UK's MI6 former chief Sir John Sawers: Muslims can't integrate and islam isn't 'well geared for modernization'. Klevius: Easily qualifies as an "islamophobe", doesn't he!

Islam is forever* locked in its original "infidel" hatred

* This is just the other side of the same muslim coin that says that we were all meant to be muslims and those who didn't became "infidel" prey for the "true" muslims. How can any civilized person take islam seriously?! It's a shame and tragic that we even have to defend ourselves against such an evil and hateful totalitarian ideology.

Mohammed Emwazi (aka Jihadi John) was from a well off muslim Arab immigrant family from Kuwait and studied at a London university filled with similar muslim scum bags and "diversity trained" supporting staff

There are more than a million muslim Islamic State supporters in UK (based on how many muslims supported the motives of the Charlie Hebdo murderers. And do note that it's all about motive when it comes to murder.

However, British security says there are only "thousands" like Jihadi John but will not chase them but rather protect their Human Rights.

Klevius: Who am I to question the experts. However, there are thousands of lesser criminals who are chased hard by the justice system - and with lesser Human Rights than muslim terrorists.

Sir John Sawers, former Chief of the Secret Intelligence Service (MI6): A terrorist atrocity was now certain to 'get through'.

Why are they radicalized?

Sir John Sawers (MI6): Two reasons. 1. Muslims are not integrated. Other religions are well integrated. 2. Islam in itself is not well geared to modernize itself to the 21th century. It must be done by leaders in the islamic world. It's got to come out of the islamic world. It isn't for us to solve this problem within the islamic tradition.

Klevius: It is done by muslim leaders and clerics in the "islamic world" and it is coming out of the "islamic world"! That's the problem!

Is this the future of the British?

"Diversity trained" and/or muslim UK police take care of British "islamophobe"

Narion Rodgers from Cornwall representing Pegida: Islam is the big problem.

BBC: She says they are not racist or fascist but that islam is the big problem. That's a contradiction!

In other words, BBC says being against islamic extremism equals fascism!

Charlie Hebdo staffer Laurent Leger told BFM-TV in 2012, "The aim is to laugh.... We want to laugh at the extremists — every extremist. They can be muslim, Jewish, Catholic. Everyone can be religious, but extremist thoughts and acts we cannot accept.

Jewish cartonist Bob Mankoff from NY who likes jokes about religion and hails Charlie Hebdo doesn't himself dare to make jokes about islam.

The perpetrators are muslims - not the slightest doubt about it! But had they been even remotely connected to an anti-islam movement X, no matter how benign and well referred and formulated, they would immediately have been called "right-wing X fascists".




BBC poll: 20% of British muslims say islam can never be British.

Klevius: And how many muslims think "British" can be sharia muslim?

Hateful racist/sexist muslims all over UK universities

Muslim Tarik Mahri, who reportedly had links to pro-Islamic state group Hizb ut-Tahrir, was elected student union president 2011 at the university just two years after Jihadi John graduated. Another muslim student with reported ties to the muslim extremist group, Jamal Achchi (which also advocates the establishment of an islamic state, had been accused of violence against non-muslims), was elected vice-president.

Klevius comment: Diversity!

Avinash Tharoor: 'I studied at the University of Westminster, where Mohammed Emwazi studied. Extremist students and visitors were consistently given a platform. I'd primarily blame the extremists in the student union and the University of Westminster staff allowing them to hold office. Discrimination against gays, non-muslims and moderate muslims (sic) was definitely a recurring issue from the extremists at the University of Westminster.

The University has invited a controversial and anti-gay preacher, Sheikh Haitham Al Haddad.

Naj, a second-year law student at Westminster: 'Al Haddad is quite homophobic and came out and said he supports female genital mutilation. That is the big concern - the speakers who are being invited. The LGBT society feel displaced - they don't meet within the campus and go to cafes outside the university because they don't feel welcome.'

Klevius: And Theresa May has no problem with all of these muslim hate preachers while denying a Jew, Pamela Geller, entry to Britain because she criticizes precisely this!

Haitham al-Haddad is an islamist and television presenter of Palestinian origin and sits on the boards of advisors for islamic organisations in the UK, including the Islamic Sharia Council. He is the chair and operations advisor, and a trustee, for the Muslim "Research and Development" Foundation.

In 2001, Haitham al-Haddad allegedly said "I will tell you the truth about the fight between us and Jews who are the enemies of God and the descendants of apes and pigs". He later said that "this is the translation of what has been attributed to me" and that it had been incorrectly translated from Arabic to English.

Haddad controversially praised Usama bin Laden in 2011 following his death.

In a homophobic article called ‘Standing up against Homosexuality and LGBTs’, Haddad wrote of “the scourge of homosexuality”, which he calls a “criminal act”. On women, he declared that “a man should not be questioned why he hit his wife, because this is something between them”. In addition to this he has also claimed that “the most honourable and worthy role for a woman is striving to be a fine wife...this role does not only secure the best for a woman in the hereafter, but also fits perfectly with her natural disposition”.

He has claimed that there is a "proper" way of performing FGM, further saying "it is consensus of all the scholars that female circumcision is sunnah [proper]".

In February 2012, the Dutch parliament majority tried to prevent Haddad speaking at VU University in Amsterdam. The university subsequently cancelled the event. Haddad blamed the opposition to him on a Jewish lobby.

Haddad called for a 15,000-people march to put pressure on Newham council to permit building of a large mosque in West Ham, London Borough of Newham, which would have been three times the size of St Paul's Cathedral.

In February 2014, al-Haddad's leadership of the MRDF caused controversy after the organisation booked Legoland Windsor for a private event, which it called a "Halal Fun Day". A local UKIP councillor claimed that residents were "up in arms", and called for a demonstration, while nationalist groups Casuals United and the English Defence League also stated that they would protest. Later that month, due to backlash and threats from those nationalist groups, Legoland cancelled the planned event.

Saudi Arabia - the guardian and spreader of islamic hate

Saudi based OIC - and its islamofascist Saudi sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani - constitutes islam today, and it's against the most basic of Human Rights!

 .

The solution to the muslim problem is simple Mr. Cameron - forbid sharia that violates basic Human Rights!

and do follow it up by demanding every muslim (including BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain) to either openly abandon sharia islam or loosing their right to Human Rights!  Don't repeat the mistake of King John!

Two British leaders who wanted/wants to convert England into sharia islam

King John the Traitor, PM David Cameron and the islamofascist "king" Abdullah who pretended to be "reformist" while steering the country in an even more intolerant direction by new sharia inspired laws by early 2014 (e.g. equalizing Human Rights and Atheism with "terrorism" and due penalties - compare Raif Badawi and others).

King John in the early 13th century sent envoys to Mohammed al-Nâsir asking for his help. In return King John offered to convert to islam and turn England into a muslim state.

