Peter Klevius on Origin of Mosques - and Sex Trapped Princesses

Canadian John Peters Humphrey, the last prophet of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, must be turning in his grave. All sane non-muslims and hopefully most "cultural muslims", agree that Universal Human Rights equality is the only sane choice there exists. Yet, because of the war crimes and muslim terror spreading islamofascist Saudi dictator family's status as "an important weaponry buying ally" (for oil money they have done absolutely nothing to deserve), Human Rights defenders are smeared as "islamophobes". And the most absurd about this is BBC's etc. constant faking of "islamophobia" as something "extremist", "right wing",  "Nazism" etc. although the absolute majority of "islamophobes" are just decent people who happen to have some moral backbone left. Klevius wrote: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 Hello Eric Schmidt! Is Google's censor policy steered by anti Huma...

Klevius advise to EU: The islamofascist Saudi dictator family, the "custodian of islam", uses islam for its own hegemonic aims - incl. war crimes and spread of terror and Human Rights violating sharia. This poses a threat to EU - as does UK's close and secret ties to it and its muslim Fuhrer, "the world's most dangerous man", Mohammad Salman. The "custodians of islam", the muslim dictator family in Saudi Arabia, is obviously the worst security risk in the world today. So isn't Theresa May's "security offer" to EU plain absurd? Would Theresa May have supported the Nazis if the Nazis had been supported by the US and offered lucrative weapons deals for UK? UK supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family's war crimes in Yemen. It's a true perversion of everything decent when the islamofascist Saudi dictator family asks EU to criminalize "islamophobia", i.e. what in practice is ...

Muslim women say they need to cover their bodies. Klevius wonders why? Is it because islam creates male necrophiliacs? Drawing from 1979 by Peter Klevius. Heterosexual attraction (the "male gaze") constitutes no problem whatsoever as long as it's not connected to sex segregation/apartheid. Men have no problem understanding that body shape has nothing at all to do with the human being. A man can "objectify" the woman's body while 100% respecting the person that possesses that body. However, sex segregation makes a woman "the other" and therefore also makes it easier to include the human person in this objectifying. Many women have deliberately "up-skirted" for Klevius. However, when Klevius sees something similar that isn't intentional, he can't find anything sexy or erotic in it, whatsoever. Why? Because Klevius can't see the difference between this and necrophilia. Educate yourself about heterosexual att...