Joe Lieberman's eternal "religious" mistake
Background on why islam is the outlet of medieval backwardness/sexism
Excerpt from Angels of Antichrist/Sex Segregation and the (lack of) Influence of Fathers:
The God of Moses was the god (father, ancestor) of a national group based on kinship. For the Hellenistic Jews in Diaspora, God represented a continuing tradition still emphasizing family and kinship values. Emerging universal Christianity, with its emphasis on a personal God was a step outside biology. The development of modern protestant Christianity has been in a direction of even less emphasis on biology (Klevius 1996).
Opening Pandora's box
Joe Lieberman's "monolitheist religious" embracing of islam resembles that of how the world now has opened up for true sexist fascism and due racism/progromes. However, because islam's revitilization (apart from oil money) rests on sex segregation (and a general detachment due to technological/economic development/social state - even more pronounced among strict "religious" strata than among secularists) and because de-sex segregation was a central feature of early kibbutism, these aspects have to be included in any possible analysis. So far they are not - outside Klevius writings of course. And when confronting whether Klevius or the world is in sane, many think quantity in front of quality (those of my readers who like me should try to forgive me for this).
One may argue, from a non-religious/secular (but see Klevius definition of religion and the Vagina gate) point of view that the 1948 Zionist emphasise on religion was a huge mistake. However, the creation of Israel really strikes the core problem of real religion, i.e. family/kinship vs state vs globalization.
But no matter how we angle it the creation of Israel was the real chance for the entire mideast had it not been for the revitilization of medieval* islam.
* no matter how poor, rich, "cool", oppressed, on "top", enslaved etc you think you are, islam's backwardness is stipulated in its very essence, an unchangable Koran dictated by a "god" that is out of reach, and the interpretations, in practise, given to anyone, i.e. in the end on one hand a harmless and castrated private, individualist religion, and on the other hand an extremely dangerous, violent political fascist movement with totalitarian and violent aims for personal greed/problems and a continuing of artificial, cultural sex segregation.
Journalists and politicians as co-murderers and/or islam-fascist sympathizers
The world's journalists/politicians/ and a general racism/sexism/ignorance abt islamists then caused the burst(s) of islamic evilness we have now faced around the globe (no, I'm not forgetting the eternal islamic violence/rapetivism that has continued for 1400 years on many spots of the earth).
Islam as a totalitarian/fascist movement compared to communism and nazism
If your religion is communism then you are a communist, aren’t you!
If your religion is national socialism then you are a nazist, aren’t you!
If your religion is islam then you are an islamist, aren’t you!
Since the 19th century there have been (in vain) attempts to wash the dirt of islam. The result: condemnation as anit-islam and/or barrening due to lack of the real (i.e. evil) attractions of islam, i.e. “infidel” contempt/racism
Islam as the opposite to Klevius definition of the negative human rights
1. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This right shall include freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his [her] choice, and freedom either individually or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his [her] religion or belief in worship, observance, practice and teaching.
Klevius comment: Freedom means that you as a child aren’t forced into a system of belief that may punish you if you decide to leave it, adopt another system of belief etc. Islam's sensitivity to criticism is rooted in it's inborn aim of inclusion/exclusion that covers its inherent social and technological impotency (see e.g. Shinto, the world's oldest religion meets islam the world's youngest "religion"). Although islam proclaims itself totalitarian it hasn't the means for ever becoming it even in theory.
2. No one shall be subject to coercion which would impair his [her] freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his [her] choice.
Klevius comment: Hardly needs a comment when it comes to islam, does it!
3. Freedom to manifest one’s religion or belief may be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary to protect public safety, order, health, morals or the fundamental rights and freedoms of others.4. The States Parties to the present Covenant undertake to have respect for the liberty of parents and, when applicable, legal guardians, to ensure the religious and moral education of their children in conformity with their own convictions.
Klevius comment: What abt the apparent unbalance between "religious" and non-religious individuals?! You don't build mosques etc to celebrate lack of religion, do you!
