Update: Muslim convert John T Booker (aka Abdullah Hassan Mohammad) seems allegedly to have planned a terrorist attack at Fort Hood and should not be confused with Ivan Lopez who shot multiple individuals there including himself.
The muslim problem isn't in the muslims but in the Koran and Sharia, i.e. islam - now harbored by Saudi based and led OIC
and the complacency of BBC's deceptive muslim Sharia presenter Michal Husain and others like her who give you a false picture of true islam
John T Booker (aka Mohammad)
M.L. Nestel and Ryan Walsh (http://www.vocativ.com/usa/military/know-john-booker-man-fbi-thought-might-jihadi/) : Facebook friends lobbied for a wife for Booker, aka Muhammad, the Army enlistee they thought would soon to be martyred
The FBI put out an alert on Monday for an apparent homegrown jihadi who had enlisted in the Army in Kansas with possible plans to commit a massacre on a military base.
A spokeswoman for the FBI said later in the day that agents had interviewed the man in question and decided that he didn’t, in fact, represent a threat. “There is no manhunt. There’s never been a manhunt,” said Bridget Patton, of the Kansas City-based FBI field office. “The individual was interviewed, and it is believed there is no imminent threat to the public.”
John T Booker Battalion 2011 2012_04
The release, sent out by the FBI to local law enforcement and military personnel and first reported by FoxNews.com, warned of a potential attack by someone named Booker who also went by “Muhammad.”
“On 20 March 2014, the Kansas City Division FBI became aware of an individual named BOOKER aka Muhammad Abdullah Hassan who had publicly stated his intention to commit jihad, bidding farewell to his friends and making comments indicating his jihad was imminent,” the FBI announced.
The man referred to in the release is John T. Booker, 19, who grew up in Tennessee and Kansas before moving to Missouri after graduating from high school. People who knew him say he began to be deeply interested in Islam in high school and has shown some signs of radicalization in the last couple of years. Friends say his other passion was the military, and he had long hoped to be a soldier.
Those two goals appear to have been on a collision course in recent weeks. It was a string of Facebook posts by Booker and others in his social network that were highly suggestive of jihad that alarmed the FBI. “Getting ready to be killed in jihad is HUGE adrenaline rush!! I am so nervous. NOT because I’m scared to die but I am EAGER to meet my lord,” Booker wrote on his own Facebook page in the middle of last month, according to a screen grab of the post, which was subsequently taken down. The FBI has been publicly outed for using social networks to identify suspects and has long mapped traditional social networks for leads.
By analyzing his circle of online connections through shared work, education and religious or other activities, we found a Facebook group called Story of the Prophets, founded by one of Booker’s Facebook friends. It has almost 800 members and mentions the late and incendiary imam Anwar Al Awlaki, who inspired dozens of jihadis around the world, including Nadal Malik Hassan, who killed 13 people and injured dozens more in 2009 at Fort Hood in Killeen, Texas, in an apparent terrorist attack against his fellow soldiers. It was exactly that sort of attack that the FBI was concerned about when it put out the alert about Booker yesterday.
In one March 15 post to Story of the Prophets, the Facebook friend, Mohamed ibn Abdullahi, asks for willing wives to come forward to marry the would-be martyr, presumably referring to Booker.
//
Two days earlier, Mohamed ibn Abdullahi, who also uses the handle “Juzz Dhat Guy Momo,” posted a request for young women to friend-request Booker by his Islamic name.
//
While the FBI has dismissed Booker as an imminent threat, high school classmates and at least one spiritual leader told us in interviews that he had adopted some of Islam’s more extreme views.
John T Booker_01
Imam Omar Hazim, 71, who has presided over the Islamic Center of Topeka since 1987, says he knew Booker as “Muhammad” and remembers him stopping by to pray. “I talked with him personally and prayed with him,” he says. “He was a visitor a couple times over the past couple of years and each visit was an hour or so.”
Imam Hazim says the FBI showed up Monday to ask him about Booker. He says agents told him Booker was being evaluated “at a mental health hospital” and that he is struggling with a bipolar condition. “My recommendation to them was to get this guy some assistance and put him away somewhere so he wouldn’t be a threat to society,” he says. He didn’t elaborate and neither did the FBI.
