Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo

God is an escape route from Human Rights

First sophisticated art by the first truly modern humans

Oldest real portrait ever found (>29,000BP Central Europe, dated by the latest space technology)

Finland's lion tramping the islamic scimitar 1583

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Origin of the Vikings

Two slavs and one ex-muslim kick islam in its groin

A victim of rapetivism - and an interfaith messenger of rapetivism

A victim of rapetivism - and an interfaith messenger of rapetivism

Native Brits from Doggerland spoke a proto-Finnish/Uralic language

We non-muslims need to honor racist islam's victims - cause muslims won't

We non-muslims need to honor racist islam's victims - cause muslims won't
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-f4ihemJ34G4/T2yuFzSUqiI/AAAAAAAAA_U/FcGmXfvhkCw/s640/Ms+Lucy+Black+racist+4.jpg

The islamic extermination of Jews

Modern humans originated in Siberia

Alwaleed bin Talal, a rape accused muslim who's never worked & spends oil Billions on sexist Sharia

Alwaleed bin Talal, a rape accused muslim who's never worked & spends oil Billions on sexist Sharia
Klevius is probably now the world's foremost expert on sex segregation, and islam (the worst cime ever) is the foremost expression of sex segregation. By 'islam' Klevius means Sharia as described by Bill Warner.

Burn OIC's islamic anti-Human Rights declaration!

Sunday, July 27, 2014

Klevius (the world's foremost bias hunter): Always run like Always run their business - not like a girl!


Always run like Always




To understand the theoretical background to this - please, do keep reading and informing about Klevius sex tutorials!


Always question: Why can't 'run like a girl' also mean winning the race?

Klevius answer: Because of sex segregation, stupid!

Klevius question: How do you put Always in place 'like a girl'?

Why would you try to run like a girl or a woman or a man or a horse anyway - why not like a human? Compete in a women's race but do not run 'like a woman'! Running 'like a woman' is always history (sorry about that) and might limit your potential!


The world's fastest woman ever, Flo-Jo (1988) had only one flaw: Because of sex segregation she let her long hair out - and lost a couple of 1/10s.








The best running woman ever didn't run like a girl


Here's the world's fastest 400m woman ever (47.6), Marita Koch in 1985. She also run 200m in 21.71, i.e. almost half a second faster than Carmelita Jeter 2009, and 100m in 10.71. That makes her the world's best running woman ever.

Taken from Klevius 2004 web page Heroic Women and some Tiny Men



Friday, July 25, 2014

BBC calls the muslim "infidel" hating tradition the 'holy Ramadan' - but never the 'holy Christmas', ''holy Midwinter, 'holy Eastern', 'holy Midsummer' etc!


Ramadan is a pagan tradition that was taken over by islam and made an "infidel" hating feast.

Ramadan is an especially popular time for jihad killing of "infidels" and parasiting on slaves. Btw, the word 'slave' comes from 'Slav' because of the great number of Slavic slaves.


Thursday, July 24, 2014

Fly Qatar to Sharia


 When will Cameron & Co address Saudi Arabia and Qatar?

 


Most of passenger planes that have been bombed or shot down have been targeted by muslims supported by Saudi Arabia and Qatar!



Air Algerie flight AH5017 came down in an area occupied by muslim jihadists (supported by Qatar) almost an hour after it had taken off which means it had reached an altitude well above any sandstorm. Moreover, it's said that the plane debris and bodies were badly burnt, indicating the burning happened in the air.


Tuesday, July 22, 2014

Which one is weirder, Klevius (the main world critic of sex segregation/apartheid*) or sex apartheid?


* Admittedly Klevius seems also still to be the only one addressing the core issue of this monumental world problem. However, this fact is no more surprising than the fact that we live in a world where every girl has to assign herself to long hair, make up, "feminine" clothing etc cultural "femininity". And if she doesn't then she has to excuse herself by labeling herself a lesbian, a transexual etc or be labeled by others as "suffering" from the invented mental pathology of "gender dysphoria".


What is sex segregation - and what is it not?


According to soft brained Wikipedia: Sex segregation is the physical, legal, and cultural separation of people according to their biological sex. This is distinct from gender segregation, which is the separation of people according to social constructions of what it means to be male versus female.

According to hard brained Klevius: Sex segregation is the physical, legal (e.g. Sharia), and cultural separation of girls/women from boys/men according to social constructions of what it means to be male versus female.

Gender segregation is an impossible term in this context because the separation of people according to social constructions of what it means to be male versus female resides inside the brain not outside the body and can therefore not be called segregation. Segregation is the action or state of setting someone apart from other people or being set apart. In other words, segregation can only be imposed on you from outside with or without your consent. You cannot segregate yourself. Moreover, segregation implies a collective, not individual, action.



According to Carmen Hamilton (apparently a soft brained lawyer):  We’re born as either male or female and, generally, are raised to look and act as our society expects men and women to look and act (sic).

If a radical (sic) approach to eliminate gender segregation were adopted, we would see the complete eradication of gender segregation in all aspects of life. There would no longer be men’s and women’s washrooms, sports, or communal change rooms.

Still, a move to eradicate systemic gender segregation, would inevitably have fallout that would need to be addressed. There are legitimate safety concerns behind some gender segregation. Physical and sexual violence suffered by women at the hands of men continues to be a sad reality. It is difficult to see how women prisoners will be adequately protected if sex segregation is eliminated in prisons.

It also begs the question about whether we can eliminate sex segregation when we have not yet achieved gender equality (sic). Would such a movement nullify the gains fought for by feminists over the last century? There was a time when it was seen as a huge win for women in trades when employers were required to provide separate washrooms for women. Further, we cannot ignore the physiological differences between men and women that put women at a disadvantage in many sports. We would likely see far fewer female Olympians.

Klevius comment: 'We are generally raised to look and act as our society expects men and women to look and act' is a meaningless tautology because 'generally' and 'our society' both have the same meaning. Moreover, Carmen Hamilton seems to be deeply confused when she uses sex segregation and gender segregation as synonyms. What do your invisible gender thoughts in your brain have to do with physical threats from men? Isn't it your biological sex (or your signaling of a female body) that is visible, not your gender.

And why a 'radical elimination of segregation'? What's that anyway?! What would radical Human Rights mean? Would it mean that there exist some moderate Human Rights according to which just a little torture is ok?!

