Muslims started World War I - but no one seems to talk much about it. Why?!

 

Servants of Sharia behind World War I

No matter how much you try to blink/whitewash history, the fact remains that islam is the most evil ideology the planet has seen so far

Apart from its basic racist approval of slavery (islam's main source of finance before oil) the evil ideology called islam stands on two basic legs:

1 Rapetivism - sex for jihadist thugs and Sharia reproduction of as many new muslims as possible aided by a one way muslim male muslimhood determination.

2 Parasitism - jihad pillaging/booty and a mafia like system of extortion etc. Pay islam to protect yourself from islam!

In the civilized world we still call such an ideology a violation of Human Rights!

Erdogan (1994): 'I am a servant of sharia'!

Islamofascism supporting BBC pushed forward an islam supporting "researcher" who blames Erdogan's islamofascism on EU's criticism of Turkey's Human Rights violations. But the fact remains that Erdogan has always been an islamofascist, no matter how much willful thinkers try to "moderate" him. And the fact remains that islam/Sharia will always not only blame but also criminalize Human Rights.

BBC's servant of Sharia

Here some other servants of Sharia. The one in the middle (Mishal Husain) employed by BBC and the two others were quite possibly employed by MI5 or MI6.

Muhamed Mehmedbasic would have been the one that started World War I had he not miserably failed

Muhamed Mehmedbasic, an Ottoman muslim, was first in line to murder Franz Ferdinand 1914. However, when he failed then Gavrilo Princip finished the Archduke.

All in all they were at least six terrorists who lined the route.

The islamofascist Ottoman Slave Empire (IOSE) entered World War I on the side of the Central Powers (mainly Germans) and was ultimately defeated. During the war, the empire's Armenians were deported and ultimately an estimated 1,500,000 were exterminated during the Armenian Genocide
Large-scale massacres committed by muslims were also committed against the empire's other minority groups such as the Greeks and Assyrians.
The muslims mass slaughtered the Assyrian population of the Islamofascist Ottoman Slave Empire (IOSI) during the 1890s and the First World War, in conjunction with the Armenian and Greek genocides.

The Assyrian civilian population of upper Mesopotamia (the Tur Abdin region, the Hakkâri, Van, and Siirt provinces of present-day southeastern Turkey, and the Urmia region of northwestern Iran) was forcibly relocated and massacred by the Muslim Ottoman (Turkish) army, together with other armed and allied Muslim peoples, including Kurds, Chechens and Circassians, between 1914 and 1920, with further attacks on unarmed fleeing civilians conducted by local Arab militias.

Estimates on the overall death toll have varied. Providing detailed statistics of the various estimates of the Churches' population after the genocide, David Gaunt accepts the figure of 275,000 deaths as reported at the Treaty of Lausanne and ventures that the death toll would be around 300,000 because of uncounted Assyrian-inhabited areas, leading to the elimination of half of the Assyrian nation.

The Assyrian genocide took place in the same context as the Armenian and Pontic Greek genocides. In these events, close to three million Christians of Syriac, Armenian, or Greek Orthodox denomination were murdered by the Young Turks regime.

In 2007, the International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS) reached a consensus that "the Ottoman campaign against Christian minorities of the Empire between 1914 and 1923 constituted a genocide against Armenians, Assyrians, and Pontian and Anatolian Greeks. The IAGS referred to the work of Gaunt and Travis in passing this resolution. Gregory Stanton, the President of the IAGS in 2007–2008 and the founder of Genocide Watch, endorsed the "repudiation by the world's leading genocide scholars of the Turkish government's ninety-year denial of the Ottoman Empire's genocides against its Christian populations, including Assyrians, Greeks, and Armenians."

The Ottoman Empire began massacring Assyrians alredy long before WWI in the nineteenth century, a time of friendly relations between the Ottomans and the British, who were defending the Ottomans from the Russian Empire's efforts to include under its protection the communities of Ottoman Orthodox Christians.

However, always remember what Klevius has always emphasized, that the WWI was the result of the islamic slave imperium decaying due to the West's abolishment of slavery in the early 19th century.

Islam's evil history repeats itself exactly according to its evil original formula

Every true muslim is a Human Rights violator

ISIS is Ansar al Islam tuned to Saudi Wahhabism which, in turn, is tuned to the origin of islam - NOT TO ANY "WESTERN INTERVENTION"!

The only "Western intervention" is islam's incompatibility with Human Rights - the very same incompatibility that made OIC officially abandon Human Rights and replaced them with Sharia in UN. I.e. in the very world institution that was  created to defend Human Rights. In practice it means that the most basic of Human Rights are criminalized - just as in the world's most intolerant country, Saudi Arabia. It also means that every true muslim, due to whatever form of Sharia, is a Human Rights violator.

