Peter Klevius on Origin of Mosques - and Sex Trapped Princesses

Click here for the video In islam a woman is never fully human - except for when it comes to punishment! Klevius wrote: Friday, February 05, 2016 If the definition of evil is to be deliberately/ideologically against the most basic Human Rights then all true sharia (e.g. OIC) muslims are evil. Klevius: Nothing could be more self evident and easier to agree on from a moral point of view than that all humans should have equal Human Rights. Except for muslims of course, whose sharia ideology stays in the way for such a civilized moral stance! Or perhaps not "stays in the way" but rather encourages racist hatred and sexism. Is this moron, who seems to hate* a true black African heroine, the next US president?! *  Ayaan Hirsi Ali is the world's foremost female "islamophobe" and Hillary wants to make her a criminal for criticizing Saudi islamofascism. Hillary Clinton:  “I think Sharia Law will be a powerful new direct...

How 1.6 Billion "muslims" are used as a single tool to feed the Saudi "guardians of islam". The "close ally" the Saudi dictator family's spread of religious hatred can convincingly be traced to the muslim terrorist attacks in France and Belgium because Belgium from which they departed, in 1974, a year after the oil crisis, bowed the Saudi dictator family's demand to "respect" and "tolerate" islamofascism. However, long before that occasion the Saudi dictator family has, as with so many other countries, thoroughly tied up a disastrous islamofascist relationship with Belgium "based on mutual respect and common interests and non-interference in the internal affairs of each other". In other wordds tolerating islamofascism. Belgian Embassy in Jeddah (where OIC's Human Rights violating sharia headquarter recides) opened in 1954 at a level of chargé d' affaires. The first ambassador of Belgium ...

The Dragon of Evil, Tolkien, and Moomin Mum   The Dragon of Evil in the Tolkien calendar by Tove Jansson Everyone (except islamist muslims) seem to agree that islamism is evil. However, many, especially politicians and muslims, claim that islam is "a great and peaceful religion". From this we may conclude that islamism contains both islam and evil in an inseparable connection which poses the question how islam could possibly be without evil. Even more so when considering that the original spread of islam during more than hundred years (before it settled as sultanates simply sponging on slave business - the so called "golden age") was completely based on evil religiously "justified" robbery, slaughtering, raping and enslavement of the "infidels". Islam's problem is it foundation in evil medieval parasitism that it has now brought to the modern society. The twisted logic that evil islam should be blinked as "islamism...

* Muslim Sharia Council of Britain of course omits the sharia word from its name in public. However, it's equally certain that they support basic Human Rights violating racist/sexist islamic sharia as it is that the Sun will rise tomorrow. And Theresa May should be aware of this undeniable fact. Klevius:  What about hateful muslims? Do they exist - and do they divide? The politically correct answer is that since islam is good then there can't be evil muslims. However, what if islam is exactly as evil as it itself says in the Koran, the Hadiths, and the actions of its attacking and slaughtering "prophet" Muhammad who stays as the raw model for all muslims? Theresa May says the spying on "extremist muslims" (i.e. muslims inspired by the original so called Medina muslims*) works fine within muslim communities. * I.e. the very same ideology that UK's "best ally in the muslim world", the Saudi dictator family, distributes wi...

Muhammad's and islam's eternal evil blinked - why?! Why is every muslim terrorist attack rooted in the ideology of islam immediately followed by a desperate defense of - islam?! BBC's tactics after every muslim terrorist attack is to cover it in random interviews with people instead of focusing on the root problem. And so called "security experts across the political spectrum" harshly criticized Trump’s statements about islam and muslims. However, Klevius wonders how one could possibly even be called an expert if one delivers one's "expertise" on a platform as logically unstable as the one that wraps islam and muslims together in one package and calls the blood sipping out of the package "radical" or "not belonging to islam" or "are you a racist?". Michael Chertoff, who was the secretary of homeland security in the George W. Bush administration: "If you look historically back at people who car...

So called ISIS, i.e. Islamic State, is closer to original islam than most other muslim organizations. However, Saudi based and steered OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia declaration in UN represent a much more deceptive global islamic threat to civilized people. It wasn't only during the alleged Muhammad's time that islam and muslims represented pure evil (from whatever - except perhaps islamic - standpoint you look at it). This kind of evil has always been tied to islamic ideology. So no surprise that muslims behaved as their "prophet" did more than 100 years earlier. So why shouldn't this same original sin of islam be present today? Only a bigoted hypocrite can deny this. BBC is eagerly defending islamofascism in most forms. However, sometimes you really get the feeling that their presenters actually believe in what they say. Such naivety may be exemplified by Melvyn Bragg's stance on original islam. Listen here to his pathetic...