Arabic Koran-Islam's rape hell: "Koran (the manual for plunder, rape and murder)"
Robert Spencer: Mohammad's rape jihad (still going on from Darfur to Western cities).
Osama bin Laden did a great mistake. For the first time in history he shed light into the dark cave where he & true Islamic "civilization"(brief/concise history lesson by Klevius) resided! Although many have choosen to blink the shocking truth, the inevitable conclusion will be that Islam is doomed to total defeat precisely on those grounds that made it popular in the first place! There seems to be a straight (and perhaps not at all surprising) link between the cruel "infidel" contempt/hatred preached in Koran, and the attitudes among many Muslims. What launched my curiosity was a very trivial experience on the street. I drove my car and saw a family almost approaching a crossing. Just to be kind I stopped although I could have passed without danger. When the young boy in the Muslim family realized that he didn't have to wait until I'd passed, he looked at me with stunning contempt (I was surprised and I'd never seen him before and the place was new for me) and begun walking utterly slowly and with a supercilious and arrogant attitude I'd never seen before in a child! My first reaction was to approach him through the window and ask why he gazed so angry at me, but when I saw the older youngsters in the family I realized that wasn't probably the best move. However, the picture really screamed out that this extreme behavior was learnt/reinforced at home (mosques, Koran schools etc), only he didn't hide it as did the rest of the family. OK, I realized, that's how the Koranic "infidel" contempt/hatred is effectively passed to the next generation via hypocritical (and psychologically child abusing) parents. From that picture there was only a small step to understanding how suicide killers and street rapists etc are purportedly made. This picture (plus what else I saw when I'd learnt to see) also learnt me that it's a lie to argue that the Koranic "infidel" contempt/hatred belongs to a distant past and could be interpreted away. No way!
Wanna get rid of terror? OK, get rid of Islam! Honestly by differing between Islam and your REAL ethnicity, or just cowardly/naively by becoming a "Muslim Refusnik". But in the latter case, remember you're still sharing reading habits with Osama! Also remember that most people advocating: "Islam's OK but it's hijacked!" use to hang in puppet wires leading, if not to Mecca, so at least to Arabic oil-for-Islam money pockets! Albeit sometimes the wires may be hard to see. Look carefully!
Is the main idea/ideology in pan-Arabic Koran Islam the worst (1400 years of slavery, rape/institutionalized rape, murder and "dhimmitude") crime ever against humanity? I for one know no competitor to Arabic Islam in this respect! The info is there on the net, in libraries etc. Why don't you pick it up?
If ever an ideology of conquest may be blamed, it's certainly pan-Arabic Islam. Its initial as well as later conquests were made possible exactly due to the key concepts in Arabic Koran. Focusing on "nice Islam" is like focusing on Hitler's moustache (luckily Hitler realized the enormous fascist potential in Islam only too late!)!
Was National-socialism hijacked by the Germans? That someone should have "hijacked" Islam is the worst of misconceptions. No, it's innocent humans (mostly children and youth) who are hijacked/abused (via Koran teaching, mosques, youth organizations etc) by the racist/sexist totaltarian militaristic ideology of pan-Arabic Koran Islam! And when should those responsible be punished/apologize (You probably already know that no one is in charge for what Islam causes. That's part of its inborn strategic evilness)? But who cares abt the "forgotten suffering" (P. Klevius 1992) of Islam's victims through 1400 years until today's Sudan etc? And we always hear the same: It has nothing to do with Islam! Really?!
The real problem isn't radical Islam, it's "moderate" Islam and its naive (or greedy) supporters who have paved the way for an Islamic totalitarian fascist/sexist.cultural HIV!
A historical parallel from the delivery room
Predating our knowledge abt germs and viruses, dangerous contaminations used to be common in medical care. When, due to new technologies, industrialization etc, and medical institutions became common, the delivery rooms surprisingly turned into death traps, compared to deliveries at home. This happened roughly through two stages: 1) statistically a hospital contains more dangerous germs and viruses than at home. As a consequence the nurses/midwives were more likely to contaminate. 2) Because of the casualties caused by nurses' (unknown) contamination, physicians were asked to participate at the crucial moment. But they were even more likely to contaminate (pockets full of unclean scalpels etc)!
Islam & integration - a tautology!
Although it's Arabic Islam that constitutes the main obstacle against integreation, we too often hear the opposite from the media and politicians, i.e. that it's Muslims who are excluded becaus of racism. Yes, Islamic racism!
Isn't it a tragic irony that Eurabia now offers money and support to that very same Islam that has assisted in the cultural (and economic - compare Arab/Islamic countries in general) confinement of its street terrorizing youth! The difference in the outcome of, for example, Shinto (with superior tech, art, litterature, music etc) and Islam is no co-incidence. And neither is the economic and technical backwardness of Islam-Arabic countries, compared to the "West" (by "West" I mean all technologically* progressive nations/areas incl., for example, South Africa since 1999, and other African and other areas capable of standing on their own).
* The simple fact that technology is the basis for ALL economies (incl. oil-sponging economies), is often overlooked by idealist etc! Also see P. Klevius' Demand for resources - on the right to be poor (1992)!
