Peter Klevius on Origin of Mosques - and Sex Trapped Princesses

Why can't the British PM utter the enemy's name (sharia islam) and the only true repellent (Human Rights)? Instead he talks about a 'perverted ideology' and 'British values'.   To be "perfectly clear" about David Cameron, pick some of the following news titles - or add your own: 1 David Cameron: The Islamic caliphate has nothing to do with islam! 2 David Cameron: Muslims do it (supporting Islamic State). 3 David Cameron is a crypto-"islamophobe". 4 David Cameron uses British muslims as scapegoats. 5 David Cameron: Muslims must repel Islamic State, sorry, Daesh, sorry, ISIL! (no words containing islam should be used, remember) Klevius: What is the connection between Cameron's 'some muslims' and the Islamic State, sorry, ISIL? If Islamic State has nothing to do with islam then why does David Cameron target British muslims?! More muslim doctors, police etc. inevitably means a higher risk of you me...

Why isn't PM David Cameron using the word 'Human Rights' when defending (or pretending?!) against islamic sharia supremacist racist hate crimes against his people?! Is this a slap in the face of the victims of islamic racist hate crime supremacism? Calling for the most basic of Human Rights, written down 1948 after the fall of National-socialism (aka Nazism) to protect human equality from supremacist racism and sexism, is the only constructive way of defeating the hateful racist/sexist supremacist ideology of sharia islam - yet the PM of the Brits doesn't even mention the word in his today BBC interview where he himself pondered about the root causes for the popularity of the Islamic State among muslims and how to counter islamic hate supremacism and Human Rightsphobia (of course he never used these important words either). He couldn't even utter the proper name of his enemy because it contained the word 'islamic'! Klevius would say the...

 The Negro Problem In the 1930's (near the time of the birth of the ultra racist black supremacist movement Nation of Islam) the Swedish socialist Gunnar Myrdal researched extensively (a couple of thousand pages) what he called US' "negro problem".  Today we know he was utterly wrong and that the problem has worsen despite every equality right possible and topped with extensive "affirmative actions". Maybe the core of the problem isn't the "whites" after all but to be searched among "black" segregationalists instead. Klevius wrote: Aftonbladet's serious hater This is how hateful and sleazy modern white collar fascism looks like: Was it hypocritical trolls like this who contributed to the Charlie Hebdo and Charleston murders? Klevius translation: The hate is always fully serious . Daniel Swedin: Perhaps it's easier to live with the thought that the bloodbath is a deed of a lonely mad b...

Ramadan, the months of jihad war in islam. "The great Battle of Badr" in 624 was the first "battle" between muslims and non-muslims and it was fought during Ramadan. Wife of muslim supremacist jihadist murderer in France: “We are normal muslims" Klevius: Indeed you are! That's the problem, when islam and being muslim is stretched all over the place - yet we all have to listen to "muslim sensitivities" within that very same wide spectrum! Do the muslim test by asking them if they are against Human Rights. If they are not then they are no real muslims, according to OIC (all muslims world Ummah). Why hasn't BBC fired their bigots? Are the Brits really ok with paying compulsory fees and taxes to support these senseless lies about islam?! They happily report about extremely rare occasions of "white supremacist hate crime"  while not even mentioning these word and 'muslim' when triggered by islam (yes, you're...

Klevius advice* to PM Cameron: When it comes to the problem with islam - the last person you should ask is a devout muslim. * Klevius is unsure about whether he can even find this most important web info or if it's already "filtered" out - perhaps by himself, who knows. By calling islam "peaceful" you encourage muslim supremacism. The aim of islamic hate jihad is to achieve submission, i.e. "peace". A much better option would be to defend basic Human Rights by rejecting sharia islam wherever it is to be seen. That would force your so called "moderate" muslims to Human Rights equality or, alternatively, isolate them as evil jihadis without the sanction of a general but extremely blurred islam that encompasses both them and Mishal Husain etc. "moderate" muslims. Human Rights violating sharia is the only defintion needed to det rid of evil islam. Sign Klevius petition to force Mishal Husain to take a clear stance a...

* Forgive Klevius for in the following ridiculing this annoying self-important von oben habit of BBC not to present news to the compulsory tax and license fee paying Brits but to use their position to extol themselves and to treat the listeners as they were completely excluded (e.g. by constantly addressing each other with forenames instead of talking to the paying listeners). This ivory tower snobbish navel gazing and self boasting is also visible in BBC's sports and documentaries where the presenter(s) places her/himself as a preposterous filter between the camera and what could have been shown to the viewers. Mishal, why don't you condemn sharia islam, especially the one by OIC, Mishal?! Mishal, it's based on Saudi islam, Mishal, and therefore essentially similar to the Islamic State's view on islam, Mishal? Michal, you grew up in the worst of islamofascist countries, namely oil rich Saudi Aarabia, whereas Ayaan grew up in the poorest (together with ...