A nun's gear doesn't sign other women as "whores". However, what about a woman in an islamic "chastity" gear?

K.S. Lal (a giant among historians): Mahmud of Ghazni had marched into Hindustan again and again to wage jihad and spread the Muhammadan religion, to lay hold of its wealth, to destroy its temples, to enslave its people, sell them abroad and thereby earn profit, and to add to muslim numbers by converting the captives.

Is BBC 100% steered by muslims? Not only can you ever hear anything critical about islam and muslims - but all main channels are also occupied by sharia (OIC) supporting (i.e. against basic Human Rights equality) muslims. Nazir Afzal ('Moral maze', news, culture etc.), Mishal Husain (news, culture etc.), Samira Ahmed (news, culture etc.), Razia Iqbal (news, culture etc.). And they all keep cheating the public about it and instead pointing finger to "dumb and hateful xenophobes". Not a word about e.g. Council of Europe's harsh critcism (see below) of muslims biggest sharia organization, the Saudi based and steered OIC. Foreigners isn't the peoblem - sharia islam is!

BBC's muslims and their PC supporters also meddle in UK election by demonizing "islamophobia", i.e. trying to stop critcs of islamofascism.

Muslim child/youth fascism induced by an islam interpretation from family and strengthened by PC media, politicians etc.

Peter Klevius: Everyone - incl. every muslim who respects Human Rights - ought to make sure to vote for an "islamophobe"! BBC and Sayeeda Warsi will make their utmost to stop critics of islamofascism in the election. Don't be robbed of your democratic right. And of course you know that the only real problem with migration is islamofascism.

BBC's "man in Hong Kong" asked street terror leader Joshua Wong if they could possibly escalate violence. And they could. One day later they put a Chinese on fire in a murder attempt.

While US/UK aim for militarism and war, China aims for health and wealth.

While US/UK aim for militarism and war, China aims for health and wealth.
The Saudi Aramco and OIC scams

Peter Klevius: The Saudi Aramco sale is the biggest ripoff in the world. If there's any future in oil and you don't care about environment, then why buy what's at its peak when Venezuela's PDVSA is bigger and as low it can get?!

Are you an "islamophobe" if you don't like islamist Human Rights violations? Islam has (via OIC's sharia declaration) abandoned the most basic anti-fascist Human Rights from 1948. Islam is hence the only religion in doing so - not even the Catholics have needed to replace Human Rights with "Catholic human rights".

The seed for world fascism is dormant in Saudi based and steered OIC's world sharia - opposed by ECHR and Peter Klevius, but supported by Sayeeda Warsi.

Breakit instead of Brexit because what's the point of leaving one EU while still staying in an other called UK? England voted leave.

However, unfortunately BBC demonizes China on behalf of UK's relying on militarist meddling, weapons sales and islamofascist sharia finance. So you see the solution: Cut off sharia etc. islamofascist ties and open up for prospering with China - not the over-selfish game of spying and dying of US.

BBC boosts stupid nationalist "Britishness" with peculiar "sports" like cricket and rugby because the world has already "colonized" football and the English language is a global property.

Nigel Farage is like BBC against "islamophobia" and pro-Saudi - but Boris Johnson doesn't like letter boxes and was criticized by Theresa May for being critical against the Saudis while serving as her foreign minister.

China (laws against sharia islamofascism) and EU (Human Rights against sharia islamofascism) are now the only ones protecting basic (negative*) Human Rights.
* Religious people and socialists don't like negative Human Rights simply because they prefer collectives ("communities") rather than individuals. That's why the web is full of misinfo about these rights. Read Peter Klevius definition instead if you want a deep view - or listen to Lauren Chen starting from 7:11 if you want it light
The Saudi "custodian of islam" has some 1.5 billion "citizens" in the muslim world Ummah nation - and demands the world to bow them no matter what (as long they aren't Shia or so, of course). China, on the other hand, keeps its citizens and laws within its own borders. IS islam IS fascism and islam (even the archbishop agrees). So why is sharia fascism not separated from an "islam" that submits to basic Human Rights? As it stands now Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia (the 1990 Cairo declaration) still stands as the basic Human Rights violation via sharia muslims all over the world. And whereas China actively tries to erase sharia islamofascism, EU keeps promoting import of it while judicially telling us it's not right, yet doing nothing to stop it.
Unlike the West, China hasn't aggressively meddled militaristically in other countries around the world, but rather being the world's foremost spreader of new technology and wealth. And whereas the West has eagerly supported Mohammed's totalitarian aims, China has, in practise, implemented in law most of the Human Rights advices that The Council of Europe has directed against OIC. Against this background West's Saudi backing and China smearing is deeply bigoted and hypocritical.

John le Carré: I'm depressed and ashamed of British nationalism. Nationalism needs enemies but today we really have no identifiable enemies except among ourselves.

North Atlantic (sic) Treaty Organization invades a country in Mideast and attacks (with chemical weapons) a people without a country.

UK's Brexit business model: Sharia finance, weapons sale and militaristic meddling?UK Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (sic) and Global Neo-Imperialist and Militarist Meddling, Jeremy Hunt, 15 Oct. 2019: It's wrong to accuse Donald Trump - it's Americans isolationism because American taxpayers don't want to pay between 1/2 and 2/3 of the defense of Europe. And Turkey is very skilled at finding wedges and gaps between allies. UK should be EU's bridge to US.
Peter Klevius: No, EU should take care of its own defense - against whom? The Saudi dictator family who is the world's no 1 spender on weapons and islamic terror incitement and who hates EU's anti-sharia legislation? And UK taxpayers should not have to pay more for dangerous militarism. Militaristic meddling is a bad and dangerous business idea.

Read K.S. Lal (free online) on islam's evil spread!

A Google (i.e. U.S. web monopoly) search (20191006) reports 'islamists Hong Kong' "missing". Really! No islamists in Hong Kong? Peter Klevius also wonders if EU citizens in UK are UKongers and can peacefully demand the same rights as Joshua Wong violently demands (and eagerly broadcasted by BBC) for Hong Kongers?

Peter Klevius congratulates Savid Javid for abandoning the islamofascist "islamophobia" smear. BBC’s bigoted hypocrite Mishal Husain and others ought to follow!

BBC's Mark Mardell couldn't get a visa to China because of his extreme and hateful Sinophobia - but that didn't stop him/BBC from producing a fake anti-China program series while pretending to be there. Is Sinophobia really better than cooperation?

Are EU citizens in UK included in Tom Tugenhadt's "British people"?

Sinophobe Tom Tugendhat, chair of UK's Foreign Affairs Committee (who has studied islam and Arabic in Mideast) suggests that English speaking universities should consider banning Chinese students because "they might be used as leverage like Huawei". Peter Klevius wonders if one could be any more racist than this, and if he doesn't see any islamofascist sharia supremacist "leverage" at all? Btw, there are more than 50,000 Chinese muslims in Hong Kong. Peter Klevius wonders how many of them are "radical" ones and participate in BBC's lengthy anti-China propaganda "news" - while the world doesn't suffer from Chinese but from muslim violence and Human Rights violations?