The muslim jihadist Mohammed al-Nâsir's view on King John: "I never read or heard that any king possessing such a prosperous kingdom subject and obedient to him, would voluntarily ... make tributary a country that is free, by giving to a stranger that which is his own ... conquered, as it were, without a wound. I have rather read and heard from many that they would procure liberty for themselves at the expense of streams of blood, which is a praiseworthy action; but now I hear that your wretched lord, a sloth and a coward, who is even worse than nothing, wishes from a free man to become a slave, who is the most miserable of all human beings." Mohammed al-Nâsir concluded by wondering aloud why the English allowed such a man to lord over them — they must, he said, be very servile and soft.

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo

Michael Adebolajo and Mohammed Emwazi were, according to British muslims, both "harrassed by MI5 to become muslim terrorists"

Klevius alternative hypothesis: They read the Koran and became muslim terrorists because of islam! And the reason this deprived world view has become so popular is twofold: Saudi hate mongering money and political correctness and "diversity training" steered by - muslims.

Michael Nazir-Ali (UK bishop): It would never be possible to satisfy all of the demands made by them because "their complaint often boils down to the position that it is always right to intervene when muslims are victims... and always wrong when muslims are the oppressors or terrorists". In reference to conflict in Bosnia, Kosovo and Afghanistan, he said "Given the world view that has given rise to such grievances, there can never be sufficient appeasement and new demands will continue to be made." In response, the Muslim Council of Britain said "We would normally expect a bishop to display more humility and work towards bringing communities closer together rather than contributing towards fostering greater divisions."

The link between BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain, Lee Rigby murderer and Jihad John

Except for that they are all fostered outside Britain, they are all also trapped in islamic sharia because you can't be a religious muslim without Human Rights violating sharia! And in the very moment Mishal Husain dares to open her usually already big open mouth and say that she opposes sharia that violates basic Human Rights (Klevius said Human Rights - not "islamic human rights")  e.g. OIC's sharia declaration via UN - which is probably the mildest of them all yet fulfills every civilized criterion of what could be called extremism - then she has committed the worst of crimes against islam! Which fact contains the key to the world muslim problem.

Michael Adebolajo, was approached by – and known to – MI5 before going on to murder Fusilier Lee Rigby with a meat-cleaver to the neck in 2013 on a busy London street.

Mohammed Emwazi aka Jihadi John, an Arab muslim born in Kuwait and allowed to become a jihadist because of pc "sensitivities" towards muslims.

Mohammed Emwazi was associated with the Ladbroke Grove group who are from a wide variety of backgrounds: unlike Berjawi, the ex-gang member, Emwazi is believed to have come from a middle class family and had not been in trouble with the law before. Exactly where they were radicalised is not clear, although a number are believed to have attended the local Al Manaar Mosque, opened by Prince Charles in 2001.

In a recent interview, its chairman, Dr Abdulkarim Khalil, said efforts were made to counter radicalisation, but said it would be “dishonest” to pretend that it did not happen. “The honest answer is that it is really difficult to know,” he said. “On Fridays we have about 2,000 people come.


Campaigners with the Cage organisation - which lobbies against the US-led war on terror - said it had been in contact with Emwazi for two years over alleged "interference" by the UK security agencies.

Cage said British security services "systematically" harassed young Muslims, leaving them with no legal avenue to redress their situation, citing the example of Michael Adebolajo, who murdered soldier Lee Rigby in May 2013.

Cage director Asim Qureshi said: "Like Michael Adebolajo, suffocating domestic policies aimed at turning a person into an informant but which prevent a person from fulfilling their basic life needs would have left a lasting impression on Emwazi.

    'Claims that MI5 drove Emwazi to extremism are pathetic'
    26 Feb 2015

    'Jihadi John' is kind and gentle, says human rights group
    26 Feb 2015

"He desperately wanted to use the system to change his situation, but the system ultimately rejected him."

But Shiraz Maher from King's College London dismissed the Cage claims that Jihadi John was driven into extremism by British security services as "pathetic".

Amit Roy: When it comes to covering the rise and rise of Narendra Modi, Indian viewers in the UK have noticed a trend: the BBC tends to deploy women reporters who are young, beautiful and Muslim. BBC announced: “The BBC’s Mishal Husain reports from India’s most populous state, Uttar Pradesh, on how India’s Muslim vote could affect the election.”
Mishal is currently the darling of the corporation and is one of the main presenters on Radio 4’s Today several mornings a week.

Taji Mustafa, Media Representative for Hizb ut-Tahrir (at least earlier associated with Sayeeda Warsi) in Britain said: “It is hardly surprising that prejudice and hatred towards Islam and Muslims is on the rise when leading politicians ignore political grievances of the Muslim world, rooted in western foreign policy, instead equating Islam with violence saying ‘The driving force behind today’s terrorist threat is Islamist fundamentalism’ (David Cameron 2005); or that the Shariah and Caliphate are ‘an evil ideology’ (Tony Blair 2005); or when they refer to Islamic scholars visiting from overseas as ‘foreign hate preachers’ (Theresa May 2010); or when David Cameron demonizes the Muslims of Pakistan during his trip to India saying they cannot ‘look both ways on ‘terrorism’; or when niqab and Pakistani men are demonized following comments by Jack Straw. These, and other statements, add to the deliber ate smears, misinformation and propaganda peddled by some politicians and sections of the British media.”

“She absolutely fails to expose the fact that this growing hatred towards Islam and Muslims has been fuelled by politicians and the media, who seem incapable of engaging in an intellectual debate about different worldviews, and instead default to emotive and populist talk of ‘extremism’, ‘hate’ and the banning of speakers and groups.

Klevius comment: Dear reader, you see the problem, don't you. Here it is!

Saudi based OIC - and its islamofascist Saudi sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani - constitutes islam today, and it's against the most basic of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi, UK's top official islamofascist* again spews islamic hatred on **BBC without anyone there questioning it!

* 'Islamofascist' is here defined as a muslim who supports the violation of the most basic Human Rights. Simple as that! If Sayeeda Warsi doesn't support sharia in this sense (e.g. OIC's sharia declaration) then she better come out as an apostate, i.e. committing the worst crime known to islam (which is already in itself the worst crime ever against humanity). 

** Using the hateful "islamphobia" against defender of Human Rights can only be classified as racist hate speech. Remember that "islamophobia" in sharia islam is synonymous with "blasphemy"!

Muslim Sayeeda Warsi, unelected "Minister for Faith islam", has stated that the UK is 'committed to working with the United Nations Human Rights Council to implement blasphemy resolution 16/18.' However, the majority of Brits don't have a clue about this because no one has informed them about it - especially not BBC whom even Klevius has beaten when it comes to informing about OIC.

