Peter Klevius on Origin of Mosques - and Sex Trapped Princesses

* Today's real fascists are those who haven't understood why fascism in the past was so widespread among politicians and ordinary people. Rational politics needs to be anchored in rational Human Rights freedom, not in irrational sharia "belief" impositions. And who needs irrational politics anyway? Nor can we accept a class society based on "beliefs". When Klevius 16-year old daughter was finishing her university degree and went for a SAT test and due application for Stanford, Klevius tried to warn her that although her age might be seen positively, her fair skin might not be an asset because of "affirmative" actions etc. PC. However, what is much more important is that the quality of Stanford's teachings has dropped dramatically during the last decades. Here's just one example: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Religion and Political Theory First published Thu Oct 2, 2008; substantive revision Thu Jan 15, 2015 ...

The "Brits" can't be that dumb (or?!) that they didn't understand that after many decades of religious terror and the "good Friday" agreement, UK's border on Ireland was hidden under the EU super set, but became immediately visible with Brexit. Blaming this on EU is just spurious (e.g. "we can't let EU split our country"). Klevius supports no border on Ireland. Follow the will of the people, i.e. let England (who voted leave) leave and let Scotland and Northern Ireland (who vote remain) stay. UK is an unconstitutional mess which now wants to leave EU without controlling its border to EU. A proper constitution would have demanded qualified majority in two consecutive elections/votes about such a crucial matter as Brexit - and being aware what the vote is about. The root of the problem is England's mad man Henry 8's colonialization of Ireland and lack of constitution. The preposterous "British...

It was wrong and cowardice by the  European Court of Human Rights to (in practice) agitate* for more Human Rightsphobia among muslims. And the reason is what Klevius calls the "Mishal Husain-syndrome"**. * ECHR hid behind "margin of appreciation" (see below) and utilized some less elegant patterns of speech by Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, hence again blinking the clear connection between islamic teachings and muslim assaults on "infidels" and Human Rights. Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff could have got away with calling Mohammad (not to be confused with Mohammad Salman) a pedophile by just saying it in a slightly different way (see ECHR verdict below). So in short, ECHR hid behind multiple barriers: 1) margin of appreciation 2) utilizing clumpsy wording by the accused 3) utilizing a diffuse "the rights of muslims (which muslims? not Mishal Husain I gather - Mohammad Salman?!) to have their religious feelings protected". Moreover, the ...

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.