US/UK destroyed the lives of millions of Chinese during some hundred years of evil militaristic meddling. BBC is now busy smearing China all the time while supporting Saudi islamofascism and violent Hong Kong demonstrators - but neglecting the mass of peaceful pro-China demonstrators. BBC also "worries" about Chinese "surveillance state" while the truth is China's technological superiority. US is much more insidious in its surveillance policies but lacks the techno - can't even produce a working 5G so far. US/UK follow exactly China but utilize the meantime to smear it. And who is really behind the Hong Kong riots? Someone who can't take China's success? But the Syria tactics won't work. US (and its UK puppet) wants to be able to meddle militarily near China - therefore its interest in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Korea, Tibet, Myanmar, Uyghur extremist muslims etc.

As Greta Thunberg is allegedly reported to the Swedish social authorities, Peter Klevius suggests that her parents read his thesis Pathological Symbiosis in LVU, Relevance, and Sex Segregated Emergence. Keeping in mind that Peter Klevius daughter was only 15 when she entered university and at 16 made her graduate paper about women in ancient times, it shouldn't be considered too sensitive for Greta either. Also read the attached email correspondence which clearly shows how democracy is manipulated. And why not consider Angels of Antichrist, the Social State vs the People (P. Klevius 1996). And last but not least, Peter Klevius 1981/1992 Demand for Resources (original titel Resursbegär).
Peter Klevius and the Council of Europe share exactly the same "islamophobia".
Council of Europe. Resolution 2253 (2019), Sharia, Saudi based and steered OIC's Cairo Declaration and the European Convention on Human Rights: Human Rights protect the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion as enshrined in Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The right to manifest one’s religion, however, is a qualified right whose exercise, under Article 17 of the Convention, may not aim at the destruction of other Convention rights or freedoms.

People in UK-land (especially women) will loose their Human Rights after Brexit - while sharia prevails in UK, and UK citizens in EU are protected by the European Court of Human Rights.

Brexit was meant to protect UK from muslim invasion via Turkey's proposed visa free deal with Merkel. Even the possibility of temporary membership in ECHR (in case of a deal) isn't enough - especially considering UK will be out of reach of the European Court of Justice.

US loosing the tech war - and starting a real one?

US loosing the tech war - and starting a real one?

A muslim wants to criminalize Peter Klevius islamophobia. Really!

A muslim wants to criminalize Peter Klevius islamophobia. Really!
West's indulgence of islamofascism (sharia) has made its boasting against China about "democratic values" empty. The risk of you being stabbed, raped etc. by a hateful jihadi is created by your political leaders, BBC etc. - who also have arranged so it's not even called a hate crime.

Peter Klevius stands for these "stops" and due huge implications - all shame on him if you can prove him wrong (click links if you need to educate yourself before saying something stupid): Stop using the misleading 'gender' instead of sex (sociology)! Stop islam's abuse of Human Rights (jurisprudence)! Stop saying humans came "out of Africa" (anthropology)! Stop talking about "consciousness" when you don't know what you're talking about (philosophy/ai).

Peter Klevius: BBC supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family's strategic use of supremacist islam which has spred muslim hate all over the world's streets, institutions etc. (and usually not correctly, if at all, reported by BBC which instead doesn't hesitate to give long coverage of "alternative news" that better suits its propaganda) - while muslim terrorist organizations keep it within muslim territories. So if true Salafists became the "gurdians of islam's holy places" then that would mean less muslim terror elsewhere. And less to cover up for BBC. How big a contributor to the suffering of islamic supremacist hate crimes has BBC's fake (and lack of) info been? Will we in the future see BBC in an international court accused of crimes against humanity? As it stands now the spill over effect of BBC's cynical support of proxy evil is stained in blood and rape etc. over innocent people. And if true Salafists took over in muslim countries, they would quickly become non-muslim countries. A better option than today's prolonged suffering caused by the hopeless effort to "adapt" a medieval slavery ideology to a modern world based on everyone's Human Rights equality. And if it's so important to keep islam in name only - then islam would loose all of its racist and sexist "we and the other" appeal anyway.

Why is BBC aiding islamofascism?

Why is BBC aiding islamofascism?

Statues of football player Nilla Fischer and Caroline Seger vandalized in Sweden

Statues  of football player Nilla Fischer and Caroline Seger vandalized in Sweden

Islam (represented in UN by Saudi based and steered OIC and its sharia called “islamic human rights”) is against Human Rights!

Sweden’s Supreme Court has found a man guilty of rape for having sex without explicit consent from a "teenage woman" who had been passive and gave no clear expression that she wanted to participate in the sexual acts. Lack of a partner’s spoken agreement or any other clear approval can hence be considered rape. However, islamic sharia gives a muslim man the "right" to have sex with wives and and concubines his "right hand possesses" (e.g. "infidel" girls/women). The neo-islamist rational (original openly supremacist islam didn't need one) is that "it satisfies the sexual desire of the female". Peter Klevius wonders if Swedish Courts will accept this reasoning - perhaps only for muslims?!

Peter Klevius also wonders whether BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not Ramadan fasting, Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim, Mishal Husain, approves of sharia?

UK introduced face recognition after for many years accusing Chinese for having it. Peter Klevius wonders how this fits UK's face covered muslims and others who utilize it?

So how do you vote for someone critical of islam's Human Rights violations if parties don't allow "islamophobia"? Is it democracy?

What do BBC and Jeremy Hunt have in common? Both support the islamofascist murderer and war criminal Mohammad bin Salman.

Peter Klevius: Girls' emancipation needs more football and less cricket, netball etc.

BBC's cricket propaganda is a slap in the face of young girls who need equally much moving around and spatial skills as young boys. However, there's a huge sex segregation in females motivation and access to football - not only the world's by far most popular physical sport, but also the only one that doesn't use tools or hands to handle the ball, and which makes all participants moving most of the time even without the ball. Moreover, the very nature of the sport forces participants to a never ending series of spatial and strategic challenges - with or without the ball and even while playing alone. So why is BBC so hostile to the Queen of sports (the "beautiful game") that is perfect for the physical and spatial development of girls - and in the face of the football loving majority who has to pay compulsory fees (and paying extra for football channels) to this faking regime propaganda media that uses stiff and lifeless colonial cricket for neo-colonial purpose?! England banned football for girls/women already 1921 and suggested cricket, land hockey and netball instead - almost like today except it's not called a ban. And what about the laughable notion of a "world cup" in cricket?! When is the "world cup" in caber tossing between Gotland and Scotland?

The murderous war criminal, Saudi muslim "custodian of islam" (and OIC) "prince" MBS is OK but Human Rights defender Peter Klevius isn't. Why?! Because the former isn't an "islamophobe", dude!
Stop US global bullying! What moral right does US have trying to dominate Earth and space? "God"?! Or the Saudi murderer and mass murderer "prince"?! Hasn't US sucked out enough already from the rest of the world? A global dollar manipulation favoring US and paid by the rest. A US marked global license and patent imperialism - and Android. Is Internet next?

26 June 2019: BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not ramadan fasting Pakistan rooted muslim, Mishal Husain (brought up in Saudi Arabia), worried about Boris Johnson not having cricket as his hobby.

25 June 2019: BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not ramadan fasting muslim, Mishal Husain (brought up in Saudi Arabia), sounds desperate when trying to smear Johnson. Is it because Boris 2016 was critical against the Saudis while foreign minister and 2018 critical of muslim women packed in burqas etc.?
BBC thinks the militaristic Saudiphil Jeremy Hunt "is a safer option" as UK PM. What about you?

BBC News 8:00 AM 23 June 2019: Johnson financially unfit because he spilled wine on a couch.

BBC News 8:00 AM 23 June 2019: Johnson financially unfit because he spilled wine on a couch.
Is the Saudi "custodian of islam" a muslim - and is the very question "islamophobic", "muslimophobic" or "Saudiphobic"?
Why is BBC comparing Saudi with China?! China's leader isn't a murderer, war criminal, and spreader of terror on the streets! "If we drop the Saudis then we can't deal with China either." Really?! BTW, 'Diversity' means different/conflicting whereas its antonym stands for similar/friendly.

Blinked by BBC's fake "news" which instead boost militaristic confrontation and the smearing of China: The Saudi war criminal "custodian of islam" who murdered Khashoggi is now the world's new Hitler. However, unlike Hitler's Germanic language imperialism, bin Salman's Arabic language imperialism is added by a totalitarian imperialism due to the fact that he is a muslim and as such represents the totality of islam (inc. the Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization O.I.C.'s sharia declaration against Human Rights). Peter Klevius has for long pointed out that we need to distinguish between Human Rights obeying "muslims" and "extremist" muslims, but for some reason they are all bundled as 'muslims'.

Chinese high tech is met with Sinophobia, bans (tariffs) and militarism by US/UK/EU.

Chinese high tech is met with Sinophobia, bans (tariffs) and militarism by US/UK/EU.

Peter Klevius evolution formula.

Peter Klevius serious questions to you "out of Africa" believer! Ask yourself:
How come that the oldest primates came from outside Africa; that the oldest great ape divergence happened outside Africa; that the oldest bi-pedals are from outside Africa; that the only australopithecines with a Homo skull lived as far from Africa you can get; that the oldest truly modern looking skull is from eastern China; that the oldest Africans are mongoloid; that the latest genetic mix that shaped the modern human happened in Siberia and is traced to SE Asia; that the earliest sophisticated art is found from Iberia to Sulawesi - but not in Africa; that the oldest round skulled Homo sapiens in sub-Saharan Africa are much younger than similar skulls in Eurasia; that we lack ancient enough DNA from Africa, etc. etc.? Peter Klevius theory answers all these questions - and more.

Peter Klevius evolution formula.

Existence-centrism (Peter Klevius 1986)

Read this: The "out of Africa" hoax is worse than the Piltdown hoax - and much bigger and more worrisome. When will “out of Africaphobia” be criminalized?

Nothing in Primate/Haplorhini evolution came out of Africa - not even Africa (it was disconnected due to tectonics).

A “definition” of “islamophobia” ought to be balanced with a definition of muslim Human Rightsphobia.

"Diversity" without basic (negative) Human Rights is like having a car without steering - dangerous.

In its senseless and continuous "islamophobia" ranting BBC says to be 'muslim' is the same as to be 'English'. Klevius thinks not. A 'muslim' is one who wittingly or unwittingly adheres to what historical records show being the most evil enslaving ideology ever around (from a Human Rights perspective). And Klevius doesn't count as real muslims those who call themselves "cultural muslims" for the purpose of benefiting from a certain "ethnicity", or those who against their will are trapped in muslimhood because of the evil apostasy tenet in islam. And islamic "modesty" attires is a protected way of calling other women "whores".

Klevius suggests the UK baby should be named Muhammad. After all, according to BBC, the Queen is related to him and all politicians love islam. And several hadiths describe him as white (one even proposing the killing of anyone who says he was black). Only problem being that he then may be described as a white supremacist. Luckily the baby, according to BBC, is “mix-race”.

Klevius to EU voters: If you respect Human Rights - don’t vote for anyone who supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family who spreads Human Rightsphobia via the Saudi based and steered OIC’s world sharia!

And if you respect your Earthly home – don’t support a hate ideology that encourages over-population and sex apartheid. We don’t need more workers because the most profitable sectors have the least jobs – a trend that AI accelerates.

No true muslim can be fully human.

Why? Because islam's dividing the world in muslims and (not fully human) "infidels" makes it impossible. Only by fully accepting the basic (s.c. 'negative') Universal Human Rights equality - which islam can't accept (see e.g. Saudi based and steered all muslims world Ummah sharia organization OIC) without committing ideological suicide - can we meet every human as basically equal, in the same way as we can give every road-user a basic equality in traffic, i.e. we have traffic sense. So Klevius asks muslims whether they have "traffic sense"? And for all the rest of you - to be 'human' in a global sense can only be achieved by giving every human you meet basic equality - no matter how alien that human might feel to you. Because every human has the right to be "alien" and there can't even be any alternative to this as long as we don't accept brainwashed totalitarianism (see e.g. Klevius 1996 paper Angels of Antichrist). This is the only way to meaningfully talk about 'humankind'. And to alien hunters Klevius says you probably meet them every day already.

A "good muslim" is one who suppresses and distorts original islam so to fit Human Rights. However, some just pretend to do so - and some just continue hating the "infidel".

So when BBC and other fake media talk about xenophobia against muslims, they actually contribute to spread xenophobia themselves.

Ultimate bigotry and hypocrisy – spying and meddling 5 Eyes instead of true 5G?

Saudi hate spreading antennas (Salafi/Wahhabi mosques etc.) or Chinese world leading 5G tech? No one knows the amount of street etc. victims of Saudi hate because when the haters are muslims their attacks are not recorded as hate crimes.

The real threat is the US led Saudi supporting spy organization 5 Eyes, which 1) tries to block superior tech, and 2) uses China as a scapegoat for US/UK privacy breaches. It's not China but US that wants to control you! So "securing 5G from Chinese influence" actually means giving US/UK a technical space for spying/influencing etc. In short, trying to hinder US/UK customers from accessing the best technology while spying on them.

Muslim terrorists get legal aid to stay in UK - EU nationals don't!

BBC collected a UKIP hating public to shout "islamophobia" against islam criticism.

However, the very same BBC also willfully misleads people about islam so that most people in UK are completely unaware of that Saudi based and steered OIC and its extreme Human Rightsphobia is a world guide for (sharia) muslims. Moreover, BBC's top presenter (Mishal Husain) who seems to be muslim in name only (drinking alcohol, not fasting on Ramadan, no muslim attire, no Haji, no sharia, etc) so to dupe the public about islam.

