UK DID NOT vote Brexit. EU residents weren't allowed to vote while non-EU residents were.

The muslim Saudi dictator family is the root of most islam induced suffering

May's secret love affair with Saudi islamofascists - while rejecting Chinese

Prince Charles blames islam's atrocities in Mideast etc. on "European populists like the Nazis"

Prince Charles blames islam's atrocities in Mideast etc. on "European populists like the Nazis"

While Klevius is forcing islam into a Human Rights corner, politicians support islamofascism

BBC's fake/angled news protect islamofascist offenders because of its ties (BBC World) to Mideast

BBC lies and fake news

The "Birmingham Koran" hoax - and a sonless "prophet" invented after it!

Lego won't sponsor the defense for Human Rights equality - but islamofascism and sharia is ok

Hillary supports sharia for women, war with Russia and aid to Sunni islamofascists

Apostate (?) Obama's bio- and adoptive dads were both muslims

BBC smears China while bolstering Saudi islamofascists - the worst spreaders of hate and terror

BBC smears China while bolstering Saudi islamofascists - the worst spreaders of hate and terror

Choudary and May both want more sharia - so what about "British values"?

Michael Morell (ex-CIA) is/was a knowing agent for Saudi wahhabism and its Koranic hate jihadism

Trump: Why wouldn't we? Theresa May: I would!

Sharia muslim London mayor voted in by his islamist friends

Sharia muslim London mayor voted in by his islamist friends

Theresa May is for sharia and EU - but against EU's Human Rights Court which condemns sharia

Muslims and Hillary against Human Rights

Muslims and Hillary against Human Rights

OIC and NOI are muslim extremist organizations

Origin of islam and an ignorant white Western nun

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo have sharia islam in common

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo have sharia islam in common

God is an escape route from Human Rights

First sophisticated art by the first truly modern humans

The world's oldest real portrait ever found (Central Europe). Carvings dated to 26-29,000 bp.

Finland's lion trampling the islamic scimitar 1583

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Origin of the Vikings

A victim of rapetivism - and an interfaith messenger of rapetivism

A victim of rapetivism - and an interfaith messenger of rapetivism

Japan 10 yrs ahead of Europe in hybrid/fuelcell cars, space tech etc

Native Brits from Doggerland spoke a proto-Finnish/Uralic (Eurasiatic) language

We non-muslims need to honor racist islam's victims - cause muslims won't

We non-muslims need to honor racist islam's victims - cause muslims won't
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-f4ihemJ34G4/T2yuFzSUqiI/AAAAAAAAA_U/FcGmXfvhkCw/s640/Ms+Lucy+Black+racist+4.jpg

The islamic extermination of Jews

Modern humans originated in Siberia

Klevius: Why are women accomplices to their own apartheid?

The last taboo: Sex segregation/sex apartheid

Klevius is probably now the world's foremost expert on sex segregation (sad, isn't it) and islam (the worst hate crime ever) is the foremost expression of sex segregation. By 'islam' Klevius means Sharia as described by Bill Warner and the Saudi based and steered muslim world organization OIC and its Cairo declaration (sharia) imposed on all muslims via UN (meaning basic Human Rights are criminalized).

Burn OIC's islamic anti-Human Rights declaration!

Thursday, January 29, 2015

2010 Japan's IKAROS became the world's first spacecraft to sail on sunlight. But you wouldn't know if you read Robert Anderson and his biased write-alikes, would you!


Acknowledgement: Dear reader, you start realizing why Klevius has these loads of Japan related pics etc all over his sites, don't you! Yes, it's all about bias hunting.


Is there a religious reason to Japan's technological and quality superiority? I.e. the lack of (Judaic)religion!


Japan is a country that has managed (geographical location and smartness) to avoid the Judaic "monotheist" traditions of which there are and have been many varieties - although only the violent ones are usually named, i.e. the official state religion of the Roman empire (aka Christianity) and the parasitic and violently spread robber religion of the Judeo-Christian Arabs (aka islam).  Jews were the people God chose to slaughter the Canaanites. Christians were the community Constantine chose to slaughter the "Barbarians". And muslims were the community Mohammad chose to slaughter and enslave all of them, i.e. the "infidels".

Honda's Asimo robot a decade ago

Whereas the homeland of islam, Saudi Arabia hasn't by itself managed to produce anything except dates from slave worked palm plantations, the homeland of Shinto, Japan, has been the indisputable tech and quality leader of the world.


May 2010




January 2015

But Robert Anderson on January 27, 2015 had no idea about this when he wrote that: 'Have you ever thought of sailing in sunlight? No? The idea indeed sounds like some kind of magic or dream.  The scientists are all set to turn this dream into reality'.





Peter Klevius: Top tier! Is he a "muslim science" writer!


Robert is announced as a top tier university graduate in journalism. A professional journalist with several published articles and working as a free-lancer in his field, he has been able to capture public eye on his work. With the abilities he posses, he takes the readers by a swift.

Peter Klevius: What's wrong with me? I'm not swifted at all! And no wonder our media is so full of lies about islam etc. with these kind of journalists.


Some technical data about the Japanese IKAROS spacecraft


IKAROS is the first spacecraft to successfully demonstrate solar-sail technology in interplanetary space.

Whereas the US solar sail that is planned for a short test fly in May 2015 is only the size of a loaf of bread, the inter-planetary IKAROS sail has a diagonal of 20 meter.

IKAROS was successfully launched together with Akatsuki (the Venus Climate Orbiter) aboard a Japanese H-IIA rocket from the Tanegashima Space Center on 21 May 2010.

The IKAROS probe is the world's first spacecraft to use solar sailing as the main propulsion. It was planned to demonstrate four key technologies:

    Deployment and control of a large, thin solar sail membrane
    Thin-film solar cells integrated into the sail to power the payload
    Measurement of acceleration due to radiation pressure on the solar sail
    Attitude control via variable reflectance liquid crystal panels

The mission also includes investigations of aspects of interplanetary space, such as gamma-ray bursts, solar wind and cosmic dust.

The probe's instrument (ALDN-S and ALDN-E) measured the variation in dust density while its Gamma-Ray Burst Polarimeter (GAP) measured the polarization of gamma-ray bursts during its six month cruise.

IKAROS is to be followed by a 50 m (160 ft) sail, intended to journey to Jupiter and the Trojan asteroids.

The craft contains two tiny ejectable cameras, DCAM1 and DCAM2. DCAM2 was used to visualise the sail after deployment on 14 July 2010. One of those photos was considered in 2013 by Discovery News as one of the best space robot selfies. IKAROS has been recognized by Guinness World Records as not only the world’s first solar sail spacecraft between planets, but also that its two separated cameras, DCAM1 and DCAM2, are the smallest size of a spacecraft flying between planets.


Albert Einstein (born a Jew) and Peter Klevius happen to have the same view on the laughable* but also heavily tragic concept of a "god"

* Are we still allowed to laugh at people who believe in ghosts - or is it already considered an offense against ghost sensitivities - hence making you a racist? That it's considered racist to offend the sensitivities of the guy below on the pic we already know.


Albert Einstein: "For me the unaltered Jewish religion like all other religions is an incarnation of the most primitive superstitions. And the Jewish people to whom I gladly belong and with whose mentality I have a deep affinity have no different quality for me than all other people. As far as my experience goes, they are also no better than other human groups, although they are protected from the worst cancers by a lack of power. Otherwise I cannot see anything 'chosen' about them."

Peter Klevius: Einstein said this in 1954 when he and most others thought we had finally got rid of both ideological, national and religious fascism by the help of the 1948 Human Rights declaration. However, now islam is not protected from the worst cancers by a lack of power - on the contrary, evil islam is protected from scrutiny and criticism by that very same organization due to Saudi based OIC and its islamofascist leader Iyad Madani.

Saudi based OIC - and its islamofascist Saudi sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani - constitutes islam today, and it's against the most basic of Human Rights!











 Einstein expressed his skepticism regarding an anthropomorphic deity, often describing it as "naïve" and "childlike". He stated, "It seems to me that the idea of a personal God is an anthropological concept which I cannot take seriously. I feel also not able to imagine some will or goal outside the human sphere. My views are near those of Spinoza: admiration for the beauty of and belief in the logical simplicity of the order which we can grasp humbly and only imperfectly. I believe that we have to content ourselves with our imperfect knowledge and understanding and treat values and moral obligations as a purely human problem—the most important of all human problems."

On 22 March 1954 Einstein received a letter from Joseph Dispentiere, an Italian immigrant who had worked as an experimental machinist in New Jersey. Dispentiere had declared himself an atheist and was disappointed by a news report which had cast Einstein as conventionally religious. Einstein replied on 24 March 1954:

    It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it


Klevius question to BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain: So what about you? Do you believe in a personal "Allah" or a muslim OIC/Ummah sharia "Allah"? Klevius and BBC's listeners expect an honest answer!


Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo. Mishal Husain is BBC's top muslim presenter and BBC is the world's leading media.

Monday, January 26, 2015

Klevius question to BBC and their muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain: Ever thought about why Klevius blog about sex segregation is called Origin of islam?

Acknowledgement: If you want better editing etc. - just donate and it will be fixed faster than Wikipedia - and certainly less biased! You see, believe it or not but Peter Klevius doesn't get support or funds from neither Saudi Arabia, OIC, EU, US, or UN. On the contrary, these are all busy trying to criminalize his defense of Human Rights (yes, in Saudi Arabia it's already equalized with terrorism) - pretty much in line with the Saudi state's sharia verdict on Raef Badawi.

Islam is a parasitic hate crime - the worst the world has ever encountered. And with 1.5 billion muslims trapped in it it is defended at whatever cost - despite the inevitability of its defeat under the Human Rights equality moral logic.

Islamic hate mongering against the "infidel" is islam's excuse for attacking and taking slaves etc. parasitism. It's also the excuse for sex slavery, marital and exmarital sharia rape, oppression of girls/women etc.

You should be ashamed of having politicians dealing with the disgusting Saud dictator family resting their power on Western oil money and evil Wahhabism (aka Salafism i.e. original islam) which doesn't differ at all from that of the Islamic State (aka ISIS, IS etc).

In Peter Klevius series islam tutorials for the ignorant or bigoted hypocrite (which one do you choose Mishal Husain?)


Islam doesn't have a problem - islam is the problem - more than you ever thought!

The reason being that only orthodox islam (aka "extremism") fits all the violent and parasitic parts of the Koran and historical facts. This is why islam's sudden explosion out of the Arabian illiterate Bedouin desert can't be understood without islam's original formula (taken unabridged and without updatings from Klevius 2002 website www.klevius.info):

Slavery+"infidel" racism+sex segregated rapetivism+anti human rights Sharia/apostasy ban. Why isn't the worst crime ever against humanity criminalized, but instead protected by the very human rights Islam opposes?!
Without these evil racist/sexist/fascist extremist pillars and violent terror threats from so called "unislamic"* and confused morons Islam is dead!

AND ALL OF THEM ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL IN A DEMOCRACY BASED ON UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS! ISN'T THIS EXTREMISM IF ANYTHING?! FREEDOM OF RELIGION CAN'T MEAN PROMOTING DEATH OF FREEDOM!
.
Slavery (forbidden all over the world except in Koran/Islam) - It's well known that Islam allows slavery, although perhaps less well known that Islam emerged out of the very idea of sponging on institutionalized slavery. This is why Saudi islamofascist dictators, imams etc. terrorists and terrorist supporters still don't understand that the Koran is completely wrong, not only because it allows slavery but especially in claiming to be some "god's" unchangeable word hence excluding even the possibility of reformation!
.
"Infidel" racism (forbidden according to the UN declaration on every humans equal value, but a basic tenet of Koran/Islam) - The moral cornerstone needed for taking slaves and abusing others. Today this alluring but evil racism is utilized in a variety of topics from the people of Darfur to the West in particular or general.
.
Rapetivism (globally forbidden because it's not in accordance with the principle that a person's sex shouldn't be used as a regulator of that person's freedom, but a basic tenet in Koran/Islam) - Rigid sex segregation for the purpose of abusing Islam confined girls/women as physical and cultural reproducers of as many new Muslims as possible.
.
Sharia (forbidden in a democracy simply because it violates democracy and, like the other Islamic pillars, a bunch of human rights that democracy rests on) - Islam's jurisprudence for sex segregated rapetivism, apostasy ban etc. Ehsan Jami (Dutch ex-muslim): "We have an enormous problem with apostasy in Islam. We see a lot of problems where people want to leave Islam but they can't,"
.
Apostasy ban (forbidden because it limits a person's freedom of or from religion, but a basic tenet in Koran/Islam) - Children (commonly from birth) and adults (commonly via marriage/rape) are forced to become and stay Muslims.
.
These cannot be erased by mere "interpretations" but needs deep reformist castration! And in this sense "majority Muslims" are tightly connected to Islamic extremism, i.e. to Islam itself. And if that's just because of plain ignorance abt Islam they better educate themselves, e.g. in a Koran school true to the Koran and Islam! When coming out they then have two choices: Becoming an "extremist" (open or stealthy) or abandoning the message alltogether!

That Islam (Koran) allows and even encourages psychological and physical wife beating is just one of an abundance of "minor" ripples of the main pillars above. The naivity of Muslim feminism may be exemplified by Asghar Ali: "...shari'ah also clearly lays down that if a man hides his impotency from his bride at the time of marriage and she discovers it after marriage, she is fully entitled to divorce on that ground. This itself clearly shows that she is entitled to sexual pleasure along with raising family." Rising what family?! The only reason for this rule is to safeguard that no woman fails to reproduce as many Muslims as possible!



"prophet" Mohammad (a fictive figure* applied long after his "death" to symbolize "Allah's " legitimation of Arab parasitism


* According to historian Hugh Kennedy (who is very uncritical of islam) there is not a single official trace of any Mohammad before many decades after his alleged "death".

Islam is the only religion that combines utter racism (the "infidel" that due to islamic hate speech is fair game to be murdered or enslaved) with utter sexism (women seen as a separate and inferior species) in a way that constitutes optimal parasitism.


, Muhammad:

    I have been ordered to fight with the people [sometimes translated as “all men”] till they say, none has the right to be worshipped but Allah.

And then there is Muhammad’s famous command, uttered as he lay on his deathbed: “Let there not be two religions in Arabia.”  And there is this:

    The Last Hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews.  The Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say:  ‘Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him;’ but the tree Gharqad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews.

Asked … whether he would “visit Israel with a Palestinian visa,” [Egypt’s minister of religious endowments] said: “This is premature.  Let’s wait until it happens.  However, we hope that the words of the Prophet Muhammad will be fulfilled:  Judgment Day will not come before the Muslims fight the Jews[.]


"Moderate" (i.e. naive, ignorant, bigoted, hypocritical etc) muslims feed the growth of islamofascism


Hidaayah Islamic Foundation (Sri Lanka): Everywhere in the Muslim world we are witnessing, the raising of the banner of Tawheed and the revival of the Call to the Qur’an and Sunnah.

All around the Muslim world, we see some Muslims, individually and collectively proclaiming the Call to Tawheed and the return to the Qur’an and Sunnah in the face of opposition by the ‘Saint-worshippers’, `Grave-worshippers`, `the Sufis’ and the ‘Tariqat followers’. These deviant groups all purport or make the false claim to be Ahl us Sunnah wal Jam’aah and label the true callers to The Sunnah as `Wahhabis’

Sheikh Muhammad ibn Abd al Wahhab ibn Sulaiman ibn Ali ibn Muhammad ibn Ahmad ibn Rashid al Tamimi was born in the year 1115 A.H.(1703 C.E.) in ‘Ayina to the north of Riyadh, in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia during the reign of Abdulla ibn Muhammad ibn Hamd ibn Muammar.

He left his native town to perform the Hajj and then proceeded to Madinah. At that time Sheikh Abdullah bin Ibrahim ibn Saif belonging to the progeny of Saif Najdi was chief of the scholars of Madinah. Sheikh Muhammad acquired a good deal of knowledge from him and came to be loved and held in high esteem by his teacher.


However, what really made al Wahhab tick was his scare of European Enlightenment traces of which he experienced during his time in Basra influenced (via Ottoman Turks) by the so called Tulip period (see further down what Klevius wrote 2008 about this).

However, what followed was a repetition of the original islamic formula so that the Wahhab/Saud cooperation resulted in something very similar to what we have seen under the banner of the Islamic State recently.


Compare the following description with what Klevius has written (do note the resemblance with the original islam described by Peter Klevius):

In 1744 Prince Muhammad bin Saud made an agreement with Muhammad ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab:

    "You (bin Saud) are the settlement's chief and wise man. I (al-Wahhab) want you to grant me an oath that you will perform jihad against the unbelievers. In return you will be leader of the muslim community and I will be leader in religious matters."


 The alliance provided the ideological impetus to Saudi expansion. First conquering Najd, Saud's forces expanded the Salafi influence to most of the present-day territory of Saudi Arabia, eradicating various popular and Shia practices and propagating the doctrines of ʿAbd al-Wahhab


People came in large numbers to the Sheikh, seeking pure knowledge without the adulteration of fables and falsehood. He explained to them the real meaning of “La ilaaha illallah” and its significance. He stressed the importance of the negation of all false deities and the affirmation of Allah and his attributes.

The Sheikh communicated with people of other cities and invited them to accept his call and join his movement in order to eradicate Shirk and all its abominable practices.

