A nun's gear doesn't sign other women as "whores". However, what about a woman in an islamic "chastity" gear?

K.S. Lal (a giant among historians): Mahmud of Ghazni had marched into Hindustan again and again to wage jihad and spread the Muhammadan religion, to lay hold of its wealth, to destroy its temples, to enslave its people, sell them abroad and thereby earn profit, and to add to muslim numbers by converting the captives.

Is BBC 100% steered by muslims? Not only can you ever hear anything critical about islam and muslims - but all main channels are also occupied by sharia (OIC) supporting (i.e. against basic Human Rights equality) muslims. Nazir Afzal ('Moral maze', news, culture etc.), Mishal Husain (news, culture etc.), Samira Ahmed (news, culture etc.), Razia Iqbal (news, culture etc.). And they all keep cheating the public about it and instead pointing finger to "dumb and hateful xenophobes". Not a word about e.g. Council of Europe's harsh critcism (see below) of muslims biggest sharia organization, the Saudi based and steered OIC. Foreigners isn't the peoblem - sharia islam is!

BBC's muslims and their PC supporters also meddle in UK election by demonizing "islamophobia", i.e. trying to stop critcs of islamofascism.

Muslim child/youth fascism induced by an islam interpretation from family and strengthened by PC media, politicians etc.

Peter Klevius: Everyone - incl. every muslim who respects Human Rights - ought to make sure to vote for an "islamophobe"! BBC and Sayeeda Warsi will make their utmost to stop critics of islamofascism in the election. Don't be robbed of your democratic right. And of course you know that the only real problem with migration is islamofascism.

BBC's "man in Hong Kong" asked street terror leader Joshua Wong if they could possibly escalate violence. And they could. One day later they put a Chinese on fire in a murder attempt.

While US/UK aim for militarism and war, China aims for health and wealth.

While US/UK aim for militarism and war, China aims for health and wealth.
The Saudi Aramco and OIC scams

Peter Klevius: The Saudi Aramco sale is the biggest ripoff in the world. If there's any future in oil and you don't care about environment, then why buy what's at its peak when Venezuela's PDVSA is bigger and as low it can get?!

Are you an "islamophobe" if you don't like islamist Human Rights violations? Islam has (via OIC's sharia declaration) abandoned the most basic anti-fascist Human Rights from 1948. Islam is hence the only religion in doing so - not even the Catholics have needed to replace Human Rights with "Catholic human rights".

The seed for world fascism is dormant in Saudi based and steered OIC's world sharia - opposed by ECHR and Peter Klevius, but supported by Sayeeda Warsi.


Breakit instead of Brexit because what's the point of leaving one EU while still staying in an other called UK? England voted leave.

However, unfortunately BBC demonizes China on behalf of UK's relying on militarist meddling, weapons sales and islamofascist sharia finance. So you see the solution: Cut off sharia etc. islamofascist ties and open up for prospering with China - not the over-selfish game of spying and dying of US.

BBC boosts stupid nationalist "Britishness" with peculiar "sports" like cricket and rugby because the world has already "colonized" football and the English language is a global property.

Nigel Farage is like BBC against "islamophobia" and pro-Saudi - but Boris Johnson doesn't like letter boxes and was criticized by Theresa May for being critical against the Saudis while serving as her foreign minister.

China (laws against sharia islamofascism) and EU (Human Rights against sharia islamofascism) are now the only ones protecting basic (negative*) Human Rights.
* Religious people and socialists don't like negative Human Rights simply because they prefer collectives ("communities") rather than individuals. That's why the web is full of misinfo about these rights. Read Peter Klevius definition instead if you want a deep view - or listen to Lauren Chen starting from 7:11 if you want it light
The Saudi "custodian of islam" has some 1.5 billion "citizens" in the muslim world Ummah nation - and demands the world to bow them no matter what (as long they aren't Shia or so, of course). China, on the other hand, keeps its citizens and laws within its own borders. IS islam IS fascism and islam (even the archbishop agrees). So why is sharia fascism not separated from an "islam" that submits to basic Human Rights? As it stands now Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia (the 1990 Cairo declaration) still stands as the basic Human Rights violation via sharia muslims all over the world. And whereas China actively tries to erase sharia islamofascism, EU keeps promoting import of it while judicially telling us it's not right, yet doing nothing to stop it.
Unlike the West, China hasn't aggressively meddled militaristically in other countries around the world, but rather being the world's foremost spreader of new technology and wealth. And whereas the West has eagerly supported Mohammed's totalitarian aims, China has, in practise, implemented in law most of the Human Rights advices that The Council of Europe has directed against OIC. Against this background West's Saudi backing and China smearing is deeply bigoted and hypocritical.

John le Carré: I'm depressed and ashamed of British nationalism. Nationalism needs enemies but today we really have no identifiable enemies except among ourselves.

North Atlantic (sic) Treaty Organization invades a country in Mideast and attacks (with chemical weapons) a people without a country.

UK's Brexit business model: Sharia finance, weapons sale and militaristic meddling?UK Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (sic) and Global Neo-Imperialist and Militarist Meddling, Jeremy Hunt, 15 Oct. 2019: It's wrong to accuse Donald Trump - it's Americans isolationism because American taxpayers don't want to pay between 1/2 and 2/3 of the defense of Europe. And Turkey is very skilled at finding wedges and gaps between allies. UK should be EU's bridge to US.
Peter Klevius: No, EU should take care of its own defense - against whom? The Saudi dictator family who is the world's no 1 spender on weapons and islamic terror incitement and who hates EU's anti-sharia legislation? And UK taxpayers should not have to pay more for dangerous militarism. Militaristic meddling is a bad and dangerous business idea.

Read K.S. Lal (free online) on islam's evil spread!

A Google (i.e. U.S. web monopoly) search (20191006) reports 'islamists Hong Kong' "missing". Really! No islamists in Hong Kong? Peter Klevius also wonders if EU citizens in UK are UKongers and can peacefully demand the same rights as Joshua Wong violently demands (and eagerly broadcasted by BBC) for Hong Kongers?

Peter Klevius congratulates Savid Javid for abandoning the islamofascist "islamophobia" smear. BBC’s bigoted hypocrite Mishal Husain and others ought to follow!

BBC's Mark Mardell couldn't get a visa to China because of his extreme and hateful Sinophobia - but that didn't stop him/BBC from producing a fake anti-China program series while pretending to be there. Is Sinophobia really better than cooperation?


Are EU citizens in UK included in Tom Tugenhadt's "British people"?

Sinophobe Tom Tugendhat, chair of UK's Foreign Affairs Committee (who has studied islam and Arabic in Mideast) suggests that English speaking universities should consider banning Chinese students because "they might be used as leverage like Huawei". Peter Klevius wonders if one could be any more racist than this, and if he doesn't see any islamofascist sharia supremacist "leverage" at all? Btw, there are more than 50,000 Chinese muslims in Hong Kong. Peter Klevius wonders how many of them are "radical" ones and participate in BBC's lengthy anti-China propaganda "news" - while the world doesn't suffer from Chinese but from muslim violence and Human Rights violations?

US/UK destroyed the lives of millions of Chinese during some hundred years of evil militaristic meddling. BBC is now busy smearing China all the time while supporting Saudi islamofascism and violent Hong Kong demonstrators - but neglecting the mass of peaceful pro-China demonstrators. BBC also "worries" about Chinese "surveillance state" while the truth is China's technological superiority. US is much more insidious in its surveillance policies but lacks the techno - can't even produce a working 5G so far. US/UK follow exactly China but utilize the meantime to smear it. And who is really behind the Hong Kong riots? Someone who can't take China's success? But the Syria tactics won't work. US (and its UK puppet) wants to be able to meddle militarily near China - therefore its interest in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Korea, Tibet, Myanmar, Uyghur extremist muslims etc.

As Greta Thunberg is allegedly reported to the Swedish social authorities, Peter Klevius suggests that her parents read his thesis Pathological Symbiosis in LVU, Relevance, and Sex Segregated Emergence. Keeping in mind that Peter Klevius daughter was only 15 when she entered university and at 16 made her graduate paper about women in ancient times, it shouldn't be considered too sensitive for Greta either. Also read the attached email correspondence which clearly shows how democracy is manipulated. And why not consider Angels of Antichrist, the Social State vs the People (P. Klevius 1996). And last but not least, Peter Klevius 1981/1992 Demand for Resources (original titel Resursbegär).
Peter Klevius and the Council of Europe share exactly the same "islamophobia".
Council of Europe. Resolution 2253 (2019), Sharia, Saudi based and steered OIC's Cairo Declaration and the European Convention on Human Rights: Human Rights protect the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion as enshrined in Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The right to manifest one’s religion, however, is a qualified right whose exercise, under Article 17 of the Convention, may not aim at the destruction of other Convention rights or freedoms.

People in UK-land (especially women) will loose their Human Rights after Brexit - while sharia prevails in UK, and UK citizens in EU are protected by the European Court of Human Rights.

Brexit was meant to protect UK from muslim invasion via Turkey's proposed visa free deal with Merkel. Even the possibility of temporary membership in ECHR (in case of a deal) isn't enough - especially considering UK will be out of reach of the European Court of Justice.

US loosing the tech war - and starting a real one?

US loosing the tech war - and starting a real one?

A muslim wants to criminalize Peter Klevius islamophobia. Really!

A muslim wants to criminalize Peter Klevius islamophobia. Really!
West's indulgence of islamofascism (sharia) has made its boasting against China about "democratic values" empty. The risk of you being stabbed, raped etc. by a hateful jihadi is created by your political leaders, BBC etc. - who also have arranged so it's not even called a hate crime.

Peter Klevius stands for these "stops" and due huge implications - all shame on him if you can prove him wrong (click links if you need to educate yourself before saying something stupid): Stop using the misleading 'gender' instead of sex (sociology)! Stop islam's abuse of Human Rights (jurisprudence)! Stop saying humans came "out of Africa" (anthropology)! Stop talking about "consciousness" when you don't know what you're talking about (philosophy/ai).

Peter Klevius: BBC supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family's strategic use of supremacist islam which has spred muslim hate all over the world's streets, institutions etc. (and usually not correctly, if at all, reported by BBC which instead doesn't hesitate to give long coverage of "alternative news" that better suits its propaganda) - while muslim terrorist organizations keep it within muslim territories. So if true Salafists became the "gurdians of islam's holy places" then that would mean less muslim terror elsewhere. And less to cover up for BBC. How big a contributor to the suffering of islamic supremacist hate crimes has BBC's fake (and lack of) info been? Will we in the future see BBC in an international court accused of crimes against humanity? As it stands now the spill over effect of BBC's cynical support of proxy evil is stained in blood and rape etc. over innocent people. And if true Salafists took over in muslim countries, they would quickly become non-muslim countries. A better option than today's prolonged suffering caused by the hopeless effort to "adapt" a medieval slavery ideology to a modern world based on everyone's Human Rights equality. And if it's so important to keep islam in name only - then islam would loose all of its racist and sexist "we and the other" appeal anyway.

Why is BBC aiding islamofascism?

Why is BBC aiding islamofascism?

Statues of football player Nilla Fischer and Caroline Seger vandalized in Sweden

Statues  of football player Nilla Fischer and Caroline Seger vandalized in Sweden

Islam (represented in UN by Saudi based and steered OIC and its sharia called “islamic human rights”) is against Human Rights!

Sweden’s Supreme Court has found a man guilty of rape for having sex without explicit consent from a "teenage woman" who had been passive and gave no clear expression that she wanted to participate in the sexual acts. Lack of a partner’s spoken agreement or any other clear approval can hence be considered rape. However, islamic sharia gives a muslim man the "right" to have sex with wives and and concubines his "right hand possesses" (e.g. "infidel" girls/women). The neo-islamist rational (original openly supremacist islam didn't need one) is that "it satisfies the sexual desire of the female". Peter Klevius wonders if Swedish Courts will accept this reasoning - perhaps only for muslims?!

Peter Klevius also wonders whether BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not Ramadan fasting, Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim, Mishal Husain, approves of sharia?


UK introduced face recognition after for many years accusing Chinese for having it. Peter Klevius wonders how this fits UK's face covered muslims and others who utilize it?

So how do you vote for someone critical of islam's Human Rights violations if parties don't allow "islamophobia"? Is it democracy?

What do BBC and Jeremy Hunt have in common? Both support the islamofascist murderer and war criminal Mohammad bin Salman.

Peter Klevius: Girls' emancipation needs more football and less cricket, netball etc.

BBC's cricket propaganda is a slap in the face of young girls who need equally much moving around and spatial skills as young boys. However, there's a huge sex segregation in females motivation and access to football - not only the world's by far most popular physical sport, but also the only one that doesn't use tools or hands to handle the ball, and which makes all participants moving most of the time even without the ball. Moreover, the very nature of the sport forces participants to a never ending series of spatial and strategic challenges - with or without the ball and even while playing alone. So why is BBC so hostile to the Queen of sports (the "beautiful game") that is perfect for the physical and spatial development of girls - and in the face of the football loving majority who has to pay compulsory fees (and paying extra for football channels) to this faking regime propaganda media that uses stiff and lifeless colonial cricket for neo-colonial purpose?! England banned football for girls/women already 1921 and suggested cricket, land hockey and netball instead - almost like today except it's not called a ban. And what about the laughable notion of a "world cup" in cricket?! When is the "world cup" in caber tossing between Gotland and Scotland?

The murderous war criminal, Saudi muslim "custodian of islam" (and OIC) "prince" MBS is OK but Human Rights defender Peter Klevius isn't. Why?! Because the former isn't an "islamophobe", dude!
Stop US global bullying! What moral right does US have trying to dominate Earth and space? "God"?! Or the Saudi murderer and mass murderer "prince"?! Hasn't US sucked out enough already from the rest of the world? A global dollar manipulation favoring US and paid by the rest. A US marked global license and patent imperialism - and Android. Is Internet next?

26 June 2019: BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not ramadan fasting Pakistan rooted muslim, Mishal Husain (brought up in Saudi Arabia), worried about Boris Johnson not having cricket as his hobby.

25 June 2019: BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not ramadan fasting muslim, Mishal Husain (brought up in Saudi Arabia), sounds desperate when trying to smear Johnson. Is it because Boris 2016 was critical against the Saudis while foreign minister and 2018 critical of muslim women packed in burqas etc.?
BBC thinks the militaristic Saudiphil Jeremy Hunt "is a safer option" as UK PM. What about you?

BBC News 8:00 AM 23 June 2019: Johnson financially unfit because he spilled wine on a couch.

BBC News 8:00 AM 23 June 2019: Johnson financially unfit because he spilled wine on a couch.
Is the Saudi "custodian of islam" a muslim - and is the very question "islamophobic", "muslimophobic" or "Saudiphobic"?
Why is BBC comparing Saudi with China?! China's leader isn't a murderer, war criminal, and spreader of terror on the streets! "If we drop the Saudis then we can't deal with China either." Really?! BTW, 'Diversity' means different/conflicting whereas its antonym stands for similar/friendly.

Blinked by BBC's fake "news" which instead boost militaristic confrontation and the smearing of China: The Saudi war criminal "custodian of islam" who murdered Khashoggi is now the world's new Hitler. However, unlike Hitler's Germanic language imperialism, bin Salman's Arabic language imperialism is added by a totalitarian imperialism due to the fact that he is a muslim and as such represents the totality of islam (inc. the Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization O.I.C.'s sharia declaration against Human Rights). Peter Klevius has for long pointed out that we need to distinguish between Human Rights obeying "muslims" and "extremist" muslims, but for some reason they are all bundled as 'muslims'.

Chinese high tech is met with Sinophobia, bans (tariffs) and militarism by US/UK/EU.

Chinese high tech is met with Sinophobia, bans (tariffs) and militarism by US/UK/EU.

Peter Klevius evolution formula.


Peter Klevius serious questions to you "out of Africa" believer! Ask yourself:
How come that the oldest primates came from outside Africa; that the oldest great ape divergence happened outside Africa; that the oldest bi-pedals are from outside Africa; that the only australopithecines with a Homo skull lived as far from Africa you can get; that the oldest truly modern looking skull is from eastern China; that the oldest Africans are mongoloid; that the latest genetic mix that shaped the modern human happened in Siberia and is traced to SE Asia; that the earliest sophisticated art is found from Iberia to Sulawesi - but not in Africa; that the oldest round skulled Homo sapiens in sub-Saharan Africa are much younger than similar skulls in Eurasia; that we lack ancient enough DNA from Africa, etc. etc.? Peter Klevius theory answers all these questions - and more.

Peter Klevius evolution formula.

Existence-centrism (Peter Klevius 1986)


Read this: The "out of Africa" hoax is worse than the Piltdown hoax - and much bigger and more worrisome. When will “out of Africaphobia” be criminalized?

Nothing in Primate/Haplorhini evolution came out of Africa - not even Africa (it was disconnected due to tectonics).

A “definition” of “islamophobia” ought to be balanced with a definition of muslim Human Rightsphobia.

"Diversity" without basic (negative) Human Rights is like having a car without steering - dangerous.

In its senseless and continuous "islamophobia" ranting BBC says to be 'muslim' is the same as to be 'English'. Klevius thinks not. A 'muslim' is one who wittingly or unwittingly adheres to what historical records show being the most evil enslaving ideology ever around (from a Human Rights perspective). And Klevius doesn't count as real muslims those who call themselves "cultural muslims" for the purpose of benefiting from a certain "ethnicity", or those who against their will are trapped in muslimhood because of the evil apostasy tenet in islam. And islamic "modesty" attires is a protected way of calling other women "whores".

Klevius suggests the UK baby should be named Muhammad. After all, according to BBC, the Queen is related to him and all politicians love islam. And several hadiths describe him as white (one even proposing the killing of anyone who says he was black). Only problem being that he then may be described as a white supremacist. Luckily the baby, according to BBC, is “mix-race”.

Klevius to EU voters: If you respect Human Rights - don’t vote for anyone who supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family who spreads Human Rightsphobia via the Saudi based and steered OIC’s world sharia!

And if you respect your Earthly home – don’t support a hate ideology that encourages over-population and sex apartheid. We don’t need more workers because the most profitable sectors have the least jobs – a trend that AI accelerates.

No true muslim can be fully human.

Why? Because islam's dividing the world in muslims and (not fully human) "infidels" makes it impossible. Only by fully accepting the basic (s.c. 'negative') Universal Human Rights equality - which islam can't accept (see e.g. Saudi based and steered all muslims world Ummah sharia organization OIC) without committing ideological suicide - can we meet every human as basically equal, in the same way as we can give every road-user a basic equality in traffic, i.e. we have traffic sense. So Klevius asks muslims whether they have "traffic sense"? And for all the rest of you - to be 'human' in a global sense can only be achieved by giving every human you meet basic equality - no matter how alien that human might feel to you. Because every human has the right to be "alien" and there can't even be any alternative to this as long as we don't accept brainwashed totalitarianism (see e.g. Klevius 1996 paper Angels of Antichrist). This is the only way to meaningfully talk about 'humankind'. And to alien hunters Klevius says you probably meet them every day already.

A "good muslim" is one who suppresses and distorts original islam so to fit Human Rights. However, some just pretend to do so - and some just continue hating the "infidel".

So when BBC and other fake media talk about xenophobia against muslims, they actually contribute to spread xenophobia themselves.

Ultimate bigotry and hypocrisy – spying and meddling 5 Eyes instead of true 5G?

Saudi hate spreading antennas (Salafi/Wahhabi mosques etc.) or Chinese world leading 5G tech? No one knows the amount of street etc. victims of Saudi hate because when the haters are muslims their attacks are not recorded as hate crimes.

The real threat is the US led Saudi supporting spy organization 5 Eyes, which 1) tries to block superior tech, and 2) uses China as a scapegoat for US/UK privacy breaches. It's not China but US that wants to control you! So "securing 5G from Chinese influence" actually means giving US/UK a technical space for spying/influencing etc. In short, trying to hinder US/UK customers from accessing the best technology while spying on them.

Muslim terrorists get legal aid to stay in UK - EU nationals don't!

BBC collected a UKIP hating public to shout "islamophobia" against islam criticism.

However, the very same BBC also willfully misleads people about islam so that most people in UK are completely unaware of that Saudi based and steered OIC and its extreme Human Rightsphobia is a world guide for (sharia) muslims. Moreover, BBC's top presenter (Mishal Husain) who seems to be muslim in name only (drinking alcohol, not fasting on Ramadan, no muslim attire, no Haji, no sharia, etc) so to dupe the public about islam.

The 1948 Human Rights declaration was created to protect against fascism. Accepting islam without a clear border against sharia that violates the most basic Human Rights, allows space for islamofascism (i.e. original supremacist islam).

However, the new fascist mob is shouting "islamophobia" because islam can't comply with it (compare Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration against Human Rights). This smear is then "enhanced" by connecting it to murderers, Nazis, right wing extremists etc. Islam's sharia sexism and racist supremacism is the problem - so why is addressing it "bad"?!

BBC is also keen on silencing the only truly free media, i.e. bloggers etc. social media.

The crystal clear connection between the surge in knife, rape etc. attacks and islam - and its custodian, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - is desperately silenced by BBC and politicians (BBC now tries to cover this up by airing long programs about "conventional" knife crimes instead). This means they are directly complicit, doesn't it. Klevius suggests boycotting BBC and Saudi bribed politicians. They constitute the worst security threat.

Muslim terrorists get legal aid to stay in UK - EU nationals don't!

The best explanation to the surge in knife crimes since 2015 is the Islamic State's exhortation to street jihad. However, the police don't record hate crimes as muslim - other than if directed against muslims. And do consider that IS and the Saudi dictator family both rest on the same Salafi islam that most young true muslims in the West follow. Following Salafism (etc. true muslimhood) involves distinguishing muslims from others, to show that one only belongs to islam and that true muslims ought to be strangers to the "infidels". When Klevius sees a muslim woman in burqa, veil etc. he thinks that's a supremacist and rapist attitude towards other women. And certainly contempt of Human Rights.

UK continues even after Brexit to use EU citizens as bargaining chips by placing their rights in an unsafe statutory instrument instead of in the law.

Stop security cooperation with UK whose close connection to the the suspected murderer, war criminal and islamic terror spreading islamofascist Saudi custodian of islam, Mohammad bin Salman, constitutes the by far worst threat against the security of people in EU! Moreover, sharia islam (the only real islam for real muslims) which is a racist and sexist supremacist ideology that violates Human Rights, is supported by UK.

Don't let haters and Human Rightsphobes get away with it by calling themselves 'believers'!

Either religion is (grades of) supremacist hate and sexism and you better become an Atheist (and therefore universal human) - or you keep your "beliefs" for yourself. In traffic you can think what you want about other people, but you can't drive over them!

You muslim should be ashamed of calling Human Rights defenders "islamophobes"

- and take responsibility for your own supremacist sharia, represented by Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization OIC, which violates the most basic Human Rights! And do note the difference between universal impositions and universal freedom! Full respect of the other rests on accepting her/his freedom. This is the only way of being universally human.

Islam is an evil* supremacist and divisive ideology - why isn’t this told by BBC, schools etc.?

* weighed against the anti-fascist, anti-supremacist, anti-racist and anti-sexist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948 that all civilized people are supposed to build on. Islam doesn't fit these goals, so OIC (the legal world Umma steered from and by the Saudi dictator family) decided to replace them with medieval racist, sexist and supremacist sharia.

Article 24 of the Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration (CDHRI) states: "All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Sharia." Article 19 says: "There shall be no crime or punishment except as provided for in the Sharia." CDHRI also fails to guarantee freedom of religion, in particular the right of each and every individual to abandon their religion, as a "fundamental and non-derogable right".

Article 10 of the Declaration states: "Islam is the religion of unspoiled nature. It is prohibited to exercise any form of compulsion on man or to exploit his poverty or ignorance in order to convert him to another religion or to Atheism." Since in Islamic society all reasons for conversion away from Islam are considered to be essentially either compulsion or ignorance, this effectively forbids conversion away from Islam.

CDHRI denies women equality with men by imposing "own rights" and "duties to perform".

Klevius "islamophobic" heroine Nawal El Saadawi from Egypt

Klevius "islamophobic" heroine Nawal El Saadawi from Egypt

Anti Human Rights muslim or not?

A global world is only possible under the guidance of (negative – i.e. individual freedom from racist/sexist impositions) Human Rights - as outlined in the original anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. It excludes any religious or other supremacist tenets or impositions on the individual.

Due to the above and due to the West (politicians and media) having locked itself in with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (the custodians of islam) we now have a deficit of (negative) Human Rights education – but massively more religious propaganda (e.g. Saudi spread “islamophobia” smear) against these rights. Against this background it's utmost hypocrisy to point against wealth spreading China while supporting islamic hate, terror and war crimes spreading hegemonic Saudi dictator family.


When Klevius writes 'islamofascist' it should always be understood as islamic default tenets (e.g. OIC's world sharia) that are gravely opposite UN's anti-fascist 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration. So Klevius suggests every muslim to openly declare if they oppose the most basic Human Rights or not. This is particularly important when it comes to media people and politicians who say they are muslims but hesitate on this most crucial issue.
Klevius supports no border on Ireland. Follow the will of the people, i.e. let England leave and let Scotland and Northern Ireland stay. UK is an unconstitutional mess which now wants to leave EU without controlling its border to EU. A proper constitution would have demanded qualified majority in two consecutive elections/votes about such a crucial matter as Brexit - and being aware what the vote is about. The root of the problem is England's mad man Henry 8's colonialization of Ireland and lack of constitution. The preposterous "British" Brexit parody is then spiced with the government's and BBC's use of religious hate mongering etc. In summary UK is an anomaly of countries trying to be a state in a world of federal states united as countries.

Calling criticism of islam "islamophobia" is pure racism and also supports islamic racism and sexism

BBC isn't much interested in anti-semitism, homophobia etc. but uses them as an excuse for its Saudi/OIC supported "islamophobia" smear campaign against Human Rights.

Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?

* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).

Saudi islamofascism more important than the peaceful erasing of poverty by China?!

Saudi islamofascism more important than the peaceful erasing of poverty by China?!

Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?

First UK people voted to join and share borders with EU. Then England voted to leave while Scotland and Northern Ireland voted to stay. And now UK politicians want to leave while keeping the Irish EU border open. UK lacks a modern constitution according to which a constitutional issue has to pass at least two majority votes.

Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles worldwide.

Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles worldwide.

Saudi induced muslim attack on UK Parliament. How many elsewhere? And what about Saudi/OIC's sharia

Saudi induced muslim attack on UK Parliament. How many elsewhere? And what about Saudi/OIC's sharia

Peter Klevius "islamophobia"/Human Rightsphobia test for you and your politicians

Saudi hate speech against Human Rights in EU

Saudi hate speech against Human Rights in EU

UN with muslim terrorists in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Warning for a muslim robot!

There's no true islam without Human Rights violating sharia

There's no true islam without Human Rights violating sharia

Klevius CV

Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):

* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.

1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.

2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).

3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.


4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).

UK PM candidate Rees-Mogg: Germans needed Human Rights - we don't. Klevius: I really think you do.

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a racist/sexist "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

BBC's compulsory fee funded propaganda for Saudi sharia islam

Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Today England's parliament vote between islamofascist sharia and Human Rights - without even mentioning sharia. Shame on you England, to even have to vote about it!

While Theresa May tries to pave the way for islamofascist Saudi friendly sharia by trashing Human Rights, BBC fills its news with the suffering of Rohyngia muslims - without a word about the Saudi backed muslim terrorist attacks against Buddhists that preceded it.

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Theresa May's sharia = >23,000 jihadi - before Brexit. How many after?

Theresa May's sharia = >23,000 jihadi - before Brexit. How many after?

UK DID NOT vote Brexit. EU residents weren't allowed to vote while non-EU residents were.

The muslim Saudi dictator family is the root of most islam induced suffering

May's secret love affair with Saudi islamofascists - while rejecting Chinese

While Klevius is forcing islam into a Human Rights corner, politicians support islamofascism

Why hasn't Klevius got the Nobel prize for his theory on consciousness/AI?

BBC's fake/angled news protect islamofascist offenders because of its ties (BBC World) to Mideast

BBC lies and fake news

The "Birmingham Koran" hoax - and a sonless "prophet" invented after it!

Lego won't sponsor the defense for Human Rights equality - but islamofascism and sharia is ok

Hillary supports sharia for women, war with Russia and aid to Sunni islamofascists

Apostate (?) Obama's bio- and adoptive dads were both muslims

BBC smears China while bolstering Saudi islamofascists - the worst spreaders of hate and terror

BBC smears China while bolstering Saudi islamofascists - the worst spreaders of hate and terror

Choudary and May both want more sharia - so what about "British values"?

Michael Morell (ex-CIA) is/was a knowing agent for Saudi wahhabism and its Koranic hate jihadism

Trump: Why wouldn't we? Theresa May: I would!

Sharia muslim London mayor voted in by his islamist friends

Sharia muslim London mayor voted in by his islamist friends

Theresa May is for sharia and EU - but against EU's Human Rights Court which condemns sharia

Muslims and Hillary against Human Rights

Muslims and Hillary against Human Rights

OIC and NOI are muslim extremist organizations

Origin of islam and an ignorant white Western nun

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo have sharia islam in common

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo have sharia islam in common

God is an escape route from Human Rights

First sophisticated art by the first truly modern humans

The world's oldest real portrait ever found (Central Europe). Carvings dated to 26-29,000 bp.

Finland's lion trampling the islamic scimitar 1583

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Origin of the Vikings

A victim of rapetivism - and an interfaith messenger of rapetivism

A victim of rapetivism - and an interfaith messenger of rapetivism

Japan 10 yrs ahead of Europe in hybrid/fuelcell cars, space tech etc

Native Brits from Doggerland spoke a proto-Finnish/Uralic (Eurasiatic) language

We non-muslims need to honor racist islam's victims - cause muslims won't

We non-muslims need to honor racist islam's victims - cause muslims won't
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-f4ihemJ34G4/T2yuFzSUqiI/AAAAAAAAA_U/FcGmXfvhkCw/s640/Ms+Lucy+Black+racist+4.jpg

The islamic extermination of Jews

The last taboo: Sex segregation/sex apartheid

Klevius is probably now the world's foremost expert on sex segregation (sad, isn't it) and islam (the worst hate crime ever) is the foremost expression of sex segregation. By 'islam' Klevius means Sharia as described by Bill Warner and the Saudi based and steered muslim world organization OIC and its Cairo declaration (sharia) imposed on all muslims via UN (meaning basic Human Rights are criminalized).

Burn OIC's islamic anti-Human Rights declaration!

Saturday, June 29, 2013

Muslim Human-rights-phobia (Sharia)


We need a European Spring against fascist islam - so not to repeat what happened some 70 years ago!




Nothing can be more fascist than islam! A totalitarian racist/sexist ideology that cannot accept basic Human Rights and which makes it extremely hard for muslims to leave the "faith" because of its apostasy ban and fascist organization (e.g. Saudi and Sharia based OIC which now more or less rules the UN that was created to stop it).

And our worst enemies are some of our own politicians and their connections with the worst scumbugs you can imagine.





Ha Ha "islamophobia"





Patrick Condell is an English writer, political commentator, comedian and atheist. internet personality. He performed alternative comedy shows during the 1980s and 1990s in the United Kingdom, and won a Time Out Comedy Award in 1991. He was also a regular panelist on BBC Radio 1′s “Loose Talk”. As of March 2013, Pat Condell’s YouTube channel has over 177,902 subscribers and 44 million video views.


Sayeeda Warsi is probably now the worst threat to the Brits' Human Rights



Douglas Murray: According to the Home Office if you are a non-Muslim and you make the following statement your presence will be deemed ‘not conducive to the public good’ and you will be barred from entering the United Kingdom:

    ‘It [Islam] is a religion and a belief system that mandates warfare against unbelievers for the purpose for establishing a societal model that is absolutely incompatible with Western society. Because of media and general government unwillingness to face the sources of Islamic terrorism these things remain largely unknown.’

If, on the other hand, you are a Muslim and you say the following then the UK government has no problem with you, and you can come in to the UK to do a speaking tour:

    ‘Devotion to Jihad for the sake of Allah, and the desire to shed blood, to smash skulls and to sever limbs for the sake of Allah and in defense of His religion, is, undoubtedly, an honor for the believer.’

In welcoming the decision to ban the first speaker, rather than the second, Keith Vaz, chairman of the Home Affairs Select Committee, has said:

    ‘The UK should never become a stage for inflammatory speakers who promote hate.’

Too late, Keith.  Too late.



Some comments on this:


Avatar
chan chan • 2 days ago

Cameron and his dhimmi government once again enforcing shari'ah law.
60

Reply

Share ›

Avatar
Julieann Carter • 2 days ago

Gosh! This is terrible! Why? Why? Why? There's no good reason! How utterly disturbing and sinister is this malicious and cowardly 'affirmative action'. Stand alone Muslims in government appear to be more powerful and influential than the rest of parliament combined. That what it seems like. Bloody creepy. You really have to question the motivation of Keith Vaz in wishing to bar those who would speak out
truthfully against violent Islam (as opposed to 'peaceful Islam')? I thought we were all supposed to be on the same side here?
57

Reply

Share ›

Avatar
Marky_D • 2 days ago

Wasn't that long ago I was hoping Theresa May would oust Cameron. Are there absolutely no free speech loving conservatives in the Conservative party any more?
Presumably Theresa May would ban those who came back from Nurembourg with scaremongering stories about that nice Mr Hitler and his National Socialist party...
55

Reply

Share ›

Avatar
retundario • 2 days ago

This is the most outrageous decision, and I will not vote for LibLabCon as a matter of principal because of it. Not only is it grossly unfair, it is also just stupidly dangerous, in the sense that many people are so disgusted and fed up with the UK political class's blatantly far (far, far, far) stronger repression of British people's right to express things from our ethnic point-of-view, as compared to the ultra-liberalism that applies to ethnic hatred against us and claims to Britishness from non-whites.
80 1

Reply

Share ›

Avatar
Old Fox • a day ago

The double standard to which you refer has been in place for many years. It arises from the "anti-racist" establishment's commitment to anti-white racism. Under the term's of this belief, all whites are collectively guilty for the alleged crimes of white Europe across recorded time. This of course is a form of collective guilt, one of the pillars of antisemitism. It also ignores inconvenient facts such as the Islamic slave trade, the involvement of black African chiefs in the Atlantic slave trade and the enslavement of more than a million white Europeans by the Ottoman Sultan. As a result of this belief only whites or those friendly to "white" values and society, such as Ayaan Hirsi Ali, are considered guilty of "hate-speech" or worse, because the rest of the world is merely giving vent to the just rage of the "oppressed". Why do you think the sexual exploitation of white girls by Pakistani perverts in northern England is greeted with such bland sang-froid? Why do you think our so-called "liberals" are so reluctant to highlight Islamic persecution of Christians and others across the middle east and so eager to prattle about "Islamophobia" in the west? Why do you think they have been so happy to flood Europe's heartlands with hostile newcomers - often from Islamic countries? Our ruling elite is in the grip of a morbid, self-hating attitude which heralds the persecution and perhaps the holocaust of European peoples. Unless we can overthrow these criminally treacherous scum we are heading for an unimaginable catastrophe.






The pic below illustrates at least two things: 1) How fascism hides behind gas, and 2) how islam and sex segregation (apartheid) are synonyms.

And sadly, Peter Klevius still seems to be the web's by far best informed (and intelligent enough) auctority on sex segregation. He feels quite alone though* so please come up with some competition. However, keep in mind that he has already long since eaten and burped both Judith Butler and Pierre Bourdieu. And he is a proud Atheist and therefore not vulnerable for "monotheistic" sexism.

* except, of course, that he is supported by the whole world in its inevitable march towards de-sex segregation. Compare his Demand for Resources (1981, and in book format 1992), Daughters of the Social State (1994), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Warning for Feminism (1998), and http://klevius.info/pathologicalsymbiosis.html (2004). Just to name a few.


Qatar is a main hub (together with Saudi Arabia and some other muslim states)  for the spreading of islamic hatred and muslim Human-rights-phobia (Sharia)


How many have muslim fascists murdered, raped and tortured in Libya, Syria and elsewhere?

Having anything to do with them can only be excused with ignorance!

Thursday, June 27, 2013

Is there a difference between Qatar and Taliban?!



This is the islamic perversion muslim born (apostate?!) Mr X Barry Barakeh Hussain Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever) approves of!






Fly or flee Qatar islamofascism?

Not only is the Qatari dictator family responsible for the murdering and victimization of millions of mainly muslims abroad, it has also some of the world's worst Human Rights records at home.

Some examples of islamic Human Rights violations in Qatar

Discriminatory Family Code
Family law was codified in 2006 with the introduction of Sharia Family Law, which applies to all muslims in Qatar, regardless of nationality.
A male guardian must sign a woman's marriage contract for it to be valid. Muslim women do not have the right to marry outside islam, although muslim men are free to marry whomever.
Polygamy is legal in Qatar. It is not known how many women in Qatar actually live in polygamous marriages.
The legal status of women and men as parents in Qatar is unclear. According to a forthcoming report by UN Women, within Qatari families it is widely accepted that the husband is the head of the household, and that he retains control over the household budget and expenditures. Domestic work and childcare remain the responsibility of the wife. Qatari women only have the right to pass citizenship onto their children in certain, limited circumstances. However, there is no information available on what these circumstances are.
Men in Qatar have the right to divorce their wives unilaterally (repudiate), while women’s rights to divorce are heavily restricted. Women can obtain a divorce if they can prove to a court that their husband has failed to uphold his marital duties (e.g. by providing insufficient financial support, or by deserting her). 
 Alternatively, they can request the court to grant a khula divorce, although this entails renouncing all future financial support, and a woman giving up her dowry. In cases of divorce, under the 2006 Sharia Family Law mothers retain responsibility of girls up to the age of 15 and boys up to the age of 13, although the father always remains the children’s legal guardian.
Women do not have equal inheritance rights in Qatar, as inheritance is also governed by Sharia, which allows women to inherit half what a similarly situated male relative would receive (e.g. daughters receive half the amount that sons receive).

Restricted Physical Integrity
Rape within marriage is not recognized as a criminal offense. Data on conviction rates are unavailable, and few rape victims report the crime, due to fear of Sharia and social stigma. There are no specific laws in place to protect women from domestic violence. Amnesty International reports that the law and state bodies do not protect women from sex-based violence in Qatar.
Qatari courts often give lenient sentences in cases when male violence against women has been motivated by ‘immodest behavior’ on the part of the victim, according to the Freedom House report. There are no statistics available as to the number of so-called ‘honour crimes’ in Qatar.
The domestic workers who form the bulk of Qatar’s female migrant population have limited awareness of or access to rights and justice. This means that they are effectively without protection in cases where they are experiencing physical, sexual or mental abuse, or the denial of their right to freedom of movement; according to Amnesty International, such cases are common. Amnesty also reports that in 2009, 52 foreign nationals were imprisoned, sentenced to flogging, and/or deported from Qatar for engaging in ‘illicit sexual relations’.
Qatari women do not have any legal control over their own fertility. Moreover, Qatari women are encouraged by the state to have large families, to aid the policy of ‘Qatarization’, to counter the demographic imbalance in the emirate between Qatari and non-Qatari nationals. They also face pressure from their families to give birth to large numbers of children. In fact, rapetivism is one of the most central pillars in islam.


Son Bias
Sex-disaggregated data regarding child labour was not available. However, according to survey data quoted in an unpublished report for UN Women, 28% of respondents felt that daughters should undertake domestic work in the home, compared to just 4% who felt that sons should. This may indicate son bias in regard to allocating domestic labor.


Restricted Access to Resources and Entitlements
Although increasing numbers of Qatari women are entering the business sector, many businesswomen operate through male intermediaries. This is because women directly engaging with male business contacts often face criticism from family members.


Restricted Civil Liberties
Qatari women need permission to apply for a drivers licence. Islamic sex segregation restricts interactions between unrelated men and women, and limit women’s access to non-sex segregated public spaces. It is not considered socially acceptable for women to live alone in Qatar, and those who choose to do so face criticism from their families and harassment. Migrant women working as domestic workers in Qatar face significant restrictions on their freedom of movement, including their right to leave the country, as their employers must give their consent before exit permits can be issued to allow them to leave.
Freedom of speech, assembly and association are non-existing in Qatar. According to a forthcoming report by UN Women, despite the presence of the well-known media company Al-Jazeera in Qatar, very few women work in the media in the emirate. Overall, the media environment is restricted, with little consideration of sensitive social issues – including sex issues – in local media. According to a 2010 report by Freedom House, the 2004 law governing private associations is so restrictive that independent women’s rights NGOs remain non-existent. As a result, most women’s organizations are state-run.
Women are virtually invisible in political life in Qatar; no woman has ever been appointed to the Advisory Council (the main legislative body, directly appointed by the Emir). 
Attitudes towards women in positions of leadership remain negative among many sections of the population, with 62% of women and men questioned for a 2007 survey reporting that they would not vote for a female candidate.
There is a significant sex gap between women and men in regard to earnings. In part, this is due to employers consistently disregarding the principle of equal pay, particularly in regard to allocation of benefits and bonuses.
Muslim Qatari husbands have a considerable say over their wives’ employment decisions, particularly due to sex segregation where a woman’s presence in the public sphere may lead to social contact with unrelated males.


Klevius' question: So what do you think about it, Janet Jackson?


Tuesday, June 18, 2013

Mr X "president", who bowed deeply for the islamofascist Saudi oil dictator, now shakes hand with the Taliban - and farts at women's human rights


Is it islamophobia to dislike these murderous dictators and their supporters?

Thes guys are responsible for the death of more than 100,000 in Syria. Their black head-bands certainly not belong to saints.





Fly Qatar Airways to the Taliban's headquarter in Qatar - Mr X "president", muslim born (apostate?!) Barry Barakeh Hussain Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever) does!

And when Mr X "president" says he will ask the devil the Taliban to respect "women's rights" it constitutes no problem for the Taliban because for them, as for OIC, Sharia takes care of women's "rights".

What sanctions the violations against girls' and women's rights is islam, period! And this fact is clearly visible for everyone who dares to look.



There has been a 50 percent increase in women and girls being imprisoned for “moral crimes” over the last 2 years.

Most females in Afghan jails are victims of sexually motivated violence and had run away from their attackers.

Four years after the adoption of a law on violence against women and 12 years after Taliban rule, women are still imprisoned for being victims of forced marriage, domestic violence and rape.



But while Afgan girls/women suffer the Saudi criminals party.




Press-TV:

Ali al-Maliki said in a televised interview that these individuals - all enjoying immunity from prosecution - excessively indulge in sensual pleasures, crazy partying and wild night parties often accompanied by a lot of alcohol.

He added that he has heard about the ongoing promiscuity in the country from several youths, who used to attend the parities but are remorseful of their past deeds.

Maliki also pointed to the massive flow of narcotics into Saudi Arabia, noting that members of the governing regime are involved in smuggling and trade of illicit drugs in the country.

Saudi Arabia is the world's largest oil exporter, with the black gold accounting for 90 percent of the country's exports.

However, corruption is so ingrained in Saud Arabia’s royal family that despite the country’s enormous oil money, it struggles with problems such as poverty and unemployment.

Job growth and welfare programs in Saudi Arabia have failed to keep pace with a booming population that has soared from 6 million in 1970 to 28 million today, according to a report published in December 2012 by the Washington Post.

The report added that in Saudi Arabia, “poverty and anger over corruption continue to grow. Vast sums of money end up in the pockets of the royal family through a web of nepotism, corruption and cozy government contracts, according to Saudi and US analysts.”


Klevius comment: Look at the comments below. What strikes me most is the similarity in rhetoric between Western politicians and islamist fundamentalists. Both repeat the naive mantra about some "real islam" beyond what we see and experience.  However, when you accept that islam was born evil the loose pieces in your world-view will start fitting reality!



Comments (16)
Add Comment Click Here
Note: The views expressed and the links provided on our comment pages are the personal views of individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Press TV.
GIBMO
May 25, 2013 6:1 AM
OH THE HOUSE OF AL-SAUD, YOU HAVE BECOME A CANCER TO THE PROGRESS OF ISLAM..OH THE HOUSE OF SAUD, YOU HAVE BETRAYED ALLAH, THE PROPHETS AND THE UMMA..MAY ALLAH FORGIVE YOU IF YOU TURN BACK TO HIM..AND MAY ALLAH PUNISH YOU IF YOU FAIL AND CONTINUE TO HARM ISLAM...AMEEN
Click to Rate ReplyRating2
Debauchery
May 24, 2013 2:49 AM
Is it proper to have the House of Saud the guardian of Islam's two holiest sites?
Click to Rate ReplyRating4
your fathers are facing unimaginable punishment
May 23, 2013 5:16 PM
the al saud family are the descendants of abu jahl and the other evil chiefs of quraish
Click to Rate ReplyRating10
remember the day of judgement!!
May 23, 2013 4:32 PM
i have always respected osama bin ladin no matter what people said about him because he was a saudi prince who could'v lead such a corrupt disgraceful hypocrite lifestyle with his family if he wanted, but he refused to and decided to live a very simple life in the mountains and caves of afghanistan to expose his family regime and to start a khilafat movement which fights for truth and justice to the very end, even if the whole world is against them. you guys may disagree with me but i believe that only the likes of the taliban can truly free the muslim world, establish the khilafat and bring these oppressive hypocrite traitor tyrants to justice. its us the muslim sheeple citizens around the world that is holding them back from saving us.
Click to Rate ReplyRating3
Islam is progressivein reply to remember the day of judgement!!
5/23/2013 6:21:16 PM
The first thing you need to know is that in Islam there no prince or princes or even king,all muslims are brothers and equal(please read Quran)second,the khalifat you are talking about unfortunately appeared to be cannibals,look what they are doing in syria,free muslims are real Iranians who freed their country from foreigners first and then stood on their own feet both men and women and now have become role model in the world,please wake up.
Click to Rate Rating7
Arianoin reply to remember the day of judgement!!
5/23/2013 5:27:55 PM
Anyone who lived in Afghanistan knows who are the Taliban.Dont spread lies here. Taliban is a ISI-CIA-Takfiro Crypto Zio group backed to the teeth by those Saudi Butchers.Even Nazis were better then those Satanic Pashtoon tribes famous for barbarism, destruction and ethnic cleansing of other minorities in Afghanistan. Bin Ladin was the best CIA asset as Gordon Duff said.
Click to Rate Rating5
people like you will always face hardshipin reply to remember the day of judgement!!
5/23/2013 5:07:01 PM
@ RAHEEL there is a BIG HUMONGOUS difference between the taliban/hezbollah and alqaeda (free syrian army and al nusra front for e.g). who you are describing is al qaeda, NOT the taliban.
Click to Rate Rating2
Raheelin reply to remember the day of judgement!!
5/23/2013 4:50:20 PM
Do u know have a sense of what you are saying. Those illiterates are a curse to Muslims. Their destiny is in Hell with their leader because of the crimes they commited against innocent muslims with the support of America. Who ever is telling you this is a big Hypocrite.
Click to Rate Rating7
Ariano
May 23, 2013 3:45 PM
There is a video of a Dutch woman on youtube who was abused as child by European Elite in Satanic rituals, I was shocked when she said that twice she was brought to Saudi Arabia in her childhood time for such Satanic abuse rituals. She said that there was also the famous Rabbi Schnerson...
Click to Rate ReplyRating7
Throw Saud Family out of Arabia
May 23, 2013 2:48 PM
Throw Saud Family out of Arabia - they are a filth to the land of the prophet
Click to Rate ReplyRating15
JJ
May 23, 2013 1:38 PM
Once the USA falters, these guys are going to last aboutas long as a snowball in the Sahara. I hope the people of Saudia Arabia put them all on trial then, they are a criminalmafia.
Click to Rate ReplyRating16
Yes!
May 23, 2013 1:24 PM
I have seen them in London. They spend Money on women, drugs, .... specially the most Beautiful women. It is a consumtion society for West. So, they support this dictatorship because it is in their interests. So called Western democracies and their puppet dictators, all of them, slaves of Zionists who support terrorism for Zionist IsraHell. What a wonderful World? Welcome to the new World order after 9/11! huge lies and hypocrisies of Western domination!
Click to Rate ReplyRating15
Puppets must fallin reply to Yes!
5/23/2013 1:31:01 PM
I have seen Saudis go to Manama, Bahrain to enjoy alcohol, drugs, and women. Every weekend the causeway that links KSA to Bahrain is full of Saudi traffic. What is the heart of the Islamic lands and the birthplace of our Prophet (pbuh) has been corrupted by the filthy Al Sauds.
Click to Rate Rating20
Puppets must fall
May 23, 2013 1:19 PM
These filthy, disgraceful, un-Islamic, traitor Zionist puppets must be overthrown! There are no words strong enough to express my revulsion of them. They are the root cause of all problems in the Muslim world today.
Click to Rate ReplyRating25
suleimanj
May 23, 2013 12:44 PM
For almost one century now. our blood have been spilling ,all those who died on this cause are shuhadaa, we have know the why? bz these giant hypocrites( saudi king,qadar,kuwait ,and bahrain) were leading us . They should be prepared for doom now and hellfire. ALAQSA will inshaAllah be liberated and muslims will be one. the zionist and brethren kingdoms clock is ticking.the wave of the sunami that will engulf them like pharoah has already begun.
Click to Rate ReplyRating18
Guys who never worked
May 23, 2013 12:38 PM
What a disgrace artificial smile,just like children who are excited for candies,chocolates and baloons....fools


Monday, June 17, 2013

Is UN's schizophrenia incurable?


History repeats itself

While UN is taken over by islamofascists archbishop Justin Welby in his pathetic medieval speech for the Queen’s coronation 60th anniversary had the nerve to state “We live in a hierarchy of liberty under authority that ascends to God. Here is the model of liberty and authority. Liberty is only real when it exists under authority. Liberty under authority  begins with our duty to God"

Klevius: However, as an atheist I'm less interested in God than in the humans staying on the steps just below God. Dear Justin, you've got it all wrong! The very idea of basic Human Rights is to defend our all freedom against authorities. We are our own authority and the system is called democracy. Or maybe you've already abandoned Human Rights because of your "inter-faith" duties!

Read about Negative Human Rights and cure your ignorance!


Turkish OIC Fuhrer Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, who is proposed by Saudi Arabia to be UN's next secretary general (sic), asks the West to bomb Syria.

The fascist symbol of German National-socialism (aka "Nazism") was actually less totalitarian than OIC's islamofascist world embracing Umma nation symbol.



OIC's islamofascist Sharia declaration concealed as "islamic human rights" within UN


By 1) using the the concept 'islamic human rights' (sic) instead of Sharia, and 2) by creating a Sharia zone within the UN, OIC has managed


We now live with a schizophrenic UN thatis based on Human Rights yet harbors its very opposite!

OIC, consisting of 57 more or less muslim member states, created the Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in islam (Sharia). Article 24 states that "[a]ll the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the islamic Sharia" and Article 25 follows with "[t]he islamic Sharia is the only source of reference for the explanation or clarification of any of the articles of this Declaration." Attempts to have it adopted by the United Nations Human Rights Council have met increasing criticism, because of its contradiction of the UDHR.

Critics of the CDHR state bluntly that it is “manipulation and hypocrisy,” “designed to dilute, if not altogether eliminate, civil and political rights protected by international law” and attempts to “circumvent these principles [of freedom and equality].”

According to Human Rights Watch OIC has “fought doggedly” and successfully within the United Nations Human Rights Council to shield states from criticism, except when it comes to criticism of Israel. For example, when independent experts reported violations of human rights in the 2006 Lebanon War, “state after state from the OIC took the floor to denounce the experts for daring to discuss Hezbollah as well.” OIC demands that the council “should work cooperatively with abusive governments rather than condemn them.” HRW responds that this works only with those who are willing to cooperate; others exploit the passivity.

The OIC has also been criticised for failing to discuss the treatment of ethnic minorities within member countries.

Along with the revisions of the OIC’s charter in 2008, the member states created the Independent Permanent Human Rights Commission (IPHRC).

The IPHRC has the power to monitor "human rights" (i.e. OIC's Sharia) within the member states and facilitates the integration of "human rights" (i.e. OIC's Sharia) into all OIC mandates. The IPHRC also "aids" in the promotion of political, civil, and economic rights in all member states.

LGBT rights are rejected by OIC as "licentious behaviour ... against the fundamental teachings of various religions, including islam".


Violent islamic jihad terrorism is, according to OIC, not terrorism


 OIC's definition of terrorism in article 1 describes “any act or threat of violence carried out with the aim of, among other things, imperiling people’s honour, occupying or seizing public or private property, or threatening the stability, territorial integrity, political unity or sovereignty of a state.” This is vague, ill-defined and including much that is outside the generally accepted understandings of the concept of terrorism. It is subjective and ambiguous and opens up for abusive use of terrorist prosecutions against political opponents and others. It also labels, or could easily be used to label, as terrorist actions, acts of peaceful expression, association, and assembly. Not to mention criticism against islam or its islamofascist leaders.

OIC doesn't recognise as terrorism acts that serve causes endorsed by their member states.

Not surprisingly contradictions between OIC's and other UN members' understanding of terrorism has stymied efforts at the UN to produce a comprehensive convention on international terrorism.

OIC also rejects any description of muslims attacking Israel as terrorism.


However, OIC calls non-violent defense of Human Rights "islamophobia" and "the worst form of terrorism" 


At the 34th Islamic Conference of Foreign Ministers (ICFM), an OIC section, in May 2007, the foreign ministers termed islamophobia the worst form of terrorism.



Sunday, June 16, 2013

How many murderous, racist and sexist Allahs do muslims have?!


Some 100,000 humans, mostly muslims, have now been killed in the islamic religious "monotheist" sectarian violence in Syria that is backed by the Saudi, Qatar, Turkey etc islamofascist leaders.



When muslims dislike other muslims they call them takfiri, i.e. an apostate who is not a true muslim, i.e. who believes in the wrong Allah.

And to make it impossible to decide whose Allah is the "right" one, islam has made Allah redundant in its praxis.

So the only function left to these Allahs is as a reference to why one commits what would be classified as atrocities etc. under Human Rights.


There are no "right" or "wrong" humans in Human Rights!


Because of islam's inherent incompatibility with Human Rights the Saudi based Sharia organization OIC with 57 member states introduced islamofascist Sharia via UN as an excuse for violating Human Rights.






Tuesday, June 11, 2013

Erdogan thinks introducing Sharia against the will of 88% is "democratic"!


Erdogan is not democratically elected because he deliberately lied by not openly telling the voters about his Sharia plans for Turkey! And although Klevius during the two last elections tried to inform the Turks via the web few were able to hear this crucial information due to the conventional media's noisy support of Erdogan and his party.


Two Turkish islamofascist fanatics





The origin of islam and its Sharia finance was parasitism centered on the enslavement of "infidels" and girls/women.


Erdogan now plans to build the world’s largest mosque in Istanbul, which is located in Europe. Moreover, he wants an islamic ruked Turkey to become the biggest member state in EU. And just like Hitler, Erdogan, though democratically elected (Hitler got first 33% and later more than 90% support from the Germans), he is for the introduction of Sharia which is undemocratic because it's islam and "islam covers all aspects of life".

Ihsanoglu, the leader of all muslims Saudi based Sharia organization OIC, in an interview said he wants to reinstate the Ottoman empire, which, btw, was nothing else than a Sharia financed slave market which fell in total misery and decay at the exact beat of the West's campaign against slavery.


Most Turks are islamophobes
According to an April 2013 Pew Institute survey, only 12 percent of Turks want Sharia (i.e. the very core of islam).




Shadowy Sharia finance
Businessmen who, together with pious muslim men and ignorant women, made up Erdogan's constituency, benefit from the AKP party’s spending via the public sector and government contracts etc.








Monday, June 10, 2013

Islamofascism


                                         Fascism




                                         and one of its victims

 




Aleppo province in Syria: A 15 year old boy, Muhammad Qatta', a was executed by rebel fighters in the Sha'ar neighbourhood of Aleppo. SOHR activists in Aleppo have verified that Islamist rebel fighters detained the young boy at 10 p.m. last night from where he worked selling coffee in the Sad al-Lawz area of al-Sha'ar, they took the boy for blaspheming during an argument while he was working; he said "even if Muhammed comes back to life i won't lend". They later returned with the boy to the area, the child's shirt was made to cover his head, his body had obvious marks from torture and beating. The rebels then publicly announced, and they spoke not in a Syrian accent but in a classical Arabic one, that apostasy and cursing the prophet is a terrible vice and that anyone who does so will face similar fate. They then shot the boy twice with a automatic rifle in front of the gathered crowd, a shot in the neck and a shot in the head, and then left in their car. The boy's mother and father were among the crowd. The SOHR demands that the killers of the child be brought to justice. It is important to note that the Shari'a court of Aleppo has a security branch in the area but did not stop the summary execution of the boy.

Sunday, June 09, 2013

How many mosque rats at Leicester University?




Sexist islam in UK universities






Sharia sex segregation or Human Rights for girls/women?

In every possible form of Sharia girls/women are forced to lead their lives in sex apartheid of varying degrees. But according to Human Rights every girl/woman has the right to decide herself what kind of life she wants to lead - incl. a sex segregated life if she so wishes.

In islam women and non-muslims are all "infidels", and the only thing that really distinguishes a woman as muslim is her "duty" towards islam to reproduce (physically and/or culturally) as many new muslims as possible. .


In John Peters Humprey's world view "infidels" didn't exist


John Peters Humphrey (peace be upon him and Human Rights) is the last prophet of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights - and he is utterly defamated by muslim Humanrightsophobes - yet all the Billions of Human Rights followers take it (too?) calmly.

John Peters Humphrey (who actually existed and who wasn't a pedophile or a murderous scumbag or a fanatic warlord or a terrorist) wrote the first draft of the Universal Human Rights Declaration (peace be upon him and Human Rights). Here's part of his profound and sacred original revelation:





"Subject to the laws governing slander and libel there shall be full freedom of speech and of expression by any means whatsoever, and there shall be reasonable access to all channels of communication. Censorship shall not be permitted"

Klevius comment: By 'libel' and 'slander' John Peters Humphrey of course meant something directed to an existing individual, not a totalitarian ideology!

Human Rights and islam are irreconcilable: Klevius knows it, OIC knows it - how come that McGill University doesn't know it?!


When a Sharia believing muslim, Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na`im, says Sharia is reformable he lies straight up your "infidel" face. The very fact that OIC had to step aside of the Human Rights Declaration speaks for itself. And when this crypto-islamofascist is allowed to "lecture" (read lie) at McGill University it's the worst possible insult against the work of John Peters Humphrey and Human Rights.

Islam is dependent on sex-apartheid and can never survive without it! A Sharia without sex apartheid is impossible. Muslim men are the only true muslims and "muslim" women are there to sexually and reproductively satisfy muslim men and islam, period. That this arrangement then can take many different forms doesn't change these basic facts at all.

Human Rights, on the other hand allows girls/women freedom from sex apartheid.

The fact that women married to muslims are, in general, in a better position in secular societies doesn't at all excuse the horrifying fact that Sharia NEVER will give women equality! It's the Human Rights, dude, that makes life easier for women married to muslim men in secular states where legislation takes its inspiration from the Universal Human Rights Declaration, not from an evil and totalitarian sex slave ideology! The idea about so-called “muslim laws” as a colonial construct, is quite hilarious when considering that islam through its Sharia slavery finance throughout some 1400 years has been the by far worst colonizer ever in human history. Moreover, "the realities of muslim(men)'s lives and how they see their relationship to islam and Sharia" is nothing more than the repetition of the senseless islam excuse that "because we're used to do so" it's ok!

Hitler and his National-socialists (politically backed by the Germans) censored everything that was against their ideology. For islam censorship is even more important precisely because unlike the short-lived German National-socialism (popularly called Nazism for the purpose of hiding its socialist roots) islam has a 1400 year history of the worst atrocities you can imagine!

It's against this background you shall consider John Peters Humphrey's (peace be upon him and Human Rights) revelation above!




Sayeeda Warsi fights for Sharia and calls the defense for Human Rights "islamophobia"







Btw, today an islamofascist muslim on BBC compared islamic Koran based violent terrorists with the tiny (and spat on by every media and politician) English Defense League, and said that calling muslim terrorists muslims isn't fair against muslims. However, unlike EDL muslims constitute the world's biggest community and has the world's biggest organizations (islamofascist Sharia-OIC and UN) behind them, yet do not show any effort whatsoever to call those muslims apostates!












Wednesday, June 05, 2013

There is no other islam than Sharia islam!


Mosque mice feeding mosque rats


After OIC (all muslims Saudi based world organization) publicly abandoned Human Rights in UN and replaced them with Sharia, there is no space left for "moderate islam" or islam as a "faith". Islam is anti-democratic and more political than any ordinary political parties. Islam is fascism.




Kadri Gursel: Professor Atilla Yayla, one the most prominent defenders of liberal thought in Turkey, wrote in Taraf May 28 why the alcohol ban is critical for Muslim Turkey: "Alcohol is a basic test of freedoms that should given to religious conservatives, and whether we like it or not is a symbol of existence of freedom in Muslim countries. The freedom-drink linkage is this: Freedom is a person’s right to choose between the option of drinking or not. Forcing someone not drinking to drink is a violation of freedom, just as it is a violation to stop someone who wants to drink. In a country of freedoms, alcohol consumption can be regulated for secular reasons but not for religious pretexts, and such regulating cannot reach the point of the outright banning of drinking.”
As can be seen, ”moderate political Islam” in a country like Turkey that totally lacks checks-and-balances mechanisms and where there is no questioning by an effective opposition and free media is bound to eventually end up as a "moderate Shariah order."
This is what the Turkish experience is teaching the world.

Klevius: This is just one more example of violation of Negative Human Rights, i.e. the right not to be the target of questionable impositions.
Stupid people, like the British archbishop for example, think that such individual freedom causes dangerous selfishness. However, it is precisely the other way round. A right can only be universally human when given to every individual, because that (negative) right is inseparably tied to a corresponding right of every other individual. In other words, no room for religious infidel racism or sexism based on a person's sex.



Tuesday, June 04, 2013

Does the homophobic archbishop Justin Welby oppose individual Human Rights?


Only those at the top of the hierarchy and directly connected to "god", are free, according to the British archbishop





Archbishop Justin's speech for the Queen's coronation 60th anniversary referred to the words "knelt" and "slave". But in a democracy based on Human Rights (not Sharia) no one should have to kneel or be a slave.



Here are some picks from the speech:

Liberty is only real when it exists under authority. Liberty under authority  begins, as the Book of Common Prayer puts it, with our duty to God, "whose service is perfect freedom".

We live in a hierarchy of liberty under authority that ascends to God

The nature of power is found in radical commitment, single-minded devotion and servant leadership.

The very nature of being British follows this simple logic. It is founded on liberty under authority. It imitates the example of Jesus who did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but humbled Himself and took the form of a slave.

“Her Majesty knelt at the beginning of a path of demanding devotion and utter self-sacrifice, a path she did not choose, yet to which she was called by God.

"Liberty is only real when it exists under authority. Liberty under authority  begins, as the Book of Common Prayer puts it, with our duty to God, "whose service is perfect freedom".

“We live in a hierarchy of liberty under authority that ascends to God's limitless love. As we see in the life of Jesus, with God justice and mercy are perfectly joined, wisdom is unlimited, generosity is unstinting, and love pours out to the whole world in an overwhelming embrace that is offered universally and abundantly.

Klevius: The wording reflects medieval backwardness and may be seen as "interfaith dialogue".


Andrew Brown (The Guardian): The new archbishop of Canterbury spoke in favour of hierarchy and obedience.

If your duty is to God, rather than to society, or, failing God, to some large abstract or apparently timeless principle, then you have a yardstick against which to measure society, and indeed to measure your own progress: something or someone to whom you are responsible.

Obviously, this can go horribly wrong. But so can the alternative. The idea of being responsible only to your own idealised self is a kind of hell.


Klevius: Why should the alternative be an "idealised self"? The very core of the (negative) Human Rights concept is a restraint against this. Moreover, how can your duty ever be to a God who is unreachable? You will always end up with "God's" assistant who always happens to be a human with the right to interpret "God's" will.

Monday, June 03, 2013

Erdogan: What is the message? Klevius: Get rid of islam (Sharia)!


Erdogan in a speech already 1994: " I am a servant of sharia"!

Islamofascism supporting BBC pushes forward a "researcher" who blames Erdogan's islamofascism on EU's criticism of Turkey's Human Rights violations. But the fact remains that Erdogan has always been an islamofascist, no matter how much willful thinkers try to "moderate" him.

Islam can never be democratically elected because it is inherently undemocratic, i.e. fascist


Hitler was democratically elected but steered Germany into fascism.

Hamas was democratically elected.

Erdogan was democratically elected but is steering Turkey into islamofascism.



Will one of these islamofascists take over UN (created to fight fascism) after Ban Ki Moon?


The two main faces of Turkish islamofascism: PM Erdogan and Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, the Egyptian born Turkish Fuhrer of Saudi based OIC, the muslim world organization whose aim is to implement it's Sharia declaration on every muslim in the world.


Islam without slaves or oil is a financial disaster





While Turkey's household income goes down the public sector (i.e. Erdogan & Co - not the people) increases its spending on borrowed money, crowning it with an Ottoman mosque at the highest point in Konstantinopel (Istanbul) on the European side of Turkey.

Klevius reminder: The Ottoman slave empire decayed in misery to the beat of the European anti-slavery movement. Without its slave finance it was doomed, which fact was the insight that propelled Ataturk's deliberate secularization.


Ignorant and/or silent mosque mice sanction Sharia islamofascism 







Saturday, June 01, 2013

According to Turkish PM and OIC's world Sharia, Human Rights constitute "a crime against humanity"

Elected islamofascist dictatorship

Turkey's PM is attacking his citizens. Time for the West to support islamist intervention or Human Rights?



Amnesty International: The lack of freedom of speech in Turkey is one of the country's "most entrenched human rights problems.

Klevius: This "Human Rights problem" stems from islam and its Sharia which is against Human Rights and which Turkey is prescribing for, mainly via its PM Erdogan and OIC's Fuhrer Ihsanoglu.



The Human Rights declaration is the ultimate "islamophobia"


It's not Klevius but the original anti-fascist 1948 Human Rights Declaration that constitutes the worst "crime" against islam today!


Qur'an:8:39 — "So fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief) and all submit to the religion of Allah alone [in the world]."



Muslims WorldWide: There are no churches allowed in Turkey and the number one cause of death for women is assault. Like all Muslim societies Turkey constantly pretends to be striving for democracy to appease the EU while none of this is true. Democracy, equality, freedom and so on, taken for granted in the West are completely against Islamic doctrines and violates Sharia law. Like Egypt’s president Morsi, the Turkish PM Recep Erdogan has been caught numerous times contradicting his open lies to the EU. While Mustafa Kemal Atatürk recognized the dangers of Islam he banned minarets, the Koran and the spread of Islam in his country to try and avert it from a totalitarian rule, PM Erdogan is a deep admirer of the Ottoman empire and cannot wait to be a stepping stone for it to reappear in our modern age.

The Muslim world is eagerly waiting for Turkey to open borders with Europe, which many Brussel lunatics support, so the country can serve as a bridge between the Middle East and Europe, allowing enormous mass immigration of the kind that created the Palestinian people and the endless effort to gain control over Israel. Turkey’s EU membership and open borders with this Islamic state allows the Muslim world to infiltrate and speed up the new Caliphate order that Muslims dream of. Islam intends to ‘rule the world’ no matter how absurd it sounds. And they have no intentions to let go of that dream. It is being done through mass immigration, mass baby production, exploitation of human rights laws, abuse and pressure on political policies, lawfare, crime, and economic exploitation (massive welfare exploitation, common in Muslim communities all across Europe).