The 1948 Human Rights declaration was created to protect against fascism. Accepting islam without a clear border against sharia that violates the most basic Human Rights, allows space for islamofascism (i.e. original supremacist islam).

However, the new fascist mob is shouting "islamophobia" because islam can't comply with it (compare Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration against Human Rights). This smear is then "enhanced" by connecting it to murderers, Nazis, right wing extremists etc. Islam's sharia sexism and racist supremacism is the problem - so why is addressing it "bad"?!

BBC is also keen on silencing the only truly free media, i.e. bloggers etc. social media.

The crystal clear connection between the surge in knife, rape etc. attacks and islam - and its custodian, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - is desperately silenced by BBC and politicians (BBC now tries to cover this up by airing long programs about "conventional" knife crimes instead). This means they are directly complicit, doesn't it. Klevius suggests boycotting BBC and Saudi bribed politicians. They constitute the worst security threat.

Muslim terrorists get legal aid to stay in UK - EU nationals don't!

The best explanation to the surge in knife crimes since 2015 is the Islamic State's exhortation to street jihad. However, the police don't record hate crimes as muslim - other than if directed against muslims. And do consider that IS and the Saudi dictator family both rest on the same Salafi islam that most young true muslims in the West follow. Following Salafism (etc. true muslimhood) involves distinguishing muslims from others, to show that one only belongs to islam and that true muslims ought to be strangers to the "infidels". When Klevius sees a muslim woman in burqa, veil etc. he thinks that's a supremacist and rapist attitude towards other women. And certainly contempt of Human Rights.

UK continues even after Brexit to use EU citizens as bargaining chips by placing their rights in an unsafe statutory instrument instead of in the law.

Stop security cooperation with UK whose close connection to the the suspected murderer, war criminal and islamic terror spreading islamofascist Saudi custodian of islam, Mohammad bin Salman, constitutes the by far worst threat against the security of people in EU! Moreover, sharia islam (the only real islam for real muslims) which is a racist and sexist supremacist ideology that violates Human Rights, is supported by UK.

Don't let haters and Human Rightsphobes get away with it by calling themselves 'believers'!

Either religion is (grades of) supremacist hate and sexism and you better become an Atheist (and therefore universal human) - or you keep your "beliefs" for yourself. In traffic you can think what you want about other people, but you can't drive over them!

You muslim should be ashamed of calling Human Rights defenders "islamophobes"

- and take responsibility for your own supremacist sharia, represented by Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization OIC, which violates the most basic Human Rights! And do note the difference between universal impositions and universal freedom! Full respect of the other rests on accepting her/his freedom. This is the only way of being universally human.

Islam is an evil* supremacist and divisive ideology - why isn’t this told by BBC, schools etc.?

* weighed against the anti-fascist, anti-supremacist, anti-racist and anti-sexist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948 that all civilized people are supposed to build on. Islam doesn't fit these goals, so OIC (the legal world Umma steered from and by the Saudi dictator family) decided to replace them with medieval racist, sexist and supremacist sharia.

Article 24 of the Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration (CDHRI) states: "All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Sharia." Article 19 says: "There shall be no crime or punishment except as provided for in the Sharia." CDHRI also fails to guarantee freedom of religion, in particular the right of each and every individual to abandon their religion, as a "fundamental and non-derogable right".

Article 10 of the Declaration states: "Islam is the religion of unspoiled nature. It is prohibited to exercise any form of compulsion on man or to exploit his poverty or ignorance in order to convert him to another religion or to Atheism." Since in Islamic society all reasons for conversion away from Islam are considered to be essentially either compulsion or ignorance, this effectively forbids conversion away from Islam.

CDHRI denies women equality with men by imposing "own rights" and "duties to perform".

Klevius "islamophobic" heroine Nawal El Saadawi from Egypt

Klevius "islamophobic" heroine Nawal El Saadawi from Egypt

Anti Human Rights muslim or not?

A global world is only possible under the guidance of (negative – i.e. individual freedom from racist/sexist impositions) Human Rights - as outlined in the original anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. It excludes any religious or other supremacist tenets or impositions on the individual.

Due to the above and due to the West (politicians and media) having locked itself in with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (the custodians of islam) we now have a deficit of (negative) Human Rights education – but massively more religious propaganda (e.g. Saudi spread “islamophobia” smear) against these rights. Against this background it's utmost hypocrisy to point against wealth spreading China while supporting islamic hate, terror and war crimes spreading hegemonic Saudi dictator family.

When Klevius writes 'islamofascist' it should always be understood as islamic default tenets (e.g. OIC's world sharia) that are gravely opposite UN's anti-fascist 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration. So Klevius suggests every muslim to openly declare if they oppose the most basic Human Rights or not. This is particularly important when it comes to media people and politicians who say they are muslims but hesitate on this most crucial issue.
Klevius supports no border on Ireland. Follow the will of the people, i.e. let England leave and let Scotland and Northern Ireland stay. UK is an unconstitutional mess which now wants to leave EU without controlling its border to EU. A proper constitution would have demanded qualified majority in two consecutive elections/votes about such a crucial matter as Brexit - and being aware what the vote is about. The root of the problem is England's mad man Henry 8's colonialization of Ireland and lack of constitution. The preposterous "British" Brexit parody is then spiced with the government's and BBC's use of religious hate mongering etc. In summary UK is an anomaly of countries trying to be a state in a world of federal states united as countries.

Calling criticism of islam "islamophobia" is pure racism and also supports islamic racism and sexism

BBC isn't much interested in anti-semitism, homophobia etc. but uses them as an excuse for its Saudi/OIC supported "islamophobia" smear campaign against Human Rights.

Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?

* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).

Saudi islamofascism more important than the peaceful erasing of poverty by China?!

Saudi islamofascism more important than the peaceful erasing of poverty by China?!

Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?

First UK people voted to join and share borders with EU. Then England voted to leave while Scotland and Northern Ireland voted to stay. And now UK politicians want to leave while keeping the Irish EU border open. UK lacks a modern constitution according to which a constitutional issue has to pass at least two majority votes.

Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles worldwide.

Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles worldwide.

Saudi induced muslim attack on UK Parliament. How many elsewhere? And what about Saudi/OIC's sharia

Saudi induced muslim attack on UK Parliament. How many elsewhere? And what about Saudi/OIC's sharia

Peter Klevius "islamophobia"/Human Rightsphobia test for you and your politicians

Saudi hate speech against Human Rights in EU

Saudi hate speech against Human Rights in EU

UN with muslim terrorists in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Warning for a muslim robot!

There's no true islam without Human Rights violating sharia

There's no true islam without Human Rights violating sharia

Klevius CV

Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):

* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.

1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.

2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).

3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.

4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).

UK PM candidate Rees-Mogg: Germans needed Human Rights - we don't. Klevius: I really think you do.