Saudi based OIC - and its islamofascist Saudi sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani - constitutes islam today, and it's against the most basic of Human Rights!


Sayeeda Warsi today on BBC: Islam forbids the killing of innocent people.

Klevius: Absolutely! And by "innocent" islam means the killers and those who support them! Either directly or by "being offended" (a term that should be read "islam's inferiority complex" against Human Rights). Those who didn't support Muhammad when he slaughtered all the Jews in Medina were not innocent according to the strongest part of islam, i.e. back then Muhammad's sword waiving muslim thugs, and today Warsi's beloved OIC which has criminalized the most basic of Human Rights and replaced them with muslim sharia.

Sayeeda Warsi today on BBC (about a gallup): British muslims felt more loyal to Britain and had a much bigger trust in institutions than white Britons.

Klevius: Absolutely! And it's appalling! And why shouldn't they when the institutions are made sharia compliant by the help of "diversity trained officials" who are scared to death to be called racist "islamophobes" or have already been exchanged to sharia muslim officials. And no one cares about muslim racism and hate crimes against the Brits.






Klevius wrote:

Wednesday, August 27, 2014

Muslim ethnicity - not geographical location - behind "Asian" or "Pakistan" sex abuse/murder of white girls!

The disgusting face of the social state

Joyce Thacker has been a central figure in the responsibility for letting children be abused and even murdered. How much does she get from your tax money, and will she be rewarded in the usual way for defending islam while not defending of children. 

However, she seems not very visible on Google News despite the biggest sex slave shock ever in Britain happened under her watch!?

To get a theoretical background to this please read what Klevius wrote some 20 years ago (Angels of Antichrist in the social state - the most important sociological paper written in the last century) and a decade ago (Pathological symbiosis in the social service).

Also consider The Swedish girl problem.

However, what you really should give a serious thought is why Joyce Thacker is defended?


The now reported over 1400 child (young girls "rescued" from their families by the social state) sex slaves taken and abused lately by British muslims is just a tiny glare from the tip of the iceberg. And although it's common and accepted all over the muslim world, in Western countries it's protected under the "islamophobia" slogan.

It's not islam! Really? So muslim jihadists, and muslim sex offenders just happen to follow the text in the Koran and the historical origin of islam in this respect?!


And some other disgusting females supporting muslim sex slavery

Is the Darfur genocide a "random muslim scare story", Nesrine Malik? As a Sudanese you should know, shouldn't you. Or the global muslim sex abuse and trafficking of underage girls?

Nesrine Malik: In 2012, nine men were convicted of child exploitation and grooming of vulnerable young girls in Rochdale. Similar grooming gangs were identified in Derby, Rotherham and Oxford..The fact that these grooming gangs were Asian and Muslim ('muslims' were almost never mentioned - it's entirely Malik's own spice to ther story), and their victims white, became central to their offences in public discourse and media coverage. How was this done? Newspaper articles, radio shows and TV panel discussions adopted, discussed and repeated the claim of Muslim grooming and abuse. By popularising a notion that their crimes were somehow mandated by a sharia law that condoned sexual exploitation of non-Muslims. That is, not only is their religion relevant, it is blessing their crimes, or at least informing their culture. This was simply not true but it was repeated and sublimated into fact. "Muslim grooming gangs", a description about as unhelpful as  the "Christian paedophile Jimmy Savile". It was a scenario in which a factually erroneous religious justification was used to explain an anomalous episode.

Max Dunbar: “I used to get outraged about people like Nesrine Malik. Here we have an independent woman working in finance in secular London, telling women in the developing world that theocracy really isn’t so bad as they make out. Isn’t this an imperialist attitude? But in the end, the appropriate response isn’t outrage: it’s a dark and riotous laughter at the arrant stupidity of it all.”

It was because they were muslims they were so leniently handled with by social workers, police, courts, etc. - not because they were from Asia! Non-muslim Russians from Asia would hardly have been equally leniently handled!

Who else than Klevius can tell all these abused or about to become abused girls about sex apartheid and the true origin of islam?

When a girl trapped in a limiting sex segregated upbringing suddenly realizes the heterosexual attraction of her ass she might easily get lost - especially if her attachment to her parents is cut off by the state power of senseless social authorities. Combine this to the Koran that tells you that infidel girls your right arm possesses are legitimate. And add to this that, according to islamic logic, the West (more or less by its very existence) is attacking islam and therefore war booty is legal.

And who else than Klevius can tell all of you others that your tax money to the social state is of no use - but contributes to abuse! Yes, Klevius has seen all the evidence through academic studies as well as on the actual field as a solicitor in cases were the state wants to abduct children for no real reason other than placing them in commercial foster or care homes they themselves often have commercial interest in. Moreover, the social state has itself developed into a self serving commercial interest spiced by political interest.

Again, read Angels of Antichrist and Pathological symbiosis before you even open your big mouth in these matters.



Here's what Klevius wrote

Friday, September 28, 2012

Was it muslim (or muslim "sensitive") social workers/police who failed Victoria Agoglia and other white vulnerable ("trash") girls in Rochdale etc?

 Angels of Antichrist (no idiot, Klevius isn't Christian)

 is by far the most important sociological paper written in the last Century. In summary it shows that there is no connection at all between tax money invested in the welfare social state and the quality of its outcome. And how could there ever be when it's a defacto overgrown commercial company except fot that it:

   doesn't have to show results (or the results can be arbitrarily manipulated by itself)
   its parts work as authorities
   it has monopoly
   it writes, more or less, its own laws via its extensive bureaucracy and lobbying (for a horror example from Sweden of how democracy is sidestepped by bureaucracy see Pathological Synbiosis)
   its main interest is to feed itself
   it started as a dump for the spill over (women) of sex segregation (in the post-industrial automation), i.e. women (who couldn't go to the private sector) were paid to get away from their children (often to take care of children of others). As Klevius has shown in his thesis groundbreaking (but largely neglected) Pathological Symbiosis (with all the references you may ask for to really see how bad the social state is in taking care of children) this process also includes an element of feel of guilt boosted by "motherhood" psychology, i.e. that women who couldn't take care of their children because they were working started pathologizing women who did take care of their children.

Although the welfare state was born in the 1940s the social state emerged on a powerful new tax platform in Sweden in the 1970s with some roots in much earlier practices.

In Angels of Antichrist (which, so far, is the world's only serious/informed attempt to an overall interdisciplinary approach on the social state) and Pathological Symbiosis it's shown beyond reasonable doubt that there's absolutely no evidence (see e.g. Vinnerjung's comprehensive study on foster children) that the social state has contributed any good social work on the whole despite the enormous amount of money invested in it. And this is no rocket science to understand. How could a young sex segregated woman without children of her own and brainwashed for many years in courses based on all the time changing and heavily biased flimsy but fashionable non sense psychology ans sociology, possibly know anything else than khow to get the most out of it for herself? 