In Iraq Mullah  Krekar founded in 1999 Ansar al Islam organization with Abu Musab al Zarqawi, with whom he had contact since 1994. Through the cell of Abu Musab al Zarqawi in Amman Jordan. Their so called Jordanian millennium attack was scheduled to the 2000 new years eve. Ansar al Islam then developed to a copy of the original Caliphate including the Levant.


The Saudi dictator family plus its allies are the main contributors, both ideologically and financially, to the slaughtering, raping, torturing etc terror now going on. And of course they don't distribute the money with a tag marked the state of Saudi Arabia.

Günter Meyer, Director of the Center for Research into the Arabic World at the University of Mainz. Meyer, has no doubt about where ISIS gets its funding. 'The most important source of ISIS financing to date has been support coming out of the Gulf states, primarily Saudi Arabia but also Qatar, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates.'

However, just like original islam, ISIS utilizes financial possibilities in the wake of their slaughtering conquest. Sex slaves, pillaging and booty are the main incentives for jihadists. Piracy blessed by the Koran and Allah.

Charles Lister at the Brookings Doha Center: 'ISIS has made an effort to establish networks in society that generate a continuing flow of money. One example is the systematic extortion conducted by ISIS in the recently conquered city of Mosul. The exortion affects small businesses and big companies, construction firms, and if the rumors are true, even local government representatives. In addition, it's suspected that the organization levies taxes in the areas that it completely controls - for example Raqqa in northeastern Syria.'

According to Günter Meyer at the University of Mainz, there is no chance that money is flowing to ISIS from Sunni circles connected to the former dictator of Iraq, Saddam Hussein. The goals of ISIS are too different from those of people in Hussein's network. Both groups want to topple the Shiite government of Iraq, but ISIS wants to establish an islamic theocracy, whereas the Sunnis from Hussein's Baath Party want to establish a secular democracy.'


ISIS' looting of the central bank in Mosul, brought them some hakf a Billion $ in cash. Other banks in Mosul and other areas under ISIS control were also plundered.

Eliot Higgins, writing under the pseudonym Moses Brown: 'ISIS can now buy a lot of jihad. With $429 million, ISIS could pay 60,000 fighters $600 a month for a whole year.'


Klevius question to BBC and its muslim Sharia presenter Mishal Husain: Do you see the pattern that exactly resembles how Klevius for more than a decade on the web has described the origin of islam? And if you really need additional support, why not critically read Hugh Kennedy's and others similar (although less articulated) descriptions.

And always remember Hugh Kennedy's words: 

'Before Abdul Malik, Mohammed is never mentioned on any official document
whatsoever, nor any form of religious pronouncement'!

This is why the Saudis have put meters of concrete on non-existing tombs, early mosques etc. Islam is later modelling of a parasitic Arabic piracy formula "justified" via references to Judaic/Christian writings.


 This is what Klevius wrote after 9/11 on the web:

 The root formula of Islam
Slavery+"infidel" racism+sex segregated rapetivism+anti human rights Sharia/apostasy ban. On behalf of today's and historical victims of Islam (in Darfur and globally), and on behalf of all humans who feel offended by the tenets/acts of Islam. Why isn't the worst crime ever against humanity criminalized, but instead protected by the very human rights it opposes?!* i.e. 1400 years of slavery/rapetivism/genocides
Without these evil racist/sexist/fascist extremist pillars and violent terror threats from so called "unislamic"* and confused morons Islam is dead!

AND ALL OF THEM ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL IN A DEMOCRACY BASED ON UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS! ISN'T THIS EXTREMISM IF ANYTHING?! FREEDOM OF RELIGION CAN'T MEAN PROMOTING DEATH OF FREEDOM!
.Slavery (forbidden all over the world except in Koran/Islam) - It's well known that Islam allows slavery, although perhaps less well known that Islam emerged out of the very idea of sponging on institutionalized slavery. This is why Saudi islamofascist dictators, imams etc. terrorists and terrorist supporters don't admit that the Koran is completely wrong in a non-totalitarian world, not only because it allows slavery but especially in claiming to be some "god's" unchangeable word hence excluding even the possibility of reformation!
."Infidel" racism (forbidden according to the UN declaration on every humans equal value, but a basic tenet of Koran/Islam) - The moral cornerstone needed for taking slaves and abusing others. Today this alluring but evil racism is utilized in a variety of topics from the people of Darfur to the West in particular or general.
.Rapetivism (globally forbidden because it's not in accordance with the principle that a person's sex shouldn't be used as a regulator of that person's freedom, but a basic tenet in Koran/Islam) - Rigid sex segregation for the purpose of abusing Islam confined girls/women as physical and cultural reproducers of Islam, i.e. as many new Muslims as possible.Sharia (forbidden in a democracy simply because it violates democracy and, like the other Islamic pillars, a bunch of human rights that democracy rests on) - Islam's jurisprudence for sex segregated rapetivism, apostasy ban etc. Ehsan Jami (Dutch ex-muslim): "We have an enormous problem with apostasy in Islam. We see a lot of problems where people want to leave Islam but they can't,"
.Apostasy ban (forbidden because it limits a person's freedom of or from religion, but a basic tenet in Koran/Islam) - Children (commonly from birth) and adults (commonly via marriage/rape) are forced to become and stay Muslims.
.
These cannot be erased by mere "interpretations" but needs deep reformist castration! And in this sense "majority Muslims" are tightly connected to Islamic extremism, i.e. to Islam itself. And if that's just because of plain ignorance abt Islam they better educate themselves, e.g. in a Koran school true to the Koran and Islam! When coming out they then have two choices: Becoming an "extremist" (open or stealthy) or abandoning the message alltogether!