And why can't we have female prisons, washing rooms etc?  It has nothing to do with sex segregation/apartheid. We have parking spots for disabled people but not for women. And why can't women continue running 100 m separate from men? We don't call other effects of physical sex differences sex segregation either. Carmen Hamilton seems to seriously mix apples and pears on this topic. She represents a dangerous view that blurs women's right to full Human Rights equality.

Carmen Hamilton also asks 'whether we can eliminate sex segregation when we have not yet achieved gender equality'. What a non sense! 'Gender equality' is an oxymoron in many sense but here mainly because sex segregation is the opposite to "gender equality"! In other words a catch 22.

LGBT people have "gender rights" but 11-year old football girls have none (see below).

Klevius' sex tutorial: The problem with main stream* feminism is its "equal but different" separatism

* Folks, there are two main types of 'feminism' out there: One that is academic and based on segregation/separatism/apartheid (e.g. muslim feminism), and one that could be described as folk "feminism", i.e. the erroneous belief that feminism stands for equal rights when it in fact stands for separatism.

'Heterosexual attraction' is the only analytical concept you need - yet no one seems to use it as such except Klevius


The feminist fallacy of the double failure not to recognize heterosexual attraction while simultaneously keeping up sex segregation

Heterosexual attraction is the evolutionary logarithm that underpins heterosexual reproduction.

The only heterosexual human is a heterosexual man. If you don't understand/recognize this simple fact then you, just like feminists, have no say at all in discussions about Human Rights and the adverse effect of sex segregation.

Heterosexual attraction in humans resides in the male brain as the female body. Not the other way round. As a consequence only men can have heterosexual sex.

All men and women are different but equal according to Human Rights. However, according to feminists, only men and women are different from a rights perspective. So when Moi uses some 500 pages to tell us that only women, not men, can have women's experience, we can waive her next deep thought namely that women are different from other women.

Ever thought about why Mideast happened to be the birthplace of the most disgusting of cumber stones on humanity's road to Universal Human Rights (including women)? In Demand for Resources Klevius established the root origin of "general" sex segregation as connected to the transition from hunting/gathering to investment a la the neolithic revolution.

However, pure institutionalized sexism, i.e. sex segregation as apartheid, was born out of particular secondary circumstances and effects of sex segregation in the commerce between the new forms of production. The main birthplace for true sexism was Mideast due to its geographical location.You don't have sex religions in China, Japan etc.

When men traded and therefore travelled around, women became even more segregated than they were in the farming society where they at least had a daily contact over the sex barrier. Combine this development with slavery and defense against slavery and you end up with "the chosen people" whose survival was the institutionalized Vagina gate and whose (im)morality was sanctioned by "God".



Slowing down the process of de-sex segregation at an 'all deliberate speed' while treating sex segregation symptoms with hormones and surgery


'All deliberate speed' was a phrase used in the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Board of Education, which declared the system of legal segregation unconstitutional. However,  the Court ordered only that the states end segregation with ‘all deliberate speed', i.e. to weigh something in the balance.

Grace Kelly Bermudez is the plaintiff in a suit, which alleges Colombia’s military service requirement is discriminatory insofar as it only considers assigned sex — typically determined at birth by the presence of absence of external sex organs — and not gender identity – a 'lived internal and individual experience'.

While the military service requirement only applies to men, there is currently no statute governing cases of transsexuals who were assigned a restricting sex at birth and due to sex segregation weren't allowed to lead their lives as they wished.

Gender, as opposed to sex, is a “lived internal and individual experience,” according to an amicus brief filed on Bermudez’s behalf.

Trans persons’ ability to 'construct their gender in a determining fashion' is an implicit part of their “individual autonomy as human beings', an interpretation the Constitutional Court agreed with, argues the brief, when it ruled that all Colombians have the right to 'freely' define their 'association with any particular gender, as well as romantic orientation toward others.'

As a consequence it is argued that the current military exemption practice violates Bermudez’s 'right to gender identity and all related rights by denying her construction of identity, leading to the violation of her privacy, personhood, and right to live free of humiliations', reads the brief.

Klevius comment: So wrong! It is sex segregation that denies the construction of an identity that partly or fully falls outside this segregation, leading to the violation of privacy, personhood, and right to live free of humiliations etc. And sex segregation is already dismissed in the 1948 Human Rights declaration. Why not simply stick to Human Rights rather than upholding a ridiculous sex apartheid.


Jeff and Hillary Whittington presented a video showing little Ryland's female-to-male transition




Klevius comment: You can't possibly be born with a 'gender'. The popularity of LGBT rhetorics is largely due to the defense of sex segregation/apartheid. So ironically, LGBT people's fight for the freedom to lead their lives as they wish simultaneously restricts the playroom for non-LGBT girls and women. Again, Klevius simple answer is to empower girls'/women's Human Right to lead their lives without restrictions because of their sex. And if people don't stop bullying them then why not criminalize such bullying as a hate crime. That would in no time make people equally cautious as they are now about saying anything about muslims, wouldn't it.


John D. Inazu, associate professor of law at Washington University School of Law, an expert on the First Amendment freedoms of speech, assembly, and religion: In less than three decades, the Supreme Court has moved from upholding the criminalizing of gay conduct to affirming gay marriage. The tone of the debates has also shifted. Views on gender and sexual conduct have flip-flopped. Thirty years ago, many people were concerned about gender equality, but few had LGBTQ equality on their radar. Today, if you ask your average 20-year-old whether it is worse for a fraternity to exclude women or for a Christian group to ask gay and lesbian members to refrain from sexual conduct, the responses would be overwhelmingly in one direction.

Luke Brinker (in Bill O'Reilly's Dangerous Parenting Advice For Transgender Kids): O'Reilly has also encouraged parents to actively force their transgender children to conform to gender stereotypes.

Klevius: So it's not a 'gender stereotype' when 'activities and clothing more commonly associated with boys' is enough to deem a girl on a path toward physiological manipulation of her body rather than give her the right to perform these activities without sex apartheid.

Jack Drescher, a member of the APA subcommittee working on the revision of DSM: 'All psychiatric diagnoses occur within a cultural context.

Klevius comment: So when DSM 15 is out, can the male to female trans get their penis back, please?

Homosexuality was diagnosed in the DSM as an illness until 1973, and conditions pertaining to homosexuality were not entirely removed until 1987.
The new term 'gender dysphoria'  implies a temporary mental state rather than an all-encompassing disorder, a change that blurs the picture even more.

Shannon Minter, legal director of the National Center for Lesbian Rights: 'Having a diagnosis is extremely useful in legal advocacy. We rely on it even in employment discrimination cases to explain to courts that a person is not just making some superficial choice ... that this is a very deep-seated condition recognized by the medical community.'

Klevius comment: The only deep-seated condition in this appalling symptom of sex segregation  is the medical community and money.

Mental health professionals who work with trans clients are also pushing for a revised list of symptoms, so that a diagnosis will not apply to people whose distress comes from external prejudice, adults who have transitioned, or children who simply do not meet gender stereotypes.



Why is the sex segregated bullying of girls like Moa Thambert supported when it should, in fact, be classified as a hate crime?!







Parents used to shout 'boy' at me, says now 16-year old Moa Thambert.

Moa Thambert, 16, has always had short hair cut and been tough on the football pitch.

Moa Thambert, 16: It took me hard to be called a boy. Is still in the back of my head. As a child I didn't understand why they wanted to segregate me. But now I understand that it was because I dare to take my place and that I have a certain appearance. It makes me really sad.

When Moa was six she begun playing football and immediately got comments about her "inappropriate" sex appearance. 'It's so sick because there is no difference in how kids look like. One should really be careful not to do so. It strikes very hard.It shouldn't need to be like that.






Pia Sundhage (Sweden's football lady number one and former US coach): It's appalling. In the 1960s I had to pretend to be a boy to be allowed playing in a football team.

Pia Sundhage refers to a recent Swedish football tournament (Fotbollsfesten) for kids where 11-year old girls in Glumslövs FF/Lunds BK were accused of being boys by leaders and parents from Åhus IF.

Åhus IF coaches  were so aggressive and got the whole team with them, says
Jens Lindblom, father of 11-year old Agnes.

The girls cried while the sex abuse continued.


Klevius concluding comment: I've even written a PhD thesis about exactly  this (including in depth interviews with Pia Sundhage and other important female football personalities from the 1940s and on). However. now I want to publish my findings for the general public but hesitate to do so due to the slim interest (or is it just deep ignorance) in this the biggest of global questions. Football/soccer is the sport that seems to best reveal the medieval thinking about sex segregation.

Any hints on how to make the book more popular than this blogging?

And why isn't the whole world reading Klevius?

Anyone?



Some previous reflexions on the topic:

The shameful contamination of British universities with religious fanatism




Guardian:  The University of Leicester has launched an investigation into gender segregation (sic) at a public lecture held by its student Islamic society.

    The talk, entitled Does God Exist?, featured a guest speaker Hamza Tzortzis as part of an Islamic Awareness week. Seating at the event was segregated, with different entrances into the lecture theatre for men and women. . .

    In Leicester, more than 100 students attended the segregated event, which took place last month. A photograph passed to the Guardian shows signs put up in a university building, directing the segregation.

    A message on the group’s website says: “In all our events, [the society] operate a strict policy of segregated seating between males and females.” The statement was removed after the Guardian contacted the society.


Klevius comment: Again this confused and irrational oxymoron 'gender segregation'. The sign on the wall of Leicester University clearly states 'males' and 'females'. It means biological sex, not cultural gender!



Rupert Sutton, from the campus watchdog Student Rights: There is a consistent use of segregation by student of islamic societies across the country. While this may be portrayed as voluntary by those who enforce it, the pressure put on female students to conform and obey these rules that encourage subjugation should not be underestimated.

Klevius: Although islam is by far the worst culprit when it comes to sex apartheid, there is also a consistent low level general use of sex segregation "light" across the world. While this may be portrayed as voluntary by those who enforce it, the pressure put on females (not the least by other females) to conform and obey to sex segregation that encourages subjugation should not be underestimated.





 Leicester University is one of the world's most sexist (i.e. islamized) universities. You may not believe me but the truth is (an other professor witnessed it) that a female professor, Barbara Misztal (an East European immigrant? as BBC uses to put it), when presented with criticism against islam's rejection of women's full Human Rights via Sharia, said "Why don't you want to let women lead their lives as they wish". Yes, you got it right. She saw Sharia restrictions of women's rights as a right! Why hasn't anyone taught her that impositions are not rights, and that Human Rights don't hinder muslim women from choosing to live under these impositions whereas Sharia denies them the choice to freedom. Moreover, she also blamed the messenger for not allowing women to NOT HAVE THEIR FULL RIGHTS!

Barbara Misztal's  female students need to know this, and as usual, it seems that Klevius is the only one daring to really address this ultimate and extremely disastrous and even dangerous sexism.




Sharia sex segregation or Human Rights for girls/women?



In every possible form of Sharia girls/women are forced to lead their lives in sex apartheid of varying degrees. And that includes OIC's all muslims covering Sharia law via UN. But according to Human Rights every girl/woman has the right to decide herself what kind of life she wants to lead - incl. a sex segregated life if she so wishes. So to live in a society where Sharia rules doesn't really give any fair options.

In islam women and non-muslims are all "infidels", and the only thing that really distinguishes a woman as muslim is her "duty" towards islam to reproduce (physically and/or culturally) as many new muslims as possible - and of course to have the Sharia duty to serve as a sex slave for her muslim husband.

Isn't that funny, muslims need a law to get sex while for me such compulsory sex equals rape!


Wednesday, July 16, 2014

Most of the world's Jews descend from Aryan mothers



 Hessy Levinson Taft - an Aryan Jew






A woman whose photograph was chosen by the German National Socialist Workers Party (aka known as "Nazis" by those who want to suppress its socialist roots) to depict the perfect Aryan baby has described how she was selected by Joseph Goebbels himself – despite being Jewish.

What Joseph Goebbels and other Germans did not know back then was that the girl in the picture was really a young Jew named Hessy!

However, what the media (and perhaps even Hessy herself) do not seem to know now is that the she was really an Aryan girl after all.



In 1935 Pauline Levinson took her six-month-old daughter Hessy to a well-known Berlin photographer to have her baby photograph taken.

A few months later, she found her daughter’s picture on the front cover of Sonne ins Hause, a major German family magazine.

