Is Mrs Theresa May digging a racist/sexist "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Theresa May's sharia = >23,000 jihadi - before Brexit. How many after?

Theresa May's sharia = >23,000 jihadi - before Brexit. How many after?

UK DID NOT vote Brexit. EU residents weren't allowed to vote while non-EU residents were.

The muslim Saudi dictator family is the root of most islam induced suffering

May's secret love affair with Saudi islamofascists - while rejecting Chinese

Prince Charles blames islam's atrocities in Mideast etc. on "European populists like the Nazis"

Prince Charles blames islam's atrocities in Mideast etc. on "European populists like the Nazis"

While Klevius is forcing islam into a Human Rights corner, politicians support islamofascism

Why hasn't Klevius got the Nobel prize for his theory on consciousness/AI?

BBC's fake/angled news protect islamofascist offenders because of its ties (BBC World) to Mideast

BBC lies and fake news

The "Birmingham Koran" hoax - and a sonless "prophet" invented after it!

Lego won't sponsor the defense for Human Rights equality - but islamofascism and sharia is ok

Hillary supports sharia for women, war with Russia and aid to Sunni islamofascists

Apostate (?) Obama's bio- and adoptive dads were both muslims

BBC smears China while bolstering Saudi islamofascists - the worst spreaders of hate and terror

BBC smears China while bolstering Saudi islamofascists - the worst spreaders of hate and terror

Choudary and May both want more sharia - so what about "British values"?

Michael Morell (ex-CIA) is/was a knowing agent for Saudi wahhabism and its Koranic hate jihadism

Trump: Why wouldn't we? Theresa May: I would!

Sharia muslim London mayor voted in by his islamist friends

Sharia muslim London mayor voted in by his islamist friends

Theresa May is for sharia and EU - but against EU's Human Rights Court which condemns sharia

Muslims and Hillary against Human Rights

Muslims and Hillary against Human Rights

OIC and NOI are muslim extremist organizations

Origin of islam and an ignorant white Western nun

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo have sharia islam in common

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo have sharia islam in common

God is an escape route from Human Rights

First sophisticated art by the first truly modern humans

The world's oldest real portrait ever found (Central Europe). Carvings dated to 26-29,000 bp.

Finland's lion trampling the islamic scimitar 1583

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Origin of the Vikings

A victim of rapetivism - and an interfaith messenger of rapetivism

A victim of rapetivism - and an interfaith messenger of rapetivism

Japan 10 yrs ahead of Europe in hybrid/fuelcell cars, space tech etc

Native Brits from Doggerland spoke a proto-Finnish/Uralic (Eurasiatic) language

We non-muslims need to honor racist islam's victims - cause muslims won't

We non-muslims need to honor racist islam's victims - cause muslims won't
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-f4ihemJ34G4/T2yuFzSUqiI/AAAAAAAAA_U/FcGmXfvhkCw/s640/Ms+Lucy+Black+racist+4.jpg

The islamic extermination of Jews

Modern humans originated in Siberia

Klevius: Why are women accomplices to their own apartheid?

The last taboo: Sex segregation/sex apartheid

Klevius is probably now the world's foremost expert on sex segregation (sad, isn't it) and islam (the worst hate crime ever) is the foremost expression of sex segregation. By 'islam' Klevius means Sharia as described by Bill Warner and the Saudi based and steered muslim world organization OIC and its Cairo declaration (sharia) imposed on all muslims via UN (meaning basic Human Rights are criminalized).

Burn OIC's islamic anti-Human Rights declaration!

Tuesday, July 31, 2007

The evilness of Islam: Educational Islamofascism in Egypt

Two "brilliant" students at the French Lycee school of Alexandria, Mario Medhat Ramses, 11, and Andrew Medhat Ramses, 13, refused to pass an Islamic exam because that would have meant conversion to Islam.

According to Sam Grace (Koptic News) Egypt's ministry of education ordered the boys to take the test that would result in their conversion to Islam because their father, Medhat Ramses, who left the family some five years ago, apparently had been forced to convert from Christianity to Islam to be able to marry a Muslim woman (who, according to Klevius "rapetivism" analysis, was doomed under Sharia threat to become a Muslim forever before she was even born!). The opinion of the boys' mother Camellia Medhat, of course, doesn't count in Islam.

However, the Islamic law that has been adopted by the civil government in Egypt, anyway stipulates that children follow the faith of any parent who converts to Islam, "since Islam is the superior religion that abrogated all other religions".

Thursday, July 26, 2007

How come that the world tolerates Islamic apostasy ban while bothering abt "Islamophobia"?!

Ali Goma'a, the mufti of Egypt: "What I actually said is that Islam prohibits a Muslim from changing his religion and that apostasy is a crime, which must be punished"

Mustafa Al Chaka of the Islamic Research Centre: "He cannot deny punishment in this life for the apostate".