That Islam (Koran) allows and even encourages psychological and physical wife beating is just one of an abundance of "minor" ripples of the main pillars above. The naivity of Muslim feminism may be exemplified by Asghar Ali: "...shari'ah also clearly lays down that if a man hides his impotency from his bride at the time of marriage and she discovers it after marriage, she is fully entitled to divorce on that ground. This itself clearly shows that she is entitled to sexual pleasure along with raising family." Rising what family?! The only reason for this rule is to safeguard that no woman fails to reproduce as many Muslims as possible!

The victims of Islam often reveal the same loyalty conflict as allegedly do victims of child abuse. However, some don't.So why isn't the human rightsphobia we call Islam globally criminalized and indicted, and how come that many a "democracy" seem to care more abt islamofascist terrorists than supporting the war on islamofascist terror?! And why are we supposed to ask islamist imams, professors etc for advice?! It's like asking Goring how to deal with Hitler and his terrorist youth! The likely answer: "Don't question, criticize or mess with us but support us!"

Sensibel people out there - here's the ultimate proof of how BBC (and its muslim Sharia presenter Mishal Husain) deliberately misinforms you right now in the service of Saudi Arabian islamofascism!

This is how BBC doesn't inform you about the world's most dangerous man - and an ongoing evil repetition of the origin of islam, the worst ideological crime ever against humanity! 'Iyad Madani', the Fuhrer of the world's biggest muslim organization, OIC, gets 216 hits on Google News today. However,

'Iyad Madani BBC' gives no result at all.

And this is while Saudi backed ISIS spread jihad terror over the Levant!

While islam and the Saudis mass murder Shia muslims in Iraq. Will we see "king" Abdullah in the International Criminal Court soon?!

Were most German Nazis moderate Nazis? Like allegedly most muslims are moderate muslims - despite Erdogan's claim that there is no moderate islam?!

How does being a muslim without taking responsibility for one's ideology differ from being a German without taking responsibility for National-socialism (Nazism)? Even an extremely cautious estimate reveals that muslims have murdered, tortured, enslaved, raped and terrorized multiple times that of the Germans. And still ticking...

The Saudi islamofascist Iyad Madani is the Fuhrer of the world's most powerful muslim Sharia organization (Saudi based OIC which via a scumbag muslim voting bloc in UN has made EVERY muslim a Sharia-muslim and made the most basic Human Rights a criminal offense wherever Sharia rules). Saudi Arabia is behind the racist sectarian slaughtering and sexist Sharia oppression of people not only in the Mideast but all over the world. And BBC and Mishal Husain are accomplices to this. There was a time when naive muslims and Westerners thought one could be a muslim without Human Rights violating Sharia. Not so anymore. So what they now do is to propose "moderate Sharia". However, the violation of the most basic of Human Rights can never be moderate!

The naive urban PC myth that Bush's Iraq war caused islamic terror in Iraq seems  to have at least a 4-10 year deficit - and the real culprits and their disgusting ideology are still at large

Saudi-backed infiltration has been going on since the early 1990s, from the Balkans to the borders of China

ISIS is former Ansar al-Islam.

Mouaz Moustafa, executive director of the Syrian Emergency Task Force, a Syrian-American organization that supports the opposition: '[The extremist groups] are the most well-resourced on the ground…'.



Klevius comment: How come that evil always gets most of the funds?

