Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a racist/sexist "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Theresa May's sharia = >23,000 jihadi - before Brexit. How many after?

Theresa May's sharia = >23,000 jihadi - before Brexit. How many after?

UK DID NOT vote Brexit. EU residents weren't allowed to vote while non-EU residents were.

The muslim Saudi dictator family is the root of most islam induced suffering

May's secret love affair with Saudi islamofascists - while rejecting Chinese

Prince Charles blames islam's atrocities in Mideast etc. on "European populists like the Nazis"

Prince Charles blames islam's atrocities in Mideast etc. on "European populists like the Nazis"

While Klevius is forcing islam into a Human Rights corner, politicians support islamofascism

Why hasn't Klevius got the Nobel prize for his theory on consciousness/AI?

BBC's fake/angled news protect islamofascist offenders because of its ties (BBC World) to Mideast

BBC lies and fake news

The "Birmingham Koran" hoax - and a sonless "prophet" invented after it!

Lego won't sponsor the defense for Human Rights equality - but islamofascism and sharia is ok

Hillary supports sharia for women, war with Russia and aid to Sunni islamofascists

Apostate (?) Obama's bio- and adoptive dads were both muslims

BBC smears China while bolstering Saudi islamofascists - the worst spreaders of hate and terror

BBC smears China while bolstering Saudi islamofascists - the worst spreaders of hate and terror

Choudary and May both want more sharia - so what about "British values"?

Michael Morell (ex-CIA) is/was a knowing agent for Saudi wahhabism and its Koranic hate jihadism

Trump: Why wouldn't we? Theresa May: I would!

Sharia muslim London mayor voted in by his islamist friends

Sharia muslim London mayor voted in by his islamist friends

Theresa May is for sharia and EU - but against EU's Human Rights Court which condemns sharia

Muslims and Hillary against Human Rights

Muslims and Hillary against Human Rights

OIC and NOI are muslim extremist organizations

Origin of islam and an ignorant white Western nun

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo have sharia islam in common

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo have sharia islam in common

God is an escape route from Human Rights

First sophisticated art by the first truly modern humans

The world's oldest real portrait ever found (Central Europe). Carvings dated to 26-29,000 bp.

Finland's lion trampling the islamic scimitar 1583

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Origin of the Vikings

A victim of rapetivism - and an interfaith messenger of rapetivism

A victim of rapetivism - and an interfaith messenger of rapetivism

Japan 10 yrs ahead of Europe in hybrid/fuelcell cars, space tech etc

Native Brits from Doggerland spoke a proto-Finnish/Uralic (Eurasiatic) language

We non-muslims need to honor racist islam's victims - cause muslims won't

We non-muslims need to honor racist islam's victims - cause muslims won't
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-f4ihemJ34G4/T2yuFzSUqiI/AAAAAAAAA_U/FcGmXfvhkCw/s640/Ms+Lucy+Black+racist+4.jpg

The islamic extermination of Jews

Modern humans originated in Siberia

Klevius: Why are women accomplices to their own apartheid?

The last taboo: Sex segregation/sex apartheid

Klevius is probably now the world's foremost expert on sex segregation (sad, isn't it) and islam (the worst hate crime ever) is the foremost expression of sex segregation. By 'islam' Klevius means Sharia as described by Bill Warner and the Saudi based and steered muslim world organization OIC and its Cairo declaration (sharia) imposed on all muslims via UN (meaning basic Human Rights are criminalized).

Burn OIC's islamic anti-Human Rights declaration!

Sunday, April 28, 2013

Who is Samira Ahmed and does/did she have a muslim Dad?



Islamofascist terrorists and supporters may show up wherever and in whatever shape and background - but the blood and suffering they cause is the same






A fatherless little sex segregated girl in Diaspora confusion?!


"My dad found a way to get us on the Concorde on a short internal US flight when I was 11 year old".



It's a strange fact that it's difficult (with a normal brief search considering she is otherwise all over the web) to find anything about Samira Ahmed's Dad as well as about her views on Sharia and OIC including its demand to criminalize criticism against islam.

Samira Ahmed herself talks a lot - and fluently as wet soap in a bath tub - about islam and islamic feminism but is hard to find writing anything on the web about Sharia, islam's most important part according to Saudi based all muslim's world organization OIC. And according to this islamofascist UN organization women under no circumstances are allowed full Human Rights!

Left-winged Samira Ahmed's equally unintellectual (and fluent) right-winged twin Sayeeda Warsi



While the Catholic Church is in decline partly because various scandals have eroded the defense of the Church's cultural authority, oppressive cultures resting on islam, by contrast, are growing ever stronger in their rigidities.

BBC: As a British muslim, presenter Samira Ahmed has watched the rise of fundamentalist islam with bewilderment.

Klevius comment: Perhaps the very fact that she is "a British muslim" constitutes the main clue to the answer. The horrifying islamic fire in muslim land turns into a peaceful candle lit by her feminist fantasy in her London studio.

A "British muslim" could mean at least two things: 1) Someone living in one of the many more or less Taliban style Sharia ruled muslim communities in the UK, or 2) secular muslims (who are no real muslims in any sense) who pretend they can stretch islam to suite their personal lives.

Samira Ahmed: The ingrained hatred of women apparent in many aspects of Afghan society is undeniable.

The global power of women hating (islamic) clerics stunned me.

Much news analysis to mark the 10th anniversary has rightly pointed out that women and children have suffered disproportionately in the drone attacks increasingly used by NATO commanders.

Klevius comment: NATO commanders!? The man behind it is muslim born (apostate?!) Mr X "president" Barry Barakeh Hussain Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever). Why don't you say it Samira?!

Samira Ahmed says she is passionate about "telling the complete story". May I then suggest she takes a look at the origin of islam. Nothing peaceful as far as the sources can see. And the only explanation to the origin of islam that fits the sources (excluding muslim fairy tales, of course) is the formula suggested by Klevius: Slavery+"infidel" racism+sex segregated rapetivism+anti human rights Sharia/apostasy ban.

Hugh Kennedy (considered a foremost expert on the muslim atrocities in the vacuum left by previously retreating Byzantine forces): ”Before Abdul Malik, Mohammed is never mentioned on any official document whatsoever, nor any form of religious pronouncement”.

Samira Ahmed: I’ve found my British Indian/Pakistani and mixed religious background a huge asset to producing the most impartial and inclusive journalism.
Klevius comment: I've not! On the contrary your unfounded excusing of islam's atrocities only worsens and prolongs the suffering of islam's victims - including muslim women in muslim land.

BBC: Samira Ahmed investigates why a faith with over a billion followers is seen by many as misogynistic and intolerant.

Klevius comment: Perhaps because islam is misogynistic and intolerant.This is why islam cannot accept full Human Rights for girls/women.

BBC: As part of her journey across four continents and fourteen centuries, she searches out women who have re-interpreted the Koran to fight back against tribal and patriarchal practices.

Klevius: Islam IS tribal and patriarchal practices lumped together. Islam is oppressive, muslim men are sexist and muslim women are voiceless thanks to Sharia which deprives them from basic Human Rights.

Muslim feminists: "Our message has been loud and clear: Muslim women don't need to be liberated".

however

Muslim women's voice of agency is effectively drowned in Saudi based OIC's deliberate abandoning of Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia. So no matter what "voice" muslim women try to use it will be useless. The missing key is in the Human Rights declaration and is spelled:


Article 2. (Human Rights)

  • Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.


This article is the reason Saudi based muslim world organization OIC and its fanatic Fuhrer Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu replaced all muslim women's Human Rights with islamic Sharia. To allow this article would mean the death for all meaningful forms of islam.

