers in Germany to impose "the will of the United States and British Empire upon Russia"*. The "unthinkable" plan assumed a surprise attack on Russian soldiers stationed in Germany to impose "the will of UK and US upon Russia". "The will" was qualified as "a square deal for Poland", but added that "that does not necessarily limit the military commitment". The assessment, signed by the Chief of Army Staff on 9 June 1945, concluded: "It would be beyond our power to win a quick but limited success and we would be committed to a protracted war against heavy odds". The code name was now reused instead for a second plan, which was a defensive scenario by which UK was to defend against a Russian drive towards the North Sea and the Atlantic Ocean after the withdrawal of the US forces from the Continent. When the Labour Party acquired power by the 1945 general election, it ignored the draft plan. However, today Labour seems to have revitalized it again.

* Compare this to leading UK voices during the UK initiated Opium war who wanted 'to show the Chinese British civilization'.