So when Jim Taylor, chief executive of Rochdale Borough Council, refuses to answer whether he'll get rid of those social workers who called sexually abused/raped (by muslims from Pakistan) white girls (whom the social state already had taken "care" of) and who were in their early teens, "prostitutes" "life choice" and didn't in any way react to the cries for help, then this is a pattern that has been around for long also in Swedish schools etc as Klevius has written for a decade on his sites and blogs.

.

Islam induced hatred

Obama's and Farrakhan's best hate card spells islam

Klevius to the "islamophobia" shouters: You're the purest of "diversity"* fascists!

* "Diversity" means sectarianism based on skin color, religion, etc., i.e. against the most basic of Human Rights. "Diversity training" means  tolerating intolerance.

Ever thought about how true fascism looks like? One example is the use of the extremely twisted reasoning that traps ignorant "muslims" in the same group as true muslims who deliberately oppose those very American values that these fascists used in the forst place to criticize the defense of American values and Human Rights.

Rudy Giuliani gets death threats after hinting that Obama might be more a muslim than a Christian

Compare Giuliani with Blasio on the police pic below!

Rudy Guiliani: Obama must begin acting and speaking in a way that draws sharp, clear distinctions between us and those who threaten our way of life. He wasn’t brought up the way you were brought up and I was brought up.

Klevius: Meaning he was brought up as a communist muslim.

According to Giuliani, Obama is “criticizing his country more than other presidents have done.” He writes that Presidents John F. Kennedy, Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton were, on the other hand, able to provide “constructive criticism” on the United States but still believe in American exceptionalism.

The former New York mayor said that his office secretary had reported receiving death threats since POLITICO first published his remarks about Obama.


Shaun King: 11 years after his autobiography, Dreams from my Father was released, in which he details his Christian faith explicitly, it's preposterous at this point in the game for anyone as public as Walker to deny ever, one single time, hearing that President Obama is a Christian.

Klevius: The desperate voice of King is that of a desperate man. And the desperation emanates from the really troublesome fact that as a born muslim you can't change or give up your religion without committing the worst crime islam knows about. However, you're allowed to lie if it's in the best interest of islam.

Frank Gaffney: President Obama on Wednesday said “it is a lie” when leaders of the Islamic State and al Qaeda describe themselves as “holy warriors in defense of Islam.” He insisted that they are “terrorists” who have “perverted Islam.” We are not, he proclaimed, “at war with Islam.” Mr. Obama even declared “no religion is responsible for terrorism.”

Someone is lying, all right. Unfortunately, it is our president, not our jihadist enemies.

The truth was recently exposed by another president, muslim Egypt’s elected leader Abdel Fattah el-Sisi.  He blamed the authorities of islam, not terrorists, for “antagonizing the entire world.” In other words, it is their practice of the faith, not “terrorists,” who are the problem.

Our president’s lying to the American people about that reality amounts to material support for our enemies.

'I will kill you' shouts the brain dead* hateful black muslim supremacist racist clown Louis Farrakhan

* Can we agree that hateful people are not only stupid but also dangerous - to all of us, including themselves.  Ok, he's smarter than Sharpton but what does that really prove! It's still far short of what could be expected from an ordinary civilized man. Just listen to this childish but hateful rant to childish but, as a consequence, hateful listeners. 

This hateful racist is whom Obama's minister for some 20 years awarded!

Yes, Klevius knows very well that people are very vulnerable to theatrical performance - especially when this helps to excuse one's often misdirected anger about oneself. This is why Klevius would never even dream of acting like Farrakhan. And this is why Klevius believes in Human Rights instead of segregation.

'I will kill you if you put your hands on me' Farrakhan said in a context where some presumably white official during the "million man marsh" had explained an escape route for him in the case of violence. And for his black audience (above) he made it sound the opposite to what the official had meant. Farrakhan unscrupulously played the race card hard, hinting the possible violence was white, not black, and then in a childish but obviously for this audience effective way (see how happy they look at the very moment he utters 'kill') played the hero card by stating that he 'should die with his people'. Moreover, Farrakhan knows very well that many young and some older black haters love to hear him hinting at hate violence by using words like 'kill' and 'fight back' etc. He also loves using the word 'devil' when talking about white people. Why? Simply because Nation of Islam's very racist hateful core idea is that "whites" are evil devils while "blacks" are "god's" chosen people. No other race is as good as "blacks" according to just one of the unbelievable fantasies from which Farrakhan's muslim hate organization emerged (see more about NOI furthest down on this posting).

How many police officers and civilians have been assaulted and murdered by young black haters because of muslim clown Farrakhan's and others continuous hateful agitation?

NYPD officers turning their back against NY mayor Blasio who together with muslim born (apostate?!) Mr X "president" Hussein Obama Soetoro (or whatever) has been agitating in support of black racism. NYPD officers Wenjian Liu and Rafael Ramos (top left) were murdered by a black thug (with a long criminal record) while sitting in their patrol car. Whereas every muslim is tied to Human Rights violating islam via islamic sharia, a black police has no such a tie to black criminals. However, because blacks in certain areas are hugely over represented in crime stats (hence also proportionally in general stats), it would be quite strange if equally many whites were pulled over, arrested etc. in such areas.


The black clown* "Minister" Louis Farrakhan for the audience on the pic: You grew up a privileged devil on the sweat and blood of black people who made America before your fathers got here. All you recent Europeans, you're so happy here but you're walking on our blood. We picked the cotton till our fingers were cut and bruised. And you sold it all over the world so you got rich and we got nothing.

If we hypothetically consider so called "African-Americans" as a group having the same intelligence as other groups - then what we see here would be a segregation based on intelligence, i.e. that dumb blacks are clustered together via hate speech while the smart blacks keep away - or just benefit on these dumb blacks. Although one might expect that most of the audience are quite privileged (enjoying money from the Obama administration etc) and that the dirty guides this agitation is meant for listen to it via Youtube.



However, the one and only hook that keeps up Farrakhan's hate speech is something that has absolutely nothing to do with the audience or the Youtube consuming haters. And without that slavery hook Farrakhan's racist rant becomes completely meaningless in every other sense except as a pure invitation to hate - and to politically/financially benefit on it - thanks to the Obama administration.

Blacks are not the only ones whose forefathers and mothers suffered and it's ridiculous to connect 1/8 of one's genetics into a skin color that encompasses everything (even albinos?) but not "white" and then categorize it as "black" for segregational hate usage. If blacks have claims against history then they will end up in an endless cue of other "sufferer heirs" as well. And could they even stand a cue filled also with white people?!

