Today Sweden's new deputy PM admits Klevius was right abt the depth of corruption in Swedish (s)tate bureaucracy!
Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Economy Maud Olofsson today accused former Swedish socialist government for "what in other countries should have been called corruption" via hand picked state bureaucrats who deliver what the government asks for rather than the truth. Although she was questioned abt whether to keep a leading state bureaucrat who she had accused of delivering false employment figures, she also noted that this phenomenon in general probably had to do with the length of the Swedish socialdemocratic hegemony.
Klevius comment: Finally! It took one decade to accept anything of my social state criticism! I felt like a space alien when I expressed the view that the "subjectivity" within an economic system out of real control by necessity can't deliver what was initially expected, e.g. "in the best interest of the child". A main thread of my analysis of the "social state" (in Angels of Antichrist - kinship vs social state 1996) was focused on the effects an almost century old socialdemocratic political hegemony has had on Sweden. The combination of high taxes, indirect transferrals (i.e. money to the bureaucracy and its private allies rather than to the citizens in general and those with special needs) and hoax ideologies let loose, has produced an endless stream of social tragedies in sharp contrast to the meaning of negative human rights! As a byproduct the social state has heavily contributed to detaching people notonly from each other but also from their children. The 1950s "young rebels" have, by the help of the social state, developed into ruthless and confused singulars who, quite often, seem to applaude totalitarian neo-fascism in the form of sex segregated infidel racist Islam (see Origin of Islam).
Klevius comment: Finally! It took one decade to accept anything of my social state criticism! I felt like a space alien when I expressed the view that the "subjectivity" within an economic system out of real control by necessity can't deliver what was initially expected, e.g. "in the best interest of the child". A main thread of my analysis of the "social state" (in Angels of Antichrist - kinship vs social state 1996) was focused on the effects an almost century old socialdemocratic political hegemony has had on Sweden. The combination of high taxes, indirect transferrals (i.e. money to the bureaucracy and its private allies rather than to the citizens in general and those with special needs) and hoax ideologies let loose, has produced an endless stream of social tragedies in sharp contrast to the meaning of negative human rights! As a byproduct the social state has heavily contributed to detaching people notonly from each other but also from their children. The 1950s "young rebels" have, by the help of the social state, developed into ruthless and confused singulars who, quite often, seem to applaude totalitarian neo-fascism in the form of sex segregated infidel racist Islam (see Origin of Islam).
Comments