Peter Klevius agrees with Trump: NATO has been the initial aggressor in Ukraine - not Putin.
Peter Klevius also agrees with John Mearsheimer: Russia is a stronger card for US against China than Ukraine.
However, behind it all is US dollar theft 1971 which has caused a US bubble economy about to burst, based on ripping off what originally (1944) was meant to be the world dollar equally pegged against all currencies - not as it's now after 1971, i.e. a 100% US controlled currency that enables US continuos embezzlement from it. Until China stepped forward, that is.
Moreover, EU's and UK's never ending warmongering against Russia will only increase unnecessary death toll and suffering. After all, Ukraine was promised to be nuclear free but Obama planned to put US (via NATO) nukes on Crimea 2013. When it failed he toppled Ukraine's president and incited violent protests and a civil war where Ukrainian military aided by US (and allies) since 2014 has bombed and terrorized its Russian speaking population.
So the only fair solution is to stop the war and pay the price for 11 years of letting US (and allies) proxy war against Russia continue by ruthlessly sacrificing Ukrainians and Russians.
No NATO and no military meddling - there's absolutely no truth in West's puppet Zelensky's lies about Putin constituting a threat to EU. Putin showed the very opposite by trying to make a peaceful trade connection with EU, which Biden effectively blew up - literally.
So Peter Klevius supports Trump in this but not his support of Israel's genocide against Palestinians.
However, US 1971 crime makes Trump's actions understandable, because he knows that if he can't defuse China - which he can't - then US economy will sooner or later crumble. So he might try some middle-way deal in the meantime.
Comments