Klevius comment: Islam's apostasy ban is just one example of its inborn evilness from its birth as a blueprint for slavery/rapetivism! Cure your ignorance abt Islam and read, for example, the horror story on How the Vikings emerged to power by selling slav(e) girls to Islam!
EVERYONE WHO UNCRITICALLY DEFENDS/SUPPORTS ISLAM HAS BLOOD ON HER/HIS FINGERS!

Klevius caution: Don't confuse Islam with ethnicity!
´

Ralph Peters: "The utter failure of Islamic civilization between Morocco and Pakistan. The Islamic world's values, traditions, structures and practices are thoroughly uncompetitive in the 21st century (and already were in the last century). All that they hold dear holds them back. Islamists and their sympathizers are humiliated by their self-wrought failures, angry at our success, sick with jealousy, and desperately in need of a hot date. The greater Middle East is one vast psycho-ward. And no, I'm not being flippant or exaggerating--the region's Muslim societies are mentally and morally diseased.

Hatred is satisfying. Revenge (even against the innocent) is gratifying. And death is a release from the miseries of a failed existence. As a result--as I've remarked over the years--we face ruthless killers who regard death as a promotion. But, of course, our leaders assure us that religion has nothing to do with any of this.

Obama's proposal to attack Pakistan is a classic example of the fateful mix of hubris and naivety on Capitol Hill. Mr. Obama has yet to supply any details, so let me help him out: Sure, we can invade Pakistan. Of course, we'll need a draft to round up enough troops. And we'll have to kill, as a minimum, a few hundred thousand Pathan tribesmen and their families, and we'll have to remain as an occupier for many years. Oh, and Pakistan's got nuclear weapons and it's already torn by civil strife."

Tuesday, July 24, 2007

The extreme stupidity/deliberate bias of Islamic "science"

Mohd Zaidi Ismail (a Malaysian Islamist "scientist"): "What is wrong, is when natural sciences – particularly physics – is taken to be the model, the prototype, or the benchmark, of true knowledge and science"

Klevius comment: So what else could it possibly be?! Mohd Zaidi Ismail's private Allah?! The benchmark of true science is that it's, unlike racist/sexist and totalitarian dogms, open for scrutinity, i.e. that it constitutes an open discourse language accessible for everyone incl. Mohd Zaidi Ismail! But he isn't talking abt science at all but trying to confuse the reader by tendentiously mixing human subjectivity involved in the pre-arrangements and post-arrangements of the scientific process, i.e. what isn't science, with science! It's not hard to trace some deep envy and cheap political rhetoric behind his confused babbling.

"...according to many authoritative (sic) scholars and metaphysicians, is the world known theologically as barzakh (life after death). Therefore, in order to ensure that the sciences – natural sciences included – as developed by Muslims are Islamic, it is important that they be conceived of, and caused to unfold in line with, the worldview of Islam and its attendant system of knowledge. This framework, if rightly imbued and disseminated through proper education, can determine a totally different orientation for the development of science in Muslim societies."

Klevius comment: Indeed! Reminds me of Lysenko. How ignorant and deliberately misleading can a human be? Mohd Zaidi Ismail certainly belongs to the top in such a league. Also reminds me of the pathetic Indonesian Muslim crypto-creationist "scientist" Teuku Jakob who stole, damaged and (obviously deliberately) misinterpreted Homo Floresiensis to make it a better fit for Islamic "science".

After all, what, for some people is confused as Islamic science (what a tautology) is robbed/copied all the way from the leftovers of the Islamic destruction of Sassanid and other highly developed cultures to Western technology and Internet etc (also see Shinto, the world's oldest religion meets Islam the world's youngest "religion").

Friday, July 20, 2007

"Moderate Islam Is No Islam!" and an unreachable idea of God is no God!

Amil Imani: "Moderate Islam Is No Islam! Many people have asked me why I have put my life in harm's way by tangling with Islam and why I do what I do. Born in a Muslim family and having witnessed first-hand the horrors and indignity that Islamofascism visits on people it subjugates, I have taken it upon myself to do my part in defeating this ideology of oppression, hate and violence. Islam is wrapped in deception as a spiritual dogma or religion and is more dangerous than Nazism, Communism and Fascism."


Klevius comment: Sadly, however, Amil Imami, like so many others, in vain keeps reaching for the unreachable*! Why? The answer, I would suggest, is the very same "virus" that makes Islamofascism possible in a world that pretends to adhere to the idea of human rights while still upholding sex segregation. This stupid/confused idea means that females can/should be stripped off their freedom and confined to a mysterious "femininity" or "gender" (see From Klevius without love) or simply be (ab)used for rapetivism (e.g. as reproducers of Islam). Furthermore, this is accompanied by the tautological idea that one may justify one's way of life via a religion based on a "god" one can't know anything about!

see Klevius definition of religion and KLEVUX the only possible "religion" of the future! In short it stands for the secular human rights idea of the individual's "bubble of freedom" (negative human rights)