Pauline then was terrified that the family would be exposed as Jews so she rushed to the photographer, Hans Ballin who told her he knew the family was Jewish, and that he had deliberately submitted the photograph to a contest to find the most beautiful Aryan baby. “I wanted to make the National Socialists ridiculous”.

Hessy's photograph appeared on widely available German postcards, where she was recognized by an aunt in Memel, Lithuania.

In 1938 Hessy's father was arrested by Gestapo on a tax charge, but acquitted after his accountant, also a member of the National Socialist Workers Party, had given a testimony.



However,

The majority of eastern Jews—and hence of world Jewry— are of Khazar, and not of Semitic origin




Klevius history lesson for ignorant PC people: Khazaria was the biggest Jewish empire that has ever existed. And it's finance was almost entirely based on white sex slave girls. It decayed when the Vikings took over (see Klevius' Origin of the Vikings).

The Khazars constituted one of the the main furnishers of slaves to the muslim market supplying it with captured Slavs and tribesmen from the Eurasian northlands. It was profit from the slave trade that enabled it to maintain a standard army of Khwarezm muslim troops.



Given the strength of the case for even the founders having a European source, the best estimate is to assign ~81% of Ashkenazi lineages to a European source, ~8% to the Near East and ~1% further to the east in Asia, with ~10% remaining ambiguous. Thus more than four-fifths of Ashkenazi maternal lineages have a European ancestry.

Fragments of the Khazar kingdom persisted into the thirteenth century.

Here some voices about the Jewish Khazar slave empire:


“About the time when Charlemagne was crowned Emperor of the West, the eastern confines of Europe between the Caucasus and the Volga were ruled by a Jewish state known as the Khazar Empire. The country of the Khazars, a people of Turkish stock, occupied a strategic position at the vital gateway between the Black Sea and the Caspian.

“Around the time, probably 740 A.D., the Kagan (Hakan), his court and the military ruling class embraced the Jewish faith and Judaism became the state religion of the Khazars . . . It was the Jewish faith which became the official religion of the ruling strata of society. Needless to say, the acceptance of the Jewish faith as the state religion of an ethnically non-Jewish people could be the subject of interesting speculations. We shall, however, confine ourselves to the remark that this official conversion — in defiance of Christian proselytizing by Byzantium, the Muslim influence from the East, and in spite of the political pressure of these two powers—to a religion which had no support from any political power, but was persecuted by nearly all — has come as a surprise to all historians concerned with the Khazars, and cannot be considered as accidental, but must be regarded as a sign of the independent policy pursued by that kingdom.

“... Various late mediaeval Khazar settlements are mentioned in the Crimea, in the Ukraine, in Hungary, Poland and Lithuania. The general picture that emerges from these fragmentary pieces of information is that of a migration of Khazar tribes and communities into those regions of [astern Europe — mainly Russia and Poland — where, at the dawn of the Modern Age, the greatest concentrations of Jews were found.

 Klevius final comment: But the lucrative Jewish sex slave trade with white Slav girls went on for centuries - not the least to Andalusia.

Tuesday, July 15, 2014

Klevius islam tutorial for Malala Yousafzai


Islamic hate is not only abundant in the Koran but more importantly a handy way of covering up racism and sexism as "the will of Allah"

Today we would call it history falsification when Malik, long after the alleged Mohammed's death, made murdering, terrorism, looting, slavery, rapetivism etc a "religion". Hugh Kennedy (professor of Arabic language and Arabic history, especially the early muslim "conquests"): "Before Abd al-Malik (caliph 685-705) Mohammed (dead 632) is never mentioned on any official document whatsoever..."






Malala Yousafzai, the Pakistani schoolgirl who moved to Britain after being shot by the Taliban, vowed she was going to 'speak up for them until they are released'. However, she did not but instead defended the root cause of the abductions and other ideologically defended muslim atrocities.


Malala Yousafzai says the politically right thing: Islam is never evil - what is evil is not islam

Peter Klevius says the politically wrong thing: Islam is always evil - what is not evil isn't islam

Klevius defends his statement by showing that islam is incompatible with basic Human Rights. Can Malala Yousafzai really deny that Human Rights violating OIC (led by the Saudi Wahhabist Iyad Madani on the slave pic above) via its UN representation is the main representative today of the world's muslims?! OIC defends the introduction of Sharia and due criminalization of the most basic of Human Rights - such as for example women's Human Riights.

Malala Yousafzai presents no defense for islam but is herself a tool used by islam to cover up islam's misogyny. Her cherry picking of the Koran stays in sharp contrast to the direct reading the Taliban and other islamofascists use.


Islam is not being 'manipulated by islamic leaders' - islam IS evilness against Human Rights! Those "muslims" who don't participate in jihad against "infidels", "wrong muslims", and Human Rights have nothing to do with islam. Islam is meaningless without jihad and sharia.


An example of a critic who pinpoints some essentials about islam (yet misses rapetivism/sex apartheid) but still seems to think islam is 'manipulated'. However' the only manipulation of islam is when its original formula is denied.

Shenali D Waduge: Muslims the world over must introspect. There were no Americans, US State Department or CIA when the spread of Islam took place violently with the core mission to ‘kill infidels” or non-believers. Islam via sword cut across entire continents and destroyed entire civilizations. These natives did not even have time to defend against the attacks. Undeniably, the acts were not in self-defense and the use of sword were inspired by the Quran. It is these factors that raise the existential fears of non-Muslims once more. The fear of history repeating itself prevails when 95% of violent conflicts around the world involve Muslims even if these conflicts are mischievously ignited by Western Christian countries. These conflicts are drawn using Koranic verses by numerous Islamic groups.

...

Whatever context the verses are being argued on the claim that Islam is ‘misunderstood’ the fact is that there are verses that call for action against non-Muslims while ideological differences have enabled external factors to pit Muslims against Muslims.

There are over 100 verses that call Muslims to war with non-believers for the sake of Islamic rule. Some of these commands are graphic calling to chop off heads and fingers and kill non-believers wherever they are hiding. Quran (8:12) – I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them”  There is nothing defensive about these calls – Muslims were not attacked by the Buddhist priests of Nalanda when they burnt to cinders the world’s first Buddhist learning center and library. Muslims were not attacked when they travelled to Maldives and beheaded all Buddhist monks and destroyed all Buddhist artifacts in their belief of iconoclasm and declared Maldives as Islamic. Muslims were not attacked when they raised all Hindu architecture built by Hindu emperors in India.