Moreover, there are no groups of sufferers other than sufferers and sufferers can't be distinguished by 1/8 genetics that occurred many hundred years ago.  And the only ones in the group of sufferers who can suffer are individuals, not the group. And "whites" isn't and has never been a self conscious group. On the contrary, it's a group created recently and mainly by segregationalists outside that "group" as a target for hatred.

However, what is totally lacking in Farrakhan's retarded theatrical rant is the self conscious group that enslaved practically the whole of Africa, i.e. islam. And not only did the Arab muslims based their entire finance on slavery, they did it so consciously that they even wrote a book about it in Arabic that said they could do so, and used Arabic language imperialism as an interface to segregate the "infidels" and to "educate" other Africans in how to "justify" the taking and trading of African slaves to the islamic slave markets. Zwahili is one remnant of that slavery interface.

Islam is the worst ideological crime history knows about. That's why criticism of islam is called "islamophobia" (i.e. "blasphemy"). And it's the very same reason why the defense of the most basic of Human Rights inevitably becomes "islamophobic".

Islam is today OIC and its world sharia

Saudi based OIC - and its islamofascist Saudi sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani - constitutes islam today, and it's against the most basic of Human Rights!


 Klevius wrote:

Monday, August 08, 2011

Islam/Shariot (sharia riot) taking over London thanks to "sensitivity ("diversity") policing" and cooperation with islamofascist OIC. And BBC calls the thugs "protesters" and their crimes "general anger"!

BLACK RACISM AIDED BY THUGS AND ISLAM
A European version of the disgusting ultra-racist American black fascist movement Nation of Islam - you know, the very same movement that was rewarded by Obama's minister. Their leader Louis Farrakhan also supports Qadhafi and threatens: "You will be drowned in your own blood" (read what he vomitted in July 2011 below).

You really don't seem to get it. Islam is hate mongering racism and parasitism based on sexism! The (Sha)riot coordination of the UK riots was islamist! Got it dude?! And the answer will most probably AGAIN be more appeasement for parasitic racist islam (the by far worst ideological crime ever)! You will again be taught islam got nothing to do with it.Yes, islam can appear in many forms but the basis of it is shared by all from more timid variants to Nation of Islam (NOI) etc.

Btw, Iran's president asks British government to "restrain" from using violence against the "protesters".

Polis and politicians ask parents to take their kids home. But Klevius says many of the parents actually sent them out there in the first place!

Youth jihadists terrorizing the infidels and getting rewarded through looting, while their hypocrite and bigot teachers (other family members, imams, politicians, media, academics etc) suck their share of it. And all this precisely because people can't comprehend the simple truth that this "moral" excuse is pure evil in its true essence.

Klevius comment: This is EXACTLY how islam originally emerged. And in every detail in accordance with those parts of the Koran that YOU don't want to read! Islam has ALWAYS combined rioting/looting/intimidation/humiliation with a white collar "diplomacy" (i.e. blackmailing)! "Sensitivities" and "cooperation" only worsen the case. In pre-democratic times, when slave trade was the main currency of islam, influential non-muslims were directly bought into islam (see Klevius description of East-African and Indian Arabic/islamic slave system, as well as The Origin of the Vikings). Today the process is (sometimes) a little more complicated but follows essentially the same pattern.

The bizarre but extremely racist "ideology" of Nation of Islam may be summarized as this: Blacks are the superior race on Earth and white people beong to Satan and should be destroyed. The other races are somewhere in between with Asians (Mongoloids) near the bottom just above the whites.

An, irony, isn't it, that Blackberry, which was forbidden in Saudi Arabia because it threatened the islamofascist leadership, now are used in London by islamofascists who are the product of Saudi hate mongering via racist/sexist islam!

Sadly, many (most?) "muslims" don't understand the evilness of islam but rather let their own inferiority complex evolve into racism against non-muslims and as a consequence support that very evil.






Louis Farrakhan: "According to what we understand, only two percent of the Libyan people are in rebellion against their government. Now, you [Obama] mean to tell me that half the people don't want you, and you dare to say that this man [Al-Qadhafi - i.e. the guy who possibly arranged the Lockerbie terrorist attack and who arranged for the freeing of the one who actually did it] is illegitimate? What makes him illegitimate, and what makes you legitimate?

"I came here to preach the doom of this institution. You say that he is illegitimate, he kills his own people? What's your record? What's your record, America?

"Your governments will soon be laying in… some of you, who have plotted against the peoples of the world, will be seen on the back of pickup trucks, driving through the streets of America, with the American people throwing stones and raw garbage at you.

"In the name of Allah, the Merciful and Compassionate. Dear brother leader, Mu'ammar Al-Qadhafi, may this letter find you, your family, and the faithful people of the Libyan Arab Republic, in the best health and spirit in spite of the prevailing circumstances.

"Dear brother leader, in the general orders that we were given by the honorable Elijah Muhammad, whose desire was to make us brave fighters, willing at any time to give our lives for Allah's sake and righteousness, it states in general order No. 5 'Do not quit your post until properly relieved.' Allah put you on your post, and neither NATO, the president of the U.S., the Arab League, or anybody else, has the power or authority to tell you to quit your post. Elijah Muhammad told me: 'Die on your post.'

"Dear brother [Barack Obama], be careful about the assassination of Mu'ammar Al-Qadhafi and others in the Muslim world. Could it be that while you and your staff are planning the death of Mu'ammar Al-Qadhafi, could it also be that members of your own Democratic Party are plotting to betray you? Could it be that right now, while you are planning for your second term, that there are those in your party [who don't] want you for a second term, and definitely the Republicans don't want you to be a one-term president.

"So, like Abraham Lincoln, who was prosecuting the civil war, and doubted that he would be reelected, won a second term, but this so angered the opposition that it was then that his own reelection inspired his assassination. Could that be going on right now, under your own nose?

"Think, dear brother, before you act, because as the Bible puts it: 'God is not mocked. As a man soweth, the same shall he also reap.'As Obadiah the Prophet said: 'As thou hast done, so shall it be done unto you.' If they are successful in killing brother Al-Qadhafi, this is not going to be the end. This is the beginning of horrors, as you will see."

"The Future for Europe and America is Bleak, Very Very Bleak; China and Russia – Oh, You All will be at War"

"Al-Qadhafi wasn't in some tent twiddling his thumbs. He was working for the good of the African people. The African people will rise. NATO and… I'm sorry, America – I have got to say it, because I heard it from the mouth of the honorable Elijah Muhammad – Europe is finished.

"All of you who love war will be drowned in your own blood, as it is written: 'Those of you who love to shed the blood of others – Allah will make you drunk with your own blood, as with sweet wine.' Europe is headed for war, as we speak. Yes England, France, Italy, Germany, the honorable Elijah Muhammad told me that at the right time to tell you that Europe is the graveyard of the future. All of you who ran to Europe, to your former colonial masters, it is written that everyone will have to go to their own, and find refuge under their own vine and fig tree.

