BBC's handpicked Russophobic guest today (adviser to defense): To get to peace we need more weapons. Peter Klevius: So should West also give more weapons to Hamas?
Peter Klevius history lesson with a "winology" update: West started its series of unprovoked attacks on Russia 1609 when it was weak after multiple Mongol attacks. This two-front threat resulted in the world's largest country - and a Russophobic "mongol complex".
Understanding
the threat from US nukes on Russia's border (starting 2013) is
precisely why Putin* in the first place, but in vain (until Trump 2.0),
has asked for negotiations about the threat West has escalated on
Russia.
* Before US nuke
threat on Crimea 2013 and US 2014 toppling of Ukraine's president,
sanctions against Russia, and support for Ukraine's Nazi militia's
attacks on Russian speakers in Donbas, Putin had made every effort to
build peaceful trade relations with EU. And even after 2014 Russia still
offered Nord Stream, i.e. the first pipeline that bypassed Ukraine and
Poland to deliver cheap high quality Russian natural gas directly to
West Europe.
Most of Europe is now following the military
path of Hitler's Nazi-Germany which biggest arms company Rheinmetall
now has seen a similar upbeat and has surpassed VW.
Western "Winology" Sinophobia, together with classic Russophobia constitute the knot that keeps Ukrainians and Russians unnecessarily dying while UK/EU constitute the main obstacles for peace, and instead promote arms production instead of EVs and green energy with the help of world leader China.
The “Winology” theory combined with Peter Klevius'
analysis of the consequences of US' 1971 dollar theft against the
background of China's rise, puts bare two possibilities to avoid US
total economic and social bankruptcy because of the buildup of debt US
embezzlement since 1971 has created. One is to contain China by
weakening its most powerful ally Russia, and the other is to join Russia
so to weaken its ties with China. However, although both are doomed to
fail, the second one gives peace a chance and possibly - with some help
from China - a softer landing for US.
China’s economy is often
downplayed or framed as a threat rather than a legitimate global force. A
growing body of thought, dubbed “winology,” suggests this isn’t
accidental, but a symptom of deeply ingrained Western biases that
systematically undervalue China’s economic and technological
advancements. This theory, originating with Chinese academics, proposes
that the West maintains a hierarchical worldview, hindering fair
recognition of China’s achievements and potential.
Coined by
Chinese scholars, winology isn’t simply about China wanting to “win”
against the West. It’s a framework for understanding how nations can
simultaneously achieve global leadership in specific domains and gain
appropriate recognition for those achievements. The core argument is
that a historical power dynamic, rooted in two centuries of UK and later
US dominance, has created a mental model where China is automatically
relegated to a lower tier. This isn’t necessarily about direct malice,
but a subconscious adherence to a pre-existing global hierarchy.
Peter
Klevius comment: It rests both on pure ignorance due to medial and
political brainwashing, as well as on actually understanding China's
real strength and potential but for various reasons not willing to admit
it but rather to continue blocking (using the empty "China threat"
ranting) cooperation that would benefit both sides.
Some
interpretations of winology, particularly circulating on social media,
have sparked controversy, with claims of a perceived ranking of global
citizens based on ethnicity – Germanic peoples as “first-class,” Latins
and Slavs as “second or third-class,” and Chinese as “fourth-class.”
While these interpretations are contentious and not universally endorsed
even within the winology framework, they highlight the sensitivity
surrounding perceptions of global power and cultural bias. It’s crucial
to understand that the academic theory focuses on national positioning,
not individual worth.
Peter Klevius comment: Interestingly
black/colored people are lacking from this analysis, perhaps because
they are somehow put on top (or bottom if you like) due to the senseless
and scientifically completely unfounded "out-of-Africa" mantra that is
in fact a racist pity "compensation". Africa's previous backwardness in
development was due to "Abrahamic" slave trade during 1400 years - not
due to lack of talent.
Trump's peace plan addresses the root cause (US/NATO meddling, incitement, aggression, and 2022 ultimate nuke (US/NATO) provocation posing an existential threat to Russia's security)* to the Ukraine civil war against Russian speakers, while UK/EU want to continue the slaughtering by blocking any resolve with the imposible "no territorial change". Compare occupied West Bank and Gaza where no Palestinian have had any say!
* As Trump 2.0 seems
to have realized that US cannot beat China even if Russia is crippled,
he instead tries to commercially tie up Russia with US. That's why he in
early 2025 admitted that US (Obama/Biden) incited the Ukraine war.
Since Obama, US aim has been weakening Russia and demonizing its leader.
While Putin worked hard for peaceful trading with EU, Obama instead
planned to attack Russia's rented naval base on Crimea 2013. And for
that purpose Obama ordered a poll about Crimeans. However, when that
poll showed overwhelming anti-Ukrainian and pro-Russian sentiments,
Obama changed his plan. And when Putin, inspired by Obama's poll, later
let the Crimeans decide in an official referendum, they overwhelmingly
voted for belonging to Russia. However, US/Obama/CIA then started
supporting the neo-Nazi militia's civil war against Russian speakers in
Donetsk and Luhansk, which led to them voting for autonomy and belonging
to Russia, which Putin approved 2022.
Finland's
president Alexander Stubb, who - like Peter Klevius (although clearly
lacking Peter Klevius intelligence - just follow Stubb's meaningless and
empty opportunistic ranting), belongs to the tiny Finland-Swedish
minority which has rights Russians in Ukraine and the Baltic states can
only dream about - stubbornly follows a path that is detrimental for
both Finns and Ukrainians.
Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk were
mainly Russian speaking parts which Ukraine's Russophobic leadership
from 2013-14 on not only oppressed and denied their Russian identity,
but on top of it after 2014 also militarily attacked them with neo-Nazi
militia. On 30 September 2022, Putin signed accession treaties with the
four leaders of the regions, Leonid Pasechnik, Head of the Luhansk
People's Republic; Denis Pushilin, Head of the Donetsk People's
Republic; Yevgeny Balitsky, governor of the Zaporizhzhia Oblast; and
Volodymyr Saldo, governor of the Kherson Oblast.
*
Compare China's peaceful de-radicalization of Islamic State Uyghur
jihadism lmported from Syria to commit similar terrorist acts as Sunni
islamist (al-Aqsa Brigades etc.) did in Israel, with the Jewish
theocracy Israel's response.
Zelensky is a corrupt war criminal by any standard - so what does it tell about his supporters?
When
Zelensky became president 2019 he did nothing to stop the genocide* and
miltary attacks against Russians speakers, and 2022 refused to
negotiate a peace plan and how to stop the genocide and the NATO
expansion of US nukes on Russian border in Ukraine.
Prince Dmitry Pozharsky and Kuzma Minin liberated Moscow from the first Western attacks.
Early
17th century both Sweden and Polish-Lithwenian Commonwealth attacked
Russia, hence staring the long Western history of anti-Russian
Russophobic state propaganda, where the last example is US campaign from
2013 on which unashamedly utilized a Ukrainian fascist Nazi movement
with roots in WW2. US toppled the elected president and encouraged and
supported the civil war against majority Russian speaking populations in
Ukraine.
Polish-Lithuanian Sigismund III was the first
Westerner to invade Russia in 1609 when it was plagued by a civil war
known as the Time of Troubles. Millions of Russians died because of
Sigismund's unprovoked full scale invasion. Prince Dmitry Pozharsky and
Kuzma Minin liberated Moscow from the aggressor.
The Russian
army, led by Prince Pozharsky, was credited with clearing the Moscow
Kremlin of Polish forces on November 1, 1612. Minin distinguished
himself as a skilled commander and was made a nobleman and member of the
boyar duma under the newly elected tsar of Russia Michael Romanov. He
died in 1616 and was interred in the Archangel Cathedral of Nizhny
Novgorod. A central square of that city is named after him and Prince
Pozharsky.
How Russia stopped the Crimean slave trade
8
January 1784 Crimea was formally incorporated into the Russian Empire
as Taurida Oblast. Catherine the Great visited her newly-claimed
territories in an elaborate tour during 1787.
The annexation brought an end to the Jewish/muslim Crimean slave trade.
The
muslim Ottomans attempted to reclaim Crimea in the Russo-Turkish War of
1787–1792, but were defeated and forced to again acknowledge Russian
rule in the Treaty of Jassy.
Stopping the ugly but profitable
slave trade spurred a mass exodus of Tatars from Crimea; an estimate by
Arsenii Markevich suggests that the Tatar population declined from
approximately 300,000 at the time of the annexation to 170,000–180,000
in the aftermath of the 1792 treaty.
Russophobia is a mix* of racist Yellow Peril and Red Scare propaganda, and rests on the diversity* of the mongol complex* that Peter Klevius was the first to address on the web more than 20 years ago.
*
After WW2 Finland was targeted by US because of it bordering Russia. US
(+allies like UK and France) arranged the 1952 Olympics to Helsinki. US
also arranged that the first Miss Universe title was given to 17-year
old Armi Kuusela who then, as the only Miss Universe, to be crowned with
the Russian Romanov Imperial Nuptial Crown that was previously owned by
the Russian monarchy. This as an anti-Communist message.
Peter
Klevius (see below) has for long pointed out how Mongol attacks and
invasions in Europe came to both create the greater Russia as a
defensive measure, as well as how they also, as a consequence, came to
create the Western Russophobic view of Russians as a dangerous mix with
Mongols. In Finland this culminated in what Peter Klevius calls the
"mongol complex" which mixed anti-Saami sentiments with anti-Russia
sentiment after WW2.
The Mongol attacks, primarily during the
13th and 14th centuries, involved a series of military campaigns that
led to the creation of the largest contiguous empire in history, the
Mongol Empire. These invasions resulted in significant devastation
across Eurasia, including the conquest of parts of China, Eastern
Europe, and the Middle East, with many cities destroyed and populations
decimated.
Carl Gustav Mannerheim, who rode a (coward?) tightrope
between Hitler and Churchill, had to redo a year in school at age 16 -
just like Peter Klevius, but due to a very different background. As a
militaristic aristocrat Mannerheim was securely embedded at the top
anyway, while an abused foster boy like Peter Klevius who had been
kidnapped at age two, was told that his foreign citizenship excluded him
from free higher education. So Peter Klevius used much of his school
time on library where he studied his beloved science etc. topics, well
knowing that at home he would have almost no time for it because of all
works he had to do there. And at the age of 17 he was told to go back to
his country of birth because the foster family would no longer get paid
for him.
Finland's war on the Nazi side against Russia
In
July 1941 the Finnish Army of Karelia was strengthened by the German
163rd Infantry Division. They retook the Finnish territories annexed by
the Soviet Union after the Winter War, and went further, occupying East
Karelia. Finnish troops took part in the Siege of Leningrad, which
lasted 872 days.
Soviet leader Joseph Stalin pressured Churchill
to declare war against Finland, a decision that was particularly
difficult for Churchill due to his close acquaintance with Mannerheim.
Churchill delayed the declaration and sent a personal note to
Mannerheim, in which he recalled their past encounters and warned
Mannerheim about the impending declaration. Mannerheim thanked Churchill
for his thoughtfulness and responded that his mission was to ensure
Finland's security.
While Russia payed a heavy toll when liberating Europe from Nazism, US and UK firte-bombed sivilians far from the frontline.
.














Comments