Over a period of 800 years, millions of Hindus were slaughtered by Muslims as infidels or converted by the sword.There are scores of other examples as well to depict that there was no excuse for the manner Muslims drawing Islam killed unarmed civilians and completely destroyed ancient civilizations. Islam destroyed inventions of others but have shown little of creativity themselves.

What has to be said is that Muslims are drawn to violence not because they are bad people but the bad ideology that engulfs them and it is on the basis of these that non-Muslims are appealing for the scrutiny of madrassas where Islamic leaders are able to play mischief with the minds of Muslim children indoctrinating them by using verses of hatred. This is where non-Muslim governments have failed to realize and take action upon.

Klevius comment: I've always been fascinated with human self deception. How come that when the only explanation of the rise of islam that fits historical as well as contemporary facts is the very one that ISIS and Saudi Arabia embrace people still try to believe in a less evil fantasy islam?!

Shenali D Waduge: Let us take Quran (2:191-193) – And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief] is worse than killing…but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful.   And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone.  But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)” . There is nothing defensive in this passage too even in the historical context as Muslims had relocated to Medina. The verse is actually drawing Muslims to drive Meccans out of their own city – which they eventually did.

Madrassas and Muslim leaders can easily manipulate Muslims through Quran (2:216) – Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not.”  The verse establishes that violence can be virtuous (again negating the oft quoted excuse of self-defense).

Muslims who do not wish to be part of violence are also ridiculed. Quran (4:95) – Not equal are those believers who sit (at home) and receive no hurt, and those who strive and fight in the cause of Allah with their goods and their persons. Allah hath granted a grade higher to those who strive and fight with their goods and persons than to those who sit (at home). Unto all (in Faith) Hath Allah promised good: But those who strive and fight Hath He distinguished above those who sit (at home) by a special reward,-” They are told that they are less worthy in Allah’s eyes.

That non-believers had little choice but to convert to Islam and pay tax is revealed in Quran (9:5) – So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them.”

This clearly reveals the context of present day fears of non-Muslims knowing that when Muslims have power, if Muslim leaders use the violent verses of Koran they would not hesitate to convert or kill those who do not convert to Islam – peaceful Muslims have no say and no power to overrule this reality. With the number of Islamic factions rising, the number of Islamic groups calling for various jihads the looming dangers are great made worse by the West manipulating these leaders for their own agendas.

Quran (9:73) – O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination.”  dehumanizes those who reject Islam and shows how Muslims can be easily led to show disregard for non-Muslims.

 Armed Muslims groups are all described as Islamists because they are using Islamic verses. Every killing of non-Muslims follows instructions taken from the Koran (whatever context it is read in). Since 9/11 there are said to have been over 20,000 acts of deadly Islamic terrorism.

Elements that define hate speech include drawing a moral distinction between one’s own identity group and those outside it. Devaluating and dehumanizing other groups drawing superiority of one’s own. Advocating different standards of treatment clearly established in categorizing believers and non-believers and thus calling to violence against them. 61% of the Quran s about non-Muslims 98:6. Non-believers are even compared to vile animals. Verse 7:176 compares unbelievers to panting dogs” with regard to their idiocy and worthlessness.  Verse 7:179 says they are like cattle” only worse. It is these verses that enable Islamic groups to call for jihads against non-believers. We can’t be faulted for claiming that Quran is about brotherhood of believers (49:10). We wonder what Minister Vasudeva Nanayakkara has to say about the verses that incite hate?

 Nowhere in the Quran does it say that Allah loves non-believers of Muhammad. However there are over 400 verses giving the torment for people of other religions. Moreover, in today’s context of affairs the 9 places in the Quran where believers are warned not to befriend non-Muslims can be easily seen in the manner Muslim children are not encouraged to even play with non-Muslims. O ye who believe! Take not for friends unbelievers rather than believers: Do ye wish to offer Allah an open proof against yourselves? (4:144).

In the present context of conflicts is it not time to question why Islam is at war with every major religion in the world when none of these religions are at war with each other? Is the reason not found in the Quran itself that shows non-Muslims to be inferior to Islam’s adherents and do Islamic groups and their leaders not draw upon Allah’s hatred for non-Muslims to wage these wars? The moderate Muslims have been totally powerless to control this aspect and have themselves become part and parcel not desiring to be outcasts of their religion. 

Entering the present, we see how far Islam has become easy to manipulate by the West with Osama bin laden himself part of the West’s agenda and continuing through various factions/associated entities of the Al Qaeda. The Muslim world itself is faced with the ISIS who are demolishing mosques and shrines and wonder who are responsible for making Muslims victims of their own faith.

Islam today suffers from within as well as because of external factors. On the one hand there are bizarre fatwas issues upon Muslims. Rashan Hassan Khalil, former dean of Islamic law at al-Azhar University in Cairo, Egypt forbid married couples to be naked in 2006. Saudi Arabia’s highest committee for Scientific research and Islamic law banned Pokmon video games and cards in 2001. Pakistan’s largest Islamist umbrella group, Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal banned immunizing children from polio in 2007 claiming it sterilized Muslims. Parents of 24,000 children refused to give polio vaccine to their children as a result. In the year 2005, an Islamic Organization Jamiat-e-Ulama-e-Hind based in Kolkata issued a fatwa warning ominously that Indian tennis star Sania Mirza would be ‘stopped from playing’ if she did not start wearing ‘proper clothes’.  Sheikh Muhammad Munajid, a former Saudi diplomat pronounced that Mickey Mouse was Satan’s soldier.  The head of the Moroccan Association for Jurisprudence Research” issued a fatwa allowing Muslim men to have sex with their just-deceased wives. The pretext of the ruling is based on nothing in Islam prohibits sex with corpses.  Egypt, Sheikh Amr Sotouhi, head of the Islamic Preaching Committee at al-Azhar, issued a fatwa prohibiting fathers from marrying their daughters to members of the formerly ruling National Democratic Party owing to their corruption.”

 It is not hard to imagine how non-prevalent issues have suddenly emerged giving Muslims a sense of grievance against non-Muslims for not accepting these new culture changes into non-Muslim majority societies. These factors have also become a means to create disharmony by encouraging non-Muslims to react against incursions.

 We can also imagine the mischief Western envoys are upto. On the one hand they would be encouraging the very elements that they know raises reactions by non-Muslims because these elements are perfect for the Western superiority to prevail.

 As examples we can take how hijab/nikab have been encouraged on the one hand while also shown as non-integrators and non-co-existence elements. We have seen how halal has become a mere commercial element for Muslims who have a choice to even eat haram items given the condition they are in. We also see how far incursions are encouraged through Western-partnered Islamic leaders/groups and even politicians for they become perfect ingredients to push other agendas even inside countries of the West too.

 Thus, even Britain is home to Islamic scare stories. The French had been wiser. Before announcing the ban on the face veil its survey estimated that not even 0.1% of Muslims wore the face veil. The French also showed how more Muslims were without the nikab than those wearing it. The French also highlighted the security concerns over ID and testifying in court, drivers license, as well as driving. 

 Essentially, anyone reading the Koran deserves to be told why these verses exist. It is because they exist and are uncontrolled Muslim groups are using these verses to create mayhem and the mayhem is funded by the West for their own corporate geopolitical agendas:

And slay them wherever ye catch them..” (2:191)

 ..But if they turn away, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks.” (4:89).

    Slay the unbelievers wherever you find them(2:191)
    Make war on the infidels living in your neighboorhood (9:123)
    When opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you catch them (9:5)
    Kill the Jews and the Christians if they do not convert to Islam or refuse to pay Jizya tax (9:29)
    Any religion other than Islam is not acceptable (3:85)
    The Jews and the Christians are perverts; fight them (9:30)
    Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticise Islam. (5:33)
    The infidels are unclean; do not let them into a mosque (9:28)
    Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water; melt their skin and bellies
    (22:19)
    Do not hanker for peace with the infidels; behead them when you catch them (47:4)
    The unbelievers are stupid; urge the Muslims to fight them (8:65)
    Muslims must not take the infidels as friends (3:28)
    Terrorise and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Qur’an (8:12)
    Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorise the infidels (8:60)

 Sri Lanka’s President recently declared those who condemn other religions bring disgrace to their own. The examples of the Quran are not to condemn Islam but to showcase that because these verses exist, they are open to interpretations by Islamic groups that are not controlled and end up destroying their own as well as destroying the harmony around the world.

It is no better a time than now to relook at these verses and for Muslim scholars to make a statement on the verses directly attributed against non-Muslims (non-believers) and the calls to destroy or convert them.

Klevius comment: Killing islam for good!

Thursday, July 10, 2014

Origin of islamic parasitism and rapetivism






Raymond Ibrahim: There is little new or original in the videos and communiques from the Islamic State. Just static Islamism.

If one turns to the speeches of other Islamic and jihadi groups around the world – from the African groups such as Boko Haram (Nigeria) and al-Shabaab (Somalia), to Asian groups such as Abu Sayyaf (Philippines) and the Islamic Movement (Uzbekistan) – it’s the same thing, same themes, same scriptures, same quotations, same exhortations, same condemnations. Only their temporal circumstances and vicissitudes of victory or defeat differ.

While the Western mentality, so used to seeing and hearing about the “latest” or “newest” fad, may deem the Islamist approach as static or insipid, it is, quite the contrary, immensely effective for its purposes, and thus dangerous.

Consider: It’s the same exact message – of supremacism, hate, and violence, capped off with divine sanctioning – repeated over and over again, from a myriad of sources and organizations, all of which claim authority.

One can think of few better ways to brainwash and indoctrinate young and impressionable minds – to the point that they eagerly embrace death, including through suicide (AKA “martyrdom operations”).

Nor is this message of jihad, conquest, and death-to-the-infidel, limited to the verbiage that transpires among terrorist organizations; instead, this sort of rhetoric has spread far and wide, thanks to modern technology – including the Internet and social media – and the rich Gulf States, chief among them Saudi Arabia, which have seen to it that the jihadi books and passages being quoted are available to all and sundry.

Indeed, and has been demonstrated repeatedly, such jihadi rhetoric is regularly used in mosques all throughout Europe and America – explaining why an inordinate amount of jihadis in Syria and Iraq, such as Abu Muthana, the aforementioned “Brit,” are in fact from the West.

If the West, in the name of “religious freedom,” is still too fretful to monitor and ban such sermons, in Egypt – a Muslim nation in the heart of the Islamic world – the post Muslim Brotherhood government has come to understand the necessity of outlawing “certain” kinds of rhetoric  from the mosques, specifically those about jihad against infidels and apostates.

The overwhelming majority of attacks on Egypt’s Christian Copts occur on Friday – the one day of the week Muslims congregate in mosques to hear sermons.

Ultimately, however, such a move from Egypt – an Islamic nation – is an indicator of just how problematic unregulated (i.e., jihadi) sermons can be: if “moderate” Muslims are fearful from the repercussions of “radicalized” sermons, shouldn’t we “infidels” be even more wary of them?


Klevius comment: The problem isn't rhetoric but islam! This author seems not to understand that "static islamism" is the very origin of islam whereas PC islam is "new and original". It’s the same exact message – of racist/sexist supremacism, hate, and violence, capped off with divine sanctioning - which made islamic parasitism successful in the first place!

Wednesday, July 09, 2014

Unelected British Cabinet Minister of islamofascism, Sharia supporting Sayeeda Warsi, uses taxes for promoting sectarian violence


When should the British Parliament stop listening to islamofascist Sharia supporters' agitations? Is Human Rights violating Sharia really the will of the Brits?!






A Saudi hard line Sunni islamofascist, Mohammed al-Arifi, accused of stirring up tensions with Shia Muslimsand reportedly calling the sect evil, and even accusing its followers of kidnapping and cooking children, is now linked to the "radicalisation" (i.e. being educated about islam) of young British born muslims who travelled to Syria to fight for muslim terrorist organization ISIS, was last year invited to the 'tackling extremism and islamophobia' conference with British Cabinet Minister of Faith islam Sayeeda Warsi  to address the annual conference of the Federation of Student Islamic Societies (FOSIS) just last year.

Saturday, June 28, 2014

Muslims started World War I - but no one seems to talk much about it. Why?!


 

Servants of Sharia behind World War I


No matter how much you try to blink/whitewash history, the fact remains that islam is the most evil ideology the planet has seen so far




Apart from its basic racist approval of slavery (islam's main source of finance before oil) the evil ideology called islam stands on two basic legs:

1 Rapetivism - sex for jihadist thugs and Sharia reproduction of as many new muslims as possible aided by a one way muslim male muslimhood determination.

2 Parasitism - jihad pillaging/booty and a mafia like system of extortion etc. Pay islam to protect yourself from islam!

In the civilized world we still call such an ideology a violation of Human Rights!

Erdogan (1994): 'I am a servant of sharia'!

Islamofascism supporting BBC pushed forward an islam supporting "researcher" who blames Erdogan's islamofascism on EU's criticism of Turkey's Human Rights violations. But the fact remains that Erdogan has always been an islamofascist, no matter how much willful thinkers try to "moderate" him. And the fact remains that islam/Sharia will always not only blame but also criminalize Human Rights.




BBC's servant of Sharia


Here some other servants of Sharia. The one in the middle (Mishal Husain) employed by BBC and the two others were quite possibly employed by MI5 or MI6.



Muhamed Mehmedbasic would have been the one that started World War I had he not miserably failed


Muhamed Mehmedbasic, an Ottoman muslim, was first in line to murder Franz Ferdinand 1914. However, when he failed then Gavrilo Princip finished the Archduke.

All in all they were at least six terrorists who lined the route.

The islamofascist Ottoman Slave Empire (IOSE) entered World War I on the side of the Central Powers (mainly Germans) and was ultimately defeated. During the war, the empire's Armenians were deported and ultimately an estimated 1,500,000 were exterminated during the Armenian Genocide
Large-scale massacres committed by muslims were also committed against the empire's other minority groups such as the Greeks and Assyrians.
The muslims mass slaughtered the Assyrian population of the Islamofascist Ottoman Slave Empire (IOSI) during the 1890s and the First World War, in conjunction with the Armenian and Greek genocides.

The Assyrian civilian population of upper Mesopotamia (the Tur Abdin region, the Hakkâri, Van, and Siirt provinces of present-day southeastern Turkey, and the Urmia region of northwestern Iran) was forcibly relocated and massacred by the Muslim Ottoman (Turkish) army, together with other armed and allied Muslim peoples, including Kurds, Chechens and Circassians, between 1914 and 1920, with further attacks on unarmed fleeing civilians conducted by local Arab militias.

Estimates on the overall death toll have varied. Providing detailed statistics of the various estimates of the Churches' population after the genocide, David Gaunt accepts the figure of 275,000 deaths as reported at the Treaty of Lausanne and ventures that the death toll would be around 300,000 because of uncounted Assyrian-inhabited areas, leading to the elimination of half of the Assyrian nation.

The Assyrian genocide took place in the same context as the Armenian and Pontic Greek genocides. In these events, close to three million Christians of Syriac, Armenian, or Greek Orthodox denomination were murdered by the Young Turks regime.

In 2007, the International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS) reached a consensus that "the Ottoman campaign against Christian minorities of the Empire between 1914 and 1923 constituted a genocide against Armenians, Assyrians, and Pontian and Anatolian Greeks. The IAGS referred to the work of Gaunt and Travis in passing this resolution. Gregory Stanton, the President of the IAGS in 2007–2008 and the founder of Genocide Watch, endorsed the "repudiation by the world's leading genocide scholars of the Turkish government's ninety-year denial of the Ottoman Empire's genocides against its Christian populations, including Assyrians, Greeks, and Armenians."

The Ottoman Empire began massacring Assyrians alredy long before WWI in the nineteenth century, a time of friendly relations between the Ottomans and the British, who were defending the Ottomans from the Russian Empire's efforts to include under its protection the communities of Ottoman Orthodox Christians.

However, always remember what Klevius has always emphasized, that the WWI was the result of the islamic slave imperium decaying due to the West's abolishment of slavery in the early 19th century.




Sunday, June 22, 2014

Islam's evil history repeats itself exactly according to its evil original formula


Every true muslim is a Human Rights violator




ISIS is Ansar al Islam tuned to Saudi Wahhabism which, in turn, is tuned to the origin of islam - NOT TO ANY "WESTERN INTERVENTION"!


The only "Western intervention" is islam's incompatibility with Human Rights - the very same incompatibility that made OIC officially abandon Human Rights and replaced them with Sharia in UN. I.e. in the very world institution that was  created to defend Human Rights. In practice it means that the most basic of Human Rights are criminalized - just as in the world's most intolerant country, Saudi Arabia. It also means that every true muslim, due to whatever form of Sharia, is a Human Rights violator.

In Iraq Mullah  Krekar founded in 1999 Ansar al Islam organization with Abu Musab al Zarqawi, with whom he had contact since 1994. Through the cell of Abu Musab al Zarqawi in Amman Jordan. Their so called Jordanian millennium attack was scheduled to the 2000 new years eve. Ansar al Islam then developed to a copy of the original Caliphate including the Levant.


The Saudi dictator family plus its allies are the main contributors, both ideologically and financially, to the slaughtering, raping, torturing etc terror now going on. And of course they don't distribute the money with a tag marked the state of Saudi Arabia.

Günter Meyer, Director of the Center for Research into the Arabic World at the University of Mainz. Meyer, has no doubt about where ISIS gets its funding. 'The most important source of ISIS financing to date has been support coming out of the Gulf states, primarily Saudi Arabia but also Qatar, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates.'

However, just like original islam, ISIS utilizes financial possibilities in the wake of their slaughtering conquest. Sex slaves, pillaging and booty are the main incentives for jihadists. Piracy blessed by the Koran and Allah.

Charles Lister at the Brookings Doha Center: 'ISIS has made an effort to establish networks in society that generate a continuing flow of money. One example is the systematic extortion conducted by ISIS in the recently conquered city of Mosul. The exortion affects small businesses and big companies, construction firms, and if the rumors are true, even local government representatives. In addition, it's suspected that the organization levies taxes in the areas that it completely controls - for example Raqqa in northeastern Syria.'

According to Günter Meyer at the University of Mainz, there is no chance that money is flowing to ISIS from Sunni circles connected to the former dictator of Iraq, Saddam Hussein. The goals of ISIS are too different from those of people in Hussein's network. Both groups want to topple the Shiite government of Iraq, but ISIS wants to establish an islamic theocracy, whereas the Sunnis from Hussein's Baath Party want to establish a secular democracy.'


ISIS' looting of the central bank in Mosul, brought them some hakf a Billion $ in cash. Other banks in Mosul and other areas under ISIS control were also plundered.