2008 Klevius wrote:

The root man of Saudi islamofascism was Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahab who, during his studies in Basra in the 18th C, got seriously dazzled by glimpses of the European Enlightenment twinkling through the temporary crack to the West called the "Tulip period". He then retreated back into his medieval islamic darkness & as a result, came to position himself as the very opposite to the British "Glorious revolution" which fought against Catholic papacy, & which ended up in Lancashire's coal fueled textile industries as the beginning of the modern industrialized* world based on technology & rationality rather than on religious superstition & fundamentalism (also compare Shinto vs islam). A major outcome of industrialization was universal suffrage & the idea about negative human rights.
* isn't it an irony then that Britain, who started the series of modern revolutions as well as industrialization, came to deeply embed itself with the most intolerant, racist & sexist constitution, i.e. the Saudi islamofascist state which was incapable of producing anything by itself except hatred & more fanatic muslims!

Together with the criminal "house of Saud" Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahab then confined the Arabs in islamic backwardness &, in addition, the Arab women in an islamic burka of extreme Sharia sex segregation/apartheid.

After having robbed Mecca & Medina, the Sauds/Wahhabis run the stolen country by the help of what they fleeced from visiting pilgrims. This was the main source of income until Westerners found/drilled oil & made the lazy islamist looters even wealthier.

From the beginning of the Iraq liberation, the Kurds expressed fear of Saudi Wahhabi jihadist penetration. They reported Saudi Wahhabi desecration of cemeteries--always an early sign of the Saudi-backed infiltration that has been going on since the early 1990s, from the Balkans to the borders of China.

An individual calling himself Mullah Krekar (aka Najmuddin Faraj Ahmad, born 07/07/1955 in Iraqi Kurdistan), religious mentor of the terrorist group Ansar al-Islam, which first operated in Kurdistan and then moved to the Sunni Triangle, has declared that he was proud to be described as a disciple of Ibn Abd al-Wahhab, founder of Saudi islamofascism.

Mullah Krekar was the original leader of the islamist armed group Ansar al-Islam, which was set up and commenced operations in Kurdistan while he had refugee status in Norway.

In 1991, after the first Gulf War, when Saddam Hussein oppressed, gassed and pursued the Kurds in Northern Iraq, Mullah  Krekar fled to Norway. From there he continued his relations with islamic militants in the Middle East and especially in Jordan and Iraq.

In Iraq Mullah  Krekar founded in 1999 Ansar al Islam organization with Abu Musab al Zarqawi, with whom he had contact since 1994. Through the cell of Abu Musab al Zarqawi in Amman Jordan, Jordanian intelligence found evidence to his involvement in the Jordanian millennium plot scheduled to the 2000 new years eve.

In 2002 Mullah  Krekar visited the Kurdish autonomy in Northern Iraq.

After the arrest of Jamal Zougam, one of the main offenders that carried out the Madrid Trains Bombing on 3/11/2004, Jamal Zougam revealed in his investigation that between 1999 – 2001, he traveled several times to Oslo, Norway, to meet Mullah  Krekar for “spiritual guidance”.

The name of Mullah  Krekar emerged so many times in the activities of Ansar al Islam, the most dangerous islamic network in Europe, and in connection with so many muslim terrorist cells in Europe and the Middle East, that it is impossible to assume that Mullah  Krekar is innocent from harboring terror.

Mullah Krekar is an example of shrewd manipulation of the judicial system by islam supporters.

The US had Islamic State of Iraq and al-Shams (ISIS) leader Abu Bakr al Baghdadi in custody at a detention facility in Iraq, but muslim born (apostate?!) Mr X "president" Barry Barack Barakeh Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever) freed him. Al Baghdadi was among the prisoners released in 2009 from the U.S.'s now-closed Camp Bucca near Umm Qasr in Iraq.

But now five years later he is leading the army of ruthless extremists bearing down on Baghdad who want to turn the country into an Islamist state by blazing a bloody trail through towns and cities, executing Iraqi soldiers, beheading police officers and gunning down innocent civilians.

al Baghadadi, aka Abu Duaa, was an islamic fundamentalist long before the U.S. invaded Iraq and he became a leader in al Qaeda's network before he was arrested and detained by American forces in 2005.

'Abu Duaa was connected to the intimidation, torture and murder of local civilians in Qaim,' according to a 2005 U.S. intelligence report.

'He would kidnap individuals or entire families, accuse them, pronounce sentence and then publicly execute them.'

The Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS), act in coordination with Saddam Hussein's former Baathists.

Western and Arab countries have happily supported ISIS and other muslim terrorist groups.

The muslim terrorists have now become owners of a territory.

However, terrorists such as ISIS cannot control large territories on their own but need others supporting them.


ISIS is attempting to take over Sunni-populated regions with the help of local forces so that it can control activities on the border of Syria and Iraq hence facilitating attacks against Iraq and weaken the Shiite-dominated government in Baghdad.

ISIS will probably negotiate similarly as the Taliban have done.