"And as Europe is trying to push out the Africans, to push out the Pakistanis, you would be wise to prepare yourself to get out of there or die there, because the future for Europe and America is bleak, very very bleak. China and Russia – oh, you all will be at war. You like it, so Allah is going to give it to you. You will have war soon. Mark my words – not my words, but the words of a man who was taught by God. You will face every word that he spoke. You will remember what you heard today – that a man, a real man of God was in your midst, and every word that I speak – you will face it."

Klevius answer to this pathetic "wanna be god's messenger" who uses to agitate extreme religious racial hatred while simultaneously changing views like a chameleon when it suits him: You idiot hide behind the otherwise non-related facts that Arabic islam managed to destroy most of Africa for more than a Millennium, and that a majority of African people have darker skin than most of the rest of the world. And of course, when the most advanced cultures (meaning they are based on the non-religious idea of Universal Human Rights) are predominantly "white" (actually really white people, so called albinos you find mostly oppressed in Africa!) this has been utilized by NOI and you as a ground for agitating dangerous racism especially in children and youth. You moron are lowering, not bettering the moral of what you try to lump together under skin color as "blacks".

You, Louis, and your butt-wipes are so funny to watch in your pompous appearance, was it not for all the misery and suffering you cause! All the way from Wallace Fard Mohammad (a white guy with extremely confused ideas) via a string of serial killers incl. Black Panthers etc to British street riots and looting. And on the way your organization didn't only murder people like Malcolm X but also, of course, targeted Martin Luther King and others (a god's gift was it that a "white" man was sentenced).



The founder of Nation of Islam, who actually existed - unlike the made up founder of islam

Drug dealer Wallie Wallace Dodd Fard Ford Farrad David Ali Mohammad (or whatever - i.e. the NOI foudner that Farrakhan forgot to refer to) was born somewhere and died somehow. He founded the fascist organization Nation of Islam in the period between World War 1 and 2 that saw all kinds of fascist movements appear. He became the head of the Chicago mosque in 1929, i.e. when Hitler led the growing National Socialist Party in Germany (by the help of his ability to evoke a sense of violated national pride - compare NOI). Already at the start NOI was connected with murders and suspicious disappearances. He himself also disappeared in 1934, most probably murdered by the next NOI leader, Eliah Muhammad, just as Hitler murdered his competitor Ernst Röhm.






Muslim females: We speak for ourselves!

 Klevius: Do you really?
.

How can anyone be fooled by this islamofascist* whom Cameron naively made a peer and party chairman?

* Due to lack of info paired with a heavy load of mis-info about islam - such as e.g. that Warsi herself supports the muslim extremist organization OIC and its sharia that is diametrically against the most basic of Human Rights, Sayeeda Warsi has managed to undermine British and Human Rights values for the purpose of replacing them with sharia. OIC has officially abandoned the most basic of Human Rights in the UN and replaced them with sharia and, consequently criminalized Human Rights where sharia is the rule.

OIC is a muslim extremist organization that has criminalized the most basic of Human Rights - and wants to force others to do so as well

Muslim Sayeeda Warsi, unelected "Minister for Faith islam", has stated that the UK is 'committed to working with the United Nations Human Rights Council (where Saudi Arabia is participating) to implement blasphemy resolution 16/18.' However, the majority of Brits don't have a clue about this because no one has informed them about it - especially not BBC whom even Klevius has beaten when it comes to informing about OIC.

Resolution 16/18 calls upon UN member states to combat "intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization of, and discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against, persons based on religion or belief." It was initially introduced in March 2011 at the UN Human Rights Council by the OIC.

Anne Marie Waters: Baroness Warsi's commitment (on behalf of the UK) to work with the OIC to implement Resolution 16/18 seems to be grounded in the idea that the OIC are equally committed to religious freedom. In making such claims, Warsi shows herself to be either a) completely stupid, b) a damn liar, or c) both.

Sayeeda Warsi calls the defense of Human Rights "islamophobia" and wants it criminalized under a blasphemy law as it is in muslim countries such as e.g. Saudi Arabia and Pakistan

Daily Mail Comment: 'Sayeeda Warsi's abilities have never matched her estimation of them.'

Klevius: A bit like islam itself! Apart from pure violence ignorance and deception have always been intimate partners with islam.


Daily Mail Comment: 'Indeed, she was lucky to escape police attention over her expenses – and to avoid graver censure after taking a business partner on an official trip to Pakistan.'

Sayeeda Warsi: 'The Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) also remains a key partner in our quest to promote religious freedom.'

Klevius: As OIC promotes islamofascist sharia over Human Rights the oxymoron "religious freedom" means a ban on "blasphemy" i.e. a ban on criticism directed against islam.

Whereas Ayaan Hirsi Ali proposes reformation of islam, Sayeeda Warsi's recept is to criminalize criticism of islam 

Ayaan Hirsi Ali: How does one tackle misguided religious devotion of young Muslims? The answer lies in reforming Islam profoundly—not radical Islam, but mainstream Islam; its willingness to merge Mosque and State, religion, and politics; and its insistence that its elaborate system of Shariah law supersedes civil laws created by human legislators. In such a reform project lies the hope for countering Islamism. No traditional Islamic lobbying group committed to defending the reputation of Islam will recommend such a policy to the U.S. government. Yet until American policymakers grapple with the need for such reform, the real problem within Islam will remain unresolved.

However, Sayeeda Warsi condemns the lack of ministerial engagement with a cross-government working group combating "anti-muslim hatred" aka "islamophobia" (read criticism of muslim sharia that is against the most basic of Human Rights). Chief whip Michael Gove is singled out for particular criticism for his criticism of the Birmingham muslim schools Trojan horse affair. She also criticizes the attitude of government ministers towards the cross-government anti-muslim hatred working group against "islamophobia" (read against criticism of muslim sharia that is against the most basic of Human Rights), set up in 2012 to ensure "islamophobia" (i.e. criticism of muslim sharia that is against the most basic of Human Rights) receives the same support as previous campaigns to tackle anti-semitism, anti-black racism and homophobia.

Warsi's attack came after communities secretary Eric Pickles wrote to more than 1,000 islamist leaders calling on British muslims to “explain and demonstrate how faith in islam can be part of British identity”.

Pickles also said that he was proud of the way British muslims had responded to the Paris terror attacks, but the letter was condemned by many sections of the muslim community. Pickles was accused of treating muslims as in some way “apart” from the rest of British society. Warsi says this reaction graphically illustrated the gulf that has grown between the coalition government and muslims.

Klevius clarification: The "gulf" is called sharia and it violates the most basic of Human Rights and British values!

Saudi based OIC - and its islamofascist Saudi sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani - constitutes islam today, and it's against the most basic of Human Rights!

