The extreme stupidity/deliberate bias of Islamic "science"
Mohd Zaidi Ismail (a Malaysian Islamist "scientist"): "What is wrong, is when natural sciences – particularly physics – is taken to be the model, the prototype, or the benchmark, of true knowledge and science"
Klevius comment: So what else could it possibly be?! Mohd Zaidi Ismail's private Allah?! The benchmark of true science is that it's, unlike racist/sexist and totalitarian dogms, open for scrutinity, i.e. that it constitutes an open discourse language accessible for everyone incl. Mohd Zaidi Ismail! But he isn't talking abt science at all but trying to confuse the reader by tendentiously mixing human subjectivity involved in the pre-arrangements and post-arrangements of the scientific process, i.e. what isn't science, with science! It's not hard to trace some deep envy and cheap political rhetoric behind his confused babbling.
"...according to many authoritative (sic) scholars and metaphysicians, is the world known theologically as barzakh (life after death). Therefore, in order to ensure that the sciences – natural sciences included – as developed by Muslims are Islamic, it is important that they be conceived of, and caused to unfold in line with, the worldview of Islam and its attendant system of knowledge. This framework, if rightly imbued and disseminated through proper education, can determine a totally different orientation for the development of science in Muslim societies."
Klevius comment: Indeed! Reminds me of Lysenko. How ignorant and deliberately misleading can a human be? Mohd Zaidi Ismail certainly belongs to the top in such a league. Also reminds me of the pathetic Indonesian Muslim crypto-creationist "scientist" Teuku Jakob who stole, damaged and (obviously deliberately) misinterpreted Homo Floresiensis to make it a better fit for Islamic "science".
After all, what, for some people is confused as Islamic science (what a tautology) is robbed/copied all the way from the leftovers of the Islamic destruction of Sassanid and other highly developed cultures to Western technology and Internet etc (also see Shinto, the world's oldest religion meets Islam the world's youngest "religion").
Klevius comment: So what else could it possibly be?! Mohd Zaidi Ismail's private Allah?! The benchmark of true science is that it's, unlike racist/sexist and totalitarian dogms, open for scrutinity, i.e. that it constitutes an open discourse language accessible for everyone incl. Mohd Zaidi Ismail! But he isn't talking abt science at all but trying to confuse the reader by tendentiously mixing human subjectivity involved in the pre-arrangements and post-arrangements of the scientific process, i.e. what isn't science, with science! It's not hard to trace some deep envy and cheap political rhetoric behind his confused babbling.
"...according to many authoritative (sic) scholars and metaphysicians, is the world known theologically as barzakh (life after death). Therefore, in order to ensure that the sciences – natural sciences included – as developed by Muslims are Islamic, it is important that they be conceived of, and caused to unfold in line with, the worldview of Islam and its attendant system of knowledge. This framework, if rightly imbued and disseminated through proper education, can determine a totally different orientation for the development of science in Muslim societies."
Klevius comment: Indeed! Reminds me of Lysenko. How ignorant and deliberately misleading can a human be? Mohd Zaidi Ismail certainly belongs to the top in such a league. Also reminds me of the pathetic Indonesian Muslim crypto-creationist "scientist" Teuku Jakob who stole, damaged and (obviously deliberately) misinterpreted Homo Floresiensis to make it a better fit for Islamic "science".
After all, what, for some people is confused as Islamic science (what a tautology) is robbed/copied all the way from the leftovers of the Islamic destruction of Sassanid and other highly developed cultures to Western technology and Internet etc (also see Shinto, the world's oldest religion meets Islam the world's youngest "religion").
Comments