So why is Samira Ahmed hiding? Klevius answer: Because "islamic feminism" is b------t and in essence pure islamofascism. Basically the only difference between Taliban women and Samira is the latter one's fluency.

However, Samira Ahmed and muslim feminists not only contribute to prolonging islamic crimes but also hinder muslim girls from true emancipation. Under Human Rights a girl/woman is free to lead her life as she wishes - under whatever form of Sharia she is restricted.

If muslim women want to continue aiding their own oppression it's ok for Klevius. However, it's not ok that they force female children into the same limitations.


Femen vs muslim feminists


Two slavs* and an ex-muslim kick islam in its groin.

* Islam enslaved so many slavic girls/women that it created the world 'slave' (see Origin of Vikings).

In an April 3 demonstration in Paris, on the eve of International Topless Jihad Day, three Femen activists--two French and one Tunisian--burned the islamic flag in front of the Grand Mosque. The flag contains the declaration of the belief in the oneness of Allah and acceptance of Muhammad as the prophet of Allah.

Femen's leader, Inna Schevchenko: "So, sisters (I prefer to talk to women anyway, even knowing that behind them are bearded men with knives). You say to us that you are against Femen, but we are here for you and for all of us, as women are the modern slaves and it's never a question of color of skin . . .You say you live the way you want. Being fifth wife in harem the maximum you can be is the favorite wife . . . Right? You say we talk about you because we are irritated only by bearded men who pray five times per day. Sisters, we don't care how many times your men are praying, but we care a lot what they do in between. We care a lot about violence and aggression, we care a lot when your fathers, brothers and husbands are raping and killing, when they call to stone your sisters, we care a lot when they burn embassies etc, and all that for Allah!"



Islamic feminism is connected with "islamic academia"


Klevius comment: And "islamic academia" is entirely connected to islamic fairy tales - like a microphone in front of a loudspeaker it just painfully repeats itself in an eternal loop!
Asma Lamrabet in "Islamic Feminisms": “Muslim women have come to accept discriminatory acts supposed to be established by God, whereas they simply result from human interpretations that became sacred with time.” The project is extensive. It consists — in theory — of revising the fiqh (Islamic jurisprudential law), practicing ijtihad (intellectual effort), differentiating universal verses from those whose scope is only temporary, and distinguishing the text of the Quran from its application on the ground. These practices led Ali and her female colleagues to draw radical conclusions. Hanan al-Laham, a Syrian activist who interprets Islamic texts and works as a teacher in Saudi Arabia (sic), called for ijtihad to solve the difficult question of inheritance. These women have concluded that the framework in which the distribution of inheritance was designed in islam is no longer compliant with our times. Hence, it must be amended to create more equitable inheritance.


Klevius comment: “Muslim women have come to accept discriminatory acts supposed to be established by Allah". Yes, muslim women like Shamira Ahmed and Sayeeda Warsi both seem to fully accept Saudi based OIC and its Sharia (the so called Cairo declaration on "human rights in islam (sic)" which is aimed to cover the whole world's muslims. OIC's islamofascist coup d'état in the UN has resulted in a state of affairs that excludes muslim women from full Human Rights - no matter what "muslim feminists" try to do. The only possible way out for muslim women is apostasy, the worst crime known to islam! In this light pretend-to-be muslim women such as Shamira Ahmed and Sayeeda Warsi are hypocrites and bigots who earn their money on the behalf of all muslim women who continue suffering under islam. In fact, Samira Ahmed and Sayeeda Warsi have both already committed apostasy just like Obama (whose father was a muslim and whose father was also a muslim) unless, of course, they aren't committing taqiya, i.e. deliberately lying for the sake of islam!

Nothing of this nonsense addresses the main problem visavi full Human Rights! And the childish "differentiating universal verses" proposal can never free itself from equal but differing proposals from other muslim groups!



Thursday, April 25, 2013

Stop searching for the motive - it's in the Koran for anyone to read!


If women wouldn't submit to sex apartheid, islam would be dead by now - not its victims!


Klevius comment: And aided by sex segregation. Just consider the denying mum who got a veil at approximately the same time as her son matured. And the US wife "who didn't know anything" although she had to convert to islam.


The pathetic US "president" eagerly tries to erase islam's fingerprint from this case while he equally eagerly supports Saudi and Qatar islamofascists and Al-Qaeda in Syria.

Monday, April 22, 2013

Racist/sexist muslim supremacist attitudes behind atrocities in Myanmar and Nigeria


Rapetivism - the interfaith connection



According to BBC Nigeria suffers from "ethnic violence" and Myanmar from "Buddhist violence"!? But who started it?

Whereas believers in Universal Human Rights believe in the freedom of the individual, no matter of sex etc, believers in islam have to (because of Sharia) act as a collective, the Umma (today steered by OIC).

Myanmar/Burma


The first trigger: Rohingya muslims raped and murdered Buddhist Ma Thida Htwe



On the evening of 28 May 2012, a group of men robbed, raped and murdered an ethnic Rakhine Buddhist woman, Ma Thida Htwe, near the Kyaut Ne Maw village. The locals claim the culprits to have been Rohingya Muslims. The police arrested three suspects and sent them to Yanbye township jail. This event is first cause of riots of Rakhine.

Second trigger: Tun Tun Oo, a wealthy muslim gold shop owner slapped a Buddhist woman customer in her face and had her husband badly beaten up


Witnesses told Reuters that on March 21, Tun Tun Oo slapped a Buddhist woman who had accused employees of damaging a gold hair clip she wanted to sell. The woman’s husband was pulled outside, held down and beaten by three of the shop’s employees, according to the couple and two witnesses. The assaulted Buddhist couple was U Khin Maung Win and Daw Aye Aye Naings.
A mostly Buddhist crowd gathered, hurling stones and eventually destroying the shop and neighboring businesses. Later that day, four muslim men killed a Buddhist monk and Buddhist mobs then went on the rampage.
The muslim gold shop owner was sentenced to jail time after court hearing.

At that day, a Buddhist monk from Hanzar village of One-dwin township had come into the Meiktila town as a passenger on a motorbike and they were unknowingly riding through the Da-hart-tan muslim ward the biggest muslim quarters in Meiktila. Already-agitated muslims saw the Buddhist monk and chased the motorbike and managed to strike the Buddhist monk from behind with a sword and he fell to the ground from his pillion-riding position on the motorbike. He had a long deep gash on the back of his head just above his left ear. Muslim mobs forcefully took off his robe and brutally dragged the direly-wounded Buddhist monk into the nearby Myo-ma Mosque. Once inside the mosque they poured acid and petrol all over the wounded Buddhist monk and burned him alive.


Nigeria

Nigerian islamofascists sponsored by Saudi Arabia (what else), UK and BBC


While Boko Haram initially relied on donations from members, its links with Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, AQIM, opened it up to more funding from groups in Saudi Arabia and the UK. Other sources of funding include the Al Muntada Trust Fund and the Islamic World Society

Queen Ugeh of the Federal Radio Corporation Nigeria (FRCN) said that reports showed an escalation in cases of gang rape and killing of women in Lagos which required attention of security agencies. In such incidents, the valuables of the victims were not taken by their assailants which showed that they were not cases of robbery.

Strategypage: In northern Borno state, where Boko Haram has been most active, the Islamic terrorists have destroyed all but two of the 52 Catholic churches in the state. Boko Haram has been particularly hostile to non-Moslems and southern politicians are having a difficult time restraining southern Christians from retaliating against Moslems living in the largely Christian south. This is what Boko Haram wants, as they see a general religious war as benefitting them. Most Nigerians don’t see it that way. In response to that, Boko Haram is increasingly vocal and specific about its plans to drive all Christians from Nigeria, killing those who resist. Christians are welcome to convert to Islam but going the other way will get you a death sentence from Boko Haram.