Some accepted while others rejected and some even ridiculed him and accused him of sorcery. He continued with his mission undeterred. The opponents exerted their utmost to rally their forces to destroy this nascent movement by any or all means. Sheikh Muhammad and the Prince had no alternative but to resort to the sword to defend this movement. This war went on for many years and village after village fell to the new alliance. Some opponents voluntarily began to accept them when they realized the true nature of the movement.

All the efforts by the misguided group to rally their forces to destroy this nascent movement by any means miserably failed. After the conquest of Riyadh in 1187 A.H. the Sheikh entrusted the governing of the people to Prince Abdul Aziz bin Muhammad bin Saud and devoted his time to worship, learning and teaching. Prince Muhammad and his son Abd al Aziz always consulted him before they undertook anything and he gave his ruling. After an arduous struggle and having reached his goal he passed away in Dhul Qa’dah of 1206.




Muslim hate crimes against Jews (muslim hate crimes against "infidels" are by far the most common hate crimes but we totally lack definite and official figured because these muslim hate crimes are blinked)


Muslim hate crimes against Jews in the world


The most anti-Jewish place is the West Bank and Gaza, where 93 percent of people held anti-Jewish beliefs, followed by Iraq, Yemen, Algeria, Libya, Tunisia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Jordan and Morocco. Saudi Arabia we have no reliable figures on but they might even be higher than in the West Bank and Gaza.

Muslim hate crimes against Jews in the US


Although almost two-thirds of religion-based hate crimes in 2012 in the US were committed against Jews and although the majority of these hate attacks stem from islam this is how a Jew who tries to point it out is treated:


In other words, when muslims attack Jews it's not anti- Jewish but anti-muslim!

According to US Ambassador Samantha Power, anti-Semitism is an increasing domestic concern in the US and cited statistics from an FBI report, revealing that almost two-thirds of religion-based crimes in 2012 were committed against Jews.

Muslim hate crimes against Jews in Sweden


Malmö, Sweden's third city with a big muslim population, has for many years been the most dangerous place for Jews. However, Thomas Bull, coordinator at the hate crime section of Malmö police says 'I don't believe Malmö is worse when it comes to hate crimes'. Only after some reporters disguised as Jews showed him the muslim atrocities they encountered he changed his mind: 'It might be harder for Jews to show their attributes here than I previously thought.' However, the question remains: Why is the coordinator of hate crimes in Sweden's most anti-Jewish city not aware of it when almost every other Swede knows it?!


Saudi Arabia - the cradle of muslim evil


Religious freedom "does not exist" in Saudi Arabia. Islam is the official religion of Saudi Arabia, and the tenets of that religion are enforced by law.

Antisemitsm is common within religious circles. Abdul Rahman Al-Sudais, the imam of the Grand mosque in Mecca, Saudi Arabia, has been described as an antisemite for publicly praying to God to 'terminate' the Jews

Saudi Arabian media often attacks Jews in books, news articles, at their Mosques and with what some describe as antisemitic satire. Saudi Arabian government officials and state religious leaders often promote the idea that Jews are conspiring to take over the entire world; as proof of their claims they publish and frequently cite The Protocols of the Elders of Zion as factual.

One Saudi Arabian government newspaper suggested that hatred of all Jews is justifiable. "Why are they (the Jews) hated by all the people which hosted them, such as Iraq and Egypt thousands years ago, and Germany, Spain, France and the UK, up to the days they gained of power over the capital and the press, in order to rewrite the history?"

Saudi textbooks vilify Jews (and Christians and non-Wahabi Muslims): according to The Washington Post, Saudi textbooks claimed by them to have been sanitized of antisemitism still call Jews apes (and Christians swine); demand that students avoid and not befriend Jews; claim that Jews worship the devil; and encourage Muslims to engage in Jihad to vanquish Jews.

Even during the height of the Saudi crackdown on extremism in 2004, a Saudi IQRA TV "man on the street" segment on feelings toward Jews, was entirely antagonistic. Interviewees described Jews as "our eternal enemies", "murderous", "the enemies of Allah and His Prophet," "murderers of prophets," "the filthiest people on the face of this earth", etc.


What Klevius has said about Abd al-Wahhab the father of Saudi islamofascism (2008) plus what yo won't find on Wikipedia:



The root man of Saudi islamofascism was Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahab who, during his studies in Basra in the 18th C, got seriously dazzled by glimpses of the European Enlightenment twinkling through the temporary crack to the West called the "Tulip period". He then retreated back into his medieval islamic darkness and as a result, came to position himself as the very opposite to the British "Glorious revolution" which fought against Catholic papacy, and which ended up in Lancashire's coal fueled textile industries as the beginning of the modern industrialized* world based on technology and rationality rather than on religious superstition and fundamentalism (also compare Shinto vs islam). A major outcome of industrialization was universal suffrage and the idea about negative human rights.

* isn't it an irony then that Britain, who started the series of modern revolutions as well as industrialization, came to deeply embed itself with the most intolerant, hateful, racist and sexist constitution, i.e. the Saudi islamofascist state which was incapable of producing anything by itself except hatred and more fanatic muslims!

Together with the criminal "house of Saud" Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahab then confined the Arabs in islamic backwardness and, in addition, the Arab women in an islamic burka of extreme Sharia sex segregation/apartheid.

After having robbed Mecca and Medina, the Sauds/Wahhabis run the stolen country by the help of what they fleeced from visiting pilgrims. This was the main source of income until Westerners found/drilled oil and made the lazy islamist looters even wealthier.

(analysis taken from Homo Filius Nullius by Peter Klevius).

Klevius comment: And today this evilness threatens the free world through spineless politicians and UN! The banner of Enlightenment is now upheld by heroic women, e.g. African Ayaan Hirsi Ali who has suffered as a victim of islam(ofascism) and escaped to the West, only to find that she was abandoned by those she thought would protect her! In fact, Western politicians and media are busy implementing that very Arab-islamic oppression so many muslims have escaped!


Saying islam is "a great religion" is a grave insult to secularism* and secularized religions


* No religious or other superstitious and spiritual basis for legislation etc. The only guidance for legislation is the most basic of Human Rights, i.e. the universal equality principle that makes sexism and racism (and due hate) redundant (Klevius 1992). Add to this the so called negative rights, i.e. freedom from impositions. Read Klevius important definition of Negative Human Rights. It's been on the web since 2002 but somehow you might have missed this most educational page you can find re. Human Rights! And if you understand it you either give up your Human Rights violating racism/sexism - or admit that you really are a hateful racist.


Barely are the victims of islam's latest atrocities buried before the Pope, BBC and politicians (not to mention muslim organizations) again campaign for muslims' right to offend us non-muslims.
 


BBC got one more muslim presenter, Mishal Husain, yet uses non muslim presenters to talk about the most important muslim news! Why? Is it to protect her fantasy "Euro-muslim" virginity"?!


When the islamofascist Saudi dictator and "guardian of islam" died Mishal Husain was silent about it and rather talked about prince Andrew's alleged sex with a minor prostitute.


While pious orthodox muslims chase Jews, BBC's main muslim presenter drinks alcohol during ramadan and argues, in an extremely bigoted and hypocritical way, that as a muslim she thinks that ‘the emphasis on what you wear on your head or how many times you pray, on the outward things rather than what’s in your heart and the way you treat people, is misguided’. Well Mishal please, what you have in your individual head has nothing to do with collective islam where you count as one of the more than a Billion muslims who via their muslimhood sanction OIC's Human Rights violating islamofascism!


However. either she is a muslim and thereby has to support Human Rights violating sharia - or she is a lying apostate. There is no such a thing as an individual muslim! Although Mishal Husain as an individual is free to believe whatever she likes, if she calls herself a muslim she automatically connects to sharia islam - e.g. as stated by all the world's muslims' Saudi based and UN sanctioned sharia organization OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation) and its islamofascist Saudi Fuhrer Iyad Madani.

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo. Mishal Husain is BBC's top muslim presenter and BBC is the world's leading media. The only thing she needs to say is that she opposes Human Rights violating sharia - and thereby also opposes islam because islam without some form of Human Rights violating sharia is not islam anymore - it's just a private belief and won't bother Klevius a bit.

A consequence of this is that a sharia supporting muslim's vote is undemocratic. OIC's 57 member state voting bloc in UN who supported Human Rights violating sharia as a guidance for muslim legislation was therefore also undemocratic.

Why do you let your politicians keep licking the most evil dictator family on Earth?!


Saudi Arabia and islam - the Human Rights violating sharia curse (incl. street jihad in the West) of the world

Not since the German National socialists has the world seen such an apparent pure evil as what the Saudis (+accomplices) have produced by the help of oil money and the most hateful of ideologies. The Saudis have been behind most major terrorist attacks incl 9/11, Iraq (most atrocities since Bush's speedy victory over Saddam), Libya, Egypt, Syria, Russia, UK etc around the world; OIC, the islamofascist organization against Human Rights is based in Saudi Arabia and its Fuhrer is a Saudi named Iyad Madani; Saudi Arabia is the center of muslim racism and intolerance; the Saudis have deliberately covered with concrete and various constructions all sites that could reveal the total lack of archaeological evidence about the islamic myths. And on and on!


