Saudi islamofascist in UN urges us to respect an ideology based on disrespect!?
also consider Obama's stealthy islamization jihad embedded in stimulus package
& British foster mother fired because she did not prevent a 16 y girl from leaving islam!
From islam's UN minaret Zeid Al-Hussein, vice president of the islamofascist Saudi Arabia's human rights (sic) commission now preaches to the UN Human Rights Council:
"I wish to emphasize that religious particularities, as correctly (sic) viewed in islam, supplement rather than detract from international human rights standards"
Klevius comment: "Supplement" means something added to complete something, make up for a deficiency, or extend it. This is exactly the opposite to the Negative Human Rights (see the net's most distinct definition) which constitute the very basis for the U.S. Constitution & the 1948 UN Declaration! Not to "detract", on the other hand, means not to take something away, i.e. rather that something is added in this case. These added islamofascist "rights", which btw mainly hurt girls'/women's rights, are then not only to be analyzed as positive "rights", but also as very peculiar such rights. This is because the islamofascist Cairo declaration on "human* rights" effectively shackles girl's/women's right to the (negative ) right to freedom from such shackles (e.g. sex), by imposing "responsibilities tied to sex segregation (pls note that Klevius is, so far, the only one to seriously address this burning issue - compare the groundbreaking 1996 Angels of Antichrist article).
* Always consider that "human" in Koran-islam's totalitarian & political (& therefore fascist) ideology inevitably excludes non-muslims and women.
Zeid Al-Hussein admits that he is "in most Islamic countries, individual (sic) practices do not always (sic)reflect the true essence of Islam. Despite declared guarantees for freedom of belief, non-Muslim religious worship isn't allowed in his own country. Zeid Al-Hussein & Co's bottomless hypocrisy is revealed when he states that because the Saudis possess (in fact stole) Mecca & Medina, they don't need to bother abt it.
"There is no point in discussing this issue (human rights) from the standpoint of positive man-made law, since religious belief stems from the heart and not from rational proof".
Klevius comment: So let's discuss it from the standpoint of negative human rights, & the inevitable fact that "positive man-made law" stems from exactly the same place as does "religious belief"! This is precisely why we need negative human rights as a last resort for freedom from "belief" of others.
However, Zeid Al-Hussein makes a surprising (or perhaps rather deceptive) conclusion: "This is our belief, which we expect others to respect and not contest, in the same way as we (who?!) respect and do not contest their beliefs". Either he proposes islam's suicide or he simply cheats non-muslims. Whereas the latter is fully in accordance with the text in Koran, the former would be an irreparable breach with islam's main pillar, racism against "infidels"! This racism is in essence what fuels islam. The lack of it, on the other, is the nonracist world views. So again, the only nonracist ideology that can compete with racist/sexist islamofascism is an "empty" one, i.e. the shared "belief" in negative human rights.
Acknowledgement: If you wonder why islam isn't capitalized you may consider capitalizing words like murder, genocide, rape etc as well (Koran is a book title, stupid!)! To even try to talk away 1400 years of Koranic/islamic slavery, genocides & rapetivism, i.e. by far the worst ideological crime ever against humanity, is simply deeply immoral. I heard a typical Western supporter of islamofascism making the utterly hypocritical argument that islam shouldn't be criticized because "they" (muslim's?) are "marginalized"! Well, the islamofascist Saudi "king" (& Co), who uses his oil-wealth to spread islamofascist hatred through mosques, schools, universities etc. while simultaneously influencing/abusing UN to silence criticism of islam**, can hardly be classified as marginalized, can he. However, the raped & otherwise assaulted & humiliated girl/woman in Darfur, who is terrorized by the Saudi king's close pal Bashir (WANTED BY THE HAGUE TRIBUNAL FOR CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY), is certainly marginalized, although she can hardly be called an islamist or muslim when she doesn't even remotely know what islam stands for!
** This effort, btw, is quite stupid because you just have to switch from 'islam' to 'islamofascism' (hence following the long preached formula "it's not islam")!
Nor would you write 'communists' with capital C either, would you!
Educate yourself through KLEVUX:
Definition of Negative Human Rights
Definition & origin of religion
What's sex segregation & rapetivism?
Origin of "man"
What is mind?