One former classmate who attended Topeka West High School with Booker and served with him in the school’s Junior Reserve Officer Training Corps program told us that Booker had strong opinions about women. “He talked about multiple wives and how women should be subjugated and serve the man,” says the classmate, who asked not to be named.
The classmate, who believed Booker “wasn’t violent,” says she ran into Booker about a month ago at a local supermarket, and he had talked about his failed marriage. “He said he was recently divorced; he had a three-month marriage,” says the classmate.
We reached a woman who identified herself as Booker’s mother who told us that her son was away and that she didn’t know his whereabouts. “I haven’t spoken to him in a while,” she says. “He’s a grown man, and I don’t know what is happening.”
Another classmate, Alfonso Gonzalez, who also served with Booker in JROTC, recalled his fervor to one day become a soldier and also to convert to Islam. “He had always talked about joining the military,” Gonzalez says, speaking with us in a phone interview. He says during their senior year in high school, Booker also talked about changing his name to Muhammad. “He was pretty gung-ho about Islam,” Gonzalez says.
Gonzalez describes Booker as a “straight-laced cadet.” A video of the Topeka West High School 2011-2012 Cadet Ball shows a bespectacled Booker, proudly donning his uniform and gushing with smiles. Gonzalez says he saw Booker as recently as a year ago, and remembers him saying he wanted to “join the Army.” Booker had been scheduled to start Army basic training this month.
Booker also had a philanthropic side, says Gonzalez. “We had what’s called Farm Inc., and we adopted some children as a battalion and we would give presents off their list, and [Booker] was fairly instrumental in raising money to help those kids.”
When Booker would speak proudly about his faith in Islam, Gonzalez says it rubbed other students the wrong way. “Some people did give him a hard time,’ Gonzalez says. “No one called him out, but he could be obnoxious.”
Here's what Klevius wrote about the previous muslim jihadist at Fort Hood:
Sunday, November 08, 2009
Fort Hood investigators: No terror plot. Klevius: Did they check in the Koran?
According to "muslim sensitive" US officials, this bloodthirsty Arabic islamic jihad inspired muslim terrorist mass murderer monster "acted out under a welter of emotional, ideological and religious pressures"! Klevius comment: What should I say? Poor man?! No, I'd rather say poor victims who happened to encounter this otherwise perfectly normal* but islam distorted "psychiatrist"!
* i.e. not suffering from a biological nerve dysfunction! Islam, like other brainwashing sects, is not biologoical! Nor is islam's main pillar sex segregation/rapetivism!
Btw, as those who have studied on KLEVUX already know, psychology/psychiatry (except for the understanding of psychic drugs) are hoax "sciences", mainly funded by tax payers!
Check out:
Klevius Psychosocial timeline
Origin of islam
And Mr X "president" (see previous postings to understand the X & the quotation marks - no, Klevius isn't even close to a racist, just read his writings against race & sex segregation, will you, stupid!) talks & covers up in the trails of his beloved Saudi mad men.
Wednesday, November 25, 2009
Islam doesn't deserve Human Rights
This is the world's main terrorist & spreader of racist islamic hate/intolerance, the Saudi dictator (& Co) over the world's most intolerant muslim nation, who tries to cover it up (with the eager help of PC media & spineless politicians) in one way "inter-faith" talks (islam is always a dead end) & flashy spending of Western oil money, no matter if it's universities or blood money for killing other muslims (every Saudi soldier's family get USD 266,000 from "king" Abdullah when their son dies in Wahhabi jihad aginst Shia muslims in Yemen). This Saudi Arabia also wants to criminalize (via UN & OIC) criticism of the worst crime ever (it's a worrisome fact that few people seem to understand that islam's deeply immoral & extremely evil slave finance, mass murdering, genocides, imperialism, colonialism, sex slavery & Sharia confinement of females etc constitute the very soul of islam, from Mohammed to now*)! Moreover, this Saudi Arabia also initiated (via UN & OIC) the Cairo declaration which eliminates human rights for girls/women.
Islam is against the law in two ways: 1) It's got its own "law" Sharia, 2) It opposes all the main tenets that constitute a democracy based on Negative Human Rights(see Origin of islam). This is why a true muslim never can honestly participate in a democratic election or as a democratic representative of democracy! Islam doesn't count "infidels" as humans!
Yes' I know, most "muslims" aren't muslims. So why do they support true islam & true muslims?!