Saudi based OIC - and its islamofascist Saudi sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani - constitutes islam today, and it's against the most basic of Human Rights!

Islam has always been used for evil. Why? Because it's originally made as a tool for evil!


 There was never a good Nationalsocialim (aka "Nazism") in Germany. So why should there be a good islam - especially considering that islam has committed way more crimes against humanity throughout 1400 years?! Moreover, islam is the only "monotheist" religion that started by slaughtering its Jewish parents.

Nazi German, Saudi Arabiay and islamist Turkey - no freedom of speech!





Excerpts from OIC's sharia declaration sanctioned by UN


ARTICLE 24:

All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Shari'ah.


ARTICLE 25:
The Islamic Shari'ah is the only source of reference for the explanation or clarification of any of the articles of this Declaration.

Klevius: This declaration is the real muslim problem because it constitutes islam of today. This is also the reason why BBC and its muslim sharia presenter try hard to keep ordinart Brits and others unaware of this disgusting hate declaration

Friday, January 23, 2015

Why doesn't BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain comment on her Saudi muslim sharia caliph's death?!


Saying islam is "a great religion" is a grave insult to secularism* and secularized religions


* No religious or other superstitious and spiritual basis for legislation etc. The only guidance for legislation is the most basic of Human Rights, i.e. the universal equality principle that makes sexism and racism (and due hate) redundant (Klevius 1992). Add to this the so called negative rights, i.e. freedom from impositions. Read Klevius important definition of Negative Human Rights. It's been on the web since 2002 but somehow you might have missed this most educational page you can find re. Human Rights! And if you understand it you either give up your Human Rights violating racism/sexism - or admit that you really are a hateful racist.


Barely are the victims of islam's latest atrocities buried before the Pope, BBC and politicians again campaign for muslims' right to offend us non-muslims.
 


BBC got one more muslim presenter, Mishal Husain, yet uses non muslim presenters to talk about the most important muslim news! Why?



When the islamofascist Saudi dictator and "guardian of islam" died Mishal Husain was silent about it and rather talked about prince Andrew's alleged sex with a minor prostitute.





While islamofascism chases Jews, BBC's main muslim presenter drinks alcohol during ramadan and argues, in an extremely bigoted and hypocritical way, that as a muslim she thinks that ‘the emphasis on what you wear on your head or how many times you pray, on the outward things rather than what’s in your heart and the way you treat people, is misguided’.


However. either she is a muslim and thereby has to support Human Rights violating sharia - or she is a lying apostate. There is no such a thing as an individual muslim! Although Mishal Husain as an individual is free to believe whatever she likes, if she calls herself a muslim she automatically connects to sharia islam - e.g. as stated by all the world's muslims' Saudi based and UN sanctioned sharia organization OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation) and its islamofascist Saudi Fuhrer Iyad Madani.

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo. Mishal Husain is BBC's top muslim presenter and BBC is the world's leading media. The only thing she needs to say is that she opposes Human Rights violating sharia - and thereby also opposes islam because islam without some form of Human Rights violating sharia is not islam anymore - it's just a private belief and won't bother Klevius a bit.

A consequence of this is that a sharia supporting muslim's vote is undemocratic. OIC's 57 member state voting bloc in UN who supported Human Rights violating sharia as a guidance for muslim legislation was therefore also undemocratic.
 
Yet BBC manages today to:


1  Call the world's most intolerant dictator - who even on his death bed asked for more Human Rights violating sharia - a 'cautious reformer'!



2 When interviewing terrorist experts trying to belittle the Saudi connection to the Islamic State (which has a huge support among Saudis) while instead trying to emphasize the Shia threat which has a much less support within Saudi Arabia.


3  Not with a word touching the subject of worldwide Saudi sponsored jihadist hate crimes around the world. "king" Abdullah was the main culprit behind this hate mongering.


4  The fact that his follower is, at least equally keen to violate Human Rights with islamofascist sharia.



5  The fact that the Saudi family steers all muslims world Umma via its Jeddah based OIC organization.



Is it just Klevius who thinks these would have been topics of interest for British license fee paying listeners?



Every true* muslim is a Human Rights violator

* I.e. follower/supporter of OIC's Human Rights violating sharia.





Saudi based OIC - and its islamofascist Saudi sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani  - constitutes islam today, and it's against the most basic of Human Rights!


There was never a good Nationalsocialim (aka "Nazism") in Germany. So why should there be a good islam - especially considering that islam has committed way more crimes against humanity throughout 1400 years?! Moreover, islam is the only "monotheist" religion that started by slaughtering its Jewish parents.

Nazi German, Saudi Arabiay and islamist Turkey - no freedom of speech!




Excerpts from OIC's sharia declaration sanctioned by UN


ARTICLE 24:

All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Shari'ah.


ARTICLE 25:
The Islamic Shari'ah is the only source of reference for the explanation or clarification of any of the articles of this Declaration.

Klevius: This declaration is the real muslim problem because it constitutes islam of today. This is also the reason why BBC and its muslim sharia presenter try hard to keep ordinart Brits and others unaware of this disgusting hate declaration.

Wednesday, January 21, 2015

Klevius question to BBC's muslim sharia* presenter Mishal Husain: Why don't you report more about muslim hate attacks on Jews?!

 .

Islamofascists take down main Jewish news website 

 
Barely are the victims of islam's latest atrocities buried before the Pope, BBC and politicians again campaign for muslims' right to offend us non-muslims.


While islamofascism chases Jews, BBC's main muslim presenter drinks alcohol during ramadan and argues, in an extremely bigoted and hypocritical way, that ‘the emphasis on what you wear on your head or how many times you pray, on the outward things rather than what’s in your heart and the way you treat people, I find misguided’.







* However. either she is a muslim and thereby has to support Human Rights violating sharia - or she is a lying apostate. There is no such a thing as an individual muslim! Although Mishal Husain as an individual is free to believe whatever she likes, if she calls herself a muslim she automatically connects to sharia islam - e.g. as stated by all the world's muslims' Saudi based and UN sanctioned sharia organization OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation) and its islamofascist Saudi Fuhrer Iyad Madani.

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo. Mishal Husain is BBC's top muslim presenter and BBC is the world's leading media. The only thing she needs to say is that she opposes Human Rights violating sharia - and thereby also opposes islam because islam without some form of Human Rights violating sharia is not islam anymore - it's just a private belief and won't bother Klevius a bit.

 A consequence of this is that a sharia supporting muslim's vote is undemocratic. OIC's 57 member state voting bloc in UN who supported Human Rights violating sharia as a guidance for muslim legislation was therefore also undemocratic.
 

Every true muslim is a Human Rights violator


Saudi based OIC - and its islamofascist Saudi sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani  - constitutes islam today, and it's against the most basic of Human Rights!


There was never a good Nationalsocialim (aka "Nazism") in Germany. So why should there be a good islam - especially considering that islam has committed way more crimes against humanity throughout 1400 years?! Moreover, islam is the only "monotheist" religion that started by slaughtering its Jewish parents.


FREE SPEECH FOES SHUT DOWN PAMELA GELLER'S ANTI-JIHAD WEBSITE


01-20-2015 12:51 am - Pamela Geller
Anti-free speech thugs are at it again. My website, Atlas Shrugs (PamelaGeller.com), was taken down by a massive DDoS attack last Thursday, and as of this writing on Sunday afternoon, the attack is still metastasizing. This attack is unprecedented in its size and scope. Jihadis and their leftist errand boys are so desperate to silence me and my message that they have devoted tremendous resources to taking down my site, which is devoted to honest news reporting about jihad activity.

Leftists and Islamic supremacists do this on all fronts. On Saturday, I organized a rally against an anti-free speech Islamic conference, and the leftists were in lockstep, goosestep, with the Islamic supremacists – as the media coverage from leftist outlets demonstrated.

My site host, Media Temple, said they couldn’t cope with the attack against my site. They had never in their history seen anything like it. The DDoS attack didn’t just take down my site. It also took down Media Temple and threatened all of their clients, and even attacked the servers that Media Temple uses at Net Data Center, a service provider that promises “uninterrupted operations.” Net Data Center could not handle the massive traffic that the attackers were sending to my site to take it down, and finally had to pull the plug on Atlas Shrugs.

The timing was noteworthy. Our ads calling attention to Islamic Jew-hatred in San Francisco have gotten an immense amount of national and international press. And above all, our free speech rally last Saturday to counter the “Stand with the Prophet” anti-free speech conference in Garland, Texas, got the foes of freedom riled.

Leaders of the Muslim community in America held their “Stand with the Prophet” conference in Garland, in support of Muhammad and the restriction of “Islamophobic” speech – working for the same goal as that which was held by those who killed 12 people at the Charlie Hebdo offices in Paris last week: the punishment of criticism of Islam and Muhammad, including even examinations of the motives and goals of terrorists.

The event featured:

John Esposito, head of the Saudi-funded Alwaleed bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding at Georgetown; and

Siraj Wahhaj, an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and close friend of the mastermind of that bombing, the “Blind Sheikh” Omar Abdel Rahman.

Saturday’s “Stand with the Prophet” event sought to combat “Islamophobes in America” – including me. This is in line with Islamic supremacist groups’ longstanding objective of defaming, smearing and marginalizing anyone who opposes the jihad agenda. They said they wanted to defend Muhammad – which means to silence those who notice that defenders of Muhammad just murdered 16 people in Paris and tens of thousands worldwide since 9/11.

Nevertheless, the superintendent of schools allowed this anti-American group to hold this conference agitating for an abridgment of the First Amendment – despite the mass slaughter of the Charlie Hebdo staff for violating the draconian Shariah blasphemy laws, mandating death for criticism of Islam. The Islamic law restricting free speech has no place in the American public sphere. It is anathema to the principles upon which this great nation was established.

But we were unbowed. Saturday in Garland, Texas, thousands of freedom-loving Americans took a stand for the freedom of speech. Block after block, row after row, Texan after Texan, American after American, said no to the restrictions against free speech as mandated under Islamic law (Shariah).

The rally was an enormous success. Thousands of Americans joined us in Garland, Texas, to oppose the most radical and extreme ideology on the face of the earth, Islamic law (Shariah). They demonstrated their indomitable commitment to freedom. We will never give in, and never submit, and never be subjugated.

The media coverage of our rally was vicious, ugly and dishonest. It’s extraordinary in the wake of the Paris jihad attack, where journalists were mercilessly slaughtered in cold blood, that journalists are covering and advancing the most extreme and brutal ideology on the face of the earth. The jihadists screamed in the streets (while making a Nazi salute, by the way), “We have avenged the prophet.”

This conference was the same kind of initiative: It was called “Stand with the Prophet.” And what did the media call it? A “peace conference.” One headline blared, “Muslims group gathers for peace, faces threats, protest.” And the news story features only smiling young women wearing hijabs.

This coverage, the “Stand with the Prophet” conference and the attack on my site are all part of the same anti-free speech initiative. The Islamic supremacists are out for blood, determined to criminalize criticism of Islam (and opposition to jihad terror) under the guise of fighting against “Islamophobia” and “hate speech.” The media cover for them. And on the eve of their “Stand with the Prophet” event, their fellow foes of free speech took my site down.

My website reaches close to 100,000 readers a day. No wonder they want so very much to take it down and keep it down. Our rally, like my website, stood for the freedom of speech against all attempts, violent and stealthy, to impose Islamic blasphemy laws on Americans and stifle criticism of Muhammad and Islam. As Muhammad’s followers kill more and more people, we need critics of him more than ever – and free people need to stand up against these underhanded attempts to stifle all criticism of Islam, including honest investigations of how jihadists use Islamic texts and teachings to justify Jew-hatred, violence, supremacism and oppression.

The foes of free speech never give up. And neither should its defenders. As of this writing, the DDoS attack against my website continues, and there is no end in sight. I am working furiously to move the site and get back online. The costs associated with the move, the server, and the IT expertise are staggering. You can rest assured that I’ll be back online – with a righteous vengeance.

We need to get the message out and cover the news the media won’t cover – especially now when the jihad is raging. I need your help. If you believe that Atlas Shrugs must survive


Tuesday, January 20, 2015

Saudi based OIC (all muslims Ummah organization via UN) and its islamofascist* Fuhrer Iyad Madani: Violent? Me? Just trying to sharia punish Charlie Hebdo!

Saudi based OIC (all muslims Ummah organization via UN) and its islamofascist* Fuhrer Iyad Madani: Violent? Me? Just trying to sharia punish Charlie Hebdo!


* The original UN Human Rights declaration from 1948 was meant to be a final bulwark against fascism. However, by calling Human Rights violating sharia "islamic human rights" and by the help of a bunch of Human Rights violating muslim member states, the Saudis managed to bypass this bulwark and can now in an extremely bigoted and hypocritical way argue that they follow "human rights" when they in fact do the very opposite!

Dear reader, it's Charlie Hebdo, Raif Badawi and (to a lesser extent) Peter Klevius with the Human Rights sword against Saudi oil Billionaires and their sharia scimitar. Whose side are YOU on?! Should Charlie Hebdo be prosecuted in accordance with islamofascist sharia?


Charles Martel was the guy who 732 saved France from muslim jihadist "crusades". 

Is OIC now shooting itself in the foot? Or will it again be aided by Western PC politicians?


Saudi Secretary General of Saudi based OIC, Iyad Madani (member of the dictator "house" of Saud): The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) intends to take legal measures against the French magazine, Charlie Hebdo, for publishing "blasphemous" (according to sharia) cartoons. OIC is studying Europe and French laws and "other available procedures" (UN?) to be able to take legal action against Charlie Hebdo. If French laws allow us to take legal procedures against Charlie Hebdo, OIC will not hesitate to prosecute the French magazine. This publication by Charlie Hebdo requires necessary legal measures (to comply with Human Rights violating muslim sharia). These cartoons have hurt the sentiments of muslims across the world. This is hate speech (according to Human Rights violating sharia) and must not offend others.

Klevius question to BBC's muslim sharia presenter: What do you make of it? Are your "sentiments" hurt, and dou you also think Charlie Hebdo people need more suffering? BBC and you seem to be totally unaware (see screendumps below) of this Saudi islamofascist  threat. Luckily you have Klevius to help you in your heavy task of informing about really essential news.

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo



Charlie Hebdo's editor-in-chief Gérard Biard: "We do not attack religion, but we do when it gets involved in politics. If God becomes entangled in politics, then democracy is in danger. Some of Charlie Hebdo's staff members are religious, but choose not to be offended. To be a believer is a personal choice that concerns no one else. We respect that, in the same way that we respect a person's private life as long as the individual does not bring his or her private life into the public sphere.



Klevius: So what does UK's OIC loving muslim sharia Minister of faith islamofascism, Sayeeda Warsi make of it? Declaring the British parliament "islamophobic"?!





Here some screen dumps of 20 Jan 2015. As you can see, BBC seems quite uniterested in the OIC/Madani issue:




No surprise here.

Monday, January 19, 2015

Saying islam is "a great religion" is a grave insult to secularism* and secularized religions


* No religious or other superstitious and spiritual basis for legislation etc. The only guidance for legislation is the most basic of Human Rights, i.e. the universal equality principle that makes sexism and racism (and due hate) redundant (Klevius 1992).




Who is a muslim - and who isn't?




Where does "extremist/radical" islam end and "moderate" islam start?

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo

Mishal Husain pretends to be a "Brit" yet shares values that are as far you can get from Britishness and basic Human Rights. Or is she just pretending to be a muslim - i.e. an apostate? In the latter case she has committed the worst crime islam knows about.



It was considered "racist abuse" when BBC's Mishal Husain was told by a shopper in supermarket (about her children fooling around) that 'Your tribe need to behave like proper English children'.

So what about Communities Secretary Eric Pickles who has been challenged by British muslims (see nelow) for writing to mosques in England urging them to do more to fit a "British identity" and that there was “more work to do”? Racist?




Muslim born (apostate?!)* Mr X** "president"*** Hussain**** Obama Soetoro (or whatever)***** who wants to criminalize criticism of islamic hate speech (sharia), and who has made himself sharia compliant and therefore against Human Rights: 'Our biggest advantage is that our muslim populations, they feel themselves to be Americans. However, there are parts of Europe in which that is not the case and that's probably the greatest danger that Europe faces.'

* Born to a muslim father who hadn't committed apostasy (the worst crime in islam) made him a muslim. Moreover, he was also raised as a muslim because his adoptive father Soetoro was a muslim.
** All his records are labeled secret.
*** His mother was too young as the only US parent for to fulfill the constitutional criterion. He listened for some 20 years to one of the worst black supremacist racists' preachings. He used the race card in the election and he has violated the spirit of the US Constitution ever since.
**** more in line with his muslim heritage
***** sarcasm:

Klevius: Shouldn't muslim born (apostate?!) Mr X "president" and the news channels which broadcasted his nonsense, now for it as did Steve Emerson and Fox News who actually didn't say anything wrong in principle?! After all, Saudi based and Saudi led OIC is openly pushing for a worldwide sharia Ummah.


Why talk about islamic violence when the real subject should be islamic sharia causing not only violence but also all sorts of other Human Rights violations?

