BBC's senseless lies/cover up about slavery in Islam

Ever thought abt why the world's historical slave trade center also happens to be the center of Islam (and why it's still an Islamofascist resort for human rights violations)?!

BBC's lies about slavery in Islam:

"Slavery was common in pre-Islamic times and continued under Islam"

Klevius comment: Why not the truth, i.e. that slavery got a boost in Islam while remaining the same or decreasing in non-Islamic societies - see Origin of Vikings?!

"Slaves were owned in all Islamic societies, both sedentary and nomadic, ranging from Arabia in the centre to North Africa in the west and to what is now Pakistan and Indonesia in the east."

"Some Islamic states, such as the Ottoman Empire, the Crimean Khanate, and the Sokoto caliphate [Nigeria], must be termed slave societies because slaves there were very important numerically as well as a focus of the polities' energies"

Klevius comment: Why "must be termed"?! And why only pick non-critical sources?! (take a look at e.g. How Textbooks Obscure and Distort the History of Slavery by
Jonathan Burack).


"Many societies throughout history have practised slavery, and Muslim societies were no exception."

Klevius comment: Why so eagerly repeating, in the fourth sentence, this stupid nonsens from the first sentence?!

"It's thought that as many people were enslaved in the Eastern slave trade as in the Atlantic slave trade. It's ironic that when the Atlantic slave trade was abolished the Eastern trade expanded, suggesting that for some Africans the abolition of the Atlantic trade didn't lead to freedom, but merely changed their slave destination."

Klevius comment: BBC obviously lacks all knowledge about the worst slave trade in history, i.e. Islam's slave raids/trading in Africa and elsewhere throughout some 1400 years!

"It's misleading to use phrases such as 'Islamic slavery' and 'Muslim slave trade', even though slavery existed in many Muslim cultures at various times, since the Atlantic slave trade is not called the Christian slave trade, even though most of those responsible for it were Christians."

Klevius comment: If anything is misleading it's BBC! Almost 100% of the "Atlantic" slaves were abducted and traded via Islamic "banking" networks deeply embedded like cancer metastases in the African continent through local authorities etc.

"Slavery was common in pre-Islamic times and accepted by many ancient legal systems and it continued under Islam."

Klevius comment: See, third time already, same nonsense!

"Although Islam is much credited (by whom? by imams & BBC?!) for moderating the age-old institution of slavery, which was also accepted and endorsed by the other monotheistic religions, Christianity and Judaism, and was a well-established custom of the pre-Islamic world (fourth time!), it has never preached the abolition of slavery as a doctrine."

"The condition of slaves, like that of women, may well have improved with the coming of Islam (empty talk without even an ounce of proof!), but the institution was not abolished, any more than it was under Christianity at this period (fifth time! see Origin of Vikings for a better perspective on this issue).

Klevius comment: This is a ridiculous statement keeping in mind Islam's basic pillars: infidel racism, sharia-rapetivism, and severe apostasy ban - in the context of Koran's role in Islam!

Islam greatly limited those who could be enslaved and under what circumstances (although these restrictions were often evaded)

Islam treated slaves as human beings (Klevius: Yes, as coerced soldiers and coerced reproducers of new Muslims) as well as property

"Islam banned the mistreatment of slaves - indeed the tradition repeatedly stresses the importance of treating slaves with kindness and compassion" (Klevius: like we treat dogs while Islam's victims in Darfur and elsewhere suffer!)

"Islam barred Muslims from enslaving other Muslims
But the essential nature of slavery remained the same under Islam, as elsewhere (sixth time!). It involved serious breaches of human rights and however well they were treated (sic)the slaves still had restricted freedom, and, when the law (which law? the dog law? the taliban law?!) was not obeyed their lives could be very unpleasant." (Darfur?!)

"A poignant paradox of Islamic slavery is that the humanity of the various rules and customs that led to the freeing of slaves created a demand for new slaves that could only be supplied by war, forcing people into slavery or trading slaves."

Klevius comment: I'm sorry but where's the paradox? Yes, the demand for new slaves could only be supplied by war, forcing people into slavery or trading slaves, and that's what Islam is about (see Origin of Islam)! Not only does Islam allow slavery but it is itself a sophisticated blueprint for a reproductive slave economy (hence it's tremendous impotence in other areas of life and rapetivism based on sex segregation).

"Muslim slavery continued for centuries"

Klevius comment: Totally wrong! It continued for almost one and a half millennia!

"The legality of slavery in Islam, together with the example of the Prophet Muhammad, who himself bought, sold, captured, and owned slaves, may explain why slavery persisted until the 19th century in many places (and later still in some countries). The impetus for the abolition of slavery came largely from colonial powers..."

Klevius comment: Indeed!

"While Islamic law does allow slavery under certain conditions, it's almost inconceivable that those conditions could ever occur in today's world, and so slavery is effectively illegal in modern Islam."

Klevius comment: Can anyone beat this wishful thinking?!

"News stories do continue to report occasional instances of slavery in a few Muslim countries, but these are usually denied by the authorities concerned"

Klevius comment: Really!

Islam is like confused criminal biker gangs riding extremely noisy and low-quality bikes, i.e. depending on an unbroken chain of threats, violence and the abuse of law and human rights! What is missing is a balancing of this abuse. If Islam says non-Muslims are less worthy, and that Islam's goal is Islamic totalitarianism, how then can a Muslim logically apply to democracy and secular human rights (see postings below)?!

Ask your Muslim neighbor whether he admits that "infidels" are equally worthy as Muslims! But do remember that, according to Islam, he is also allowed tie lie - just like BBC!

Cure your ignorance about Islam:

Is 1400 years of Islamic genocides/slavery/rapetivism the worst crime ever against humanity?
And what is the cowardice and hypocritical contemporary blinking/forgery of Islam's history?!Origin of Islam/Koran - and the consequtive crushing of Africa's development for some 1400 years

How Islamic slavery created the Vikings
How Islamic slavery destroyed Aceh - and Indonesia
How all of Europe's Romas ("gypsies") originally were abducted by Islamic slave raiders/traders (see posting below)
Shinto (the world's oldest religion) meets Islam
Definition of true religion
The only true formula for life: Enhanced negative human rights and protection against their violators (it's called freedom by the way!)