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a racist/sexist "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

BBC's compulsory fee funded propaganda for Saudi sharia islam

Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Today England's parliament vote between islamofascist sharia and Human Rights - without even mentioning sharia. Shame on you England, to even have to vote about it!

While Theresa May tries to pave the way for islamofascist Saudi friendly sharia by trashing Human Rights, BBC fills its news with the suffering of Rohyngia muslims - without a word about the Saudi backed muslim terrorist attacks against Buddhists that preceded it.

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Theresa May's sharia = >23,000 jihadi - before Brexit. How many after?

Theresa May's sharia = >23,000 jihadi - before Brexit. How many after?

UK DID NOT vote Brexit. EU residents weren't allowed to vote while non-EU residents were.

The muslim Saudi dictator family is the root of most islam induced suffering

May's secret love affair with Saudi islamofascists - while rejecting Chinese

While Klevius is forcing islam into a Human Rights corner, politicians support islamofascism

Why hasn't Klevius got the Nobel prize for his theory on consciousness/AI?

BBC's fake/angled news protect islamofascist offenders because of its ties (BBC World) to Mideast

BBC lies and fake news

The "Birmingham Koran" hoax - and a sonless "prophet" invented after it!

Lego won't sponsor the defense for Human Rights equality - but islamofascism and sharia is ok

Hillary supports sharia for women, war with Russia and aid to Sunni islamofascists

Apostate (?) Obama's bio- and adoptive dads were both muslims

BBC smears China while bolstering Saudi islamofascists - the worst spreaders of hate and terror

BBC smears China while bolstering Saudi islamofascists - the worst spreaders of hate and terror

Choudary and May both want more sharia - so what about "British values"?

Michael Morell (ex-CIA) is/was a knowing agent for Saudi wahhabism and its Koranic hate jihadism

Trump: Why wouldn't we? Theresa May: I would!

Sharia muslim London mayor voted in by his islamist friends

Sharia muslim London mayor voted in by his islamist friends

Theresa May is for sharia and EU - but against EU's Human Rights Court which condemns sharia

Muslims and Hillary against Human Rights

Muslims and Hillary against Human Rights

OIC and NOI are muslim extremist organizations

Origin of islam and an ignorant white Western nun

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo have sharia islam in common

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo have sharia islam in common

God is an escape route from Human Rights

First sophisticated art by the first truly modern humans

The world's oldest real portrait ever found (Central Europe). Carvings dated to 26-29,000 bp.

Finland's lion trampling the islamic scimitar 1583

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Origin of the Vikings

A victim of rapetivism - and an interfaith messenger of rapetivism

A victim of rapetivism - and an interfaith messenger of rapetivism

Japan 10 yrs ahead of Europe in hybrid/fuelcell cars, space tech etc

Native Brits from Doggerland spoke a proto-Finnish/Uralic (Eurasiatic) language

We non-muslims need to honor racist islam's victims - cause muslims won't

We non-muslims need to honor racist islam's victims - cause muslims won't

The islamic extermination of Jews

The last taboo: Sex segregation/sex apartheid

Klevius is probably now the world's foremost expert on sex segregation (sad, isn't it) and islam (the worst hate crime ever) is the foremost expression of sex segregation. By 'islam' Klevius means Sharia as described by Bill Warner and the Saudi based and steered muslim world organization OIC and its Cairo declaration (sharia) imposed on all muslims via UN (meaning basic Human Rights are criminalized).

Burn OIC's islamic anti-Human Rights declaration!

Tuesday, February 28, 2006

Sexist pseudoscience (e.g. David Feinberg & Co) & Islam boosting unhealthy sex segregation

The ridiculous "scientific" claim that women (biologically) prefer deep-voiced men is but too symptomatic of today's senseless oppression and self-oppression of girls/women. (see What's sex segregation?). Culturally, perhaps, due to hundred years of sex segregated brainwashing via Freud/Hollywood etc, but not biologically. And yes, biologically a woman (in general) is more receptive for sex during the period of ovulation, although that doesn't, in any sense, mean that she necessarily wants sex or, even less so, needs sex. Freud was very wrong! Just like the simple fact that although the average man (biologically) is almost always prepared (heterosexually attracted) for sex, he isn't necessarily culturally, and doesn't have to biologically - rape is cultural. And there simply doesn't exist any evidence of "sublimation" of sex. Freud was very wrong again! So why not, instead, look at the motives behind biased "science"!!

Has sex become the excuse for sex segregation?

Please note that Klevius has no opinion on if people don't have sex at all or if they want to have lots of it, as long as its really fairly consented without pushing. One might remember, though, that although the wonderful sneezings one gets from accidental inhaling of pepper while cooking, doesn't necessarily mean one continues to do it elsewhere too, does it! But read more abt heterosexual attraction, its potential in analysis of sex segregation, as well as how it became denied by feminists and replaced by dillo "relationsship", rapetivism, and exaggerated emphasis on "differences"! There seems to be an almost fanatic and completely unfounded urge among some people to preach for more sex, especially regarding girls! But may I suggest that we let them freely decide for themselves if they do not want or if they want to have sex before, during or after marriage (see sexless marriage)! Instead we might support them by being more honest.
For an understanding of how confused and trapped in its own prejudices this kind of "research" is see Out of Africa as "pygmies" and back again as global "Mongoloids". There is a remarkable lack of understanding abt sex and kinship in a evolutionary setting. It's almost like naive TV-documentaries "explaining" animals' behavior through heavy Hollywood ignorance filters. It really seems that there has been an almost total lack of understanding of the simple fact that those animals, just like humans, evolved in distinctive and biologically well elaborated kin groups, where these kinds of "preferences" weren't, in most cases, even possible. But when a naive individualist eye catches a group, s/he assumes it's just a bunch of free individuals acting in accordance with a lousy, sexist Hollywood script.

As long as we have no problem with greater variances within the sexes than between, we have all the reasons in the world to question the motives of those claiming "necessary" or "good" differences that are, in fact, pure chauvinism.

Isn't it a true pity that, now when we have arrived at the point where the free individual eventually could be successfully combined with restored kinship ties (even friendship), unrestricted by racism/sexism), we instead open the door for sexist, social-fascist, detaching institutions that deny the negative human rights of the individual.

Return of the patriarchs (also see A Human Rights Guide to Historical Islam)

In a dynamic global world sex segregation is inevitably doomed in the long run. But forces fighting for, or timidly following, this backwardness ranges from bin Laden and pan-Arabic Islamist Saudi oil billionaires to Hollywood hens strikingly resembling their counterparts from the 1950s! This misleading of children into segregation is plain child abuse!

No wonder that such a backward and sexist ideology as pan-Arabic Koran Islam fits so well in many a confused mind! (see What's true Islam?). It's perhaps logical then that many main critics seem to emerge either from outside Europe, or among immigrants who don't want the ideology they escaped to follow them!

But naive and/or greedy nations and leaders don't hesitate to boost sex segregated and oppressing pan-Arabic Koran-Islam if they think they can benefit in any sense from it. Look e.g. at the weird Russia-Chechnya deal!