* due to a comment from an observant reader the following distinction may be needed: Whereas Islam's "god" is by (political) purpose made unreachable Amil Imani's god is only "unfathomable", i.e. what in Klevius definition of religion is termed "uncertainty" based on the fact that our ethnocentrism forever dooms us not to be allmighty seers, i.e. we are "god's" opposite. However, this logic also terminates Amil Imani's "religious god". Although this may sound "presumptious" it is, in fact, based on the very opposite, namely harsh self-criticism. In Demand for Resources (1992, see e.g. page 38) I propose that self-criticism (the ultimate scientific methodology) and humbleness are synonymous and do not need/cannot be anchored outside the realm of being human. In conclusion one may argue that although Amil Imani's religion is a much lesser threat than Islam, its main danger lies precisely in its "god"-bridging of evil and totalitarian racist/sexist Islam via "religion". Just in the same way as the prevailing remnants of our "Western" sex segregation invite evil and sexist Islamic Sharia sex segregation, sometimes ironically even motivated by the "protection" of women who are already protected by universal human rights (rapes in the Muslim umma are extremely common from Darfur to suburbs in the West).


Warner MacKenzie (Global Politician): "It’s evident that a two pronged pincer manoeuvre is well under way, with one faction of Islam softening us up by threatening to blast and terrorise us into submission, and the “good-cop” wing, represented by the various national Islamic councils and other Muslim interest groups, who are “grooming” us with assurances that, by dealing with them, we can avoid all the unpleasantness and bloodshed by acquiescing and “going along quietly”. Option “B” is merely option “A” by stealth, with a sugar coating; both lead to an identical outcome; and that is an influence on our way of life disproportionate to their numbers. Our governments have warmed to the sweeter, soft option without realizing it is merely the other side of the jihadi coin. Rather than recognising and confronting this insidious and incremental erosion of our culture, our leaders have decided that it’s easier to retreat a yard than advance an inch.Recently, a British survey found that : “According to a poll of 1,003 Muslims, 37 per cent of 16- to-24-year-olds said they would prefer to live under Sharia law, the same number of young Muslims said they would prefer to send their children to Islamic state schools while 74 per cent said they preferred Muslim women to wear the hijab headscarf in public and a small overall minority, (7 per cent,) said they "admire organisations like Al Qaeda that are prepared to fight the West".The European Union and U.K. Prime Minister Gordon Brown, in a pathetic and obvious concession to the Muslim community, declared that the words “Islam, Islamic and Muslim” must not, under any circumstances, be used in conjunction with any mention of terrorism.The familiar modus operandi of strike¯withdraw¯regroup¯p au se¯ strike again, is a feature of the time honoured Middle-Eastern stratagem of deceptive triangulation. Analogous to the story of the “slowly boiled frog”— which is unable to detect the gradual increase in water temperature—the West, in a very short period of time, has been lulled, beguiled and manipulated into a position of passive acceptance. Reports of terrorist acts no longer surprise us and the hypocrisy of “lowered expectations” toward Islam and Muslims c au ses us to accept absurdity and irrationality from them. We’re like rabbits mesmerized in their headlights and all we can offer up is the plaintive whine “why do they hate us”They hate us bec au se we are their antithesis. Everything about us reminds them of their failings and shortcomings"


Amil Imani: Many non-Muslims are obviously very well-meaning with regard to Islam, but they are also extremely naïve and ignorant of the facts. They seem to think that Islam is just another religion of love and peace and Muslims should be given full freedom to practice their religion. Do they also believe that thieves, misogynists, rapists, child-molesters and any and all manner of practicing evils should be given complete carte blanche to carry on with what they value and believe? These well-meaning poeple are just as deluded as the fanatic jihadists by refusing to acknowledge the fact that one cannot be a Muslim and not abide by the dictates of the Quran. There is no such thing as moderate Islam. There is no such thing as secular Islam or a secular Muslim. It's the nature of the faith to deny any separation of religion and the state or religion and society. There are numerous sects within Islam. One and all are extremes and not in the least amenable to change. Keep in mind that Islam claims that it is the perfect eternal faith for mankind. Splits have occurred and will continue to occur in Islam. Yet, reformation has not happened in nearly 1400 years and is not going to happen. Islam is carved in granite, just the way it is. No change. Allah's book is sealed.
There are indeed some Muslims who are moderate in the way they practice their religion. These people, for the most part, are culturally Muslims. They don't practice Islam the way it is mandated. They pick and choose. Therefore, "moderate Islam," is no Islam at all. It is not possible.

Sunday, July 08, 2007

Islamist Pakistan built on the graves of the victims of Islam's genocide/slavery/rapetivism

Islam killed, enslaved and raped the entire Indus valley early on. Just like elsewhere Islam combined militant terror with slave trade. And by using the surplus of slavery and rapetivism it connected the ruling class with itself while the less worthy in the destroyed society paid the price. Cure your ignorance by reading Origin of Islam!

Today Islam is still active in Pakistan and recruiting madrassa students - brainwashed by Koranic racism/sexism - to carry out terrorist activities and spread their confused hatred and Sharia sex segregation in Pakistan and around the world!