Cure your ignorance abt Islam: The treacherous Sharia (slave/rapetivism) path of "secular" Islam
"Secular Islam" is a strategy for boosting evil (racist/sexist/totalitarian) Islam!
In St. Petersburg, April 2007, the "Secular Islam" Summit (with Muslim speakers ranging from ex-believers to "reformers"), sponsored by islamophil Karen Armstrong´s "Center for Inquiry", issued the conviction that Islam ought to be compatible with secular democracy. "The St. Petersburg Declaration," affirmed the separation of mosque and state, gender equality in personal and family law, and unrestricted critical study of Islamic traditions.
Klevius comment: There could possibly be only "secular individuals freed from Islam", not "secular Muslims" nor "secular Islam"! However, those above in fact repeat Islam's original Koranic idea namely to enslave women (and men) in institutionalized rapetivism as forever trapped* (re)producers of Islam.
* i.e. the opposite to the idea of negative human rights, freedom for the individual, and pluralism. Islam is certainly a bigger threat to humanity than free individuals!
"Compatible with secular democracy" means that Islamic racism, sexist rapetivism, Sharia and apostasy ban, via the vote and by gaining foothold within the nomen-clatura may subvert and eventually destroy secular democracy (compare Hamas etc).
"The separation of mosque and state" is of course essential for Islam's totalitarian world umma, and certainly applauded by bin Laden & Co!
"Gender equality in personal and family law". This may be a tricky one for many who haven't yet become accustomed with KLEVUX analysis. My best advice is that you start with Klevius definition of feminism! However, the confusing concept 'gender' is crucial as a means for trapping and upholding sex segregation linguistically. By adopting the relational 'gender', feminists (incl Muslim feminists) have managed to separate/confine females in sex segregation. By applying the term 'gender' on a person is like connecting a bar between two individuals and then to argue that both are free to move wherever - except narrowing eachother! So there cannot be sex equality, just as extremist Islamists and Koran propose!
And who would argue that fanatic religious islamophils like former nun, Karen Armstrong, would ensure "unrestricted critical study of Islamic traditions"?!
By the help of "secular" Islam "extremist" Islam aids - ISLAM!
Quiz of today: What's the difference between a Swedish "secular" Islam-guru and so called Islamist extremists?
(The below is based on interpretion of Mohammad Fazlhashemi's own wordings in different comments and texts)
A stealthy fundamentalist* Islam-booster at a Swedish university (Umeå), Mohammad Fazlhashemi, rooted in "northern Iran", is a (the?) main Swedish Islam propagandist. He is seen together with such creepy Islamic women haters as "Swedish state imam" Leif Karslsson (alias "abd-al-haq-kielan")! Mohammad Fazlhashemi is also used as the main propaganda minister of the Islamofascist Swedish state radio, no matter if the radio show is abt philosophy, religion, or something else whatsoever. In this activity he now seems to have replaced the former.*
Mohammad Fazlhashemi has, for example, proposed that salafists/wahhabists/terrorists shouldn't be disturbed but that we should just keep away and stay put "as a good example"!
Klevius comment: Isn't that cute and perfectly in line with the mad and totalitarian idea abt an Islamic "world umma" by whatever means available!
Mohammad Fazlhashemi "admits" that Islam doesn't acknowledge human rights but offers as a substitute that "Islam also has some words of wisdom"! Oh thank you! The only originally Islamic "words of wisdom" are those abt making racism/slavery/rapetivism institutionalized and irrevocable, i.e. how to run an economy based on sponging on others, especially Sharia confined females! And in fact he lies because there ARE "human rights in Islam - only problem being that non-Muslims are not considered humans according to Koran and that Islam is irrevocably stuck with Koran because Koran is the ONLY "god's" words given to ONE single human who happens to be dead. That's a formula for totalitarian despotism that's hard to beat. Islam is as far you can get from religion because its "god" is effectively and forever cut off and jailed - i.e. dead!
Mohammad Fazlhashemi opposes integration, i.e. defends Islam under the cover word "multiculturalism". This strategy, seen from an Islamists point of view, is a relative of that of the Saudis' who don't allow other faiths on "its" (stolen s)oil.
When Mohammad Fazlhashemi proposes a "widened view on what democracy is" he, in fact, paves the way for not only killing democracy by Islamic rapetivist breeding but also a deliberate transformation of democracy to some confused Utopian world Islamofascism.
Like many others from wealthy upper-class families Mohammad Fazlhashemi studied in the West and continued living here. However, he seems not to have any problem living parts of the year in northern Iran.He has a fundamentalist position about the Mohammad caricatures and even has the nerve to apply to UN's 1970 The Friendly Relations Declaration for the purpose of forcing governments to bow for totalitarian, racist/sexist Islamofascism!
