Peter Klevius UK election analysis: UK's one-party rule continues under an other name - yet with only a tiny fraction of the people supporting its policy.
"British" election "democracy" is a laughing stock as far from the will* of the people you can get. * The party whip crashes some half of the main wishes of its voters. This is why meritocracy widely outperforms "one-party democracy". This short talk from 2013 eerily holds even more today - yet doesn't address the main problem, i.e. how the dollar thieve (1971-) US desperation now hurts the West and the rest precisely because of China's meritocratic success! Labour got 33.9% of active voters but got 411 seats out of 650. The combined national vote for the Labour and Conservative parties was 57.6%. The Conservatives took 23.6% of the active voters and won 121 seats. Number of overall votes: 6,755,953. 14.3% of active voters gave only 5 seats for Reform. 12.2% gave 72 seats to Liberal party 66% of voters didn't support Labour. The lower overall turnout means that despite increasing Labour's vote share, the party secured just 9,686,329 ov...