Boko Haram carried out its first terrorist attack in Borno state in January 2010 and four people were killed. In 2011, Boko Haram was responsible for at least 450 murders in Nigeria.


Timeline of Boko Haram:


    January 2012: Boko Haram launches bomb attacks and heavy gun battles in Kano targeting the police headquarters. Over 150 people reported killed.

    January 2012: President Goodluck Jonathan says Boko Haram has infiltrated government, including the executive, national assembly and the judiciary.

    January 2012: President Goodluck Jonathan declares a state of emergency in 15 local government areas in Borno, Yobe and Plateau states and also orders the closure of Nigeria's land borders in the north.

    December 2011: Christmas Day bomb attack on Saint Theresa Catholic Church in Madalla, Niger state, near Abuja. One policeman is killed in a failed bomb attack on a church in Jos, Plateau state.

    November 2011: Boko Haram announces that it will not hold talks with the government until all members of the sect, who have been arrested, are released.

    November 2011: Series of bomb and gun attacks in Yobe and Borno states

    September 2011: Babakura Fugu, brother-in-law to late Boko Haram leader, Mohammed Yusuf, is shot dead two days after attending a peace meeting with ex-President Olusegun Obasanjo. Boko Haram denies any involvement in the incident.

    August 2011: UN headquarters in Abuja is bombed. Boko Haram claims responsibility for the suicide bomb. 23 people killed.

    July 2011: Federal government states that it will create a panel to initiate negotiations with Boko Haram.

    August 2011: Federal government rejects negotiations with Boko Haram.

    June 2011: Muslim cleric critical of Boko Haram, Ibrahim Birkuti, is shot dead by two gunmen on a motorcycle.

    June 2011: Police headquarters in Abuja is bombed

    May 2011: Bomb attacks in several states after President Goodluck Jonathan's inauguration

    December 2010: Attack on Army barracks in Abuja.

    December 2010: Bombings in Jos, Plateau state and Maiduguri, Borno state kill about 80 people.

    December 2010: Governorship candidate of the All Nigeria Peoples Party (ANPP) in Borno state and seven others shot dead by gunmen suspected to be Boko Haram members

    September 2010: Boko Haram members attack a prison in Bauchi and freed hundreds of prisoners, including about 100 members of the sect.

    July 2009: Boko Haram attacks Maiduguri police stations. Hundreds are killed

    July 2009: Mohammed Yusuf, leader of Boko Haram, is captured by the Nigerian army and handed over to police. He is found dead later and the police claims he was killed while trying to escape. Residents and human rights groups claim that he was assasinated.

    June 2009: Boko Haram members refuse to follow a motor-bike helmet law. Clashes with joint military and police occur, and 17 Boko Haram members are killed. Mohammed Yusuf releases a video recording to the president where he threatens revenge attacks.

in 2009 the government began investigating reports that Boko Haram members were arming themselves

    2007: Buju Foi, an influential Boko Haram member,is appointed by Borno state governor, Ali Modu Sheriff, as commissioner of religious affairs.

    2002: Boko Haram is founded

Sunday, April 21, 2013

Why has there never been any true Arabic/islamic science and progress? Because of islamic Sharia parasitism, dude!


Islam is today trying to pathetically hide itself - much like the muslim Al-Qaeda terrorist Dzokhar Tsarnaev who was fueled by Saudi sponsored dreams of an islamist Khorasan

Remember that the absolute majority of deadly violence (terrorism) is committed by muslims and demanded by the Koran. Still, most of muslim street jihadism isn't even icluded. If you have a random sample of deranged people a certain percentage will commit violent crimes. However, if half of the sample is spiced with Koranic hatred against "infidels" then it's absolutely self-evident that this group will end up with even more violence! Klevius feels embarrassed to even mention such a matter of course but today we have ended up with a situation where pure visible naked evil has to be labeled as such - and even then people keep saying: But it's a religion - it can't be evil!


Are you equally ignorant and sex segregated as this muslim terroris's mother!


It was islam that more than 1,000 years ago gathered so many African slaves in what is now Iraq that a rebellion icluded more than half a million slaves.

It was islam that sanctioned African slavers to take as much as several tens of thousands of African slaves in a single pilgrimage to Mecca long before a single slave had entered the Americas.

Just a brief study of islam's history reveals an almost incomprehensible amount of slaves and suffering in the name of Allah, Mohammed and the Koran. As Klevius has repeatedly stated, we do need an islamic approach to history - not a cover up and whitewashing. Without understanding islam's deep rooted evilness one cannot make sense of the history of people contaminated by islam.

Jérôme Maurand, a 16th century French priest: "To see so many poor Christians, and especially so many little boys and girls [enslaved] caused a very great pity. The tears, wailings and cries of these poor Lipariotes, the father regarding his son and the mother her daughter... weeping while leaving their own city in order to be brought into slavery by those dogs who seemed like rapacious wolves amidst timid lambs. The old ones who hid in the cathedral were stripped and cut up while still alive just 'out of spite'. When we asked these Turks why they treated these poor Christians with such cruelty, they replied that such behavior 'had very great virtue'".

No other ideology comes even close. This is why OIC and other islam supporters so eagerly try to hide it!

The “common creed” rhetorics is what makes America (and other places) vulnerable to evil islam.

Obama: "Americans refuse to be terrorized". Klevius: Yes, by shutting their eyes.


If you are appalled by slavery, genocides and rapetivism - then you should be deeply ashamed of islam, because those are the main traces of islam in history! 


OIC wants to falsify and cover up islam's true slavery/genocide/rapetivism origin and history (i.e. what historically constitutes the worst ideological crime ever against humanity)


Klevius brief history of islam:


Origin of islam

The parasitic source code of islam: Slavery+"infidel" racism+sex segregated rapetivism+anti human rights Sharia/apostasy ban.

Origin of the Vikings (Klevius' evil forefathers)


Cathedral Catholicism

A product of the European defense against islam

Renaissance

The recovering from islamist jihadism and a slowly emerging understanding of the value of individual freedom as opposed to slavery.

Enlightenment

A slowly emerging understanding that religion is a dead end. Especially the excesses in Catholicism - which in turn was the result of islam's attacks on Europe.

Protestantism against Catholicism and the birth of industrialization and the modern (aka "Western") world civilization

When England eventually got rid of Catholicism 1688 the road was open for enlightened humans to use their individual creativity for industrial production.

Negative Human Rights declaration 1948

After the fall of the last muslim stronghold, the Ottoman "empire" (it fell as a result of the abolition of slavery), Europe again had to face a period of war  1914-1945 before resettling with a formula, Human Rights, that ended the theoretical possibility of evil racism and sexism. That the negative Human Rights were contaminated with positive so called Stalin rights should not in any sense disprove the former which are free from impositions.


The laughable oxymoron "islamic science", how could anyone possibly take it seriously?! Unless by ignorance out of whitewashing and brainwashing of course!