A new guide written by students at Michigan State University aims to educate the public about muslim Americans. Kate Kerbrat said that all the muslims she interviewed for the guide "denounced terrorism and wanted to ... convey that islam is not a violent religion, that the extremists misinterpret a few verses in the Quran."

Klevius: Like the Saudi based and Saudi steered 57 member state OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation) which has abandoned the most basic of Human Rights all together and replaced them with sharia via UN?!

Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam,Aug. 5, 1990

Recognizing the importance of issuing a Document on Human Rights in Islam that will serve as a guide for Member states in all aspects of life;

Having examined the stages through which the preparation of this draft Document has so far, passed and the relevant report of the Secretary General;

Having examined the Report of the Meeting of the Committee of Legal Experts held in Tehran from 26 to 28 December, 1989;

Agrees to issue the Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam that will serve as a general guidance for Member States in the Field of human rights.

Reaffirming the civilizing and historical role of the Islamic Ummah which Allah made as the best community and which gave humanity a universal and well-balanced civilization, in which harmony is established between hereunder and the hereafter, knowledge is combined with faith, and to fulfill the expectations from this community to guide all humanity which is confused because of different and conflicting beliefs and ideologies and to provide solutions for all chronic problems of this materialistic civilization.

In contribution to the efforts of mankind to assert human rights, to protect man from exploitation and persecution, and to affirm his freedom and right to a dignified life in accordance with the Islamic Shari'ah.

Convinced that mankind which has reached an advanced stage in materialistic science is still, and shall remain, in dire need of faith to support its civilization as well as a self motivating force to guard its rights;

Believing that fundamental rights and freedoms according to Islam are an integral part of the Islamic religion and that no one shall have the right as a matter of principle to abolish them either in whole or in part or to violate or ignore them in as much as they are binding divine commands, which are contained in the Revealed Books of Allah and which were sent through the last of His Prophets to complete the preceding divine messages and that safeguarding those fundamental rights and freedoms is an act of worship whereas the neglect or violation thereof is an abominable sin, and that the safeguarding of those fundamental rights and freedom is an individual responsibility of every person and a collective responsibility of the entire Ummah;

Do hereby and on the basis of the above-mentioned principles declare as follows:

ARTICLE 24:

All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Shari'ah.


ARTICLE 25:
The Islamic Shari'ah is the only source of reference for the explanation or clarification of any of the articles of this Declaration.

Klevius: This declaration is the real muslim problem because it constitutes islam of today. This is also the reason why BBC and its muslim sharia presenter try hard to keep ordinart Brits and others unaware of this disgusting hate declaration.



Iyad Madani, Saudi Fuhrer of the Saudi initiated and Saudi based OIC, all the world's muslims Umma and Sharia organization, which via UN demands the world to criminalize criticism of islam (the worst crime ever) and to make it a crime following Human Rights (as it is already in e.g. Saudi Arabia - compare the case of Raif Badawi and others).

British muslims oppose British values


Communities Secretary Eric Pickles has been challenged by Muslims for writing to mosques in England urging them to do more to root out extremists and prevent young people being radicalised.

In a letter sent to more than 1,000 Islamic leaders, Mr Pickles stressed that he was “proud” of the way Muslims in Britain had responded to the Paris terror attacks but added that there was “more work to do”.

The Muslim Council of Britain said it wanted Mr Pickles to clarify his request - and asked if, like “members of the far right”, he was suggesting that Islam is inherently apart from British society.

Deputy secretary-general Harun Khan said: “We will be writing to Mr Eric Pickles to ask that he clarifies his request to Muslims to ‘explain and demonstrate how faith in Islam can be part of British identity’.

“Is Mr Pickles seriously suggesting, as do members of the far right, that Muslims and Islam are inherently apart from British society?”

In the letter, also signed by Communities Minister Lord Ahmad (the muslim who threatened to let loose ten thousand jihadists if the Brits didn't obey to muslim demands - same muslim was later sentenced for killing a person with his car), Mr Pickles wrote: “You, as faith leaders, are in a unique position in our society. You have a precious opportunity, and an important responsibility, in explaining and demonstrating how faith in Islam can be part of British identity.

“We believe together we have an opportunity to demonstrate the true nature of British islam today. There is a need to lay out more clearly than ever before what being a British muslim means today: proud of your faith and proud of your country. We know that acts of extremism are not representative (sic) of islam, but we need to show what is.”


A "colored" voice on islamic schizophrenia


Aki Muthali (born and raised in Sri Lanka): We know Reza Aslan is a stickler for misrepresenting the truth. I have discussed him once before here. His obsession with omitting key details of Islamist violence has made him a proper unicorn since his takeover of Western media. He also found comfort in the hearts of [pseudo] liberals obsessed with their own western colonial and imperial guilt who also have no problem limiting human rights for people [in the east and west] just so it doesn’t “offend” religious fanatics.

On January 8, 2015, he was on CNN (yet again) with Don Lemon, discussing the Charlie Hebdo massacre.

ASLAN:"They make fun of Muslims for a very specific reason to sort of show, or maybe demonstrate, that look if you maybe want to be in this country, if you want to be in France, then you have to deal with the French values, you have to rid yourself of your own values, ideals, norms and you have to take on French values."

In the case of Charlie Hebdo—the massacre took place because the “French value” was to uphold free speech [over religious appeasement]. But that isn’t a “Muslim value”—am I hearing this right? I’ll let my head fall on the table for a minute here…

With all the different races and cultures that create France’s multicultural landscape, only those practicing Islam are being specially targeted by the French society? So the Kouachi brothers simply reacted by killing cartoonists and police officers?

being religious means people can never truly integrate into secular societies—that religion will be at a constant war with the provision of human rights above the law of religion itself

he is admitting that being religious means people can never truly integrate into secular societies—that religion will be at a constant war with the provision of human rights above the law of religion itself.

Jihadists had heavily indoctrinated the Kouachi brothers with Islamic tribalism [on recruitment at a young age] which resulted in mental lacerations that kept them further apart from civil society and convinced them to contribute to the tyranny of those wanting an Islamic totalitarianism. And that’s what Islamists do—they take advantage of young children and preach anti-western and anti-secular sentiments to the point where they feel victimized whenever their Islamic values aren’t placed above human rights—then Aslan proceeds to reiterate these clearly erroneous placement of blame on the west as well. Somehow, the west is “accountable” when they refuse to sacrifice fundamental human rights for the bigotry of religious fanaticism.

ASLAN:“And there have been a number of laws passed not only in France, with regard to prohibitions on Islamic dress, but throughout Europe about whether you can build mosques, about whether you can build minarets, etcetera. And this tension, this polarization I'm afraid has led to a lot of acts of violence. Not just the tragedy yesterday...”

Surely, Aslan’s eyeballs will bulge momentarily after hearing one of the gunmen literally admitting to being influenced by the scriptures to die as a martyr for Islam [back in a 2005 documentary on Muslim extremism] but he would probably brush that off as well and make another mental note to deflect and deter criticism of Islam and shorten it to an “identity crisis” and “clash of civilizations” to place a collective blame [on those being abused by Islam]. Where did he get his Ph.D. from—Fox News?

Infidels must have been asking for it with their enticing secular nonsense—so of course it makes sense to shout “Allahu Akbar” while slaughtering them. But it still has nothing to do with Islam!

One of the brothers told a female worker at Charlie Hebdo that she is being left alive because she is a woman, but she must convert to Islam and wear a hijab. See—women are not compelled to wear the hijab at all!

ASLAN:“And particularly in France, an aggressively secularizing country that has never really tolerated multiculturalism or the kind of cultural religious diversity that is the hallmark of the United States, you can see how that would create the kinds of tensions that would bubble up occasionally into acts of violence on both sides. We have seen a lot of anti-Muslim violence in Europe as well as Muslim violence against Europeans.”

He claims a multi-racial “Muslim” group is having hostility with a multi-racial “European” group and yet he only blames one group for the atrocities.This is what I call ‘mind-numbing idiocy’—and as if that weren’t enough, his hyperbole narrative implies severe racism against the “Muslims”.

Why is the controversial caricature being referred to as “racist”? It sounds rather unsophisticated to me. Who exactly is Charlie Hebdo being racist towards—blacks—whites—browns—olives? I think my hair just turned white.

Islam is represented by Asians, Africans, Americans, Australians and Europeans—so who exactly is being racially discriminated by the satire…? I’m genuinely curious.

I’m sure Aslan has heard of Anjem Choudary. If we are to scan through his social media pages—he incites hatred and violence against non-Muslims and calls for an Islamic colonialism in the west [in accordance with the Quran and Sharia Law].

The way free speech works is Choudary can spout as much hate speech against non-Muslims as he wants and still he hasn’t been violently victimized by ‘anti-Muslim bigots’ in the west,whereas anybody else who satirizes or criticizes Islam under the same banner of free speech—they get shot and killed or threatened by Islamists who are protecting the “honour” of Islam exactly as any citizens living in countries governed by the law of Sharia are terrorized for blasphemy.