When true islam meets democracy
The muslim victims were in a convoy of vehicles Monday heading to register a candidate to challenge even more muslim islamic Ampatuan in next year's election for governor.
What's happening in the Philippines is an example of what happens when you give islam a finger! Since Arabic islam first started to enslave poor Philippinos (many centuries before any European was around) an evil parasitic islamic slave hierarchy developed. This together with islam's jihad pillar has to be acknowledge before assessing the situation in the Philippinos. The US was very wrong when it didn't completely stop islamic slavery there some 100 yrs ago but instead (wrongly) believed it was better to leave it as it was. They saw some uneducated poor slaves whom they thought would be "better off" where they were!
Amina Rasul, the director of the Philippines "Council for Islam and Democracy" (sic): "It will be difficult for authorities to enter Ampatuan territory, let alone arrest a member of the family. Most of the elected politicians are Ampatuans, the police are their people, it's very difficult to get in without having more violence if they do not cooperate".
Klevius comment: Really! I.e. an islamic state & part of the Saudi Caliph's (Mr X "president's" dearest friend) world Umma.
Amina Rasul, the director of the Philippines "Council for Islam and Democracy" (sic): "With such kind of an alliance between islamic politicians (she actually wrongly said "warlords") and the national elected government officials, it then becomes difficult to see how they could actually do democratic reforms, how they could actually do electoral reforms at the local level since they have a bond of gratitude to these local leaders (she now uses the term "local leaders" instead of "warlords" - presumably the next step would be "local politicians").
Klevius comment: She's right, "it then becomes difficult to see how they could actually do democratic reforms" if democracy involves islam! Isn't it simply the other way round, i.e. that islam abuses democracy for reforming democracy to suit islam, i.e. anti-democracy!
Every finger given to islam inevitably leads to its main body. This simple rule explains what should have been totally unexplainable just a decade ago, namely that a European country such as UK now has Islamic Sharia courts! You "muslims" who are on the run from islam, don't go to Britain if you want to avoid Sharia!
The only cure against islam is to get rid of it. Start by facing every muslim you meet with these essential questions abt "infidels", sexist legal segregation etc etc etc etc etc etc!!!!!!
Peter Wagner: "Basically, when Mohamed or Allah have said something contradictory, and there are lots of those, the last command takes precedence over the earlier command and renders the earlier command null and void. Since the books of the Koran are not in chronological order one needs to know which command came last. Much of the "kill the infidel" stuff is the more recent commands.
"Part of the problem with "peaceful Muslims" is that none will repudiate the "kill the infidels" commands of their god and prophet because to do so would make one worse than an infidel with another command by Allah to put the apostate to death. In fact, "Radical Islamists" are nothing more than true believers doing exactly what Mohammed and Allah are telling them to do. The "peaceful Muslims" are actually the unbelievers and the Jihadists are the true believers. Check the 'murtadd'; it also explains why "peaceful Muslims" won't condemn the Jihad at Fort Hood. If you want personal proof, when talking to a Muslim, ask them to condemn and repudiate the grossly hateful and kill-the-infidel stuff in the Koran. You will get some interesting answers."
Whereas true Christians "turn the other cheek, love their enemies, do unto others..." etc. True Muslims kill the infidels. Both are just doing what their god and prophet told them to do.
* yes, all forms of monotheisms(sic) are evil & part of an immoral sex segregation(early Christianity may be seen as an anti-sexual exception, before it was overpowerd by patriarchal sexism). However, as explained in Origin of islam, islam is the latest & most advanced/evil form of this evilness (what made it successful was Mohammed's sex & booty attraction on teenage boys!). Islam took the worst parts of old Judaism & fine tuned it via laws that STILL IN 2009 makes it impossible for a true muslim woman to love a non-muslim whereas a muslim man can fuck whomever & the child can be claimed a muslim (compare Mr X "president"). I never cease to get surprised when I meet decent people who still don't know this simple fact! They seem to daydream that islam can't be that bad, can it? YES' IT CAN!!!
Monday, November 23, 2009
Mr X "president's" beloved Saudi-islamic hate mongerer strikes again: some 60 murdered in islamic terror on the Philippines while PC media is silent!
