Peter Klevius on Origin of Mosques - and Sex Trapped Princesses

Islam is forever* locked in its original "infidel" hatred * This is just the other side of the same muslim coin that says that we were all meant to be muslims and those who didn't became "infidel" prey for the "true" muslims. How can any civilized person take islam seriously?! It's a shame and tragic that we even have to defend ourselves against such an evil and hateful totalitarian ideology. Mohammed Emwazi (aka Jihadi John) was from a well off muslim Arab immigrant family from Kuwait and studied at a London university filled with similar muslim scum bags and "diversity trained" supporting staff There are more than a million muslim Islamic State supporters in UK (based on how many muslims supported the motives of the Charlie Hebdo murderers. And do note that it's all about motive when it comes to murder. However, British security says there are only "thousands" like Jihadi John but will not chase them ...

and do follow it up by demanding every muslim (including BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain) to either openly abandon sharia islam or loosing their right to Human Rights!  Don't repeat the mistake of King John! Two British leaders who wanted/wants to convert England into sharia islam King John the Traitor, PM David Cameron and the islamofascist "king" Abdullah who pretended to be "reformist" while steering the country in an even more intolerant direction by new sharia inspired laws by early 2014 (e.g. equalizing Human Rights and Atheism with "terrorism" and due penalties - compare Raif Badawi and others). King John in the early 13th century sent envoys to Mohammed al-Nâsir asking for his help. In return King John offered to convert to islam and turn England into a muslim state. The muslim jihadist Mohammed al-Nâsir's view on King John: "I never read or heard that any king possessing such a prosperous kingdom ...

* 'Islamofascist' is here defined as a muslim who supports the violation of the most basic Human Rights. Simple as that! If Sayeeda Warsi doesn't support sharia in this sense (e.g. OIC's sharia declaration) then she better come out as an apostate, i.e. committing the worst crime known to islam (which is already in itself the worst crime ever against humanity).  ** Using the hateful "islamphobia" against defender of Human Rights can only be classified as racist hate speech. Remember that "islamophobia" in sharia islam is synonymous with "blasphemy"! Muslim Sayeeda Warsi, unelected "Minister for Faith islam", has stated that the UK is 'committed to working with the United Nations Human Rights Council to implement blasphemy resolution 16/18.' However, the majority of Brits don't have a clue about this because no one has informed them about it - especially not BBC whom even Klevius has beaten whe...

Obama's and Farrakhan's best hate card spells islam Klevius to the "islamophobia" shouters: You're the purest of "diversity"* fascists! * "Diversity" means sectarianism based on skin color, religion, etc., i.e. against the most basic of Human Rights. "Diversity training" means  tolerating intolerance. Ever thought about how true fascism looks like? One example is the use of the extremely twisted reasoning that traps ignorant "muslims" in the same group as true muslims who deliberately oppose those very American values that these fascists used in the forst place to criticize the defense of American values and Human Rights. Rudy Giuliani gets death threats after hinting that Obama might be more a muslim than a Christian Compare Giuliani with Blasio on the police pic below! Rudy Guiliani: Obama must begin acting and speaking in a way that draws sharp, clear distinctions between us and those who thr...

* Due to lack of info paired with a heavy load of mis-info about islam - such as e.g. that Warsi herself supports the muslim extremist organization OIC and its sharia that is diametrically against the most basic of Human Rights, Sayeeda Warsi has managed to undermine British and Human Rights values for the purpose of replacing them with sharia. OIC has officially abandoned the most basic of Human Rights in the UN and replaced them with sharia and, consequently criminalized Human Rights where sharia is the rule. OIC is a muslim extremist organization that has criminalized the most basic of Human Rights - and wants to force others to do so as well Muslim Sayeeda Warsi, unelected "Minister for Faith islam", has stated that the UK is 'committed to working with the United Nations Human Rights Council (where Saudi Arabia is participating) to implement blasphemy resolution 16/18.' However, the majority of Brits don't have a clue about this because...

Muslims constitute a couple of percent of US population yet their influence in the White House seems to be a couple of hundred percent! Is it because their Human Rights violating hateful sharia ideology is so much preferred than the boring equality principle of Human Rights? Ruby Giuliani: 'The reality is, from all that I can see of this president, all that I’ve heard of him, he apologizes for America, he criticizes America … This is an American president I’ve never seen before.' And here's US islamofascist representative Rashad Hussain in OIC, the worst scum bag organization the world has seen since the Nazis. Yes, he has memorized the hateful Koran text by heart and is now ready to take over as director of the Center for US Strategic Counterterrorism Communications. OIC is a muslim extremist organization which openly violates the most basic of Human Rights! Albert Einstein: 'For me the unaltered Jewish religion like all other religions is an i...

* It doesn't alter anything of what Klevius has written about islam since 9/11 but reveals an extreme helplessness among Klevius readers who haven't dared to point it out in all these years! Or are you really so scared to comment on Klevius' "islamophobic" Human Rights defending  blogs?! And when it comes to Kennedy and Hoyland and their view on early islam they are almost intellectual twins in this respect. " Before Abd al-Malik (caliph 685-705) Muhammad (allegedly dead 632 but see Pourshariati) is never mentioned on any official document whatsoever ..." This oral statement Klevius has previously attributed to Hugh Kennedy. However, it was overheard in a discussion where also Robert G. Hoyland participated. Now when I've heard Hugh Kennedy again I realize it was probably not him but Robert G. Hoyland who said it. There's no doubt about the authenticity of the statement itself though, and it alters nothing of what Klevius has wri...