PS. Although Klevius has a reasonably deep voice he doesn't like women who "like deep voiced men"! But he loves deep-voiced women/men as much as he does love high pitch women/men!

Ever thought abt why more feminism has led to less progress for girls/women? According to a brand new report from Sweden's official social board, Swedish girls, compared to boys, have never been so unhappy since mid 1980s,i.e. since difference feminism really got momentum (see Heroic women vs feminism). Ironically this sad development has occured in the shadow of an almost fanatic (many innocent accused and families unnecessarily destroyed) interest in "child abuse/sexual abuse WITHIN the family" campaign, while the worst and most frequent abuse happens OUTSIDE most families, at schools and other public spheres (see posting below on how Linda, 13, was sexually abused to death at her school). Most of the perpetrators can't even be described due to political/legal correctness, or sentenced because of age and/or political correctness, which fact, of course, boosts even more of the same in an environment of already too detached (from their families) youth. Did I mention that the Swedish rape figures now are skyrocketing while it's considered (by cowardice teachers, social workers etc) totally OK that girls are heavily harrassed and named whores etc. in feminist Sweden! Good job?! If you have already read Mary Wollstonecraft's Education of Daughters (1787) you may read abt the "Swedish girl problem" in Klevius paper Angels of Antichrist (1996).

Klevius' sites/blogs still seem to be the only ones (exciting but also sad) clearly addressing this issue (sex segregation) fully, coherently, and with an unbiased, non-profit, informed, interdisciplinary approach. See Klevius definition of feminism!
And yet, the semen is already delivered - not only among the millions of Klevius-visitors, but more so because of an inevitable and fast growing global consciousness among the masses. An irony, isn't it, that Islamists initially thought abt Internet as an ally for the spreading of Islam, whereas it now turns out that the Islamic Internet striptease perhaps revealed too much of true Islam.

Klevius music link of today: Stupid girls

Is sex segregation a problem?
Free polls from Pollhost.com

Monday, February 20, 2006

"Islam has become the KKK of the 21st century - should it be made illegal?"

Klevius comment: Become? It's always been - see What's true Islam? But the really interesting point is why it's always Europe (not USA) that has transformed Mideast "monolitheisms" into true modern big scale fascism/communism/socialism? Whereas the original Jewish faith (ancestor/family/tribal warship - see The Vagina Gate in the atom of kinship) was initially (before Saul) synonymous with defense of kinship against kingships, Christianity (Roman empire) and Islam (pan-Arabism) have been tools for conquest. The roots of Holocaust came from Mideast but were fertilized in Europe's most "European" countries (see Angels of Antichrist abt Sicilian socialism, German Nazi women & the modern social state) on a socialist breeding ground. Remember, no one has sufficiently diagnosed this disease - and the bug is still at large! Not the least among Islamic youth. When anti-Jewish/anti-American Islamic terror movies are now applauded in dark German cinemas, it's an eery echo of true fascism from the past.

Islam - 1400 years of slavery, rapetivism & pan-Arabic colonialism

Secularism isn't for the protection of religion but AGAINST religon!

Update: Has Bush gone nuts selling US ports to Islamists?

Wednesday, February 15, 2006

WARNING - pan-Arabic oil-Islamists demand "religious" protection from criticism for the worst political fascism/sexism ever!

Is Islam the worst crime ever against humanity during 1400 years?
Have "Muslims" been hijacked by Islam?

What if the Mohammed caricature is, in fact, no caricature?!

Creeping Islamofascism*: Islamist dictator states now want a "code of conduct" against critics of Islamofascism! Errand boys for the oil dictators are (who else?) the bribed (compare Iraqi oil-for-food scandal) black oil-patriarch Kofi Annan, and the Spanish socialist (remember how the Spanish socialists came to power by the help of Islamofascists?) Javier Solana. Islamofascist Saudi Arabia's prince Saud Al-Faisal calls for EU to "prevent a repeat" of the "blasphemy". NOTE, this is the man who 9/11 victims charged that had actually paid protection money to al-Qaeda in exchange for promises not to attack the kingdom or make moves to destabilize its government!

Jordan's "moderate" Islamist king Abdullah II: "In my view, Islam is going in a direction that's very scary"!
Klevius comment: This is the guy Solana talked with when he promised more protection for Islam against those who dare to criticize it!!! Solana and Annan are under pressure from Organization of Islamic Conference, an Islamist group of countries promoting the spreading of Islam, and incl. such Islamofascist states as e.g. Saudi Arabia, Iran, Sudan, Syria etc!

Islamic countries which have misled their people by Koran brainwashing now want to safeguard more of the same by oil-power and institutions they would never themselves have developed/allowed!

* A political and militaristic (terrorism on different levels) power with unlimited oil-resources and an agenda that combines anti-democratic/anti-human rights racism (pan-Arabism) with a racist/sexist and totalitarian (Koran/infidel etc) system proposing itself as "the only way"! What could possibly be more fascist?

Sex segregated pan-Arabic Islam - which is itself based on disgusting racist/sexist infidel/non-believer contempt - is terryfied of being considered contemptuous and ridiculed!

The Swedish state Islamist clown Leif "Abd al Haqq Kielan" proposes that women shouldn't be allowed a social life outside home (see Klevius biography on this lost Swede - compare Klevius "lost Swede syndrome" Homo Filius Nullius). Zainah Anwar (Muslim feminist): "These Islamists believe in the total segregation of women and men and that women are best suited to remain behind the confines of the four walls of the house..."

Klevius comment: But Zainah Anwar is a also a girl/woman betrayor herself because she desperately (and in vain) wants to "interpret" pan-Arabic Islamofascism in a way that feels healthy, although the only real option is to abandon Islamofascism! Feminist sisters in Islam, for example, use to refer to "the ethical vision ofIslam" in Sura 33:. But the problem is that this sura also happens to contain Islam's evil, racist, fascist and totalitarian heart, namely the deepest contempt for "disbelievers", i.e. for those who don't surrender to the pan-Arabic Allah/Islam! Islam considers Jews and Christians as either bad or, in the best case and pragmatically, as useful allies who are, in fact, wrong-labeled Muslims. Islam considers all those who don't at all belong to "the people of the book" as "infidels". And being non-religious is, according to Islam, not even human. So here we have the ultimate quest to be discussed. Islam's problem with people who don't submit to it! Hanna Arendt called views like this totalitarian.

Before "talking", ask Islam's imams abt bin Laden, girls/women, homosexuals, "infidels" etc.

Tuesday, February 14, 2006

From the darkest corners of the West: profs Annica Dahlström & Lawrence D Summers preaching confused 19th century sexism

According to essentialist feminists Swedish brain researcher Annica Dahlström & Harvard University President Lawrence H. Summers, men's and women's brains are different because of differencies in brains due to exposure to testosterone. Klevius comment: Well, da...! Most males also have bigger penises and smaller breasts than most females! And...?!