 

 Sayeeda Warsi with OIC's former Fuhrer Egyptian born Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu


Donna Rachel Edmunds: Baroness Warsi, the first Muslim woman to sit in Cabinet, used her position to set up a government advisory panel stuffed with Islamist ‘entryists’, it has been claimed. The Cross-Government Working Group on Anti-Muslim Hatred, set up by Warsi and Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg, includes a number of people with links to extremist organisations.

Some members are using their positions on the Working Group to push for bans on hate preachers entering Britain to be lifted, including Zakir Naik, who has stated that “every Muslim should be a terrorist”. Another has links to the anti-Semitic group which has been lobbying for a hardline Muslim mega-mosque to be built in London; yet another has links to an organisation described as a “political front from the Muslim Brotherhood,” The Times has reported.

Fiyaz Mughal, the head of Tell Mama, a national organisation which monitors anti-Muslim attacks, resigned from the group in protest at it’s activities. He told the Telegraph: “I was deeply concerned about the kinds of groups some of the members had connections with, and some of the groups they were recommending be brought into government. It seemed to me to be a form of entryism, by people with no track record in delivering projects.”

Another member said: “The working group was Sayeeda [Warsi]’s personal project and she was responsible for the appointments. There was very little transparency about who was put on.”

One of the most prominent members of the group is Muddassar Ahmed, a former senior activist of the Muslim Public Affairs Committee, an extremist militant organisation which waged anti-Semitic campaigns against “Zionist” Labour politicians Jack Straw and Lorna Fitzsimons. Ms Fitzsimons, former MP for Rochdale, lost her seat after MPAC delivered thousands of leaflets to her Muslim voters saying that they should sack her because she is Jewish, although she is not.

Mr Ahmed defended himself on the grounds that his “regrettable” MPAC involvement had been “many years in the past”, and claimed not to have been involved in the campaign against Ms Fitzsimons, concentrating on the campaign against Mr Straw instead. He claimed to be a “very different person from what I was then”, and drew support from the government, who insisted that Mr Ahmed had “disassociated himself” from MPAC and it’s “approach” to politics.

But Mr Ahmed, through his PR company Unitas Communications, has more recently been involved in the Newham People’s Alliance, a campaign group formed to press for the creation of a mega-mosque in East London which Tablighi Jamaat, a conservative Islamist sect wants to set up. The NPA conducted an anti-Semitic campaign against Newham Borough’s Mayor, Sir Robin Wales, whom they nicknamed “dirty Robin”, branding him a “Zionist” and racist, and saying that no Muslim should vote for him. It also blockaded Newham Town Hall when the plans for the mosque were refused planning permission.

Meanwhile the NPA has also shown support for Lutfur Rahmen, the Mayor of neighbouring borough Tower Hamlets who has been linked to extremism and accused of vote rigging, saying that Newham should be more like Tower Hamlets.

“It was a very vicious campaign, with a lot of lying and making things up, and they were close allies of Lutfur,” said Sir Robin last night. “Muddassar Ahmed wanted to stand as candidate for us [Labour], but we blocked him because of his background.”

The NPA was represented at the planning enquiry into the mosque last June by Mr Ahmed and others from Unitas Communications. “The NPA were very unpleasant and bullying people to deal with,” said Alan Craig, a former Newham councillor who led a rival campaign MegaMosque No Thanks at the inquiry. The planning appeal will be decided by the Department for Communities and Local Government, the department in which the Working Group on which Mr Ahmed sits is based.

Mr Ahmed has since distanced himself from the NPA, saying that he was not responsible for their behaviour and that they were a “very loose group, a group of guys we grew up with who asked us to help them out at the planning inquiry. Tablighi Jamaat have never been linked to any sort of extremism and we have got to be careful not to alienate them from mainstream discourse.” He insisted that he and Unitas had not been paid by the sect nor anyone else.

Other members of the working group include Iqbal Bhana who has repeatedly praised the Islamic Human Rights Commission for their work. The IHRC has spoken in defence of Abu Hamza, claiming that he was “demonised” and calling his conviction for terrorism in America an example of the “double standards of the British justice system in relation to Muslims”.

Also on the working group is Iftikhar Awan, a former trustee of Islamic Relief, which has links to the Muslim Brotherhood, and Sarah Joseph, a former spokesperson for the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB), which the government broke ties with thanks to its association with Islamists.

Other members have tried to get the government to rebuild the relationship with the MCB, and also with the Cordoba Foundation, which was described by David Cameron as a “political front for the Muslim Brotherhood”.

One group member who has opposed these attempts has said “Civil servants in the DCLG resisted strongly. They kept saying that there was nothing showing a change in the voice and opinions of these groups. But they were under tremendous pressure from Warsi.”

Lady Warsi, a former solicitor who stood unsuccessfully for Parliament in 2004, was elevated to the Peerage in 2007. Three years later, Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron appointed her to the Cabinet as Minister without Portfolio; she later joined the Foreign and Commonwealth Office as a Senior Minister before her resignation in 2014 over what she termed the Government’s “morally indefensible” policy on Gaza.

During that time she sparked controversy with her views on the integration of Muslims into British life; in 2011 she claimed that Islamphobia had “passed the dinner table test” and was “widespread and rising”. despite police figures showing that anti-Muslim hate crimes are very much in the minority.

In fact, anti-faith hate crimes, which include hate crimes directed at people of all faiths, make up just 5 percent of the total, and figures from the Metropolitan Police Force, which is the only force to categorise hate crimes by target, found that Jews and gays were four times more likely than Muslims to be targeted.

Nonetheless, by 2012 Lady Warsi, along with Nick Clegg, had put together the Working Group, which still continues despite her resignation. It is based in the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) and includes officials from there, the Ministry of Justice, the Home Office, the Department for Education, the Foreign Office and the Crown Prosecution Service.

Do you really need extremist muslims to fight extremist muslims?

Muslims constitute a couple of percent of US population yet their influence in the White House seems to be a couple of hundred percent!

Is it because their Human Rights violating hateful sharia ideology is so much preferred than the boring equality principle of Human Rights?

Ruby Giuliani: 'The reality is, from all that I can see of this president, all that I’ve heard of him, he apologizes for America, he criticizes America … This is an American president I’ve never seen before.'

And here's US islamofascist representative Rashad Hussain in OIC, the worst scum bag organization the world has seen since the Nazis. Yes, he has memorized the hateful Koran text by heart and is now ready to take over as director of the Center for US Strategic Counterterrorism Communications.

OIC is a muslim extremist organization which openly violates the most basic of Human Rights!

Albert Einstein: 'For me the unaltered Jewish religion like all other religions is an incarnation of the most primitive superstitions.'

Klevius quiz: Which of the Judaic branches do you think would have been first in line trying to murder Albert Einstein as of today?