Muslim Wahhabi clerics/muftis in Saudi Arabia have heavily inspired the bloodshed produced by muslim jihadi groups in Iraq and Syria. ISIS islam interpretation is hence a Wahhabi one spiced with the usual inevitable takfirism, i.e. sectarian racism. Islam rests on racism on multiple levels due to its original formula that has nothing to do with good governance but everything to do with being an ideological AK-47 for parasitism.

Islam is therefore all about racist hate and sexism (sex slaves and reproduction of as many muslim males as possible). Except for the default islamic state of eternal hate and contempt of the "infidel" and the takfirs (wrong muslims), Saudi Sunni muslims especially hate Shia muslims, and teach others to hate them as well. This hatred is inherited from the very origin of islam and has to do with islamic (Arabic)language imperialism. So it's not at all just Saudi Arabia vs. Iran but a purely religious feature of islam. In fact, as Klevius has said since 9/11, the very origin and core of islam is tailored for parasitism, greed, looting and rapetivism. After the islamic conquest of the Sassanid Empire, during the reign of the Ummayad dynasty, the Arab muslim attackers/looters tried to impose Arabic as the primary language of the subject peoples throughout their empire.

In 2006, al-Qaeda blew up the al-Askari mosque, sparking a new civil war between Shiites and Sunnis in Iraq.

The only way to stop the spread of islamic terrorism is to stop Saudi Arabia. However, Mr X "president" will never do that. Even now he wants to help the Saudis while talking about giving military aid to the Iraqis.

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family hides its dirty game behind "private donors" etc.

Pictures of Saddam Hussein and his commander Essat al-Douri have been posted in the streets by ISIS.

Khamenei blames Saudi Arabia, Qatar for Iraq insurgents

Armed groups like the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) are leading to a debate on Salafism in Saudi Arabia because although they do Saudi business they also may constitute a threat to the dictatir family itself.

Saudi Salafism shares with ISIS the islamic fanatism of Ibn Taymiyyah, Ibn al-Qaim and Mohammad ibn Abdel Wahhab.


Does the islamic Sharia rule include all people or is it limited to influential muslim figures and muslim dictators (Ahl al-Hal wal Aqad)?

However, political Salafism cannot establish a system of rule that can be held accountable, as it bans and criminalizes all forms of opposition, criticism and protest against authority. Despite the differences among Salafist movements from jihadist Salafism to Saudi government loyalists Jamia Salafism, they all refuse and criminalize opposition to authority.

Salafist political theory is a mess of contradictory sayings of Sharia fanatics from the Middle Ages. Some sayings forbid resistance and protests, while others consider criticizing power a religious duty. What makes either of both opinions prevalent and dominant during a certain era is the power and influence of those who believe in it.

Issues of Sharia rule and democracy and their relation to islam in the Arab Spring countries worries Saudi Arabia. The Syrian jihad terror and the chance it gave to jihadist Salafism has prompted many questions regarding theories of authority in islam.

Saudi "king" Abdullah, with his policy of delivering blows against Iran by orchestrating the overthrow of Assad in Syria and Malik in Iraq, shows no pity for the bloodshed he causes. Nor do his supporters, including such apart figures as Mr X "president" muslim born (apostate?!) Barry Barakeh Hussein Mohammad Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever) and BBC's muslim Sharia presenter Mishal Husain etc.

Militarily Saudi Arabia's first public display of Chinese missiles capable of hitting Tehran has to be added to Obama's and UK's selling of huge amounts of expensive sophisticated military equipment and weapon systems to this (except for oil/gas) extremely backward and evil nation that in no way could have produced this technology by the hackward islam they embrace for the sake of doing evil and violating Human Rights.

However, ISIS is the ruthless muslim killing machine, that takes Sunni hate of Shiites to its logical, and bloody, extreme.

Saudi "king" Abdullah's main goal is, using his own words, "cutting off the head of the snake" in Tehran.

The Sunni/Shiite divide coincides approximately with the division between Arabs and Persians, now and historically.

Saudi Arabia's dilemma is rooting for muslim ISIS terrorism while avoiding its advances at home.

Already in the 1920s, Muslim Brotherhood fighters were helping Ibn Saud to conquer Arabia for the Saud family (which had come to wealth by using African slaves on their dade plantations in truly islamic tradition). Ibn Saud, the father of Saudi "king" Abdullah, asked the British to use their air force to weaken the the Muslim Brotherhood jihadists who had also attacked the Brits. Ibn Saud then used his own muslim jihadists to massacre them at Sabilla in 1929.


