Posts

Showing posts from October, 2019

Peter Klevius wonders what Petra Kelly would have thought about Theresa May and Brexit militarism?

Image
NATO now bombs Kurds with chemical weapons - much like the socialist muslim dictator Saddam Hussein used to do 1988. Time for history and thoughts. Petra Kelly founded the world's first Green Party 1979 - sadly the party then left her and ended up with fascists. In 1982, Petra Kelly was awarded the Right Livelihood Award for "forging and implementing a new vision uniting ecological concerns with disarmament, social justice and human rights." Kelly wrote the book Fighting for Hope in 1984. The book is an urgent call for a world free from violence between North and South, men and women, ourselves and our environment. Same year Peter Klevius wrote The Green Dilemma in which he warned for it getting lost through political infiltration. 1983, Erich Honecker, the leader of GDR, met Petra Kelly. She demanded the release of all prisoners of the East German peace movement and asked him why he repressed something in the GDR which he supported in the West. ...

Who stole Peter Klevius "white privilieges"?

Image
And who locked him up in a racist prison because of the color of his skin? And why does his penis make him less worthy than white women, especially considering he has fought more for women's basic Human Rights than most women? Peter Klevius suggests - as he has always done since his teens - criminalization of all racist/sexist separatism (incl. sex segregation/apartheid*) - in accordance with the most basic (negative) Human Rights. And for those who out of ignorance don't understand it, or out of willfullness deliberately "misunderstand" it - just think about allowing certain, e.g. religious groups, to drive against red, instead of a traffic system where the rules apply equally to all (no dude, it's not about what vehicle you drive or how you walk etc.).  Why are "whites" banned from separating themselves from groups who separate themselves from "whites"? And as it stands now, "whites" are the only ones who in t...

After having watched Portugal-England women's football Peter Klevius recommends Klopp as coach!

Image
The secret of Liverpool FC's success is a German (Jurgen Klopp) and his extreme focusing on passing - exactly what Portugal's women need. England was lousy as well but got a self goal from Portugal's goalspoiler. However, when Peter Klevius saw the senseless passing misses he realized that the Portugese players hadn't at all been coached and trained correctly about how to pass the ball. With the Portugese women's coach Liverpool would no longer be in Premier league. Btw, unlike many others, Peter Klevius has no problem with women being on average less physically strong than men - nor with men who are less fit or less strong than him. Nor has he a problem with the fact that women usually have less training time and often have to play on inferior pitches and therefore can't perform as well as their potential. However, teaching the theory behind passing strategies and how to calculate player movements before passing as well as how to position oneself as a ...

Human Rights Atheist Peter Klevius and Maoist Marxist Atheist Carl-Olof Selenius: A telling historical background to a divided world.

Image
This completely unedited dialogue between Peter Klevius and his psychoanalysis defending friend (before Klevius turned "islamophobe") Carl-Olof Selenius, constituted the first step of Peter Klevius' (and the world's) first ever AI adapted theory on "consciousness", later presented in Demand for Resources ( Resursbegär , Klevius 1992, ISBN 9173288411) and in a letter to Francis Crick 1994, and on the web 2004 (the s.c. EMAH theory https://scienceklevius.blogspot.com/2... ). However, the evolutionary basis was already published in Hufvudstadsbladet (Resursbegär, 1981 after encouragement from Georg Henrik von Wright (Wittgenstein’s own choice of successor at Cambridge). In the (Swedish) video above from 1990, Peter Klevius is critical of psychoanalysis although having no more insight in it at the time than average people. Later he went through all main Freud critics (incl. Ellenberger) but it didn’t change anything (see e.g. Peter Klevius thes...