This is the world's main terrorist & spreader of racist islamic hate/intolerance, the Saudi dictator (& Co) over the world's most intolerant muslim nation, who tries to cover it up (with the eager help of PC media & spineless politicians) in one way "inter-faith" talks (islam is always a dead end) & flashy spending of Western oil money. No matter if it's universities or blood money for killing other muslims (every Saudi soldier's family get USD 266,000 from "king" Abdullah when their son dies in Wahhabi jihad).
This is what media should have written if they really wanted to inform those ignorant/misled abt islam (they certainly possessed the info but didn't want you to know!):
Some 50 people ambushed, murdered, decapitated & thrown into mass graves by islamic murderers resting on what is written in the Koran, & sponsored & agitated by that very same Saudi Arabia that is the "guardian of islam" & which is now busy killing Shia muslims in Yemen! Also, this Saudi Arabia wants to criminalize (via UN & OIC) criticism of the worst crime ever. Moreover, this Saudi Arabia also initiated (via UN & OIC) the Cairo declaration which eliminates human rights for women.
Islamic Abu Sayyaf (in Arabic 'bearer of the muslim sword') in the Philippines has become noted for its ambushes of government forces, kidnappings, piracy, & the beheading of captives. The U.S. Department of Treasury in 2007 named three of their Saudi supporters: Abdul Rahim Al-Talhi, Muhammad Abdallah Salih Sughayr and Fahd Muhammad Abd Al-Aziz Al-Khashiban. According to Levey, no one identified by the US or UN as a terrorist financier has been prosecuted by the Saudi authorities.
Klevius history lesson: First of all, start by curing your bottomless ignorance abt islam (e.g. Origin of islam). Islam was in its beginning as well as now a parasitic slavery ideology capable of producing nothing except suffering & more muslims in a system of institutionalized rapetivism (Sharia).
Whatever islamic historical stone you turn around you always gonna see decay masked in a slave or oil finance.
SE Asia was islamized in exactly the same way as was Africa, namely via slave rading/trading. An Arabic network of slave rading/trading was established by the help of local chiefs while selling/using the poor in slavery. In the process the wealthy ones became even more wealyhy & powerful while they adopted islam. Also due to inter-marriage & islam's inborn dead end Sharia structure (which means every pregnancy led to more muslims or muslim slaves while none the other way round according to islamic law). Whereas both Christian & islamic praxis may have widely varied in different times & settings, islam only has an unaltered moral basis that stands firm on a moral resting on infidel racism/Sharia rapetivism/apostasy ban! Against this background it's equally pathetique & tragical that, on the one hand, these young muslim terrorists deeply aware of islam's teachings, think they're (like Pol Pot's etc willing young murderers) murdering for a good heavenly cause, &, on the other hand, those youngsters who are misinformed to believe islam is "a religion of peace" & "egalitarianism" (your only real key out of this dilemma is by understanding Negative Human Rights. And when it comes to "egalitarianism" you may remember that life is per definition not egalitarian, only death is egalitarian. This is also the main shortcoming of monotheist "godisms" (see Klevius definition of religion) However, a global system based on the elimination of taxation of work, & instead progressive taxation on luxury or "bad" consumption, combined with positive human rights such as basic education, health care etc).
It's because of islam's parasitism you can't buy any decent product made in Saudi Arabia!
What many a young jihadist doesn't seem to understand is islam's inherent evilness in the form of its infidel racism & sexist treatment of women as sex slaves. Or maybe they are...
However, they do behave like Pol Pot, don't they. And why should they be more educated than the Western morons who supported Khmer Rouge?
Btw, there was no "golden age" of islam in Spain, only a disgusting islamic slave finance. Also, there was no good (like BBC use to present it) islamic Ottoman rule. On the contrary the Ottomanian slave "empire" inevitably deteriorated until the abolishment of slavery & Western force together with Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's secularization paved the way for the Turkish progress that is now again on the verge of slipping into even more islamic barbary. Let's see if the new EU president remembers what he said abt islamic Turkey as not a possible part of Europe.
Monday, May 27, 2013
Evil is inherent in islam
Is Sayeeda Warsi Britain's most dangerous extremist?
The mosque rat and the moderate mosque mouse
Sayeeda Warsi is the high priest of the "islamophobia" doctrine* in England. She is also an eager supporter of Saudi based OIC and their effort to implement Sharia all over the world via UN as well as criminalizing criticism against islam, the worst crime ever against humanity.