Btw, where are all the world's 1.5 Billion muslims who should need to follow Klevius' blog? What keeps them away?! If they need collected info digested via an unbiased Atheist (not chained by prejudicial "god" thoughts) top brain and interpreted against what we historically know about islam - there seems to be few options.
Stop being a coward muslim! Become a brave ex-muslim! You too Mishal Husain - if your muslim husband allows you to.

Dear reader, sorry for not editing this (and most other) posting properly - but as long as you don't contribute with anything Klevius cannot employ an editor. And you know, Klevius doesn't want to waste his life on editing this - isn't it more than enough that he produces this info for you! And why does Klevius bother doing even this? Well, simply because his Atheist moral is entirely resting on basic Human Rights and equality. And as he continuously sees how stupidity paves the way for evil immoral (Human Rights violation) by racist/sexist elements, he feels morally obliged to do at least this. If not for anything else than his own peace of mind.

How many lives has the muslim Saudi terrorist "king" destroyed - at home and abroad?

Saudi muslim "king" Abdullah is the world's most evil muslim terrorist - yet BBC and its muslim Sharia presenter Mishal Husain seem to have completely missed this obvious fact - as has muslim born (apostate?!) Mr X "president"! Why?

RT video: Deprived of their basic needs, the four Saudi royal princesses kept in 13-year isolation by their father, King Abdullah, have surpassed 60 days without food.

The monarch’s daughters fell out of their father’s favor for speaking out against the ill treatment of women in the Gulf kingdom. It is also believed that the king was angry at the girls' mother for not giving him a son.

Two of the princesses, Sahar and Jawaher, say they are being kept against their will in two mansions inside a royal compound in the city of Jeddah, along with their other two sisters – Maha and Hala. They say they have been deprived of food for over 60 days and have very little access to water.

“It’s a horrible situation, it’s a forced famine basically. They are confining us, depriving us of food and water, freedom and rights. We are struggling, we are surviving, we are resisting, we are trying our best to stay alive,” the two sisters told RT via Skype.

“How can we continue living like this? We have to take the risk of [speaking out]."

Having spent so much time deprived of freedom, they struggle to understand why they have been locked up.

“The king and his sons need to answer these questions: What are we charged with? What exactly is our crime?”

“What is the crime of 99 percent of women in this country, who are basically suffering under male guardianship? A male guardian can do whatever he wants; he can cut off everything and she is left with nothing,” they said on behalf of the female citizens of the ultraconservative kingdom.

“We are making these statements right now [in order to] gain our rights, our freedoms.”

Their health is slowly deteriorating. Past appeals by their mother, Alanoud Al-Fayez, for outside assistance - including from Western leaders like US President Barack Obama - have not come to fruition. The administration is turning a blind eye, according to some critics. But the situation cannot be helped by appealing to the Saudi government either, as it maintains that the princesses are in fact perfectly free to move around the city of Jeddah, provided they are accompanied by bodyguards.

The four sisters are between the ages of 38 and 42, with at least one said to be suffering from psychological problems.

Earlier, in rare interviews with foreign media, the sisters said they don’t have any passports or IDs and the king has also forbidden any man to seek his daughters’ hands in marriage. The entire time they have been kept in isolation, both electricity and water have been shut off at random, often for days – even weeks.

The 89-year-old monarch and father of 38 children, given to him by multiple wives, is listed among Forbes magazine's most wealthy and influential men, with a fortune estimated at around US$17 billion.

The princesses' mother, Al-Fayez, divorced King Abdullah in 1980, consequently leaving for London in 2001. The sisters' ordeal then began around 2002. Less than one year after their mother escaped, Abdullah began tormenting his daughters. The sisters told their mother that he drugged their food and water to keep them docile when they openly spoke against women being illegally detained and placed in mental wards.

The director of the Institute for Gulf Affairs, Ali Al-Ahmed, believes the grave human rights situation in the kingdom is compounded by a political strategy from the outside, whose purpose is to keep any negative press at bay, and is a force to either change things for the better or keep them as they are.

“This is the nature of the Saudi monarchy, who are oppressing the people in their country. But now it’s very clear that they’re oppressing their own female members. The king who is portrayed in the international media – in the Western media - as a reformer, is oppressing his own daughters; healthy adult women, who have been held for 13 years…they’re being starved deliberately,” Al-Ahmed told RT.

“People outside the country definitely can speak and hold those people who are responsible for this crime accountable; namely the Saudi king and his sons…who are deliberately doing this.”

The Saudi islamic terror tentacles

Although Qatar and other islamofascist countries try to shed as much blood as possible, Saudi Arabia's dicator family is by far the world's most dangerous terrorist organization. ISIS and Boko Haram are just two names in the islamic Saudi killing and raping machinery.


