Veils and burkas sign sexism and racism, and hinder real emancipation
Also see: The Arabic/Islamic Pandora's box opened by Hitler and a Californian oil company in 1933!
For a theoretical understanding of sex segregation and definition of feminism, and their connection to the ongoing Arabic-Islamic mass rape/genocide in Sudan, start at From Klevius without love: Sex, kinship and friendship! and Klevius' Definition of Religion! A fundamentalist test is to be found on Klevius' definition of negative human rights.
Also see What is marriage?: Why was Terri Schindler-Schiavo killed and why can't we "marry" our sibs and grown up kids?
"Muslim" girls/women! Why take the unnecessary step via (sex segregated) feminism when a world free from sex segregation is possible and just waiting for you? Also see From Freud to bin Ladin!
For a better understanding of the modern lack of attachment see Childless female child-psychoanalysts in search for motherhood/femininity.
The relation between the welfare state (social state) and the conditions for children and women are outlined on Angels of Antichrist - social state vs kinship.
Veils and burkas are like Islamic "moderatism" etc. forms of Islam, (but unlike e.g. fashion) inexorably tied to a Pan-Arabic, "religious" tradition and hence signing: I'm a Muslim! This statement then also announces a) a racist separatism from "infidels" (there might be Muslims without veils and burkas but "infidels" don't wear them), and b) a sexist underlining of a rigid sex dichotomy sex segregation (Muslim men seldom wear veils or burkas - other than if they, for example, are disguised terrorists/criminals). Ultimately veils and burkas etc constitute sexist offenses, because of the assumption that men cannot, and sometimes don't even have to, control their hormones (see Heterosexual attraction and sex)!
Oil-for-Pan-Arabic-Islam
Interestingly the homeland of the modern, oil-based spreading of Pan-Arabic Islamism, Saudi-Arabia, (or rather their over-wealthy oil-sheiks who are busy investing money they've got for nothing) seems to have realized (at least partly) the dead end of traditional fundamentalist Islam and is now trying to "modernize" and "reform" to a new reality, incl. Muslim feminism etc. But the changes are superficial when it comes to the sexist/racist/totalitarian idea about sex segregation and "infidels"/unbelievers, i.e. the real soul of Islam. Individuals without a monotheistic "God" fantasy in line with Islam (which "Islam" anyway?!), or at least a single "God" born in Mideast ("Arab-land") are considered no real humans. Islam is "the final word" from "God" and will take over the world (doesn't this sound even worse than Hitler?).
Iran, Saudi Arabia call for religious cooperation against "enemies of Islam".
In this sense the Arabic fundamentalist focus has now shifted to Iran and elsewhere. Cynically one might say that pragmatic Saudis welcome this development because it's in line with the out-sourcing of bin Laden & Co long since, yet it simultaneously continues to serve Islamic Pan-Arabism (S-A is a country that basically doesn't produce/export anything except Islam and Koran schools (incl. mosques, Muslim organizations and Arabic-Islam-conditioned "aid"), where hatred/sexism in general and suicide-bombers in particular are fertilized (Islam is Islamist Arabs' WMD in line with its original idea as a toool for Arabic conquest/exploitation).
On a basic level nothing will change, though, before Islamists/Muslims (of all sorts), openly reject the boosting of its inborn sexism and the racist belief in "infidels" (see Klevius' Negative Human Rights page. If "Muslims" do openly change this attitude it will of course remove the evil spice and real soul of Islam (which lacks the Christian - maybe stupid, but still - love messáge, which has made it survive in a secular world) and, consequently, will become its final dead end. Furthermore Islam in today's world seem to be the most successful in the darkest shadows of society among gravely misled and/or disoriented individuals of both sexes (and these individuals aren't necessarily always even poor or illitterate, but on the contrary often well-educated and wealthy).
"Islam" is sometimes used as a "religion" and sometimes as a "policy" for ethnicity etc. But the so called "Muslim ethnicity" consists in reality of two separate parts: a) An Arabic Islam-ethnicity (often spread by military and economic means) which doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the non-Arabic "Muslims" in question, and b) the real ethnicity of a particular people who has just happened to live under the cover of Arabic Islam, hence calling themselves "Muslims", and, as a consequence, hindering them from real ethnic emancipation. This disastrous tie between Pan-Arabic conquest and ethnicity can logically only be broken by abandoning Islam alltogether. And for women sex segregated Islam (incl. Muslim feminism see Definition of feminism) can never be an option for real emancipation!
If we really want to leave racism/sexism behind us there is only one holy option: Every human being is to be considered equal no matter of sex or belief/lack of belief. And fortunately we already possess an outcast for such a policy (see Klevius' definition of the Holy 1948 Negative Human Rights Declaration).