The  oxymoron "islamic science" is utter defamation of science, and is rooted in ignorance about the origin of islam!
Klevius science tutorial for Seyyid Hossein Nasr and others
Seyyid Hossein Nasr (“professor” of Islamic Studies at Georgetown University) at MIT Islamic Students Association (sponsored by the Pakistan Study Group, the MIT Muslim Students Association and “other groups”): “Science has its own world-view. No science is created in a vacuum. Science arose under particular circumstances in the West with certain philosophical presumptions about the nature of reality. As soon as you say, m, f, v, and a, that is, the simple parameters of classical physics, you have chosen to look at reality from a certain point of view. There is no mass, there is no force out there like that chair or table. These are particularly abstract concepts which grew in the seventeenth century on the basis of a particular concept of space, matter and motion which Newton developed. The historians and philosophers of science in the last twenty [or] thirty years have shown beyond the scepter of doubt that modern science has its own world view. It is not at all value free; nor is it a purely objective science of reality irrespective of the subject you study. It is based upon the imposition of certain categories upon the study of nature, with a remarkable success in the study of certain things, and also a remarkable lack of success [in others], depending on what you are looking at.”

Klevius: Listen to this utter crap! “Science has its own world-view. No science is created in a vacuum”. Two cardinal flaws in just twelve words! Does this muslim fella also believe that "the Western interpretation" 2+2=4 has a corresponding Sharia compliant islamic version?! The choice to look at reality from a certain point of view isn't science, just like what you choose to do with your power tool isn't the power tool!

OK, science doesn’t have its own world-view, that’s for sure. If it had it wouldn't be science anymore. This is the very definition of science. Just as Negative Human Rights don’t have a world-view either, simply because they are supposed to protect you from “world-views”.

Science is pure logic* and shouldn’t be confused with the scientific process, i.e. including its non-scientific parts, such as choice of topic, background/pre-understanding etc., and the interpretation of results from the scientific part of the scientific process. Nor should flaws in the scientific process (such as e.g. errors, deliberate or accidental) be blamed on scientific logic. And yes, logic could be described as “a vacuum” just like Negative Human Rights is the eliminating of impositions. Logic that is dependent on a worldview is per definition not logic at all, and Human Rights that are dependent on an ideology/world-view (e.g. Sharia) aren’t (negative, i.e. the basic freedom rights) Human Rights at all.

As Klevius use to put it: Our most holy duty is to NOT fill the freedom Human Rights with anything! You shouldn’t have the positive Sharia “right” to, for example, be raped by your husband; instead you should have the negative right to choose not to have sex. Even a child understands that this latter right doesn't deny you from having sex, only protects you from imposed compulsion. The difference is, as you can see, is mind blowing if you have been raised within an islamic "world-view".

And this is the reason why the islamofascist muslim world organization/Umma, Saudi initiated and based islamofascist OIC with its fanatic Turkish Fuhrer/caliph Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu 1) has abandoned Human Rights and REPLACED THEM WITH SHARIA, and 2) criminalized scrutiny/criticism of islam (the worst racist/sexist hate crime ever against humanity) and calls any critical scrutiny "islamophobia" or "defamation of religion".

* as Klevius has explained in Demand for Resources (1992) pure logic is the pointing out of conceptualized deterministic chains (e.g. 2+2=4) in a universe that is deterministic yet chaotic in the sense that our existence-centrism excludes us from "a total, god-like overview" (see Origin of Universe").


Here's what Klevius wrote about "islamic science" a couple of years ago


Everyone who understands islam (e.g. by reading Klevius, or by digging history records with open eyes) knows there's no such thing as "islamic science". This is because of islam's inborn parasitic nature (the open historical "secret" of islam's original fuel: booty, sex and slavery) and due cultural and technological impotency. So when someone talks about "islamic civilization" you definitely know s/he lies! Sadly, most people don't check these lies and haven't all read Klevius as yet.







One example is the Medieval Indian/Persian Al Beruni whom the notorious islamic mass murderer and enslaver (one of the worst known to history - also called the plunderer of India), Mahmud of Ghazna, imprisoned and let stay alive as long as he submitted to islamic Mohammedanism.

But BBC, Wikipedia etc. happily present this islamic hostage as a "muslim scientist" (sic)!

The bloodthirsty Mohammed is the evil and only pope of islam - and needs to be pierced by Enlightenment so his ignorant followers may be released and his deliberate followers may be ashamed. However, a strategy based on naming evil good seems less appropriate for this task, doesn't it.

It's truly sad that the descendants of islam's victims through 1400 years continue defending their bully!?






 





Remove rapetivism from islam and you have killed islam!

Don't have an interfaith dialogue with the Devil - you will inevitably loose!







Today rapetivism in islam can continue as a blunt violation of the most basic of Human Rights, thanks to OIC and its disastrous transformation of UN to become a fortress for islamofascism instead of a defender of Human Rights. .




Saturday, April 20, 2013

Obama's love affair with Saudi islamofascists behind muslim terrorists in Boston?



Why does muslim born (apostate?) Mr X "president" Barry Barakeh Hussain Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever) promote hatered, intolerance and terror?




Islamic hatred


This is what muslim children have to learn by heart:

“Fight against them (non-muslims) until idolatry is no more and Allah’s religion reigns supreme. But if they desist, fight none except the evil-doers.” – Surah 2:193 

“Those that make war against Allah and his messenger and spread disorder in the land shall be slain or crucified or have their hands and feet cut off on alternate sides, or be banished from the land.” ‒ Surah 5:33

“The infidels should not think that they can get away from us.  Prepare against them whatever arms and weaponry you can muster so that you can terrorize them.” ‒ Surah 8:59



Islamic intolerance


Saudi Sheikh Abdul Aziz bin Abdullah, the Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia: "There should be no Christian churches on the Arabian peninsula".



The home base of islamic world terror is in Saudi Arabia


Klevius: Not only Mecca and Medina but also all muslims world organization OIC with its Human Rights violating Sharia agenda is in islamofascist Saudi Arabia.

Pamela Geller: Obama's islamophiliac delusion led to Boston's 911:

FBI checked out Boston Marathon bomb suspect in 2011 FoxNews.com, April 20 (hat tip Suneil)
Officials from an unnamed foreign country asked the FBI two years ago to investigate Boston Marathon bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev because they were concerned that he possibly had “extremist ties,” Fox News has learned.
FBI officials familiar with the request say that they obliged, giving Tsarnaev, who is suspected with his younger brother of planting the bombs that killed three and injured 176, a full “scrubbing” - or background check.
“We did not find anything,” the official told Fox News.
Feds at the time had reported back to the foreign government and told them that their investigation yielded no results, but asked that their foreign counterparts follow up if they had any new information. There was no further action by either nation.
“[Not] in any way, shape or form,” said the official, who added that the FBI closed the case as a result.

What is going on here? There needs to be a full investigation of al-Harbi -- his role (if any) in the Boston jihad bombings, and what backdoor deals the Obama White House is making with the Saudis over him, and why.
Report: Alharbi visited by Michelle Obama in Hospital Shoebat Foundation April 19, 2013
Okaz, the same prominent Saudi newspaper, that published photos of Abdul Rahman Ali Issa Al-Salimi Al-Harbi in the hospital after the Boston marathon bombings, is now reporting that the Saudi national was also visited by the first lady of the United States, Michelle Obama during his hospital stay.

Steve Emerson: “That’s very interesting because this is the way things are done with Saudi Arabia. You don’t arrest their citizens. You deport them, because they don’t want them to be embarrassed and that’s the way we appease them.”




Thursday, April 18, 2013

Who is a muslim?


Klevius answer: A muslim is someone who choses Sharia and therefore violates the most basic Human Rights!






Imtiaz Alam, secretary general of the South Asia Free Media Association: One may ask our Islamists whether religious scholars agree on the definition of a Muslim? If so, then why are there violent divisions among the followers of various schools of Sharia?

Is a Muslim defined by the author of the 8th Amendment or the authors of the original 1973 constitution? Don’t we remember the Justice Munir Commission’s report that failed to find an answer to the question of who is a Muslim? Is there a standard constitutional or academic definition of the “ideology of Pakistan”? If Pakistan was created for Islam and the glory of kalima Tayyaba, then why did Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind and Jamaat-i-Islami oppose the creation of Pakistan? Why then are there more Muslims in India, who somehow subscribe to secularism and still remain Muslim?  And finally, why didn’t Muslim Bengal keep its allegiance to Pakistan? It seems that while we have new questions every day, no answers will ever be forthcoming.

Klevius answer: Trying to follow a recipe (islam/Sharia) full of logical holes makes answers vary. Unlike Sharia the basic (negative) Human Rights cannot be problematized. Simply because of a lack of any content to criticize. Whereas Sharia in ALL forms ALWAYS imposes restrictions (especially for muslim women and other lesser "infidel" beings) negative Human Rights defend you from impositions.


Monotheisms emerged for the sole purpose of keeping females at bay as reproducers and slaves.

God made Adam in his image but to entertain and reproduce Adam he created a lesser being called Eve from the least valuable part of Adam's skeleton, i.e. a rib bone which happens to be the only bone that has multiple copies and which doesn't usually cause too much of trouble even if broken. 


Today most civilized people have abandoned rapetivism for Human Rights. However, rapetivism still occurs frequently among certain people and religions.









Tuesday, April 16, 2013

Don't ever bow for fascism - even if it comes from the left or from Saudi Arabia


Will left-wing or islamist terrorists attack Margaret Thatcher's funeral?






Åsa Linderborg, a hard core communist and defender of islamofascism who is chief cultural editor on Scandinavia's biggest news propaganda paper Aftonbladet, compares the African heroine and Human Rights defender Ayaan Hirsi Ali with mass murderers.

Klevius comment: It's this kind of perverted ideological reasoning that has backed up most of the extreme left's terror that has resulted in the biggest heap of victims - after islam. 

Btw, Åsa Linderborg has today defended (by writing about everything except Sharia) Mustafa Omar's support of a Sharia view on women that isn't in accordance with Human Rights. 




Rapetivism - the fuel (together with oil) that keeps islamofascism ticking



Negative Human Rights is the only key to women becoming equals with men. No dude, it doesn't mean they loose their biological femininity!





Disgusting Sharia-slamofascism supporter Obama "jumps to conclusions"!


* Klevius doesn't use words like "disgusting" about a person unless he thinks he has most decent people behind him in this evaluation. However, decent people may not always be well informed. So here's why Obama is really disgusting: He attended racist supremacist meetings for many years before election. He deliberately appealed to racist voters in his campaign. He didn't address the problem in islam with him being a muslim according to Sharia because his father was a muslim. Instead he gave a Cairo speech that in effect supported apostasy ban and the islamic denial of women's and girls' Human Rights. He has also supported islamofascist Saudi based OIC (all muslims world organization) in its UN efforts to deny Human Rights and to criminalize criticism against islam/Sharia. And so on.


 Although the terrorist attack in Boston has ALL signs of islamofascism, un-constitutional Mr X drone "president" Barry Barakeh Hussain Obama Soetoro Dunham (or whatever) abused the tragedy and took the opportunity to imply white "right wings" for the deed before we know exactly who did it. And why would "right-wingers" attack marathon runners?! And why even consider a type of "terrorist" that is rarer than moon-landings and who don't have a religion supporting them?!



Rapetivism - the ultimate root of islamofascism











Monday, April 15, 2013

Faith in the service of rapetivism


Researching rapetivism in research




“I had no power to say ‘that’s not okay:’” Reports of harassment and abuse in the field, By Kate Clancy.


Klevius (who seems to be, sad to say, still the world's foremost expert on sex segregation): Sexism is a widespread social disease fueled by sex segregation/apartheid. And it's not cured by covering in burqas and Sharia.

Sex segregation results in girls being stripped off their humanhood and hence becoming the sole target for heterosexiual attraction and cultural sexism. Usually the only sex freed relationship outside a girl's own sex  in a sex segregated world is with close male kins (because they lack bio-heterosexual attraction).

Rapetivism , i.e. the enslavement/abuse of confined/veiled girls/women as physical and cultural reproducers of as many new muslims (i.e. islam) as possible under the threats from Sharia and apostasy ban, is, in fact, a form of HSA perversion , i.e. "cultural/physical necrophilia" that rests on cultural sex segregation. However, although islam is the ultimate sex segregation/apartheid, most of us, at least partially, still suffer under milder forms of the same cultural disease. This (+ our untreated vulnerability for fascism) is the main reason why evil medieval islam has been able to rise its ugly face of slavery/racism/sexism again.

(text extracted from Klevius old original writings)

So underpinning these rapes and sexist attitudes lies a cultural sex segregation/apartheid that is codified in the Bible and driven to ultimate excess in the Koran/Sharia.

God made Adam in his image but to entertain Adam he created a being called Eve from the least valuable part of Adam's skeleton, i.e. a rib bone which happens to be the only bone that has multiple copies and which doesn't cause much of a trouble even if broken.


Educate yourself on the crucial difference between positive and negative Human Rights!






Sunday, April 14, 2013

Sweden's biggest party has finally become islamophobic


Who should be rescued from islam: Jews or women - or both?






 


A true muslim (i.e. Sharia supporter) is kicked out from Sweden's biggest party


 
Background (according to The Local): Social Democratic Party leader Stefan Löfven has stated that embattled colleague Omar Mustafa has to fully stand behind the party's values on human rights and gender equality if he is to remain on the party's governing board. 

Klevius comment: Not to fully stand behind 'gender equality' would mean Sharia. Also note the word 'equality' instead of ''equity'. This leaves Omar Mustafa with two choices: Either step down or commit taqiya (the Koranic demand to lie for the sake of islam).
The Local:"You can't hold an elected position within the Social Democrats unless you can fully stand up for the party's values ​​that all human beings are equal and for equality between women and men," Löfven said.

Klevius comment: Good, good, good, it's about time!
The Local:"These are the values which we base our whole political platform on. This is inviolable."

Klevius comment: Good, good, good! Human Rights - not islamic Sharia! I really hope you mean it and that the rest of the party can stand up to it, despite the socialist tendency to neglect the most important Human Rights, i.e. the so called negative Human Rights (individual freedom).
The Local: Löfven comments were made in response to a question from news agency TT whether Mustafa could remain as chair of the Islamic Association (Islamiska förbundet).

Klevius comment: The Islamic Association (Islamiska förbundet) is an islamofascist association because it rests entirely on racist/sexist totalitarian Sharia!
The Local: The association's bylaws state that women and men hold different legal status.

Klevius comment: That's it - plus so much more!
The Local: The election has proved controversial with much of the criticism directed at Mustafa concerning an invitation issued by the Islamic Association to (muslim) speakers with known anti-Semitic views.

Klevius comment: These kind of messengers/messages is what keeps islam ticking.
The Local: In an open letter to the Swedish Aftonbladet daily on Friday, Omar Mustafa expressed understanding of the criticism and distanced himself from the decision to invite Egyptians Salah Sultan and Ragheb Al-Serjany.

Klevius comment: Distanced himself from himself, islam or what? Well, he invited them, didn't he. And what about Sharia and women? I.e. the undeniable fact that islamic Sharia, in whatever form (e.g. OIC's Cairo declaration aimed for all the world's muslims) robs women and girls of their Human Rights and sees "infidels" (and ALL women) as lesser beings.

Are "moderate mosque mice" accomplices to islam's atrocities?




God and Sharia is the leash between  "mosque mice" and islamofascism


If you feel you need to pray to a "god" you know absolutely nothing about, then please do it in private! Because otherwise you may "pray" as part of a totalitarian political movement.

Etymology: The word 'pray' from early 13c., "ask earnestly, beg," also (c.1300) "pray to a god or saint," from Old French preier "to pray" (c.900, Modern French prier), from Vulgar Latin precare (also source of Italian pregare), from Latin precari "ask earnestly, beg, entreat," from prex (plural preces, genitive precis) "prayer, request, entreaty," from PIE root prek- "to ask, request, entreat" (cf. Sanskrit prasna-, Avestan frashna- "question;" Old Church Slavonic prositi, Lithuanian prasyti "to ask, beg;" Old High German frahen, German fragen, Old English fricgan "to ask" a question).

Klevius:Ok, please stop begging for islamofascism!


 .






.



Saturday, April 13, 2013

Rapetivism, marital rape, rape - what's the difference?!


Klevius: Sex segregation/rapetivism is the curse of our time. Most victims are females - but so are many of the defenders of sex segregation/rapetivism as well!

The one who is least interested in sex is ALWAYS the one who should invite/decide and, at whatever stage, decline - and passivity is ALWAYS the undeniable sign of rape!
Female heterosexual attraction is a social capital given by nature. But sadly, many women want to both eat the cake and have it. And when they get older they transfer sex segregation to girls under the disguise of cultural 'femininity' instead of giving them full emancipation in accordance with Human Rights. Heterosexual attraction IS the only true "femininity" and cultural 'femininity' is sex segregation! Under Human Rights women and men are free to look just like they want to, but keep in mind that if some part of your reasoning behind your look is cultural 'femininity' then that part is sex segregation.

Why don't you women crush these rapists?! Just say NO to sex segregation and YES to Human Rights!








Islam is the purest in evil* and most elaborated of rapetivist monotheist ideologies

* Slavery+"infidel" racism+sex segregated rapetivism+anti human rights Sharia/apostasy ban + by far the biggest proven pile of ideological victims throughout 1400 years of relentless Koranic enslavement, murdering, raping, pillaging etc atrocities. This is the real social islam. However, those who use the concept of 'islam' in a Westernized half-secularized meaning don't fit in this picture and need to explain why their "peaceful" islam happens to be the precise opposite to the real historical islam. Moreover, they have also to explain why Sharia doesn't comply with Human Rights, i.e. why islamofascist Saudi based OIC and its fanatic Egyptian born Turkish Fuhrer Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, representing ALL the world's muslims, have used UN as a platform for a) violating Human Rights and b) criminalizing ALL criticism (conveniently called 'islamophobia') against Human Rights violating islam/Sharia! 
 

Koran: As a muslim you can have sex with infidel girls your right hand possesses! 

But according to the strange logic of Peter Davies (UK), Chief Executive, Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (CEOP), the fact that some Asian (read 'muslim') girls who were also groomed but not talked about showed that it had nothing to do with racism or religion.

Klevius comment: Quite the contrary! This really shows it has all to do with islam. Infidel girls can, according to the Koran, “if possessed by your right hand” be used as sex slaves. However, according to the Koran and Sharia, muslim girls are to be punished if they are groomed. Therefore it's natural that neither muslim girls nor their families want to talk about it.And muslim girls are groomed when they "behave like infidels".


Rowena Mason: After nine men were convicted of abusing girls in the Rochdale case, it emerged police and social workers had failed to tackle the issue of Asian men grooming vulnerable under-aged white girls for up to a decade.
They were accused of failing to investigate for fear of being perceived as racist.
In the Savile scandal, the BBC has been accused of failing to investigate rumours that their star entertainer molested under-aged girls in the 1960s and 1970s.
It was alleged in an ITV programme that Savile targeted vulnerable girls from care homes. Since then, more than 300 potential victims have come forward.

Sunday, April 07, 2013

Talking about bigotry and hypocrites: Is the leader of UK muslims "very very un-islamic" - or? And is BBC's Edward Stourton the slyest reporter ever?


BBC, without scruples, again spits on the poor victims of islam, and by denying islam's true nature, paves the way for more!

 A muslim can commit crimes by just following the text in the Koran. Moreover, islam itself won't be hurt because it's always explained away as "unislamic" while the perpetrators are still counted as muslims.




BBC's Edward Stourton invited an imam (would you believe it) in his program Sunday to answer why muslims are over-represented in cases involving grooming and rapes of white underage girls.



In the program Ibrahim Mogra insisted that sex slavery of infidels has nothing to do with islam although islam from scratch has had sex slavery as its main pillar! However, Edward Stourton made no effort whatsoever to even try to ask him about this undeniable fact!?


Ibrahim Mogra who is an imam from Leicester and a leader of the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) which is a self-appointed umbrella body for Muslim organizations and institutions, and was established in 1997 to help South-Asian muslims and has increased its representation since then to other Muslim groups in the UK: "I am really totally at a loss to see how people (muslim groomers/pedophiles and rapists) who profess to be from the muslim religion can have these kinds of attitudes."

His good Sharia teaching (incl Sharia finance teaching) Pakistani friend Abu Eesa Niamatullah also lives in UK and is critical of too much integration of muslims into the British society. He has also cautioned against the unrestricted involvement of muslim women in public roles, particularly the working environment. Here he reminds me of the pathetic (but dangerous) Swedish convert, homophobe and misogynist state imam islamist Leif Karlsson (aka "Abd al Haqq Kielan") whom Swedish state media continuously uses to sread propaganda about the "peaceful and misunderstood islam".

Klevius comment: If we remove all the racist/sexist muslims from the muslim Umma islam will suddenly become a "very very" small "religion". In fact, it would be necessary to start questioning whether the "Westernized" remains in any meaningful sense may be called islam anymore.


Islam not only proposes enslavement of the infidels but is itself the very product of this racist thinking



Examples from the Koran


Muslims are encouraged to live in the way of Muhammad, who was a slave owner and trader.  He captured slaves in battle.  He had sex with his slaves.  And he instructed his men to do the same.  The Qur'an actually devotes more verses to making sure that Muslim men know they can keep women as sex slaves than it does to telling them to pray five times a day.

The Qur'an:

Qur'an (33:50) - "O Prophet! We have made lawful to thee thy wives to whom thou hast paid their dowers; and those (slaves) whom thy right hand possesses out of the prisoners of war whom Allah has assigned to thee"  This is one of several personal-sounding verses "from Allah" narrated by Muhammad - in this case allowing himself a virtually unlimited supply of sex partners.  Others are restrained to four wives, but may also have sex with any number of slaves, as the following verse make clear:

Qur'an (23:5-6) - "..who abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or (the captives) whom their right hands possess..."   This verse permits the slave-owner to have sex with his slaves.  See also Qur'an (70:29-30).

Qur'an (4:24) - "And all married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess."  Even sex with married slaves is permissible.

Qur'an (8:69) - "But (now) enjoy what ye took in war, lawful and good"  A reference to war booty, of which slaves were a part.  The Muslim slave master may enjoy his "catch" because (according to verse 71) "Allah gave you mastery over them."

Qur'an (24:32) - "And marry those among you who are single and those who are fit among your male slaves and your female slaves..."  Breeding slaves based on fitness.

Qur'an (2:178) - "O ye who believe! Retaliation is prescribed for you in the matter of the murdered; the freeman for the freeman, and the slave for the slave, and the female for the female."  The message of this verse, which prescribes the rules of retaliation for murder, is that all humans are not created equal.  The human value of a slave is less than that of a free person (and a woman's worth is also distinguished from that of a man's).

Qur'an (16:75) - "Allah sets forth the Parable (of two men: one) a slave under the dominion of another; He has no power of any sort; and (the other) a man on whom We have bestowed goodly favours from Ourselves, and he spends thereof (freely), privately and publicly: are the two equal? (By no means;) praise be to Allah."  Yet another confirmation that the slave is is not equal to the master.  In this case it is plain that the slave owes his status to Allah's will.  (According to 16:71, the owner should be careful about insulting Allah by bestowing Allah's gifts on slaves - those whom the god of Islam has not favored).



Sufism used by the West to destroy islam


Ameer Jama't-ud-Da'wah Hafiz Muhammad Saeed (2006): The directive for the formation of the Sufi Council in Pakistan and the sudden interest in the promotion of Sufism has originated at the White House. US wants to promote Sufism as a counter measure against jihad. Millions of dollars are being spent in the effort to divert muslim attention towards Mausoleums and Mysticism. The US designs to advance Sufism and to duplicate Turkish secularism in Pakistan will never succeed.

The passing of the so called Women's Rights Bill in the National Assembly and the Senate was just an exercise to please Bush.

US is seeking victory over islam by promoting Sufism.

The Sufi Council patronized by Pervaiz Musharraf and headed by Chaudhry Shujaat is receiving its instructions and directives from Washington. The enemies of islam believe that Sufism is an all embracing religion whose members can be muslims, Christians, Jews, or Hindus without distinction and it should be promoted to divert the attention of muslim youth from jihad.

Hinduism and Christianity has played a major role in the promotion of Sufism. Mysticism is also just another name for Sufism and the two are one and the same thing.

The Hindus and Christians have neglected their religious teachings and have sought spirituality in Mysticism by dissociating themselves from normal society and seeking solace in solitude and monasteries. Such dissociation from the day to day problems and escape from them gave rise to secularism.

The enemies of Allah believe they have found a solution in the form of Sufism to lead people away from it and they are spending extensive amounts of funds for the purpose.

There is an ongoing war between Islam and the West and as long as muslims are eager to give sacrifices in the battles of this war the West will never succeed in its nefarious designs.






Here's what Klevius wrote a decade ago:

The root formula of Islam

Slavery+"infidel" racism+sex segregated rapetivism+anti human rights Sharia/apostasy ban.

Why isn't the worst crime ever against humanity criminalized, but instead protected by the very Human Rights Islam opposes?!
Without these evil racist/sexist/fascist extremist pillars and violent terror threats from so called "unislamic"* and confused morons islam is dead!

AND ALL OF THEM ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL IN A DEMOCRACY BASED ON UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS! ISN'T THIS EXTREMISM IF ANYTHING?! FREEDOM OF RELIGION CAN'T MEAN PROMOTING DEATH OF FREEDOM!


Slavery (forbidden all over the world except in Koran/islam) - It's well known that islam allows slavery, although perhaps less well known that islam emerged out of the very idea of sponging on institutionalized slavery. This is why Saudi islamofascist dictators, imams etc. terrorists and terrorist supporters still don't understand (?!) that the Koran is completely wrong, not only because it allows slavery but especially in claiming to be some "god's" unchangeable word hence excluding even the possibility of reformation!

"Infidel" racism (forbidden according to the UN declaration on every humans equal value, but a basic tenet of Koran/islam) - The moral cornerstone needed for taking slaves and abusing others. Today this alluring but evil racism is utilized in a variety of topics from the people of Darfur to the West in particular or general.

Rapetivism (globally forbidden because it's not in accordance with the principle that a person's sex shouldn't be used as a regulator of that person's freedom, but a basic tenet in Koran/islam) - Rigid sex segregation for the purpose of abusing by islam confined girls/women as physical and cultural reproducers of as many new Muslims as possible.

Sharia (forbidden in a democracy simply because it violates democracy and, like the other islamic pillars, a bunch of Human Rights that democracy rests on) - Islam's jurisprudence for sex segregated rapetivism, apostasy ban etc. Ehsan Jami (Dutch ex-muslim): "We have an enormous problem with apostasy in islam. We see a lot of problems where people want to leave islam but they can't,"

Apostasy ban (forbidden because it limits a person's freedom of or from religion, but a basic tenet in Koran/islam) - Children (commonly from birth) and adults (commonly via marriage/rape) are forced to become and stay muslims.

These cannot be erased by mere "interpretations" but need deep reformist castration! And in this sense "majority muslims" are tightly connected to Islamic extremism, i.e. to islam itself.







Friday, April 05, 2013


Semitic sexist gender pronouns are the exceptions in the world of lingvistics, not the rule!


Astonishing ignorance about linguistic sexism and its deep roots in Mideast






Acknowledgement: It never ceases to astonish Klevius how ignorant and poorly informed so called educated people often are. However, what astonishes him even more is the poor interest in his sites and blogs (barely over 150,000 visitors - most of whom are supposedly way above the average though). If people need education why don't they turn to the best, especially when it's for free? But now it has become evident that people in their deeply biased ignorance just underestimate Klevius as one in the mass of "opinioners". Well, stop that. Nothing could be more detrimental to your educational potential than dismissing Klevius. You need Klevius but Klevius doesn't need you. Just take a look at the total lack of adds on all of his sites and blogs for over a decade! Moreover, consider that Klevius has no economical or personal* ties whatsoever to what he is writing about! I.e. he's lacking a personal agenda other than striving towards a better world for both him and you.

* True, Klevius lost his "manhood" as a teenager when a sexy teenage girl told him "it's so relaxing to be with you when you don't try to push me in bed all the time". From then on Klevius has treated women as equals. And while never pushing for sex but always being ready, the equality approach has paid off perfectly. However, he has also continuously encountered women who don't want to be treated as equals which fact astonishes him. Women's bodies look better than men's bodies for most men. However, the "male gaze" isn't equivalent with the female person although those two may meet, albeit preferably on the woman's terms. It's not rocket science but prejudices from the past - often kept alive from mothers to daughters.





From comments on The Economist's article on gender neutral pronouns:

CUJzRmUw5b Apr 19th 2012, 14:46 In Finnish there is no singular genders and it works just well. Only overly sexist societies need constant reminder of the sex of the subjects.

Reluctant Polluter in reply to CUJzRmUw5b Apr 19th 2012, 23:25 It has nothing to do with sexism, just with some features common for all Ugro-Finnic languages. In the words of respected commenter Nirvana-bound, don't become obsessive-cumpulsive... . .


Klevius comment: It has everything to do with 'sexism'! And much more than you can even dream about with such limited knowledge/understanding. Btw, it's absolutely not "just some features common for Ugro-Finnic languages". In fact, it is and has always been the main rule in the majority of the world's languages! And btw, there are no Ugro-Finnic languages but used to be Finno-Ugric ones before they were classified as Uralic. Keep on reading!


Finland in the borderline between non-sexist and sexist languages


Is it a coincidence or a logical consequence that Finland has been the most progressive when it comes to women's rights? Arguably, most of the individuals behind it back then were Finland-Swedes. However, these bilingual people were heavily influenced by non-sexist Finnish 'hän' (meaning both he and she) culture in this rare borderline between Indo-European and Uralic linguistic domains (also consider Origin of the Goths).




Linguistic background


A gender-neutral pronoun is not associated with a person's sex. This designates two distinct phenomena, the first being that genderless pronouns occur naturally in most human languages. Most languages do not have gender distinctions in personal pronouns.

The other phenomenon regards pronouns that have been assigned nontraditional meanings in ancient times out of concerns for keeping up inequality and in modern times out of a concern for the very opposite namely defending equality in accordance with Human Rights.


Semitic Mideastern monotheist sexism after the fall of the world's oldest civilization, the non-Semitic Sumerians


In some languages - notably most Indo-European and Semitic languages - third person personal pronouns intrinsically distinguish girls/women from boys/men. History proves there's absolutely no need for such linguistic apartheid, quite the contrary.

However, it seems that the very culprit is to be found back in history in the Semitic language family. Proto-Indo-European lacked such gender divide but got it sometimes after the Sumerians were replaced by Semitic groups sometimes at the time and place of the mythic Abraham. So it wasn't Abraham that created sexist religions but sexism that created Abraham.


The very simple but extremely important bottom line is that all physical differences, whatsoever, are already included in the most important of Human Rights, i.e. the so called Negative Human Rights. Just like in traffic. We can't have different rules for different sex or sexual orientation, skin color, religion, atheism etc. Or affirmative lanes/rules for certain races or ethnicities.



Astonishing ignorance about linguistic sexism in the Bay Area


The Difference Between 'Equity' (not same rights, i.e. like Sharia) and 'Equality' (same rights, i.e. like Human Rights)


Klevius example of today of misled girls/women






Listen to this crap!


Lara David from Bay area wrote:


There's this activity I do in my class. All the students sit in a circle, and I ask everyone to take off his or her left shoe and throw it into a pile in the center. Once the shoes are all piled up, I begin re-distributing them, one to each student, completely at random. Then I tell everyone to put on the new shoes. And inevitably, there begin the complaints.

 I wanted to treat you all EQUALLY." I point to a boy with somewhat large feet, and a nearby girl with smallish feet. "He'll have more shoe than you will," I note. And without a doubt, someone unknowingly gets right to the heart of the issue:

"It doesn't matter who has more shoe, Miss David. It matters that we all have the right shoes for us."

And THAT, my friends, is the difference between equity and equality. Equality means everyone gets exactly the same outcome - two shoes - without regard to individual differences - large or small feet, for example. Equity means everyone gets the same quality of outcome - shoes that fit their individual needs.

A lot of feminist arguments are either poorly worded, claiming to desire equality for women in situations where they would actually prefer equity, or misunderstood as demanding equality when they are, in fact, demanding equity. This has become remarkably apparent to me in the recent barrage of posts about women bloggers and how they earn - or fail to earn - respect for their work. Catherine wrote this in her MamaPop post:

What is radical about it is that we push on, demanding to be heard, and demanding recognition of our worth as mothers, women, writers, business-people, innovators, people, against the ignorance of those who would keep us down.

Some have interpreted this as a half-hearted and hypocritical demand for equality, when it is actually anything but. Demanding recognition as mothers and women sort of fundamentally requires an expectation that we will not be treated exactly the same as a man would. Why would we want to be treated exactly like men anyway? In case you didn't notice, WE'RE NOT MEN. What we're demanding is not equality - it's equity.

We demand respect for doing a damn hard job and doing it well. We demand respect for creating a community that inspires and uplifts in the face of some of life's greatest challenges. We demand respect for refusing to compromise our femininity in the face of professional obstacles. We don't demand the EXACT SAME RESPECT that men receive - that's like demanding everyone wear the same shoes, regardless of size. We demand the respect that is most fitting to our stations, but damn it, we still demand the respect. We are women, and we should be treated as women - to do otherwise would be to ignore plain facts. But being treated as women should not automatically mean being treated as less serious or less important, and that's the problem with having an article about our work in the field of blogging - which really is primarily a technological field - placed in the "Style" section of the New York Times.

We are not screaming our heads off to be placated with promises of equality. We are not men - do not treat us as men. We are women, and we demand equity.



Klevius clarification for Lana and other misled people: Apart from lacking even essential logic - that's dictatorship! Why weren't they allowed to pick their own shoes?! This is communism. You intervened as a social state (see Angels of Antichrist - kinship vs social state) instead of respecting their individual freedom in accordance with the Universal Human Rights declaration. This is why USSR collapsed. They got their wrong shoes because they had to obey central dictates. And because of communist "equity" they couldn't build up financial equity either.

What if a girl or a woman likes to do something not appropriately "feminine"?! Per definition  "feminine" can't be a man in your usage of the word here. In effect that means that humans with a female sex lack rights outside "femininity". Rights that the other sex possesses!

Why are you so afraid of individual freedom (equality) and why do you want to contribute to the suppression and limitation (equity) of your sisters?!

The Human Rights declaration (equality) gives you freedom to be both "feminine" as well as "unfeminine" if you like. Sharia (equity) doesn't!

'He/she' apartheid signals and determines limitations due to your sex - Finnish 'hän' doesn't!

I can't believe it. Such deep confusion and ignorance (or?!) about sex in the Bay Area, i.e. where my beloved San Francisco resides.



Feminist confusion


Feminism started more than hundred years ago as a movement opposing the right for women to vote. Women shouldn't be like men, they should therefore be "feminine". Where 'woman' is biology 'feminine' is culture.

Today many would call Klevius a feminist although he is precisely the opposite. True feminists have their true friends among islamofascists, chauvinists etc.

Read Klevius definition of feminism (and due links)






Tuesday, April 02, 2013

Ayaan Hirsi Ali explaining islamofascism


An African woman defending Human Rights and defeating the Papacy


Modern humans came out of Siberia some 40,000 years ago. However, modern thinking seems to come out of Africa.























  
        
                             

 PLAY VIDEO


Ayaan Hirsi Ali (on how to ban muslim schools - see video for more): Ok fine, let's change the constitution so there will be no Christian or Jewish schools. Pretty soon I realized that was unrealistic.

(laughter from the audience)

And you are laughing but you know, one of the reasons it was unrealistic was that most of the Christian schools only were Christians in name. They became kind of private elite schools. They wanted to keep out immigrants, muslim immigrants who do not meet the requirements for an elite school where parents need to be very involved in the education of their children.

And that would have been a good reason to ban Christian schools, but I realized that that would have been very unrealistic.

(something that could be interpreted as the beginning of a possible smile)

My argument for banning muslim schools is that their teaching is different, that they are alien, grooming them in Sharia, grooming them to reject the values of the country they have come to live in. That would be the philosophical argument.

But there is also an other argument. Is it fair to isolate muslim children in that way? 

Then there is a third argument. The worldwide jihadi movement for which the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt provides the ideology, Saudi Arabia provides the money that are targeting those communities that are very vulnerable. That third alien argument also says no to muslim schools because Christian and Jewish schools are not affected in that way.


Klevius comment: True, however, sex segregation/apartheid (and due homophobia) has also been at the very heart of Judaism and, after a relatively short initial period, Christianity. So they all have kind of a "handle" here to hang on each other.

This is precisely why it's so important to educate girls away from this trapping "equality but not sameness" so to open up for the potential in Human Rights which clearly states that sex ought not to restrict rights.

Girls, your 'femininity' is imprinted in your bodies by nature (or perhaps more correctly, in the male brain, i.e. what Klevius calls heterosexual attraction). You don't need to fear "sameness" but rather be happy to have the Human Right not to be restricted in your rights (incl. reproductive rights). Sharia (in any form) is in this respect (and other) the very opposite to Human Rights. 

Islam's origin and history is that of looting paired with slave and sex parasitism. The "religious" parts do not even belong to islam other than as a means for totalitarian obedience, i.e. an early form of the worst kind of fascism.