Excerpt from Angels of Antichrist/Sex Segregation and the (lack of) Influence of Fathers:
The God of Moses was the god (father, ancestor) of a national group based on kinship. For the Hellenistic Jews in Diaspora, God represented a continuing tradition still emphasizing family and kinship values. Emerging universal Christianity, with its emphasis on a personal God was a step outside biology. The development of modern protestant Christianity has been in a direction of even less emphasis on biology (Klevius 1996).
Opening Pandora's box
Joe Lieberman's "monolitheist religious" embracing of islam resembles that of how the world now has opened up for true sexist fascism and due racism/progromes. However, because islam's revitilization (apart from oil money) rests on sex segregation (and a general detachment due to technological/economic development/social state - even more pronounced among strict "religious" strata than among secularists) and because de-sex segregation was a central feature of early kibbutism, these aspects have to be included in any possible analysis. So far they are not - outside Klevius writings of course. And when confronting whether Klevius or the world is in sane, many think quantity in front of quality (those of my readers who like me should try to forgive me for this).
One may argue, from a non-religious/secular (but see Klevius definition of religion and the Vagina gate) point of view that the 1948 Zionist emphasise on religion was a huge mistake. However, the creation of Israel really strikes the core problem of real religion, i.e. family/kinship vs state vs globalization.
But no matter how we angle it the creation of Israel was the real chance for the entire mideast had it not been for the revitilization of medieval* islam.
* no matter how poor, rich, "cool", oppressed, on "top", enslaved etc you think you are, islam's backwardness is stipulated in its very essence, an unchangable Koran dictated by a "god" that is out of reach, and the interpretations, in practise, given to anyone, i.e. in the end on one hand a harmless and castrated private, individualist religion, and on the other hand an extremely dangerous, violent political fascist movement with totalitarian and violent aims for personal greed/problems and a continuing of artificial, cultural sex segregation.
Journalists and politicians as co-murderers and/or islam-fascist sympathizers
The world's journalists/politicians/ and a general racism/sexism/ignorance abt islamists then caused the burst(s) of islamic evilness we have now faced around the globe (no, I'm not forgetting the eternal islamic violence/rapetivism that has continued for 1400 years on many spots of the earth).
Islam as a totalitarian/fascist movement compared to communism and nazism
If your religion is communism then you are a communist, aren’t you!
If your religion is national socialism then you are a nazist, aren’t you!
If your religion is islam then you are an islamist, aren’t you!
Since the 19th century there have been (in vain) attempts to wash the dirt of islam. The result: condemnation as anit-islam and/or barrening due to lack of the real (i.e. evil) attractions of islam, i.e. “infidel” contempt/racism
Islam as the opposite to Klevius definition of the negative human rights
1. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This right shall include freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his [her] choice, and freedom either individually or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his [her] religion or belief in worship, observance, practice and teaching.
Klevius comment: Freedom means that you as a child aren’t forced into a system of belief that may punish you if you decide to leave it, adopt another system of belief etc. Islam's sensitivity to criticism is rooted in it's inborn aim of inclusion/exclusion that covers its inherent social and technological impotency (see e.g. Shinto, the world's oldest religion meets islam the world's youngest "religion"). Although islam proclaims itself totalitarian it hasn't the means for ever becoming it even in theory.
2. No one shall be subject to coercion which would impair his [her] freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his [her] choice.
Klevius comment: Hardly needs a comment when it comes to islam, does it!
3. Freedom to manifest one’s religion or belief may be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary to protect public safety, order, health, morals or the fundamental rights and freedoms of others.4. The States Parties to the present Covenant undertake to have respect for the liberty of parents and, when applicable, legal guardians, to ensure the religious and moral education of their children in conformity with their own convictions.
Klevius comment: What abt the apparent unbalance between "religious" and non-religious individuals?! You don't build mosques etc to celebrate lack of religion, do you!
Comments