Also see Forum Mot Islamisering for Swedish news!
For a theoretical understanding of sex segregation and definition of feminism, and their connection to the ongoing Arabic-Islamic mass rape/genocide in Sudan, start at From Klevius without love: Sex, kinship and friendship! and Klevius' Definition of Religion! A fundamentalist test is to be found on Klevius' definition of negative human rights.
Also see What is marriage?: Why was Terri Schindler-Schiavo killed and why can't we "marry" our sibs and grown up kids?
"Muslim" girls/women! Why take the unnecessary step via (sex segregated) feminism when a world free from sex segregation is possible and just waiting for you? Also see From Freud to bin Ladin!
For a better understanding of the modern lack of attachment see Childless female child-psychoanalysts in search for motherhood/femininity.
The relation between the welfare state (social state) and the conditions for children and women are outlined on Angels of Antichrist - social state vs kinship.
Veils and burkas are like Islamic "moderatism" etc. forms of Islam, (but unlike e.g. fashion) inexorably tied to a Pan-Arabic, "religious" tradition and hence signing: I'm a Muslim! This statement then also announces a) a racist separatism from "infidels" (there might be Muslims without veils and burkas but "infidels" don't wear them), and b) a sexist underlining of a rigid sex dichotomy sex segregation (Muslim men seldom wear veils or burkas - other than if they, for example, are disguised terrorists/criminals). Ultimately veils and burkas etc constitute sexist offenses, because of the assumption that men cannot, and sometimes don't even have to, control their hormones (see Heterosexual attraction and sex)!
Oil-for-Pan-Arabic-Islam
Interestingly the homeland of the modern, oil-based spreading of Pan-Arabic Islamism, Saudi-Arabia, (or rather their over-wealthy oil-sheiks who are busy investing money they've got for nothing) seems to have realized (at least partly) the dead end of traditional fundamentalist Islam and is now trying to "modernize" and "reform" to a new reality, incl. Muslim feminism etc. But the changes are superficial when it comes to the sexist/racist/totalitarian idea about sex segregation and "infidels"/unbelievers, i.e. the real soul of Islam. Individuals without a monotheistic "God" fantasy in line with Islam (which "Islam" anyway?!), or at least a single "God" born in Mideast ("Arab-land") are considered no real humans. Islam is "the final word" from "God" and will take over the world (doesn't this sound even worse than Hitler?).
Iran, Saudi Arabia call for religious cooperation against "enemies of Islam".
In this sense the Arabic fundamentalist focus has now shifted to Iran and elsewhere. Cynically one might say that pragmatic Saudis welcome this development because it's in line with the out-sourcing of bin Laden & Co long since, yet it simultaneously continues to serve Islamic Pan-Arabism (S-A is a country that basically doesn't produce/export anything except Islam and Koran schools (incl. mosques, Muslim organizations and Arabic-Islam-conditioned "aid"), where hatred/sexism in general and suicide-bombers in particular are fertilized (Islam is Islamist Arabs' WMD in line with its original idea as a toool for Arabic conquest/exploitation).
On a basic level nothing will change, though, before Islamists/Muslims (of all sorts), openly reject the boosting of its inborn sexism and the racist belief in "infidels" (see Klevius' Negative Human Rights page. If "Muslims" do openly change this attitude it will of course remove the evil spice and real soul of Islam (which lacks the Christian - maybe stupid, but still - love messáge, which has made it survive in a secular world) and, consequently, will become its final dead end. Furthermore Islam in today's world seem to be the most successful in the darkest shadows of society among gravely misled and/or disoriented individuals of both sexes (and these individuals aren't necessarily always even poor or illitterate, but on the contrary often well-educated and wealthy).
"Islam" is sometimes used as a "religion" and sometimes as a "policy" for ethnicity etc. But the so called "Muslim ethnicity" consists in reality of two separate parts: a) An Arabic Islam-ethnicity (often spread by military and economic means) which doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the non-Arabic "Muslims" in question, and b) the real ethnicity of a particular people who has just happened to live under the cover of Arabic Islam, hence calling themselves "Muslims", and, as a consequence, hindering them from real ethnic emancipation. This disastrous tie between Pan-Arabic conquest and ethnicity can logically only be broken by abandoning Islam alltogether. And for women sex segregated Islam (incl. Muslim feminism see Definition of feminism) can never be an option for real emancipation!
If we really want to leave racism/sexism behind us there is only one holy option: Every human being is to be considered equal no matter of sex or belief/lack of belief. And fortunately we already possess an outcast for such a policy (see Klevius' definition of the Holy 1948 Negative Human Rights Declaration).
Also see Forum Mot Islamisering for Swedish news!
Comments