Demand for Resources - on the right to be poor
Angels of Antichrist - kinship vs social state
& British foster mother fired because she did not prevent a 16 y girl from leaving islam!
From islam's UN minaret Zeid Al-Hussein, vice president of the islamofascist Saudi Arabia's human rights (sic) commission now preaches to the UN Human Rights Council:
"I wish to emphasize that religious particularities, as correctly (sic) viewed in islam, supplement rather than detract from international human rights standards"
Klevius comment: "Supplement" means something added to complete something, make up for a deficiency, or extend it. This is exactly the opposite to the Negative Human Rights (see the net's most distinct definition) which constitute the very basis for the U.S. Constitution & the 1948 UN Declaration! Not to "detract", on the other hand, means not to take something away, i.e. rather that something is added in this case. These added islamofascist "rights", which btw mainly hurt girls'/women's rights, are then not only to be analyzed as positive "rights", but also as very peculiar such rights. This is because the islamofascist Cairo declaration on "human* rights" effectively shackles girl's/women's right to the (negative ) right to freedom from such shackles (e.g. sex), by imposing "responsibilities tied to sex segregation (pls note that Klevius is, so far, the only one to seriously address this burning issue - compare the groundbreaking 1996 Angels of Antichrist article).
* Always consider that "human" in Koran-islam's totalitarian & political (& therefore fascist) ideology inevitably excludes non-muslims and women.
Zeid Al-Hussein admits that he is "in most Islamic countries, individual (sic) practices do not always (sic)reflect the true essence of Islam. Despite declared guarantees for freedom of belief, non-Muslim religious worship isn't allowed in his own country. Zeid Al-Hussein & Co's bottomless hypocrisy is revealed when he states that because the Saudis possess (in fact stole) Mecca & Medina, they don't need to bother abt it.
"There is no point in discussing this issue (human rights) from the standpoint of positive man-made law, since religious belief stems from the heart and not from rational proof".
Klevius comment: So let's discuss it from the standpoint of negative human rights, & the inevitable fact that "positive man-made law" stems from exactly the same place as does "religious belief"! This is precisely why we need negative human rights as a last resort for freedom from "belief" of others.
However, Zeid Al-Hussein makes a surprising (or perhaps rather deceptive) conclusion: "This is our belief, which we expect others to respect and not contest, in the same way as we (who?!) respect and do not contest their beliefs". Either he proposes islam's suicide or he simply cheats non-muslims. Whereas the latter is fully in accordance with the text in Koran, the former would be an irreparable breach with islam's main pillar, racism against "infidels"! This racism is in essence what fuels islam. The lack of it, on the other, is the nonracist world views. So again, the only nonracist ideology that can compete with racist/sexist islamofascism is an "empty" one, i.e. the shared "belief" in negative human rights.
Acknowledgement: If you wonder why islam isn't capitalized you may consider capitalizing words like murder, genocide, rape etc as well (Koran is a book title, stupid!)! To even try to talk away 1400 years of Koranic/islamic slavery, genocides & rapetivism, i.e. by far the worst ideological crime ever against humanity, is simply deeply immoral. I heard a typical Western supporter of islamofascism making the utterly hypocritical argument that islam shouldn't be criticized because "they" (muslim's?) are "marginalized"! Well, the islamofascist Saudi "king" (& Co), who uses his oil-wealth to spread islamofascist hatred through mosques, schools, universities etc. while simultaneously influencing/abusing UN to silence criticism of islam**, can hardly be classified as marginalized, can he. However, the raped & otherwise assaulted & humiliated girl/woman in Darfur, who is terrorized by the Saudi king's close pal Bashir (WANTED BY THE HAGUE TRIBUNAL FOR CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY), is certainly marginalized, although she can hardly be called an islamist or muslim when she doesn't even remotely know what islam stands for!
** This effort, btw, is quite stupid because you just have to switch from 'islam' to 'islamofascism' (hence following the long preached formula "it's not islam")!
Nor would you write 'communists' with capital C either, would you!
Educate yourself through KLEVUX:
Definition of Negative Human Rights
Definition & origin of religion
What's sex segregation & rapetivism?
Origin of "man"
What is mind?
Demand for Resources - on the right to be poor
Angels of Antichrist - kinship vs social state
Comments