From Freud to bin Laden

The simple fact is that a sex-line doesn't work other than as a political (or "religiopolitical") tool. And when/if applied this has/will tie up/confine those holy negative human rights that Klevius sites & blogs are all abt, and which, in this particular area, are called sex segregation.

However, although official Sweden disagrees with these morons, their own feminist agenda is about the same but aligned for state monopoly and the world's most expensive public sector (see Angels of Antichrist - social state vs kinship) and the Swedish girl problem. This also explains why Sweden has the highest rape figures, why Swedish girls are the least educated in natural science and math, and why Sweden is a heaven for sexist Islamofascism.

Monday, February 13, 2006

"the wimps of a fanatic and schizophrenic bloodthirsty madman of Arabia"

A former Muslim on Amazon.com:"Warraq explains eloquently how through Islam, many civilized nations lost their identity, their dignity and humanity to bow in front of a savage god of a bunch of uncultured Arabs and follow the wimps of a fanatic and schizophrenic bloodthirsty madman of Arabia. Islam is the enemy of science, of freethinking, of reason and of human rights" Klevius comment: But the real culprit is Islam and its sex segregation and rapetivism.

Saturday, February 11, 2006

Islam's Western patriarch, Tarik Ramadan, the "moderate" Islamic crypto-fundamentalist vs women's rights

The world's foremost anti-fascist heroine Ayaan Hirsi Ali: ...termed it necessary and important to criticise Islam and the teaching of Mohammed. "I think that the Prophet was wrong to have placed himself and his ideas above critical thoughts, (...) to have subordinated women to men, (...) to have decreed that gays be murdered (...), to have said that apostates must be killed (...) and that adulterers should be (...) stoned and the hands of thieves should be cut off."

Interview in Spiegel, Feb 6, 2006: 'Everyone Is Afraid to Criticize Islam'

Stealthy Islamofascist Tarik Ramadan: ...does not approve of flirting, sex before (or outside) marriage, homosexuality, women’s contraception or divorce. He thinks that Muslim women should submit to their husbands if they are “good” Muslims. He believes that men must be financially responsible for the well-being of their family, and not women. In other words, Tariq Ramadan is opposed to or equivocal about feminism, women’s rights, gay rights and sexual liberation. One should also have strong doubts about his respect of the freedom of speech and thought: in Switzerland he contributed to a campaign against a Voltaire play, and he wants Muslim parents to control the content of State school programs according to “Islamic values”, to give only two examples. But that does not prevent him from constantly using the key words of today’s public relations industry: “respect”, “tolerance”, “communication” and “dialogue” in the manner of a cynical politician

Klevius (the "critical European") comment: No one has answered the puzzling quest abt European fascism & its true roots. Neither will I, but we certainly have to be aware of the creepy fact that the causes may still be at large, just awaiting for the right parameters, e.g. an ideology based on fear, miltarism, expansionism and a totalitarian view on its state, i.e. the worldwideUmma.

Is Islam the worst crime ever against humanity?
It should certainly be considered a crime to "teach" kids abt Islam and Mohammed without also telling the gruesome historical facts abt these phenomenons!

Also compare: Indonesian Muslim crypto-creationist "scientist" steals and destroys uncomfortable remains not in line with Islam

Klevius definition of religion (usually top-rated on MSN)
Klevius definition of feminism & sex segregation (usually top-rated on MSN)

If Islamofascist Saudi Arabia, (aided by crypto-terror organizations like GAAC al-Jazeera etc) is the heartland of Islam, then what are one billion "Muslims" - cards in the falling house?! !

By the way, why are the news filled with Mideast? A tiny fraction of the world's 6,6 billion inhabitants?! Oil-propaganda or what?!

Friday, February 10, 2006

Sweden aids pan-Arabic Islamofascism while Al-Jazeera, Radio Islam etc desecrators are blinked! Are Rushdie's Satanic Verses in Swedish libraries next

Sweden's foreign minister (Laila Freiwalds) shuts a registered, political party's (Sverigedemokraterna) website "because Islamists might get offended" because of some caricatures. Klevius comment: Compare how cowardice and greedy Sweden bowed for Hitler's Nationalsocialists (transits for the Nazi army, extradition of innocent Jews etc to German gas-chambers, silencing of anti-Nazi voices etc etc). And compare how Swedish website Radio Islam is allowed to spit utmost hatred and Holocaust denial against Jews without Freiwalds or anyone else in the Swedish government or judicial system bothering! Jews are, after all, a minority whereas Muslims are a majority, is the obvious reasoning.

Tuesday, February 07, 2006

Heroic Ayaan Hirsi Ali, the world's foremost anti-fascist & defender of girls'/women's rights, in Spiegel interview

Thomas Mann: "Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil"
Peter Klevius: "There's something creepy abt a minority that claims one billion members joining under a racist/sexist totalitarian pan-Arabic ideology that has survived only because of open or hidden rapetivism, slavery, violence and threats, and which now sponges on the world's oil-dependency, hatred, ignorance, fanatism and human rights"

By the way, should Salman Rushdie's Satanic Verses now be removed from thousands of Western libraries, universities etc?! Did you hear it Hizbollah? Why don't you tell everyone about this via your Islamic terrorist tv-channels etc! And why not immediately threaten the West, with violence and boycotts, to adopt Sharia, bow towards the homeland of Islamofacism etc?

Updates: Terror link to Muslim cartoon riots!

C. D. May: "At the same time, we have meekly accepted that there can be not a single church or synagogue on Saudi soil. We accept, too, that while Americans and Europeans may convert to Islam, in Saudi Arabia abandoning the faith is a crime punishable by death.
But, in the end, there is little that liberal Muslims can do. They don't have the oil money. They don't control the Middle East's mosques, media or governments. And they, too, can be intimidated by the threat of violence." Klevius comment: Precisely! And the inevitable logic would be to abandon Islam, put it in quarantine and possibly even criminlize this infested (from scratch - see What's true Islam?) ideology!

Is Islam's turban getting too narrow for the pressure for freedom inside?
And who is this elusive and sensitive mr Islam anyway?!

Klevius comment: Please, follow the Islamists' advice and remove all depictions of the historical Mohammed (incl those in US courts etc). What we know so far abt the historical Mohammed certainly doesn't give reason for depictions. Furthermore, I'm not a Christian but as I see it Jesus, as a possible historical person/s just like Mohammed, cannot be protected from scrutinity just because they also exist in individuals minds as perceptions of a "model for human perfection". And the same applies to Christianity and Islam. And by the way, isn't an Islamic suicide-bomber often said to be a "model for human perfection" and therefore rewarded in paradise?

When the Christian house of cards eventually fell in the 19th century Europe it was precisely because of scrutinity and criticism! As a consequence European universities are now filled with lectures ridiculing what is considered stupid Christian bourgeois ideals and ideas abt "human perfection". Neither back then nor now has anyone cared abt the "feelings" of the deeply Christian and ignorant part of population that was slow to adopt the new "world order".

