Declaring criticism of islamofascism "islamophobia" seems to be highest on the British socialist agenda.
There's no way to argue that criticism of Human Rights violating sharia muslims and sharia islam (aka "islamophobia") should/could be called a "hate crime" as long as that society adheres to Human Rights. Therefore, the only possible outcome of hate campaigns against "islamophobes" is support for islamofascism.
UK's former Labour leader Ed Miliband wants to root out "islamophobia" as a hate crime. And according to Jeremy Corbyn "islamophobia" is disgusting and deeply offensive".
Social state socialists* have never defended the rights of the individual because they are rooted in a mass movement (French revolution, Soviet Union, National-socialism, Mao's China, Cuba, DDR, Pol Pot etc.). This is why basic individual Human Rights freedom (the so called negative Human Rights) isn't defended by state socialists. As a consequence, these socialists are wide open for totalitarian systems like sharia islam.
* The self-evident idea that we need a fairer distribution of wealth shouldn't be allowed to be monopolized by socialists who, in the end, prioritize themselves via the state rather than individuals in general. This is why Klevius throughout his adult life has proposed so called "citizen salary" for everyone. Initially the Green parties seemed to follow the same line of thoughts. However, when they turned out to be supporters of state socialism Klevius had to abandon them (see Klevius paper The Green Dilemma, 1984).
Some voices about Ed Milliband's sharia association
Leo McKinstry: Ed Milliband is far more dangerous than his awkward image suggests. An unprincipled, ruthless, opportunistic left-wing ideologue, he represents a serious menace to Britain’s future. Backed by the ScotsNats and Labour’s trade union paymasters, his regime would be one of debts, bureaucracy, mass immigration and constitutional chaos.
But now an even more sinister aspect to his leadership has emerged, one that threatens our essential freedoms. Miliband says he will make Islamophobia a serious crime to be prosecuted by the full might of the state. Flushed with self-righteous zeal, Miliband wants to ensure that the offence “is marked on people’s records with the police to make sure they root out Islamophobia as a hate crime.”
Anyone who believes in liberty will be truly alarmed. Miliband’s proposal goes against the entire tradition of western democracy, which holds that people should be punished only for their deeds, not their opinions.
In the name of tolerance, Labour wants to impose a form of totalitarianism, making a mockery of the concept of free speech. Like so many socialist policies, Miliband’s plan conjures up the dark, Orwellian world of the Thought Police, where all citizens are required to obey the ruling orthodoxy. I n January Miliband echoed the global outrage at the Charlie Hebdo massacre by Muslim terrorists in Paris, even joining other political leaders in the French capital’s official protest march. But his call for a British law against Islamophobia exposes the hollowness of his indignation.
Under his proposal, most of the Charlie Hebdo staff would have been in prison over their satirical cartoons.
Jeremy Corbyn acts "offended" for being called racist. Yet he's openly and covertly racist against Human Rights defender against sharia islamofascism almost every day!
Here together with an islamofascist called Dyab Abou Jahjah whom he said to BBC he had never heard about.
Samuel Westrop: In 2012, Corbyn agreed to speak at a Ramadan celebration with Abdur Raheem Green, a Salafist preacher who has spoken of a "Yehudi [Jewish] ... stench." Green urges Muslims to "push them [Jews] to the side." In addition, Green encourages men to hit their wives to "bring them to goodness," and has called for the killing of homosexuals and adulterers.
In 2014, Corbyn spoke at an event organized by representatives of the Iranian regime, to commemorate the Iranian revolution of 1979. Corbyn's fellow speakers included Hassan al-Sadr, who represents the UK office of Iraqi terrorist Moqtada al-Sadr; and Abdolhossein Moezi, the personal representative of Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
Also in 2014, Corbyn hosted an event in parliament that featured the "neo-Nazi" speaker James Thring, who has appeared in a revisionist pro-Nazi documentary and has said that, "the Jewish lobby has so much power."
In the wake of Britain's general election, candidates with ties to anti-Semitic extremists and terror groups are standing for important political positions.
Boris Johnson: 'Sharia law in the UK is absolutely unacceptable'
"That is unacceptable to me. Everybody must be equal under the law, and everybody must obey the same law. That is absolutely cast-iron. The point is that the idea of a parallel system of law, a parallel judicature, people making the laws holding to a different system, is absolutely unacceptable, it's alien to our traditions
"I take grave exception to some of the support I see sometimes - and from clerics in the Church of England who've come out in favour of this, I've noticed, and said we should be a little bit indulgent of this.
"It's an interesting fact that we have some clerical fossils still in our legislature. Don't forget we have bishops sitting by right in our upper house.
"The separation of church and state is not perhaps as thorough-going in this country as you might like to think.
"The point is that the idea of a parallel system of law, a parallel judicature, people making the laws holding to a different system, is absolutely unacceptable, it's alien to our traditions.
"I won't have it in London and I'm worried sometimes by the faint bat-squeaks of support that I hear for that idea even from clerics in the Church of England."
Asked if the Beth Din would "have to go", Mr Johnson replied: "Yes, absolutely. Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander."
He said he accepted that Jewish couples could go to a Beth Din to seek sanction for their divorce, but added: "It cannot substitute for UK civil proceedings.
"They cannot replace the civil proceedings. If they want to have some ceremonial proceeding according to religious ritual or whatever, that is fine. But the actual implementation of the law has got to be done in British courts according to British law, agreed by Parliament.
"That is where the law emanates from. The law emanates in the end from people voting for MPs who enact the statutes which we all obey.
"That gives this country a vital equality."
Bubblegum commented 145 days ago: Bores had better get used to Sharia law on our streets... It will come whether he wants it or not as the Muslim birth rate produces more and more Muslims they will become future voting fodder, What does Boris expect ? That these hoards will not want to change everything to suite themselves ??
Klevius comment: The simple answer is to force politicians etc. to face muslims with the logical choice of Human Rights violating* sharia or apostasy from sharia islam. And, in case of the former, face them with hate, sexism and racism charges! However, the difficult part is to face politicians with this simple logic.
* Meaning truly basic Human Rights - not some silly "rights".