Peter Klevius on Origin of Mosques - and Sex Trapped Princesses

* Just ask a racist Polishphobic "Brit" if s/he would dare to be equally critical to muslims.  ** Is it because of her close ties to the islamofascist Saudi dictator family that she knowingly accepts and supports sharia islamofascism in England - and therefore plays the race card against non-muslim EU residents (e.g. Polishphobia) in England? How does Mrs May's, BBC's etc. extreme nationalist rhetoric (e.g. deliberately conflating 'immigrants' with EU 'residents' in England while simultaneously emphasizing "Britishness" and "our laws" and "our country") differ from e.g. BNP?  And isn't it enough that EU residents can't vote about their own status while non-EU residents in England (mostly muslims) are allowed to vote - now she wants to rob them of their last resort to protect themselves against racist "British legislation" by denying them the protection from the European Court of Justice? ...

Mrs May hates Human Rights because they stand in the way of Saudi islamofascism and sharia. Will EU residents in the future be ruled by sharia rather than Human Rights? By getting rid of European Court of Justice (ECJ) she can rob EU residents of more rights than any other group of people in England. Not surprising keeping in mind that London is a muslim city steered by a muslim mayor notorious for defending islamofascists, and that Theresa May is totally under the foot of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.   This is why Mrs May used to be so keen on getting rid of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) - which has ruled (2002) that islamic sharia is against Human Rights - that she (together with Cameron) used fringe exeples out of context to make the people in England believe Human Rights was something bad (compare e.g. that she blamed ECHR for not deporting Abu Qatada etc.). But not a word about the dangers of sharia that Human Rights could protect ...

* You can't find anything earlier than Klevius on this topic - no matter were you search! It's original research and it fulfills the criterion of fitting in the gaps that existing research has failed to explain. When in 1994 Klevius tried to publish the text in scientific AI magazines, one rejected it as 'too philosophical' for their type of magazine and the other as 'too empirical'! Moreover, wherever Klevius has presented the theory he has always asked receivers to comment, question or challenge it. No one, except for one of Klevius sons (who argues that a fruit fly has "consciousness" as well), has done it so far. ** Just consider how many animals could have been saved from suffering and death by directing research in accordance with Klevius theory, hence avoiding a lot of unnecessary dead ends.  So why is Klevius bragging - or is he?  Answer: In the service of better science. Why/how? Dichotomies created out of pre-established...

What is islam - and who is a muslim? Klevius suggests letting all "islamophobes" (incl. "muslim" ones)  out of the closet. Merkel's flirt with Erdogan pushed England (not UK) over the Brexit cliff - May's flirt with the islamofascist Saudi "guardians of islam" lands it in a sharia swamp. England committed a violation of fairness and legality when not allowing EU residents to vote about their own future - while allowing residents from non-EU nations to do so. It would have been easy to include EU residents in this particular election. Klevius advise to UKIP - independence for all parts of UK: There's a huge demand for a new party. With just a slight altering UKIP could really be what its name stands for. Anne Marie Waters islam criticism can give UKIP more votes than ever. The number of hiding "islamophobes" coming out in the voting boot would guarantee it. And if UKIP takes care of EU residents' full rights...

Why have "out-of-Africa" propagandists like Pääbo & Co been so silent* these last years?! Because the Denisovan in Siberia refutes out of Africa - as analyzed by Klevius 1992 (Jinniushan), 2004 (H. floresiensis), 2008 (Denisova bracelet), 2010 (Densiovan DNA). * Klevius thinks there may well be loads of aDNA material available but not published because of unnecessary "sensitivities" and "political correctness" - and perhaps also some personal bias among key figures - not to mention the views of important sponsors. The Denisova bracelet which Klevius has used as a main evidence since 2008 that truly intelligent humans first appeared in Asia, is now considered to be as old as 65-70,000 bp. This together with already known genetic tracks not only weakens an out of Africa scenario but makes it completely impossible. This is how Klevius responded to Stringer in 2014: Sunday, October 12, 2014 No, dear Chris Stringer*, Sulawesi cave ...