The "good muslim" racism

Although it's always worrying when individuals/groups consider themseleves better than others, Islam sponges on precisely this racism.

To protect Islam and Mohammed from scrutinity and criticism is to protect bin Laden's gang & oil-dictator Abullah & Co as well as to unnecessarily prolong suffering under a dogma!

Those who complain abt security measures against Islam and due lack of freedom, should keep in mind that Islam itself would mean substantially more of the same. And precisely as Islam in general hinders true meeting with non-Muslims, Islam also hinders/prolonges the inevitable process of globalization of freedom and democracy! And self-appointed "third world representatives" do their utmost to encourage racism, hatred and conspiracy theories combined with theoretical frameworks that seem far more accurate if applied to pan-Arabic Islam.

Time to loosen up and abandon Islam altogether? No one knows what Islam really stands for and who's in charge. No wonder, Islam is nothing but a (dangerous) tool for pan-Arabism and oil-imperialism spread by Abdullah & Co by using whatever means, incl. confused youth and lunatics. A culture that has little to offer the world. And those poor "anti-Westerners" who uncritically submit to these oil-billionaires' fanaticism, just worsen it not only for themselves but also for everyone else. And in the "West" greedy politicians etc continue to prolonge the suffering under Islamofascism. The recent "escape" of some 23 Muslim al-Qaida terrorists from a Yemeni prison came handy, didn't it?! Pan-Arabic Islam uses all channels to boost itself, while politicians' and companies' greediness and naivity pave the way. Everyone who now, in this crucial moment, bows for pan-Arabic Islamofascism, should be made responsible and later charged for it!

Historically Islam has been a non-developer, so if anything, "third world" should try to avoid it.

Islam is essentially a labeling tool for conquest by (infidel)hatred, sex segregation and pan-Arabism. And many (?) ordinary Muslims secretely or openly support terrorism just because of misdirected pride etc.

Iran is now preparing for a contest on Holocaust caricatures aimed "to test West's freedom of expression". Strange logic, though!

A question. We have growing political & financial Islam etc forms of secularization, so isn't it time now for a slight de-holying of other parts of Islam as well, for a better fit to the rest of the world! That transformation would benefit everyone exept pan-Arabic fundamentalists, wouldn't it! OK, just kidding. Of course Islam's heritage makes it impossible in a non-fascist and de-sex segregated world (other than as some superficial sort of mirage, fashion and/or a purely private "religion")

SORRY, I forgot the self-evident. As usual, and as during the Nazi era, Sweden's politicians and "economic interests" + usual Swedish cowardice now abandon its "friends" when fascism attacks. And if this wasn't enough some (leftist) politicians use the opportunity to tell the Danes they have elected the "wrong" politicians! also see the Swedish/Iranian bio-terror connection! And what abt EU:s stance on Islamofascim?

Islam has deeply insulted and desecrated my holiest belief (in negative human rights) because of its totalitarian, (infidel/non-Muslim/non-religious) racist and sexist, anti-democratic objectives
Although I left church the very first year I had the right to do so, I have had no problem with churhes as buildilngs because they are now totally harmless. But mosques may be far from harmless...

Any special defense/protection of pan-Arabic Islam (as a "religion") will only benefit Islam as fascism, racism & sexism! IS 1400 YEARS OF PAN-ARABIC ISLAM THE WORST CRIME EVER AGAINST HUMANITY?

Are Muslims hijacked by pan-Arabic oil-Islam?

PS. Super heroine Ayaan Hirsi Ali is, of course, declared a paria in Swedish state media, what else!

Monday, February 06, 2006

NMJ on Mohammed Cartoon: "one of the most aggressive demon-possessed mortals who ever breathed"

Klevius comment: Democracy & rights are based on the individual - Islam's "grouping"!

Saturday, February 04, 2006

Two faces of Islam: a pan-Arabic Muslim oil-dictator (king Abdullah) & a Swedish non-Muslim "expert" (Jan Hjärpe)

Whose picture of Islam is distorted?

Two faces that encourage confused, violent racist/sexist young fascist Islamic lunatics who don't know anything abt the historical Mohammed but love him "more than mother"!

Swedish Expresssen: Paradise of hypocrites!

Swedish terror expert Magnus Norell: Poor those Muslims who are represented by Saudi Arabic wahhabism (king Abdullah), Palestinian troublemakers", and Swedish "Islam expert" professor Jan Hjärpe who said that "poor Muslims" may vomit if "hurt"! (Klevius comment: The falling Islamic house of cards may
be even more hurt)
...and a third, and perhaps the worst (he hasn't "noticed any fundamentalist youth in the mosques") in between... another Swedish state "expert", hypocrite & real misogynist top-imam Leif Karlsson, alias abd al-Haqq Kielan)

(link to the pic on the left & Swedish interview with Leif Karlsson made by Marie Eriksson)

Klevius (non-religious) comment: Creeping, violent, totalitarian pan-Arabic Islamism takes every opportunity for advancement.

It's precisely this oil power connection ( + a general detachment of confused, primitive violent macho youngsters + some girls, trapped in deep sex segregation) combined with naive and/or greedy non-Muslim Islam-supporters, that constitutes the real power of Islam today. Originally Islam spread via the trading of slaves, slave-soldiers and Sharia rapetivism (rapes, institutionalized rapes - see pan-Arabic veil-trap - and a rigid sex segregation aimed for to confine conquered girls/women as upbringers of "pure Muslims").

Are Muslims hijacked by Islam and is it time for Islam to really face its founder/s?

Why is pan-Arabic Islam called a "civilization"?! Also see Shinto civilization (the world's oldest religion) meets Islam (the world's youngest "religion" or rather perhaps the oldest fascism).

Is 1400 years of Islam the worst crime ever against humanity?

Klevius definition of religion, negative human rights, and sex segregation toprated on MSN!

Friday, February 03, 2006

Muslim insults, hatered & hypocrisy: Continuing Holocaust deniel and racism without any reaction from Swedish authorities, media etc!?

Muslim Internet Bigotry, Extremism and Violence

Also see what Wikipedia says abt Swedish Radio Islam!
Muslims have insulted, not only Jews but the "infidel West" ever since they arrived! So why so upset now. May we assume some uncertainty abt the foundation and purpose of the pan-Arabic/Islamic house of cards?!

Why did the Danish minister talk abt Arabs? We don't talk abt Englishmen, do we! Well, because Islam IS pan-Arabism, no matter that many "Arabs" don't even understand other "Arabs" talking! (also see What's true Islam/Who's an Arab?)

But the most eager Islam defenders are the detached & sex segregated violent youngsters who "love the prophet more than their parents"! Why? Maybe they need an excuse for violence, rapetivism etc? Or...!

"Moderate" Muslims: Real true Islam IS extremism. This is repeatedly proved when "moderate" Muslims warn the West that if the West don't do as we want them to then comes the extremists and punish you!

Toprated on MSN: Klevius definition of religion, Klevius definition of sex segregation & feminism, Klevius definition of negative human rights.