How many versions are there of islam? And how many versions were there of Nationalsocialism (Nazism)?! And how come that "benign islam" always represents islam while evil Nazism always represents Nationalsocialism? Klevius doesn't approve of any state socialism* but cannot see the logic in this.

* State socialism ia when the state and state officials rather than the citizens benefit from taxes.

According to people who use the oxymoron "islamophobia", Saudi Arabia is both the islamic paradise and not islamic at all.

If we have to believe PC people (fascists) there is actually not any muslim country with "real islam". Their islam is "perverted" by the "infidel colonialists". In short, if you think you can criticize islam then think again because it's not islam's fault but yours! So Klevius has taken these advices seriously and therefore headed to the origin of islam, long before any "Western imperialism". However, what Klevius found there when islam started its own grim 1400 year colonialism campaign turned out to be exactly the very same picture as we see today.

Mr X "president" Barry Barakeh Husein Mohammad Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever) and other leaders in France, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and the UK, should all be held accountable for the destabilization of Iraq, Libya and Syria. Indeed, Egypt, Lebanon, Mali, Tunisia, Nigeria, Malaysia, Thailand, Brunei, etc etc. Islamofascist Gulf and Western powers alongside Turkey have unleashed forces that, guided by islamic original evil, shoot, bomb, behead, slaughter and rape in a stream of terrorist attacks, destroy cultural monuments and commit other barbaric acts.

According to a jihadi source, Baghdadi received 'encouraging signals from a regional agency in a friendly Sunni Muslim country to enter Syria, and promises of financial support toward this goal.' When asked whether it was Saudi Arabia or Qatar, he replied, 'It is one of these two.'

Zaid Alisa: Iraq should name and shame the countries supporting Al-Qaeda and lodge complaints at the United Nations against those countries if it wants to fight Al-Qaeda

Klevius comment: How could you possibly complain to UN when islam and Saudi Arabia have taken over UN?!

Fascism in our time

Ayaan Hirsi Ali: 'Remember apartheid -- we stopped it through writing books, writing, through songs, through trade boycotts, through diplomacy. We were united as a -- just not America but the West and all moral countries to say it is unacceptable to divide humanity to blacks and whites and what are we seeing with Sharia? We’re seeing it in Brunei. We’re seeing it in Sudan. We know it in our lives, Saudi Arabia and others. On grounds of, you know … we are not taking the positions, the moral positions that we need to and we're not fighting that moral positions with the tools we have.'

Baroness Cox (a British "islamophobic" "islam hateing" cross-bench peer leading a Parliamentary campaign to protect girls/women from Sharia): 'It's deeply disturbing. This violates everything that we stand for. It would make the Suffragettes turn in their graves.'

Klevius question: Who are 'we' in 'everything that we stand for'? Does it include BBC's crypto-islamofascist Sharia supporting* presenter Mishal Husain, who grew up in Saudi Arabia and other islamofascist countries - and all other similar muslim women in power position (compare e.g. Sayeeda Warsi) who pretend to be civilized on the surface but support uncivilized racist/sexist Sharia? Do note that EVERY form of Sharia is against the most basic of Human Rights. This is why OIC (all the world's muslims Saudi based and led world Umma organization) replaced Human Rights with Sharia in UN by the help of UN's largest voting bloc consisting of some of the world's worst Human Rights violators - yes, including the homelands of Mishail Husain and Sayeeda Warsi etc.

* If she doesn't support Sharia (in whatever form) she is no muslim and therefor an apostate.

 

All muslims world organization, Saudi based OIC and its Human Rights violating Saudi Fuhrer Iyad Madani.

Just one example of barbaric islamofascism thriving in the Western civilization

An African giant that makes every prophet laughable and pathetic

Brandeis University cancelled plans to award American Enterprise Institute fellow Ayaan Hirsi Ali an honorary degree after students raised "concerns" about statements she’s made that are critical of Islam.

Some quotes by Martin J. Gross (a Member of the Board of Trustees of Brandeis University): 'I must now confess to having serious concerns about the spirit of free inquiry at my alma mater when it rescinds an honorary degree to Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a woman who champions women's rights in the Muslim world.

And I thought it regrettable that upon learning that Hirsi Ali was offered an honorary degree 87 Brandeis faculty members were so “filled with shame” that they presented President Lawrence with a letter urging him to “rescind immediately the invitation to Ms. Ayaan Hirsi Ali for an honorary doctorate” based on her "virulently anti-Muslim public statements."
What is worthy of note is that Hirsi Ali's views do not come from an ivory tower but from the concrete reality of her personal experiences as a woman.

She was genitally mutilated as a child, fled a forced marriage at age 12 and lives under constant threat of death by the very people who proudly wear the ideology she condemns.

