Trump (US) and UKIP (UK) got most of their voters because people are fed up with Human Rights violating sharia muslims.
Trump and original UKIP wanted (just as ordinary Americans and Brits) to vet/control for them and only let in "muslims" who don't sympathize with racist and sexist views on non-muslims - i.e the classic sharia that clashes head on with the most basic of Human Rights equality.
Just consider if what sharia courts are allowed to tell muslims would be applied to ordinary Americans and Brits. Hateful speech and hate crimes!
When BBC News today "discussed" sharia courts it predictably turned into blaming "islamophobia". Even the last word uttered (by one of the guests from the Labour party) was 'islamophobic'.
Noteworthy is also that the muslim who represented the 100 muslim women's protest against scrutiny of sharia courts, called herself a 'feminist'. And as you probably already knew, Klevius is in such a context to be called an "anti-feminist" because how could he possibly belong to a category that approves of robbing girls and women from their most basic Human Rights equality inscribed in the 1948 Human Rights declaration.
Always remember: Sharia courts constitute an exception from the law of the land. In other words, a black justice hole where girls, women and others are trapped due to the "muslim sharia community" playing on "tradition", "culture", peer/famil/kin pressure etc.
Muslim woman asking for sharia on BBC: Muslim women will be abused and it will go underground without sharia courts.
Klevius: So why would muslim women be more abused than non-muslim women UK?