* The islamophobia doctrine uses the proportionally extremely few incidents against muslims by deranged individuals, as an excuse for their real target, namely those who defend Human Rights. This already fulfills the most important criterion for fascism!
A British islam defender on BBC Radio 4 reveals his extreme hypocrisy and bigotry by stating that only the belief in a "god" can protect from moral disintegration because secularism is based on human wills and interpretations.
Klevius: So what about the Bible and the Koran?! Who reads them without will and interpretation?! No, my dear idiot, it's just the other way round. Whereas negative Human Rights protects you from the wills and interpretations of others, the Koran imposes them on everyone involved. From muslim girls/women in marital sex slavery to non-muslims who have to tip-toe when encountering muslim racism.
Muslims use to say: "Killing of innocent people has no place in islam". However, they forget to mention that Sharia determines who is "innocent".
Clive Kessler, who is emeritus (of course, who else working professor would/could dare to speak out) professor of sociology and anthropology at the University of NSW: YES, following last week's horror in Woolwich it is correct to point out that there are Muslims and there is Islam. And that they are not always the same thing.
But it is no good to say such acts have nothing to do with Islam. It is an evasion to assert such acts are based on "extremist" misconceptions and deviations, not "true Islam", or are responses to "Islamophobia".
Nor will it do to say (as British Prime Minister David Cameron did) that such acts have no place or basis in Islam, that this act dishonours and misrepresents Islam, that it is "a betrayal of Islam".
"This was not just an attack on Britain - and on our British way of life. It was also a betrayal of Islam," he said. "There is nothing in Islam that justifies this truly dreadful act," he added.
True, there are Muslims and there is Islam, and they are not the same. But Muslims must acknowledge their ownership of Islamic history, cultivate what is good in it and take a clear stand against what is not.
Modern Muslims, especially in the West, must be prepared to clearly acknowledge from where the evils, such as last week's depravity, have come.
Klevius: "Muslims must acknowledge their ownership of Islamic history, cultivate what is good in it and take a clear stand against what is not." A terrible mistake, dear professor emeritus. This is precisely the kernel of the problem! There is no good whatsoever in islam. Good is replaced witd god!
However, Kessler falls short of fully understanding the inevitable logic in the early history of islam. I.e. the fact that it's precisely those now troublesome parts of the Koran that made it ticking.
Islam is Jihad
Robert Spencer: Nidal Malik Hasan the U.S. Army psychiatrist (sic) who murdered thirteen people at Fort Hood on November 5, 2009 in the name of Islam and jihad, is still be fighting his jihad.
In Islamic theology, jihad warfare is fard kifaya, an obligation of the community as a whole but not of every individual believer. Jihad becomes fard ayn, obligatory on every individual Muslim to aid in some way, when a Muslim land is attacked. Many Muslims around the world today consider that Muslim lands have indeed been attacked, because of the American presence in Afghanistan and the very existence of the State of Israel. The most serious and devout among them will see those attacks and making incumbent upon them the responsibility to wage jihad warfare against the Infidels.
A military judge ruled that Hasan could be forcibly shaved, and he most certainly would have been had he not been a Muslim. But he is a Muslim, and so his attorneys were able to charge that that judge was overcome by “Islamophobia” to the detriment of his duty when he ruled that Hasan be shaved, and was summarily removed from the case. The new judge, Colonel Tara Osborn, was more sensitive to the multicultural imperatives involved here, and ruled that Army regulations had to give way to Islamic law, and Hasan could keep his beard.
The fact that Hasan murdered thirteen people for the same reason he grew the beard -- because of his Islamic faith – doesn’t seem to have entered into her calculations.
Not only that. The very core idea in original islam was to codify parasitism for the purpose of defending one's, even back then, evil acts by the help of racism (the infidel). And this original formula is inherent in islam and cannot be removed without completely altering islam itself to something else.
And here is the murderous racist and sexist root problem, Saudi Arabia, the "guardian of islam". This is the homeland of most of the bloodshed in the muslim world and elsewhere.
Saudi based OIC and its Saudi Fuhrer Iyad Madani - the root of continuing islamic evil!
tags: John T Booker, Mishal Husain, OIC, Iyad Madani, Fort Hood,
No comments:
Post a Comment