Islam, seen as an "ethnic seal" due to its concept of "infidels" (i.e. our ethnicity is better than theirs), constitutes the main obstacle for real integration (not assimilation, which is an impossible concept - two people can't meet and discuss openly without also altering each other, no matter how little! See e.g. Inside Klevius mind!). Hence, by promoting Islam, the process of mutual integration is effectively stopped thus giving space for mutual racism and even contempt (Islam IS contempt against the "others", the non-Muslims)! Do young (and older) Islamists really know Islam, and do we (all) really want a Eurabia? Why boost racist/sexist totalitarian pan-Arabism?
The Islamic "civilization's" suicide formula, in fact, equals its non-integration formula
Lack of attachment (see below) and social confusion, combined with Koran reading/teaching ("infidel" hatred/contempt), are the means used to psychologically abuse a human being for the purpose of killing others and/or spreading Arabic Islamic contempt and sexism, instead of integration.
Saudi funded Islamists infiltrating universities and "helping" youngsters
Just like e..g. Hamas use to throw bombs with one hand and charity with the other, so do "peaceful" Islamists (called young Muslims in he news) use to "calm down" the situation (which was initially organized/agitated by them or their pals) while showing a "nice" face of Islam (remember Hitler's moustache)
"...police now believe that the entire uprising has central control via the Internet and cell phones. However, even the Telegraph waits until the penultimate paragraph to inform its readers that the suspected organizers of the riots are comprised of Islamist militants and drug dealers ... quite a different picture than what the media has painted for the last week, of a spontaneous protest based solely on economics. The New York Times still completely avoids the "M" and "I" words in its report"
Lee Kaplan: "80% of the mortgages on mosques in the US are paid for by the Wahhabist Saudis.
Over the last 30 years the Saudi Royal Family has contributed upwards of 70 billion US dollars to infiltrate worldwide institutions with propaganda against the West and Israel. This sum, it has been observed, makes the one billion dollars per annum spent by the Soviet Union during the Cold War for Communist propaganda pale by comparison.  The Saudis see donations to our universities as a way of promoting their political and religious propaganda. To quote their English language daily, Ain Al Yaqueen: "The kingdom of Saudi Arabia, under the custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, King Fahd Ibn Abdul Aziz has positively shouldered responsibility and played a promising role in order to raise the banner of Islam all over the globe and raise the Islamic call either inside or outside the kingdom." The new head of Middle East Studies at UC Santa Barbara, Stephen Humphreys, holds a chair named after Aziz himself. The head of the Muslim American Society , W. Deen Muhammed, has stated that Saudi gifts require the receiver to prefer the Saudi "school of thought." While Humphreys denies there are strings attached, one wonders how likely a thesis on Saudi misogyny or their educational system teaching hatred of Americans, Jews and Christians would go over in Saudi funded departments if someone hoped to advance or be tenured"
Gordon Cucullu: "The Saudi infiltration of American Islam has been as frighteningly quiet as it has been pervasive. Virtually every imam at an American mosque is a Wahhabi – Saudi trained, funded, and vetted – a religious leader who promotes a virulent brand of fundamentalist Islam with the ultimate aim of imposing Shari’a law upon the non-Moslem world."
It's Peter Klevius against the Islamic "civilization"** and one billion, sorry, 0,5 billion "Muslim Refusniks", and one billion, sorry, 0,5 bllion supporters! OK it's not fair. My only defense is that I'm at least not kicking a person but an (sexist/racist/totalitarian - according to its party programme) ideology!
** To my understanding a "civilization" which sole and main purpose is to (re)produce more of its own followers (through oil-money, slavery, slave-harems, rapes and/or institutionalized rapes/confined mothers/Koran teachers, i.e. Islam has been the world's foremost girl/woman abuser during 1400 years!) doesn't meet the criterion for a real civilization, which also includes technologies and production.:
Peter Klevius sites/blogs are the only ones addressingthe combination of sex segregation and lack of attachment (Angels of Antichrist and Pathological Symbiosis as the key underlying issue! Also see From Freud to bin Laden! For a deeper, philosophical background see Peter Klevius boook Demand for Resources (1992).
Update Nov 11, 2005:
"As for the relationship of Islam to other cultures, the Koran is very clear. People of other cultures are to be forcibly converted to Islam—under threat of death—except for a few whose existence may be tolerated so long as they accept the status of "dhimmi," second-class citizens who dutifully accept a whole series of restrictions lest they offend the sensibilities of Muslims"
Muslim children/youngsters' rapes etc got EVERYTHING to do with Islam and with contempt against the "infidels" (in Koran) inherited from an older generation of Muslims (at home, in mosques, Koran schools etc)!
"The number of rapes committed by Muslim immigrants in Western nations are so extremely high that it is difficult to view them only as random acts of individuals. It resembles warfare. This happens in most Western European countries, as well as in other infidels countries such as India. In Bradford, England, Channel 4 pulled a documentary about Pakistani and other Muslim men sexually abusing white English girls, some as young as 11. Writer Theodore Dalrymple thinks that "thanks to their cultural inheritance, (Muslim) abuse of women is systematic rather than unsystematic as it is with the whites and blacks."