Islam is originally built on a foundation of hate and rape - that's why it's so popular among haters and rapers!

The problem today is that original islam was so evil so we aren't really allowed to even mention it anymore because that would disturb the frenetic efforts made to use the "success" of original evil islam to fit a construed non-evil islam while blinking the fact that by doing so you really pave the way for extremist (read evil) original islam. However, this fits open or subtle muslim taqyya (lying for the "infidels" when it promotes islam) or similar strategies.

You need to understand that almost everything you read about islam is written by islamists or their supporters and therefore as far from the truth you can get. Those offering a more truthful analysis are all called "islamophobes" and therefore dismissed by pk society.
 
So for example, there was never any official Muhammad figure in original islam. He was introduced much later together with the Koran to make muslim atrocities "officially" "moral". The original islam was looting and murdering campaigns made successful by teasing teenage boys with sex slaves and booty.

An example from the tip of the iceberg:

Islam's Wikipedia "history" built on ridiculously polemic and vaguely founded single "sources" several hundred years later

Wikipedia's references to its long and colorfully detailed article about the early muslim murder campaigns (Ridda wars) against apostates contains only one source, Tabari who wrote his fantasies some 300 years later and from an Abbasid (750-) perspective.

Parvaneh Pourshariati has convincingly established that the muslim murder/looting/raping campaign of Mesopotamia (today Iraq) "took place, not, as has been conventionally believed, in the years 632–634, after the accession of the last Sasanian king Yazdgerd III (632–651) to power, but in the period from 628 to 632." An important consequence of this change in timeline means that the muslim jihad crusades started precisely when the Sasanians and Parthians were engaged in internecine warfare over who was to succeed the Sasanid throne.

The muslim finger (shahada) problem

 .

The shahada hate finger is protected by

Saudi based sharia OIC - and its islamofascist Saudi sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani - constitutes islam today, and it's against the most basic of Human Rights!

Klevius (unnecessary*) correction

* It doesn't alter anything of what Klevius has written about islam since 9/11 but reveals an extreme helplessness among Klevius readers who haven't dared to point it out in all these years! Or are you really so scared to comment on Klevius' "islamophobic" Human Rights defending  blogs?! And when it comes to Kennedy and Hoyland and their view on early islam they are almost intellectual twins in this respect.


"Before Abd al-Malik (caliph 685-705) Muhammad (allegedly dead 632 but see Pourshariati) is never mentioned on any official document whatsoever..."

This oral statement Klevius has previously attributed to Hugh Kennedy. However, it was overheard in a discussion where also Robert G. Hoyland participated. Now when I've heard Hugh Kennedy again I realize it was probably not him but Robert G. Hoyland who said it. There's no doubt about the authenticity of the statement itself though, and it alters nothing of what Klevius has written. Just something for you who can't use your own brain and therefore is incapable of reading and trusting Klevius.

Klevius analysis of the origin of islam is as rock solid as it was when he first presented it after Georg W Bush humiliated* himself by stating that 'islam is a peaceful religion'

* However, Bush had nothing to do with the fact that muslims supported by hate mongering Saudi Arabia were incapable of living in peace after their dictator had been elegantly toppled.


There are two simple reasons why Klevius understands islam equally well as whoever muslim:

1  Only the Koranic texts about pillaging, enslavement, rapetivism and booty from the "infidels" fit the historical facts about early islam and muslims.

2  Only muslim one way reproduction via rigid religious sex apartheid explains islam's growth. And as you already know, Klevius is the world's foremost expert on sex segregation (sad isn't it). Btw, you will get a sex tutorial here soon that will probably alter your view on sex equally much as Einstein altered our view on physics.

However, to these points you have to add what differs Klevius from muslims, i.e. the fact that Klevius has chosen as his axiomatic point of departure the equality principle of the 1948 Human Rights declaration instead of muslims' hateful racist/sexist sharia.

UK (diversity trained or muslim?) officers raid shops asking for names and addresses of those who have bought Charlie Hebdo. And not a word about it from BBC

Albert Einstein: "For me the unaltered Jewish religion like all other religions is an incarnation of the most primitive superstitions.

Klevius quiz: Which of the Judaic branches do you think would have been first in line trying to murder Albert Einstein as of today?

Origin of islam - some hasty random notes for you to chew on

An eighth-century manuscript of a seventh-century text in Syriac, attributed to Thomas Presbyter contains the earliest known mention in a non-muslim text of Muhammad.

    'In the year 945 [=634], indiction 7, Friday 4 February at the ninth hour, there was a battle between the Romans and the Arabs of Muhammad in Palestine twelve miles east of Gaza. The Romans fled, leaving behind the patrician bryrdn(?), whom the Arabs killed. Some four thousand poor villagers of Palestine were killed there, Christians, Jews and Samaritans. The Arabs (i.e. muslims) ravaged the whole region.'

The Arabic script as we know it today was unknown in Muhammad’s time

The construction of the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem in 691–92 represents the earliest known dated passages later found in the Koran. In these inscriptions, some letters are provided with diacritical points.

There can be little doubt that the first contacts between nascent islam and the Christian world were one-sidedly violent and bloody and that they brought much suffering on the populations of the Christian Countries that the muslims attacked.

These accounts show that offensive sword-jihad was the modus vivendi of the early muslims and that sack, pillage, the taking of (sex-)slaves and the ravaging of the land were commonplace.

The sources also show that the muslim sense of a “god-given” entitlement to Judea-Samaria, and thus modern Israel, goes back to the foundations of islam itself.

There is evidence of the establishment of Dhimmitude and payment of Jizya and other taxes that destroyed the wealth of the non-muslims.

The explanations for much of this can be found within the Koran, Biographic and Hadith literature.

Some muslims of today are inclined to say that the Hadith and Biographies are “inaccurate” or that they “reflect the views of the muslims of the times [a century or more after Muhammad] rather than the truth about islam”. What the above demonstrates is that the “views” expressed in the Ahadith and Biographies reach back to, if not the time of Muhammad himself, then to within a year or two of his death.

Given that the early records date to before the time of the textus receptus of the Koran and thus pre-date by centuries other muslim sources and further that they reflect the actions of the Sahaba, we can be quite certain that the attitudes in the later muslim sources which reflect these earlier sources are genuine in that they are accurately accounting the beliefs of the Sahaba.

Muslim born (apostate?!) Mr X "president" Barakeh Hussain Obama Soetoro (or whatever) now proposes Human Rights in his fight against original islam

However, the question is whether he means Human Rights or islamic "human rights" i.e. sharia? If the former he betrays all muslim OIC countries and in the latter case he betraysUS and the free world.

The muslim finger (shahada) problem

 .

The shahada hate finger is protected by

Saudi based sharia OIC - and its islamofascist Saudi sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani - constitutes islam today, and it's against the most basic of Human Rights!