Aslan’s narrative is so dangerous that it suggests Islamists violence and threats are part of multiculturalism and should be respected. He is defaming multiculturalism itself with his nonsensical rationale—which creates more room for the rednecks that chant “Go back home!” not just to immigrants but also to people of colour who were born and raised in the west.

Masking every wrong on European colonization and [western] foreign and national policy continues to keep even our fellow women, children and men in the east shackled in mass terror day and night under the grip of their countrymen’s law concentrated with religious insanity.

Do the people of the east not deserve a better standard of human rights from their own government and citizens? How is the “west” preventing the east from granting human rights to its own people? Is Dick Cheney responsible for their jurisprudence—is he the one enforcing the draconian blasphemy laws? Just don’t blame“religion” if you want to be Aslan’s friend though—because this lion only roars in the west.

Conforming to secularism did not happen overnight in the west—it took centuries of bloodshed to even accept the idea—and it’s still not perfect, but it has a lot more human rights to offer than the east. While slavery is abolished in the west—it’s still alive and well in much of the Middle East where it’s openly practiced. Aside from ISIS’s brutality, ask why the people from India, Philippines, China, Sri Lanka,much of Africa, etc. who arrive to the Middle East on a worker visa, hoping for employment,are unable to return home to their loved ones.

While Islamists indoctrinate and force children to gear up in suicide vests and blow themselves up—we have Aslan [and others like him] claiming these unprecedented scale of terror around the world committed by Muslim extremists is a mere response to racial and cultural oppression by the west and doesn’t involve Islam in any way.

Recently, Amnesty International reported Boko Haram had killed approximately 2,000 people—mainly children, women and the elderly. What was the “west’s” involvement in this Islamist frenzy to create an “Islamic State” in West Africa;who erased the accountability of these eastern tyrants? Just ignore the meaning of “Boko Haram” if you’re feeling too cute for critical thinking.You can click here to view details and satellite image of Boko Haram’s attack on Baga, Nigeria.

I will discuss Raif Badawi repeatedly until reality sinks in. Why is he rotting in a Saudi prison? He was charged with “insulting Islam” after promoting free speech. He will receive 50 lashes every week—his spine will bleed and fester for 19 more weeks if he does survive the remaining 950 lashes. He also faces 10 years and approximately a quarter of a million dollars in fine. His initial sentencing was death for apostasy before it was “reduced”. Alas, hypocrisy enables people to condemn Saudi Arabia while making apologies for the Kouachi brothers.

Liberal/non-Muslims are already on a trial in a kangaroo court created in the delusional minds of Islamists who also processed the voir dire on the values of Sharia but apologists claim Islamists are the victims. So let me ask these apologists a few questions…

1) Why do you not march for minorities [Kurds, Yazidis, Balochs, non-Muslims, etc.] facing apartheid in Islamic nations?

2) Why do you silence discussion on the double standards, hypocrisy and contradiction Muslims often display in both east and west?

3) Why are you so eager to discredit and neglect the plight of those victimized by Islamists—victims who are as diverse in race and nationality as the Islamists themselves?

4) What can a verdict be[in a trial built on fallacies] when the doctrine of Islam is incompatible with liberalism?

Just take a proper look at Saudi Arabia, Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Qatar,Yemen, Syria, Iraq, Palestine, Algeria, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Egypt, Libya, Somalia, Morocco, Sudan, Brunei, Malaysia, Oman, etc. and if these countries aren’t evident of human rights strife directly resulting from the consequences of embracing Islamic values—just please stop pretending to be indignant about injustice because you’re satirizing yourselves without the help of Charlie Hebdo.

Islamists stormed the magazine’s office due to their material which was enabled by freedom of speech but Aslan frills it up as a result of France “forcing” Muslim people to renounce their “norms”. His accusatory tone aimed at western people is the only thing generalizing all Muslims into one insidious category—so I denounce him for implicating the Muslim “norm” as being disconnected with liberal values.

The Kouachi brothers are not martyrs of multicultural and racial struggle—they are anti-liberal and anti-human-rights Islamists who assassinated 12 innocent people to honour their Islamic pride as commanded by the Sharia Law.

I’d like to welcome Aslan and his cheerleaders to the 21st century where multi-generational bigotry meets common sense and their redundant, preposterous apologia gets dismissed as quickly as religion dismisses human rights—and that is precisely why Islamists fear liberalism—because it is slowly ending the epoch of rule based on delusions and its momentum is creeping into the Islamic nations perilously governed by such madness.

Growing up must be so hard for some people—especially when they are told they can’t hijack the world for their own foolish sentiments.






Radical Islamists are using Sharia Law to silence fellow Muslims who critique the religion. (Photo: Emad Nassar/Flash90)

Last Wednesday’s terrorist attack against the Charlie Hebdo magazine in Paris shocked the world. A satirical magazine known for printing images of Muhammad, which is against Sharia law, the magazine has been threatened over the years by various terror and Islamist groups to stop or suffer the consequences.

The attack on the magazine, which left 12 people dead, is an attack by radical Islamists on the West’s ideals of freedom of speech. The terrorists who carried out the Charlie Hebdo attack were in line with a method of thinking that is becoming all the more popular among Muslims around the world.

Proscribed by numerous Islamic states and various Islamist groups, the terrorists believed that Sharia law should be implemented under any circumstances where the honor of the prophet Mohammed is seen to be ‘insulted’.

Over the last few years, numerous regimes and religious entities in Muslim countries have given out the death penalty for any person believed to have publicly critiqued Islam, Mohammed or even the government. Claiming that all such behavior is anti-Islam, these Islamist regimes have started a war on the basic human privilege known as freedom of expression.

image: http://www.breakingisraelnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Soheil-Arabi.jpg
Soheil Arabi (Photo: MEMRI/ Hra-news.org)Soheil Arabi (Photo: MEMRI/ Hra-news.org)

In Arab and Muslim countries, defaming Islam and the Prophet Muhammad is still defined as an offense against Sharia Law and entails heavy punishment. Recent examples of the enforcement of such laws have included the arrest of Saudi intellectual Dr. Turki Al-Hamad and Saudi blogger Hamza Kashgari; the arrest of another Saudi liberal, Raef Badawi, who was sentenced to public flogging; and both Mauritanian blogger Mohamed Cheikh Ould Mkhaitir and Iranian blogger Soheil Arabi, who were sentenced to death.

Mohamed Cheikh Ould Mkhaitir was sentenced to death for writing an article on January 14, 2014, in which he criticized some decisions that the Prophet and his Companions took during their military conquests. He applied and used these examples to implicitly criticize Mauritania for allowing a discriminatory caste system. The result was that on December 24, 2014, a court in Mauritania convicted him of apostasy and sentenced him to being shot to death, even though he publicly disavowed insulting Muhammad.

As for Iranian Soheil Arabi, he was arrested in January 2014 by the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps for insulting the Prophet on his Facebook page. He has been incarcerated in Evin prison for about a year. An Iranian court sentenced him to death, but in December 2014 the sentence was suspended, possibly due to pressure by Iranian human rights activists abroad. However, according to various activists, his sentence may be carried out after all. According to those same sources, Arabi has been threatened not to disclose any information about his legal status.

image: http://www.breakingisraelnews.com/wp-content/uploads/useful_banner_manager_banners/81-TheThirdJihad-600WIDE.jpg

More recently, Saudi authorities began to carry out the punishment for Raef Badawi. As of January 9, the government began dishing out lashes incurred by Badawi, who is a co-founder of the Saudi Liberal Network online forum. His sentence, 1,000 lashes, is to be meted out in weekly installments of 50 lashes every Friday after prayers in front of a Jeddah mosque. In addition, Badawi is to serve 10 years in jail and a fine of 1,000,000 riyals (about $267,000). His crime? “Harming Islam” and committing Internet crimes. Human rights organizations have criticized the sentence. US State Department spokesperson Jen Psaki called Badawi’s sentence “brutal” and urged Saudi authorities to overturn it.

According to the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI), the various punishments inflicted on these men for speaking their minds is straight out of the Koran. In a recently published report, MEMRI explains:

image: http://www.breakingisraelnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/rafi-badawi.jpg
Rafi Badawi with his children. Raef Badawi with his children.

“According to the Sharia, defaming the Prophet is an act of blasphemy, the punishment for which is death even if the blasphemer repents. This law is Koranic, for Koran 9:61 says: “Those who hurt Allah’s Messenger will have a painful punishment.” The same Surah also states: “…Say: ‘(Go ahead and) mock! But certainly Allah will bring to light all that you fear. If you ask them (about this), they declare: ‘We were only talking idly and joking.’ Say: ‘Was it at Allah and His verses and His Messenger that you were mocking? Make no excuse; you have disbelieved after you had believed. [Koran 9:64-66].’”

