Peter Klevius on Origin of Mosques - and Sex Trapped Princesses

If you consider/evaluate Peter Klevius as a selfish attention seeker, then you're certainly wrong about 'selfish' because according to Klevius there is no 'self'* only an origo. And if you just consider him as an "attention seeking blogger" then at least Klevius texts may work as a border, above which you can put your heroines and heroes above it. * see Klevius web museum (which hasn't been touched upon for more than a decade). Peter Klevius is a split personality (as we all are, albeit most perhaps to a more moderate extent) ancored on the bedrock of existence-centric uncertainty Klevius wrote about in his forst published article on the subject human demand for resources in 1981. In the 1980s, while Klevius worked as a radio reporter, he met a talented sound engineer with whom he "quarrelled" about sound properties etc. It ended up with Klevius, without any musical background or training, stupidly tried to do a couple of s...

Ultimate Sinophobia bigotry and hypocrisy – spying and meddling 5 Eyes instead of true 5G? Saudi hate spreading antennas (Salafi/Wahhabi mosques etc.) or Chinese world leading 5G tech? No one knows the amount of street etc. victims of Saudi hate because when the haters are muslims their attacks are not recorded as hate crimes. The real threat is the US led Saudi supporting spy organization 5 Eyes, which 1) tries to block superior tech, and 2) uses China as a scapegoat for US/UK privacy breaches. It's not China but US that wants to control you! So "securing 5G from Chinese influence" actually means giving US/UK a technical space for spying/influencing etc.  In short, trying to hinder US/UK customers from accessing the best technology while spying on them. This is just a tiny scratch from the visible top of the Chinese tech iceberg. As a consumer you want the best - and to consume in peace. If you tick those boxes you're already half Chine...

Indulgence (and funds from the islamofascist Saudi muslim custodians of islam) promotes islam's original evil. If you feel for the victims and want to stop islamofascism - vote against it! Why did BBC today try to hint it could have been "Buddhist terrorism" when every known fact pointed to muslim terrorism?! Moreover, why should wrong accusations of "Buddhist terrorism" be allowed when correct statements of muslim terrorism are condemned?! And why is it always someone else's fault when jihadi muslims riot or terrorize, whereas it's always the victims fault when they strike back?! Theresa May: The acts of violence against churches and hotels in Sri Lanka are truly appalling, and my deepest sympathies go out to all of those affected at this tragic time. We must stand together to make sure that no one should ever have to practise their faith in fear. 5,759 1:32 AM - Apr 21, 2019 Peter Klevius: As long as you cooperate with your danger...

BBC's shameful negligence to honestly report about Saudi based and steered OIC's scandalous sharia declaration against Human Rights is journalistic rock bottom. Moreover, how many people have suffered out of ignorance about true sharia islam? Klevius looks forward to a "Nuremberg" trial where BBC is one of the accused. Klevius wrote: Monday, May 21, 2012 Klevius beats BBC when it comes to true reporting about OIC! Totalitarian fanaticism replacing Human Rights while BBC misinforms muslims and others on how they're robbed of their Human Rights! Sadly, Klevius is still the foremost (and lone?!) expert on sex segregation/apartheid and, consequently, also the web's foremost expert on islam. Why? Because islam rests so heavily on sex segregation/apartheid , even in its most "secular" form (as long as it's meaningful at all to call it islam) that an effort to understand islam without understanding sex segregation/apartheid ...

This sadly ignorant and deeply religious right wing Brextremist, Jacob Rees-Mogg, thinks it's "bad practice to have a second referendum before delivering on the first". How come that a right wing extremist like Jacob Rees-Mogg today on BBC warns for UKIP and Robinson while he himself is a big fan of supporting the war crimes committing and islamist terror spreading, murderous and Human Rightsphobic islamofascist Saudi dictator family and its sharia spreading organnization OIC? Klevius: Is his ignorance due to UK lacking a proper, civilized constitution? However, nowhere in the civilized world could a referendum with simple majority (and in the case of UK only in two of its four parts) be enough for a major decision. Beggars belief! Klevius moral tutorial for Jacob Rees-Mogg and others equally ignorant (hopefully, because the other alternative ain't pretty) about Human Rights: Atheism is the only road to becoming universally Human. Whereas ...