Peter Klevius on Origin of Mosques - and Sex Trapped Princesses

 China is "a development miracle to be shared with the world" - but US/UK constitute the very extreme opposite!   Origin of Sinophobia: The 19th century Opium Wars were triggered by UK's imposition of the opium trade upon China. Lord Palmerston regarded the Chinese as uncivilized and suggested that the British must attack China to show up their superiority as well as to demonstrate what a "civilized" nation could do. The resulting concession of Hong Kong compromised China's territorial sovereignty. The appalling US/UK imperialism and colonialism is also the background to US dangerous contemporary meddling around China.     UN Resident Coordinator in China Siddharth Chatterjee, 20 March 2021: What can African countries learn from China’s success in lifting millions out of poverty? UN Resident Coordinator in China Siddharth Chatterjee, formerly the Resident Coordinator in Kenya, considers how China’s admirable rise can provide valuable lessons for ...

 While BBC wants girls to waste their PE time by "playing" boring and mostly still standing cricket, Peter Klevius suggests continuously moving football that teaches spatio-motoric skills and understanding as well as strategical thinking.    Drawing by Peter Klevius (1979) Memorizing how English feminists* put a ban on women playing football 1921.  A feminist female phycisian at Harley street was the "expert" who told FA that footbal was no good for women. Read more in Peter Klevius book Born to Play a Sport of Nature which will be published shortly because of this anniversary. It's a thorough research project that tells the untold history about women's football in England and Sweden.   Peter Klevius wrote: Tuesday, February 06, 2018 Klevius: Face it, Wikipedia, BBC etc. fake media - Finland was first in the world with full suffrage! BBC's deeply bigoted and hypocritical* muslim sharia presenter Mishal Hu...

* You can be sure "islamophobe" Peter Klevius would never be awarded a UK knighthood. How come that when BBC barely opens its mouth without talkimg abot skin color, a well meaning person in the royal house doing the same is declared a "racist". Meghan brought "falsehood" against the royal family by saying (when Harry wasn't even there yet with her and the interviewer) that some royal(s?) was "racist" by asking if the child's skin would be darker than white. Peter Klevius analysis : There's no way anyone in the royal house would say something like that but highly likely that it was an expression of hope for visible "diversity" among the royals. Yes, it was clumsy in these PC/woke times but not racist. Meghan also wanted Archie to be a prince against a 100 year old rule and convention just because he's "mixed race", i.e. his skin color would make it "racist" not to do so. Meghan also complained about no...

Heterosexual attraction* is the only analytical tool possible to understand sex segregation and sexism - yet no one except Peter Klevius seems to talk about it (sad, isn't it).  * Peter Klevius, the foremost expert on sex segregation (sad isn't itÅ: Why is the most important subject, i.e. heterosexual attraction, avoided in sex education? Even a centenary woman who has never been with a man and who happens to have lost every possible female curvature in her body is still imprisoned by the cultural effects (sex segregation) of biological heterosexual attraction (the "patriarchal male gaze" in feminist mythology - but the basis of heterosexual reproduction in evolutionary biology). To analyze the relationship between the sexes only heterosexual attraction (HSA) fulfills the measure. Pregancy, delivery, suckling etc. has no defining bearing for such an analysis of relationship. Part of the answer is that women are complicite in using heterosexual attraction...