Every true muslim wants to impose sharia on America - but Scott Eric Kaufman had no clue!
Scott Eric Kaufman: Megyn Kelly and Ayaan Hirsi Ali attack muslim scholar for claiming the majority of muslims are moderate.
Klevius correction of Scott Eric Kaufman: If 'moderate' means someone who follows the most basic Human Rights then no muslim could ever be called 'moderate' simply because to be a muslim is to follow Human Rights violating sharia (in whatever form). Moreover. sharia (in whatever form) is clearly made global for all muslims via the Saudi based (Jeddah) and steered (Iyad Madani) muslim world organization OIC!
Scott Eric Kaufman: Hirsi Ali even aligned Haroon Moghul (a muslim who wants sharia - Klevius' remark) with jihadists who wish to impose Sharia law on America. Haroon Moghul (an islamofascist resting on Taqiya and sharia) said “she just accused me of being a Medina Muslim, I mean this is exactly what I’m saying — this isn’t a serious conversation. The majority of American muslims are fully integrated.”
Klevius: No, he's right. He made a serious conversation impossible. He clearly belongs to what Ayaan Hirsi Ali calls "the Medina muslims" i.e. those who want to impose sharia! Otherwise he wouldn't be a muslim "scholar". Nor even a muslim.
Scott Eric Kaufman: Haroon Moghul noted that Hirsi Ali has “no traction” in the Islamic community, so she isn’t positioned to help create a reformist movement within it.
Klevius: How could you possibly ever have a critical conversation about islam if the participants ought to have "traction" among sharia muslims who clearly state they are against the most basic Human Rights? And how on earth could you eat the cake and still have it? Sharia excludes Human Rights and therefore also a reform of islam, period!
Scott Eric Kaufman: Haroon Moghul noted that last year the FBI declared right-wing domestic terror groups the greatest threat to the United States, and Kelly attempted to corner him into saying that he believed that right-wing groups are a greater threat than ISIS. Haroon Moghul smiled, only saying “you brought up the FBI, I’m just repeating what they’re saying.
Klevius: Yes, indeed. Left wing muslim born (apostate?!) Mr X "president" Barry Barakeh Hussain Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever) has done his best to rather talk about some minuscule right wing "terrorism" than the enormous threat from islam induced muslim terrorism. However, nowhere in the FBI report is it said anything that could be interpreted as "right wing terrorism" being a greater threat than muslim jihad and sharia terrorism. This turned out to be a media "mistake" (was Scott Eric Kaufman involved?!).
Klevius wrote about the media/islamopfascism problem:
A Nuremberg trial against BBC's bigoted and hypocritical muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain - defended by Klevius
In a May 1 sermon, Tunisian cleric Sheik Bechir Begga said that Satan and the Jews are the enemies of Muslims. He added that Allah was gathering the Jews “in Palestine, or in Tel Aviv,” where they would meet their end.
The Muslim has two enemies. The first is Satan. The Prophet Muhammad said: “Satan flows through human beings like blood flows through the veins.” Satan is the first enemy. “Surely Satan is your enemy, so treat him like an enemy.” This is what Allah said.
The second enemy is the Zionist Jew.
They violated pacts and covenants. They slayed the prophets. They disobeyed Allah’s commandments and violated his prohibitions. What we are witnessing today is their second and final corruption.
“When there comes the promise of the Hereafter, We will gather you in droves.” [Allah] will gather them from all over the world. After He had dispersed the Jews all over the world – some in Britain, some in Germany, some in the Soviet Union, and some in other countries – they will gather again in the lane of Palestine, or Tel Aviv.
“We will gather you in droves.” This is one of the signs heralding the Day of Judgment. These are glad tidings for us, because that is their end. They will meet their end by gathering in Israel. This is the beginning of the end for Israel.
Mishal Husain grew up in Saudi Arabia, the country that gave birth to and shares the same version of islam that propels the Islamic State
Islamic ideology has committed genocides, enslaved, murdered, raped and victimized more people than any other ideology throughout 1400 years. Although history is full of proof of this, the most obvious evidence of islamic evilness* is to be found in the Koran, Muhammad's biographies and the hadiths. And cherry picking away the mass of evil in islamic texts would never have been accepted re. for example Nationalsocialism (aka Nazism).
* Measured by Human Rights standard
BBC's muslim sharia presenter (or?)*: "You could argue couldn't you, that Hamas was also stopping worse happening all of this period, because although there was rockets being fired - they weren't the.. the big rockets that have caused damage in recent days, they were mostly home-made contraptions."
This support for violent jihad terror alone would be enough to render Mishal Husain morally guilty. However, a much more serious side of Mishal Husain is her support for islam in general, well knowing (unlike many less well informed muslims) that islam means sharia and that sharia inevitably means grave violations of the most basic of Human Rights.
Mishal Husain, while islam kills and victimizes millions, says that she doesn't think her way of life is under any kind of threat and that she is a proud muslim who doesn't care to fast during Ramadan and rather drinks some alcohol
A consequence of this is that a sharia supporting muslim's vote is undemocratic. OIC's 57 member state voting bloc in UN who supported Human Rights violating sharia as a guidance for muslim legislation all over the world was therefore also undemocratic.
Could there be any doubt that Mishal Husain isn't aware of OIC and its
world sharia declaration? After all, it's even on Wikipedia.
Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo (who murdered Lee Rigby). Mishal Husain is BBC's top muslim presenter and BBC is the world's leading media. The only thing she needs to say is that she opposes Human Rights violating sharia - and thereby also opposes islam because islam without some form of Human Rights violating sharia is not islam anymore - it's just a private belief and won't bother Klevius a bit.
Adolf Eichman's defense: I did not persecute Jews with avidity and passion. That is what the government did.
Mishal Husain's defense as outlined by Klevius: Mishal Husain doesn't persecute Jews with avidity and passion. That's what the militant part of islam does. Jihadis who are fighting in an unjust war (i.e. against "islamophobia") must still be treated as legal combatants, and not held responsible for the war itself. Only those behind the policy (islam) should be sentenced.
So Klevius proposes that all charges against Mishal Husain should be dismissed, because circumstantial evidence ought not to be allowed. However, this also implies that Mishal Husain has to avoid supporting violent jihad islam wherever it appears, incl. Israel, so to keep circumstantial evidence from becoming factual evidence and thereby turning her case on its head.
Comment by Anonymous: But hasn't Mishal Husain asked for muslim "scholars" to address jihadism?
Comment by Clevius: You're so right, Anonymous, that's exactly what she did - asked
Comment by Haram: Does Mishal Husain eat halal meat?
Acknowledgement: A Google search today couldn't find any pictures of Mishal Husain signed Klevius. Not even on 'more images'. Must be a bug or something.
I'm sure BBC or Mishal Husain would never lower themselves to anything like that.
Here are some more in case you've missed them: