Rimsha Masih and her family had to escape to Canada while no one in muslim Pakistan had to bare any responsibility for the evil and racist hate campaign she and her family had experienced.
Did you get that? No indictment whatsoever. The imam wasn't "freed" as now reported by confused Western news channels. HE WAS NEVER EVEN INDICTED FOR ANYTHING! And he wasn't under suspicion of framing the girl but of suspicion of having burned Koran pages (Pakistan's beloved "blasphemy" Sharia law). So logically this decision today to drop the investigation equals putting the guilt back on the poor Christian girl and her family who had been heavily harassed by their muslim neighbors. It seems that Klevius again hit the bull's eye in the posting one year ago seen below.
This is what Klevius wrote about Rimsha Masih and the imam a year ago:
Sunday, September 09, 2012
Klevius islam tutorial for Los Angeles Times: Blasphemy and "islamophobia" are synonymes!
LAT got islam all wrong! How many others have?According to Los Angeles Times headline, Muhammad Khalid Chishti was accused for "framing". Well, that's quite far from the truth!
Klevius: The muslim Cleric wasn't accused of framing a Christian girl. He was accused of blasphemy against islam (the worst crime ever against humanity)!Why is it that every evil deed originating in islam is "interpreted/transformed" into something else that looks less bad for evil islam?
A muslim Pakistani cleric, Muhammad Khalid Chishti, was detained on suspicion that he had teared out pages from the Koran. That these pages then were put into Ms. Masih’s bag was irrelevant although the police, probably in a kind pr gesture to foreign reporters, said that it was possible that other charges could follow.
Evil ideologies need evil protection and evil leaders - and to be supported by ignorance
Islam is a disastrous ideology, even worse than National-socialism (popularly called Nazism for the purpose of trying to make a socialist party with a bad reputation "right-wing") because islam doesn't stop by the nation but wants to be totalitarian.
And precisely because of islam's enormous evilness (that the "negative" freedom part of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights so effectively has revealed) it needs every means to protect itself from criticism. This task is now in the hands of the Hitler of our time, OIC's Fuhrer (or Caliph as he himself has said he wants to be called) Egyptian born Turk, Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu. He's one of the world's most eager proponents for blasphemy laws under Sharia, which he then presents in the West under the title "islamophobia".
How long will the World tolerate this evil islam hoax?
Russell D. Moore: If a Christian majority existed in a country, with the will to enforce all the laws it could, would this country be justified in outlawing Islam or atheism or Wicca? Why not? Fundamentally, this is because blasphemy laws and other uses of state power to enforce religious belief or worship are themselves a repudiation of the beliefs themselves. A religion that needs state power to enforce obedience to its beliefs is a religion that has lost confidence in the power of its Deity.
Klevius comment: Apart from the fact that islam isn't a "religion" in any meaningful sense it's all about state power in the form of the muslim state called Umma and led by the oil fueled Saudi/OIC network. The utterly dumb strategy to excuse medieval fascism in our time on the grounds that it needs time to mature into a modern civilized world should be replaced by the speeding up of the process by addressing islam's deep incompatibility with the basics of Human Rights (an incompatibility that islamofascist OIC and its Fuhrer Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu readily have admitted by replacing Human Rights with Sharia in UN and elsewhere). Only then we can spare the lives and sufferings of the victims of islam.