And how preposterous is their issue with her Western triumphalism, especially when she fled to the West from the very ideology that is trying to kill her.
I am profoundly perplexed that there is no counter letter submitted by any faculty member to President Lawrence. Is there not a single woman faculty member in the Women and Gender Studies Program who can find the compassion to defend her? Is the majority of the faculty too intimidated to speak out against this new tyranny for fear of being ostracized?

It now appears that Brandeis’ motto of "truth unto its innermost parts" has been replaced by the eleventh commandment of political correctness: “Thou shalt not offend.”'

Klevius: And here is an other example of what this African heroine has to fight

Example of Saudi islam in Europe (UK) 2014 - it's not getting better, it's getting worse!

At Oldknow academy which has 600 pupils on its roll, inspectors found that school governors had used the primary school's budget to subsidise a trip to Saudi Arabia "for only muslim staff and pupils". Extremely intolerant racist and sexist Saudi Atabia (the "guardian of islam" and home of OIC) does not allow non-muslims to even visit Mecca and Medina (the muslim slave markets were muslims now throw stones against a pillar symbolizing us non-muslims.

Staff at the academy, which has links with a school in Saudi Arabia, could not tell inspectors whether certain teaching materials had been properly vetted and said that the content in the newly introduced second Islamic assembly was not properly monitored.

The academy had also cancelled a special Christmas assembly and inspectors were told that the school had established and paid for a madrassa out of its budget.

According to the report, a group of governors is making significant changes to the ethos and culture of the academy without full consultation. They are endeavoring to promote a Sharia-based ideology in what is a maintained and non-faith academy.

Why isn't this deeply informative picture of BBC's muslim Sharia presenter Mishal Husain more popular on Google?

Is someone manipulating or are people just stupid?!

 It should preferably be viewed in the context of this picture

 and Saudi based OIC's Human Rights desecrating Sharia and its Fuhrer Iyad Madani, the Saudi leader of all the world's muslims via its (scumbag) voting bloc in UN.

 These pictures together best describe the problem with islam in the world of today. Offending? Not at all compared to the offense islam today constitutes against Human Rights. If you don't believe me please do read Saudi Arabia's (the "guardian of islam") criminal legislation which criminalizes Human Rights. And not only Saudi Arabia. OIC's world Sharia openly crimnalizes the most basic of Human Rights.

Take that and again contemplate the depth of these pics! And see them for what they really are - a defense for every human beings right to equality.

Why isn't BBC's Saudi rooted anti-semitic* muslim Sharia presenter talking about islamic "radicalism"?

 

 * Here Klevius ironically uses 'anti-semitism' in partly the same way as when BBC and other islamofascism supporting media try to  hide the fact that most hate attacks against Jews are committed by muslims. However, Klevius doesn't hide it but deliberately uses the concept precisely to emphasize this disgusting bigotry and hypocrisy. 'Semits' used to mean Semitic language family speakers, and became synonymous with European Ashkenazi Jews supposed to be rooted in Biblical Mideast, but whose only connection to Mideast was the Jewish slave traders in the Jewish Khazar slave empire in the southern part of European Russia; the Jewish slave traders who served the disgusting Andalus with white sex slaves (mainly from Slavic and Finnish parts of Europe); and the same repeated by Jewish slave traders and the Turkish Ottoman muslims up until Europe abolished slavery entirely in the early 19th century (abolishment of slavery had been made in several more or less successful attempts against the muslim and Jewish slave raiders/traders since the origin of islam). European Ashkenazi Jews were produced by Jewish slave traders having sex (usually constitutional rape) with European sex slaves or their descendants. This has been known for long but only during the last decades finally confirmed via genetic research. This may be compared with the gruesome genetic history of Arabian Mideast which confirms that almost only women (sex slaves) from Africa have left their genetic mark in Arabs because African male slaves were usually castrated before sold to muslim Arabs. And the numbers and suffering were huge - nothing like the belittling of islam's crimes against humanity so commonly (mis)taught today.

Mishal Husain's and BBC's extreme and radical bigoted hypocrisy

While BBC News today talked about the threat from "radical" muslims in British schools and, later on, the muslim Taliban problem, Mishal Husain, a muslim Sharia supporter (or apostate?!) was assigned to talk about payment protection insurance, frogs turning into princes etc. Why? Is it islamophobia, i.e. the fear of exposing a "Euro-muslim" to real islam?

Mishal Husain, apostasy, Iyad Madani, OIC, Sharia,

In much the same way as BBC has failed to inform its compulsory license fee paying audience about islamofascist OIC, its islamofascist Saudi Fuhrer Iyad Madani, and the Human Rights violating islamofascism they impose via the biggest voting bloc in UN (consisting of mainly the worst Human Rights violating nations).