Mohammad Fazlhashemi, of course, fiercefully "defends" rapetivism, i.e. "Islam's" females "right" to be veiled (culturally and literally) wherever they live their extremely sex segregated lives in the world. Jihad, infidels, Caliphate and dar el Harb were parts of the norms directing early Islamofascist conquest/slavery/rapetivism. However, Mohammad Fazlhashemi defends their modern derivatives that are aimed for the disintegration of international law and human rights. It is in this view he should be understood not only as an Islamofascist but maybe also as a terrorist, or at least terrorist supporter. What is seen as a "proper" interpretation of Koran is, in Islam, in praxis, depending solely on the circumstances and attitudes of the "judge/court" in case. I.e. a political process without the protection of human rights! Hamid Gul: "...pan-Islamists (like al-Qaeda) would never go for a narrow definition of their ideologies like Salafism..."
Is Mohammad Fazlhashemi an Angel of Antichrist? (alluding to the most important sociological paper of the last century). However, what is undeniable is that he and his alikes constitute the main threat against negative human rights! How many of these Mohammad Fazlhashemis are there creeping around (i.e. relentlessly defending and boosting racist/sexist totalitarianism) while fed by mostly non-Islamic taxpayers/technology?!
Mohammad Fazlhashemi uses a deceptive but easily deconstructed stealthy pseudo-language that (ab)uses positive concepts for the purpose of sinister Islamic totalitarianism. He has "acknowledged" the need (read strategy) for Islam to adapt to (read abuse) globalization and human rights such as freedom of religion etc.
IS 1400 YEARS OF ISLAMIC SLAVERY/GENOCIDES/RAPETIVISM THE WORST CRIME EVER AGAINST HUMANITY?
To cure your ignorance abt Islam read Klevius definition of religion. And for understanding Islam's main pillar, why not read What's sex segregation (+links such as e.g. Klevius (perhaps surprising) definition of feminism)?
Always remember that Islam's origin was slave trade and that Mecca was the world's main slave market and that Koran is but a manual (spiced with Jewish and Christian wisdom) for conquest via slavery and rapetivism. Only in this picture you will understand: why Koran allows slavery (Islam isby far the worst slave trader/abuser in history); why Koran doesn't preach missionary (because it needed "infidel" slaves); why Islamic countries have been constantly underdeveloped (if not fed by slaves or oil)Did you know that the entire Africa has been drained by Islam throughout its history?; why Sharia confinement of women is so important (physical/cultural reproductors of new Muslims); That Islam gives Muslims the right to protect themselves against ANY kind of "aggressions" (incl. criticism, disbelief etc); forced conformity etc etc.Islamic rapetivism "democracy"
When a Muslim marries a non-Muslim Islam forces the non-Muslim to abandon (usually) her faith/secularism! This is Islam's original rapetivism and sex segregation! And because of love the party without an active and oppressing/totalitarian ideology will inevitably loose (e.g. its negative human rights), and even defend its loss later because of the shame.Real Islam has nothing to do with people's personal faith but all with power and domination fueled by sexism and racism.
In St. Petersburg, April 2007, the "Secular Islam" Summit (with Muslim speakers ranging from ex-believers to "reformers"), sponsored by islamophil Karen Armstrong´s "Center for Inquiry", issued the conviction that Islam ought to be compatible with secular democracy. "The St. Petersburg Declaration," affirmed the separation of mosque and state, gender equality in personal and family law, and unrestricted critical study of Islamic traditions.
Klevius comment: There could possibly be only "secular individuals freed from Islam", not "secular Muslims" nor "secular Islam"! However, those above in fact repeat Islam's original Koranic idea namely to enslave women (and men) in institutionalized rapetivism as forever trapped* (re)producers of Islam.
* i.e. the opposite to the idea of negative human rights, freedom for the individual, and pluralism. Islam is certainly a bigger threat to humanity than free individuals!
"Compatible with secular democracy" means that Islamic racism, sexist rapetivism, Sharia and apostasy ban, via the vote and by gaining foothold within the nomen-clatura may subvert and eventually destroy secular democracy (compare Hamas etc).
"The separation of mosque and state" is of course essential for Islam's totalitarian world umma, and certainly applauded by bin Laden & Co!
"Gender equality in personal and family law". This may be a tricky one for many who haven't yet become accustomed with KLEVUX analysis. My best advice is that you start with Klevius definition of feminism! However, the confusing concept 'gender' is crucial as a means for trapping and upholding sex segregation linguistically. By adopting the relational 'gender', feminists (incl Muslim feminists) have managed to separate/confine females in sex segregation. By applying the term 'gender' on a person is like connecting a bar between two individuals and then to argue that both are free to move wherever - except narrowing eachother! So there cannot be sex equality, just as extremist Islamists and Koran propose!
And who would argue that fanatic religious islamophils like former nun, Karen Armstrong, would ensure "unrestricted critical study of Islamic traditions"?!
By the help of "secular" Islam "extremist" Islam aids - ISLAM!
Quiz of today: What's the difference between a Swedish "secular" Islam-guru and so called Islamist extremists?
(The below is based on interpretion of Mohammad Fazlhashemi's own wordings in different comments and texts)
A stealthy fundamentalist* Islam-booster at a Swedish university (Umeå), Mohammad Fazlhashemi, rooted in "northern Iran", is a (the?) main Swedish Islam propagandist. He is seen together with such creepy Islamic women haters as "Swedish state imam" Leif Karslsson (alias "abd-al-haq-kielan")! Mohammad Fazlhashemi is also used as the main propaganda minister of the Islamofascist Swedish state radio, no matter if the radio show is abt philosophy, religion, or something else whatsoever. In this activity he now seems to have replaced the former.*
Mohammad Fazlhashemi has, for example, proposed that salafists/wahhabists/terrorists shouldn't be disturbed but that we should just keep away and stay put "as a good example"!