The question that remains is how long will it take for Western countries to realize that they are not dealing with simply a bunch of radicals, but with a culture that not only condones such actions as were seen in France last week, but promotes and encourages them – even commands it.

While it is rare to see such acts of terror in Western countries that are not mandated by Sharia Law, it is sadly commonplace among Muslim countries. What are clearly acts of terror in the West are in reality run of the mill legal battles in Islamic countries. The sickening part of it all is what happens when Islam succeeds at silencing all of its critics, both internal and external.

Even ‘moderate’ countries such as Egypt, whose President came out and decried the status of radical Islam on the international level, have their less liberal and more mainstream religious elements calling for a cessation of all depictions of the prophet, even by western media.

Should the attacks in France then come as a shock? Perhaps. Or maybe it is a wake up call to the West to get them to realize that these Muslim radicals are simply trying to enforce their version of the Sharia Law in Western countries.

Thursday, January 15, 2015

Does BBC's bigoted and hypocritical muslim sharia presenter, Mishal Husain, constitute an offense to muslims?


* Acknowledgement: Klevius has nothing personal against Mishal Husain simply because Klevius doesn't know her at all. What is at stake is the public Mishal Husain as a muslim presenter at BBC!

The islamic hate mongering against the most basic of Human Rights is again supported by evil political correctness. Barely are the victims of islam's latest atrocities buried before the Pope, BBC and politicians again campaign for muslims' right to offend us non-muslims with their hateful ideology against us "infidels".


The problem can never be the solution - other than as fascism!




Freedom of speech is an offense against islam, i.e. totalitarian islamofascism (aka sharia)! On a more "sophisticated" level it's islam's "defense" against Human Rights scrutiny that is the problem. Islam is helpless against criticism. That's why we repeatedly hear BBC and other islam supporters wining about "muslim sensitivities". There's only one solution to the problem: the judicial extermination of islam. Trying to solve the problem by closing the door halfway won't hinder the poisonous gas. But you might argue that this would lead to an explosion. Yes, but a much more controlled one than today. Allowing "diversity" (sharia) means diversion from basic Human Rights. In other words, pushing for "diversity" limits the freedom of those considered "diverse".

If islam and muslims are protected from  freedom of speech then every muslim's islam/sharia interpretation, incl. so called "extremist" muslims, can freely flourish. Islam is a "diverse" religion also in the meaning how it is used - on a scale from Mishal Husain to the Islamic State. Limiting that diversity to civilized Western Human Rights standard, on the other hand, means the death of an islam worth criticizing.

Mishal Husain won't hear a single critical word from Klevius when/if she commits open apstasy by denouncing sharia.


Mishal Husain says she is a muslim but 'will never wear the hijab, drinks alcohol and does not fast during Ramadan. So what about OIC, sharia - and islam?!


Mishal Husain pretends to be a "Brit" yet shares values that are as far you can get from Britishness and basic Human Rights. Or is she just pretending to be a Sharia loving muslim. Either way she turns out as the worst of liars in a deceptive BBC package.


Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo are all UK jihadists - but only one (Mishal Husain) isn't home grown but brought up in Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.


Notorious islamist Inayat Bunglawala of Muslims4UK said that Mishal Husain's call was 'a helpful development'.

While muslims rape and kill on her backyard in the name of sharia, and while UK's Minister of faith islamofascism, Sayeeda Warsi intensively supports OIC's Human Rights violating sharia agenda, Mishal Husain, among other things, says she will never wear the hijab, drinks alcohol (what about ham and non-halal meat) and does not fast during Ramadan.

She found the debate about muslim identity in Britain misguided. Klevius wonders how many muslims in Mideast and in Western sharia ghettos have found Mishal Husain misguided?

‘The emphasis on what you wear on your head or how many times you pray, on the outward things rather than what’s in your heart and the way you treat people, I find slightly misguided,’ she said.‘Then I became aware that islam was the defining bit. Islam has no boundaries.’

Klevius: Indeed, no boundaries - except for those against the most basic of Human Rights!

Mishal Husain: I feel it’s a shame that we have started to divide people much more. Now we want to know whether people are Sunnis or Shias. All these labels within communities. I’m not sure how helpful it is.

Klevius:It's called "diversity" and those who benefit the most of it are the most evil muslims.



Klevius has repeatedly for years reported on Raif (or Raef) Badawi and how he is treated by the Human Rights violating islamofascist Saudi state. However, BBC's, otherwise big mouthed, muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain, who grew up in Saudi Arabia seems to be less interested:



See more about Raif Badawi further down the post.




Iyad Madani, Saudi Fuhrer of the Saudi initiated and Saudi based OIC, all the world's muslims Umma and Sharia organization, which via UN demands the world to criminalize criticism of islam (the worst crime ever) and to make it a crime following Human Rights.


Nazi Germany and islamist Turkey - no freedom of speech





Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu first made a show of solidarity with the victims of islamic jihadists in Paris, but later nullified his own appearance by heavily attacking free speech about islam.

However, Turkey's islamist government doesn't respect freedom of expression for cartoonists, or journalists. Turkey currently has more reporters in jail than any other country, incl. Iran (same size) and China (17 times bigger).

When the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten published cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad in 2005, then PM (now President) Recep Tayyip Erdogan, hatefully condemned them and insisted that free speech must have limitations when it comes to islam.




It's not about muslim sensitivities to freedom of speech - it's about evil islam's incompatibility with Human Rights!


Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI): The various punishments inflicted on these men for speaking their minds is straight out of the Koran. According to the Sharia, defaming the Prophet is an act of blasphemy, the punishment for which is death even if the blasphemer repents. This law is Koranic, for Koran 9:61 says: “Those who hurt Allah’s Messenger will have a painful punishment.” The same Surah also states: “…Say: ‘(Go ahead and) mock! But certainly Allah will bring to light all that you fear. If you ask them (about this), they declare: ‘We were only talking idly and joking.’ Say: ‘Was it at Allah and His verses and His Messenger that you were mocking? Make no excuse; you have disbelieved after you had believed. [Koran 9:64-66]'.

We are not dealing with some "radicals"* or "extremist" muslims, but with a religious ideology that not only condones such actions as were seen in France last week, but also promotes and encourages them – even commands it.

* "Radicals"* or "extremist" muslims are simply those (mosque rats) who openly say or act what islam asks them to do.



While it is rare to see such acts of terror in Western countries that are not mandated by Sharia Law, it is sadly commonplace among Muslim countries. What are clearly acts of terror in the West are in reality run of the mill legal battles in Islamic countries. The sickening part of it all is what happens when Islam succeeds at silencing all of its critics, both internal and external.

The mouse and rat problem originated in the evil* origin of islam - btw, who do you think will win, the mice or the rats? If there are any mice at all, will say!

 * if German National-socialism (aka "Nazism") or Russian communism should have won in Europe - wouldn't you've called it evil?



What is it you should see behind the islamofascist smile? 1400 years of Koranic genocides and rapetivism?


If she is Sharia compliant then she lacks Human Rights precisely based on the same logic that made OIC introduce the so called 'Cairo declaration on human rights in islam' (Sharia) which now, via UN, constitutes the framework for everyone wanting to call him/herself a muslim and, as a consequence, a Human Rightsophobe.

Sunday, August 18, 2013

When Saudi blogger gets 600 lashes and 7 yrs in a Saudi prison, BBC only reports he was freed (from death sentence)


Saudi islamofascism, a Saudi "islamophobe" and BBC's silence



Pamela Geller:

Saudi Blogger Raif Badawi Faces Jail and 600 Lashes For Insulting Islam

Only 600 lashes? The libs will say that is progress. The question is, how many lashes can any human being withstand? I think beheadng is more .... humane.
"We believe that when public speech is deemed offensive, be it via social media or any other means, the issue is best addressed through open-dialogue and honest debate," said US State Department spokeswoman
As for the State department's hollow remarks, I submit that the State Department should cease meeting with the OIC in Washington in order to impose restrictions on speech in accordance with the blasphemy laws under the sharia. I submit that the State Department should withdraw the Secretary of State's remarks. I submit that the Department of Justice should withdraw its vow to criminalize postings on social media that offend Muslims. I submit that Obama should cease blaming youtube and freedom of expression for murderous attacks on Americans in Benghazi and beyond. I submit that Obama should stop championing the adoption of anti-free speech resolution by the UN.




Klevius: A screen dump on a Google news search today on 'BBC Raif Gadawi' gives this shameful result:





A general search gives this:





And this kind of utterly disgusting, not to say purely criminal, behavior from BBC just continues while it simultaneously uses all its resources to silence, misrepresent, or falsify facts about islam, Sharia and OIC while using every opportunity to air the views of islamofascists and their supporters.