Peter Klevius on Origin of Mosques - and Sex Trapped Princesses

 . What's the difference between Nazism and islam? Islam is worse - both in ideology (see below) and in the amount of its victims! Is it the islamization of Germany that has caused the (relative) quality drop of Nazi cars such as VW and Audi since the 1930s?  Compared to islam's parasitism ideology, it seems the National Socialist German Workers' Party (aka "Nazi") was way more industrially effective.   This shouldn't surprise anyone with the most superficial understanding of the origin of islam as a parasitic separatist movement which after colonizing land isolated themselves in lazy "garrisons" with their slaves from where they enjoyed the fruits (incl. girls/young women, artists, scientists etc) of the working and producing people they had subdued. If you don't understand the parasitic nature of the islamic ideology then you will never understand the Koran or islam. Nor will you understand why Malik much later created Muhammad a...

The problem with islam is that the problem is an "ally" called Saudi Arabia - the heartland of the spread of the worst religious fascism ever! Klevius proposal for peace in islamofascist Mideast: Islam is an Arabic "religion" and originally covered only what was back then the only Arab land, i.e. today's Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Southern part of Syria and the desert part of what is now the southern Iraqi borderland. Let the Saudi dictator family submit to the Islamic State. That would 1) distribute oil billions more evenly 2) better isolate the evil original islam from the civilized world than the Wahhabi-West hybrid Saudi dictator family which spreads street jihadism throughout the globe 3) then talk to and defend the rest of the surrounding Westernized muslim countries which by now would be equally eager as Assad to comply. Iran is just a pseudo islamic country due to it not being an Arab country. This is why its Ayatollahs have been so overl...

The most misleading and racism boosting journalism ever from Washington Post? When will Adam Taylor be cleaned out? Or is he already! The ignorant Adam Taylor (Washington Post) accuses "far-right Swedish Democrats" for Snoop Dog's lawful* arrest. First of all, it's Sverigedemokraterna meaning Sweden Democrats - not "Swedish Democrats" as Adam Taylor ignorantly puts it. Secondly, as Klevius wrote in his previous posting, Sweden Democrats who are now level with Sweden's biggest party the Social Democrats in polls (due to being Sweden's only islam critical political voice), has a political program which is better described as a conservative center-left sometimes hard to distinguish from much Social Democratic politics and would therefore not be a choice for Klevius was it not for its islam criticism. * According to the Swedish police Snoop Dog was "extremely polite and cooperative". In other words no signs of protests et...

Britain's "diversity" stuck in the uniformity of Saudi Arabian sand dunes? Whenever you hear the politically correct oxymoron "diversity" you can be sure that it can be traced directly to the least diverse place in the world, Saudi Arabia, the "custodian" of sharia islam and its idolatry of the most intolerant city in the world.  Why does Cameron seem to have such a problem using the word sharia when precisely this word could help him finding the code to "radicalization"? Calling oneself a true muslim automatically connects to sharia islam, the very opposite to Human Rights - e.g. as stated by all the world's muslims' Saudi based and UN sanctioned sharia organization OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation) and its islamofascist Fuhrer Iyad Madani, who belongs to the Saudi dictator family. A consequence of this is that a sharia supporting muslim's vote is undemocratic. OIC's 57 member state voting ...

Sweden's only party critical of islam, Sverigedemokraterna (Sweden Democrats), is the most publicly smeared party ever. Yet they now in July scored 23.3%  making them only 0.8% behind Sweden's biggest party the Socialdemocrats. As their politics differ only marginally in most questions except for islam, this is the only clue to their tremendous success. Klevius is against state socialism (i.e. the self interest of the social state - see Angels of Antichrist ) and would therefore check carefully before giving a vote for any social state friendly party. However, if a party is the only one against sharia islam, then Klevius would give it his vote anyway. The choice is extremely easy.  If you just dare to utter the evil word 'sharia' (e.g. OIC's), then the muslim problem is solved, PM Cameron? Because then you have finally found your real enemy and its position (Saudi Arabia/OIC). Private belief and thinking is ok as is its public expression - not its ...