Klevius comment: Isn't that cute and perfectly in line with the mad and totalitarian idea abt an Islamic "world umma" by whatever means available!
Mohammad Fazlhashemi "admits" that Islam doesn't acknowledge human rights but offers as a substitute that "Islam also has some words of wisdom"! Oh thank you! The only originally Islamic "words of wisdom" are those abt making racism/slavery/rapetivism institutionalized and irrevocable, i.e. how to run an economy based on sponging on others, especially Sharia confined females! And in fact he lies because there ARE "human rights in Islam - only problem being that non-Muslims are not considered humans according to Koran and that Islam is irrevocably stuck with Koran because Koran is the ONLY "god's" words given to ONE single human who happens to be dead. That's a formula for totalitarian despotism that's hard to beat. Islam is as far you can get from religion because its "god" is effectively and forever cut off and jailed - i.e. dead!
Mohammad Fazlhashemi opposes integration, i.e. defends Islam under the cover word "multiculturalism". This strategy, seen from an Islamists point of view, is a relative of that of the Saudis' who don't allow other faiths on "its" (stolen s)oil.
When Mohammad Fazlhashemi proposes a "widened view on what democracy is" he, in fact, paves the way for not only killing democracy by Islamic rapetivist breeding but also a deliberate transformation of democracy to some confused Utopian world Islamofascism.
Like many others from wealthy upper-class families Mohammad Fazlhashemi studied in the West and continued living here. However, he seems not to have any problem living parts of the year in northern Iran.He has a fundamentalist position about the Mohammad caricatures and even has the nerve to apply to UN's 1970 The Friendly Relations Declaration for the purpose of forcing governments to bow for totalitarian, racist/sexist Islamofascism!
Mohammad Fazlhashemi, of course, fiercefully "defends" rapetivism, i.e. "Islam's" females "right" to be veiled (culturally and literally) wherever they live their extremely sex segregated lives in the world. Jihad, infidels, Caliphate and dar el Harb were parts of the norms directing early Islamofascist conquest/slavery/rapetivism. However, Mohammad Fazlhashemi defends their modern derivatives that are aimed for the disintegration of international law and human rights. It is in this view he should be understood not only as an Islamofascist but maybe also as a terrorist, or at least terrorist supporter. What is seen as a "proper" interpretation of Koran is, in Islam, in praxis, depending solely on the circumstances and attitudes of the "judge/court" in case. I.e. a political process without the protection of human rights! Hamid Gul: "...pan-Islamists (like al-Qaeda) would never go for a narrow definition of their ideologies like Salafism..."
Is Mohammad Fazlhashemi an Angel of Antichrist? (alluding to the most important sociological paper of the last century). However, what is undeniable is that he and his alikes constitute the main threat against negative human rights! How many of these Mohammad Fazlhashemis are there creeping around (i.e. relentlessly defending and boosting racist/sexist totalitarianism) while fed by mostly non-Islamic taxpayers/technology?!
Mohammad Fazlhashemi uses a deceptive but easily deconstructed stealthy pseudo-language that (ab)uses positive concepts for the purpose of sinister Islamic totalitarianism. He has "acknowledged" the need (read strategy) for Islam to adapt to (read abuse) globalization and human rights such as freedom of religion etc.
IS 1400 YEARS OF ISLAMIC SLAVERY/GENOCIDES/RAPETIVISM THE WORST CRIME EVER AGAINST HUMANITY?
To cure your ignorance abt Islam read Klevius definition of religion. And for understanding Islam's main pillar, why not read What's sex segregation (+links such as e.g. Klevius (perhaps surprising) definition of feminism)?
Always remember that Islam's origin was slave trade and that Mecca was the world's main slave market and that Koran is but a manual (spiced with Jewish and Christian wisdom) for conquest via slavery and rapetivism. Only in this picture you will understand: why Koran allows slavery (Islam isby far the worst slave trader/abuser in history); why Koran doesn't preach missionary (because it needed "infidel" slaves); why Islamic countries have been constantly underdeveloped (if not fed by slaves or oil)Did you know that the entire Africa has been drained by Islam throughout its history?; why Sharia confinement of women is so important (physical/cultural reproductors of new Muslims); That Islam gives Muslims the right to protect themselves against ANY kind of "aggressions" (incl. criticism, disbelief etc); forced conformity etc etc.Islamic rapetivism "democracy"
When a Muslim marries a non-Muslim Islam forces the non-Muslim to abandon (usually) her faith/secularism! This is Islam's original rapetivism and sex segregation! And because of love the party without an active and oppressing/totalitarian ideology will inevitably loose (e.g. its negative human rights), and even defend its loss later because of the shame.Real Islam has nothing to do with people's personal faith but all with power and domination fueled by sexism and racism.
Comments