"Islamophobia" or islamofascism?
Of course Labour won't let go of their ties to islamofascism. And that's kind of good because it will alienate British voters even more from this disgusting state party which talks a lot about "vulnerable people" when asking for tax-money, while forgetting all about these "vulnerable people" when it comes to consuming said money (read Angels of Antichrist and Pathological Symbiosis).
Boris Johnson: 'Sharia law in the UK is absolutely unacceptable'.
Klevius: Boris Johnson fulfills the most basic definition of "islamophobia" because islam without sharia is no longer islam! Welcome Boris to Klevius club.
Jeremy Corbyn acts "offended" for being called racist. Yet he's both openly and covertly racist against Human Rights defenders (i.e. most ordinary Brits) almost every day!
Here Jeremy Corbyn sits together with an islamofascist called Dyab Abou Jahjah whom he afterwards said to BBC he had never heard about.
Samuel Westrop: In 2012, Corbyn agreed to speak at a Ramadan celebration with Abdur Raheem Green, a Salafist preacher who has spoken of a "Yehudi [Jewish] ... stench." Green urges Muslims to "push them [Jews] to the side." In addition, Green encourages men to hit their wives to "bring them to goodness," and has called for the killing of homosexuals and adulterers.
In 2014, Corbyn spoke at an event organized by representatives of the Iranian regime, to commemorate the Iranian revolution of 1979. Corbyn's fellow speakers included Hassan al-Sadr, who represents the UK office of Iraqi terrorist Moqtada al-Sadr; and Abdolhossein Moezi, the personal representative of Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
Also in 2014, Corbyn hosted an event in parliament that featured the "neo-Nazi" speaker James Thring, who has appeared in a revisionist pro-Nazi documentary and has said that, "the Jewish lobby has so much power."
In the wake of Britain's general election, candidates with ties to anti-Semitic extremists and terror groups are standing for important political positions.
Klevius micro tutorial on the origin of islam:
The early muslim
The only muslim women "refugees" are those pregnant or with kids or already married (sharia marriage). So new muslim mothers are usually taken from non-muslims. Moreover, muslim women aren't even allowed, according to sharia, to date or marry non-muslims.
Muslim women in UK have four times more kids than non-muslims. Yet BBC keeps demonizing non-muslim EU migrants, Chinese etc.
"Islamophobic" math based on Human Rightsphobic islam
Most muslims who come as "refugees" are in fact from wealthy middle class, and should therefore be classified as "economical or benefit migrants". The poorer ones could never afford to pay for the travel. Why isn't this cruel fact on Labour's agenda?! The islamic pattern of today is exactly the same as when early muslim jihadis made wealthy non-muslims pay taxes while slaughtering, raping and enslaving the poorer ones. Klevius thinks it's disgusting. What do you reckon, Jeremy Corbyn? "Islamophobia" more disgusting, right.
Of these "coming alone child-refugees" most are muslims. 90% are teenage boys and most of these are late teenage youngsters.
According to islam a child fathered by a muslim is always a muslim no matter who the mother is.
So it's not only that muslim mothers have many more children than non-muslim Europeans - non-muslim mothers having children with muslim men inevitably loose their children to islam.
In Klevius series digusting Human Rights desecrating hypocritical politicians.
Raed Salah (a friend of Jeremy Corbyn): Very soon, Muhammad will be the most popular name in Europe.
Klevius: And most of them are muslim violators of Human Rights! If we don't start educating muslims about Human Rights instead of lying to our children about islam, then these future Muhammads and Muslimas will never understand the very evil origin and nature of Human Rights violating sharia islam.
So what to do?
Simple. Most muslims have a brain and understand logic. So face them with Human Rights logic according to which their system is racist and sexist. Most of these young males will probably abandon sharia islam if seriously challenged at all societal levels with the illogic of this supremacist ideology. And those who don't, then clearly define themselves as hateful and racist supremacists.
UK's former Labour leader Ed Miliband wants to root out "islamophobia" as a hate crime. And according to Jeremy Corbyn "islamophobia" is disgusting and deeply offensive".
Social state socialists* have never defended the rights of the individual because they are rooted in a mass movement (French revolution, Soviet Union, National-socialism, Mao's China, Cuba, DDR, Pol Pot etc.). This is why basic individual Human Rights freedom (the so called negative Human Rights) isn't defended by state socialists. As a consequence, these socialists are wide open for totalitarian systems like sharia islam.
* The self-evident idea that we need a fairer distribution of wealth shouldn't be allowed to be monopolized by socialists who, in the end, prioritize themselves via the state rather than individuals in general. This is why Klevius throughout his adult life has proposed so called "citizen salary" for everyone. Initially the Green parties seemed to follow the same line of thoughts. However, when they turned out to be supporters of state socialism Klevius had to abandon them (see Klevius paper The Green Dilemma, 1984).
Some voices about Ed Milliband's sharia association
Leo McKinstry: Ed Milliband is far more dangerous than his awkward image suggests. An unprincipled, ruthless, opportunistic left-wing ideologue, he represents a serious menace to Britain’s future. Backed by the ScotsNats and Labour’s trade union paymasters, his regime would be one of debts, bureaucracy, mass immigration and constitutional chaos.
But now an even more sinister aspect to his leadership has emerged, one that threatens our essential freedoms. Miliband says he will make Islamophobia a serious crime to be prosecuted by the full might of the state. Flushed with self-righteous zeal, Miliband wants to ensure that the offence “is marked on people’s records with the police to make sure they root out Islamophobia as a hate crime.”
Anyone who believes in liberty will be truly alarmed. Miliband’s proposal goes against the entire tradition of western democracy, which holds that people should be punished only for their deeds, not their opinions.
In the name of tolerance, Labour wants to impose a form of totalitarianism, making a mockery of the concept of free speech. Like so many socialist policies, Miliband’s plan conjures up the dark, Orwellian world of the Thought Police, where all citizens are required to obey the ruling orthodoxy. I n January Miliband echoed the global outrage at the Charlie Hebdo massacre by Muslim terrorists in Paris, even joining other political leaders in the French capital’s official protest march. But his call for a British law against Islamophobia exposes the hollowness of his indignation.
Under his proposal, most of the Charlie Hebdo staff would have been in prison over their satirical cartoons.