Eliot Higgins, writing under the pseudonym Moses Brown: 'ISIS can now buy a lot of jihad. With $429 million, ISIS could pay 60,000 fighters $600 a month for a whole year.'


Klevius question to BBC and its muslim Sharia presenter Mishal Husain: Do you see the pattern that exactly resembles how Klevius for more than a decade on the web has described the origin of islam? And if you really need additional support, why not critically read Hugh Kennedy's and others similar (although less articulated) descriptions.




And always remember Hugh Kennedy's words: 

'Before Abdul Malik, Mohammed is never mentioned on any official document
whatsoever, nor any form of religious pronouncement
'!

This is why the Saudis have put meters of concrete on non-existing tombs, early mosques etc. Islam is later modelling of a parasitic Arabic piracy formula "justified" via references to Judaic/Christian writings.


 This is what Klevius wrote after 9/11 on the web:

 The root formula of Islam
Slavery+"infidel" racism+sex segregated rapetivism+anti human rights Sharia/apostasy ban. On behalf of today's and historical victims of Islam (in Darfur and globally), and on behalf of all humans who feel offended by the tenets/acts of Islam. Why isn't the worst crime ever against humanity criminalized, but instead protected by the very human rights it opposes?!* i.e. 1400 years of slavery/rapetivism/genocides
Without these evil racist/sexist/fascist extremist pillars and violent terror threats from so called "unislamic"* and confused morons Islam is dead!

AND ALL OF THEM ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL IN A DEMOCRACY BASED ON UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS! ISN'T THIS EXTREMISM IF ANYTHING?! FREEDOM OF RELIGION CAN'T MEAN PROMOTING DEATH OF FREEDOM!
.
Slavery (forbidden all over the world except in Koran/Islam) - It's well known that Islam allows slavery, although perhaps less well known that Islam emerged out of the very idea of sponging on institutionalized slavery. This is why Saudi islamofascist dictators, imams etc. terrorists and terrorist supporters don't admit that the Koran is completely wrong in a non-totalitarian world, not only because it allows slavery but especially in claiming to be some "god's" unchangeable word hence excluding even the possibility of reformation!
.
"Infidel" racism (forbidden according to the UN declaration on every humans equal value, but a basic tenet of Koran/Islam) - The moral cornerstone needed for taking slaves and abusing others. Today this alluring but evil racism is utilized in a variety of topics from the people of Darfur to the West in particular or general.
.
Rapetivism (globally forbidden because it's not in accordance with the principle that a person's sex shouldn't be used as a regulator of that person's freedom, but a basic tenet in Koran/Islam) - Rigid sex segregation for the purpose of abusing Islam confined girls/women as physical and cultural reproducers of Islam, i.e. as many new Muslims as possible.Sharia (forbidden in a democracy simply because it violates democracy and, like the other Islamic pillars, a bunch of human rights that democracy rests on) - Islam's jurisprudence for sex segregated rapetivism, apostasy ban etc. Ehsan Jami (Dutch ex-muslim): "We have an enormous problem with apostasy in Islam. We see a lot of problems where people want to leave Islam but they can't,"
.
Apostasy ban (forbidden because it limits a person's freedom of or from religion, but a basic tenet in Koran/Islam) - Children (commonly from birth) and adults (commonly via marriage/rape) are forced to become and stay Muslims.
.
These cannot be erased by mere "interpretations" but needs deep reformist castration! And in this sense "majority Muslims" are tightly connected to Islamic extremism, i.e. to Islam itself. And if that's just because of plain ignorance abt Islam they better educate themselves, e.g. in a Koran school true to the Koran and Islam! When coming out they then have two choices: Becoming an "extremist" (open or stealthy) or abandoning the message alltogether!

That Islam (Koran) allows and even encourages psychological and physical wife beating is just one of an abundance of "minor" ripples of the main pillars above. The naivity of Muslim feminism may be exemplified by Asghar Ali: "
...shari'ah also clearly lays down that if a man hides his impotency from his bride at the time of marriage and she discovers it after marriage, she is fully entitled to divorce on that ground. This itself clearly shows that she is entitled to sexual pleasure along with raising family." Rising what family?! The only reason for this rule is to safeguard that no woman fails to reproduce as many Muslims as possible!

The victims of Islam often reveal the same loyalty conflict as allegedly do victims of child abuse. However, some don't.
So why isn't the human rightsphobia we call Islam globally criminalized and indicted, and how come that many a "democracy" seem to care more abt islamofascist terrorists than supporting the war on islamofascist terror?! And why are we supposed to ask islamist imams, professors etc for advice?! It's like asking Goring how to deal with Hitler and his terrorist youth! The likely answer: "Don't question, criticize or mess with us but support us!"


Sunday, June 15, 2014

Sensibel people out there - here's the ultimate proof of how BBC (and its muslim Sharia presenter Mishal Husain) deliberately misinforms you right now in the service of Saudi Arabian islamofascism!

This is how BBC doesn't inform you about the world's most dangerous man - and an ongoing evil repetition of the origin of islam, the worst ideological crime ever against humanity! 'Iyad Madani', the Fuhrer of the world's biggest muslim organization, OIC, gets 216 hits on Google News today. However,


'Iyad Madani BBC' gives no result at all.




And this is while Saudi backed ISIS spread jihad terror over the Levant!


While islam and the Saudis mass murder Shia muslims in Iraq. Will we see "king" Abdullah in the International Criminal Court soon?!

Were most German Nazis moderate Nazis? Like allegedly most muslims are moderate muslims - despite Erdogan's claim that there is no moderate islam?!

How does being a muslim without taking responsibility for one's ideology differ from being a German without taking responsibility for National-socialism (Nazism)? Even an extremely cautious estimate reveals that muslims have murdered, tortured, enslaved, raped and terrorized multiple times that of the Germans. And still ticking...




The Saudi islamofascist Iyad Madani is the Fuhrer of the world's most powerful muslim Sharia organization (Saudi based OIC which via a scumbag muslim voting bloc in UN has made EVERY muslim a Sharia-muslim and made the most basic Human Rights a criminal offense wherever Sharia rules). Saudi Arabia is behind the racist sectarian slaughtering and sexist Sharia oppression of people not only in the Mideast but all over the world. And BBC and Mishal Husain are accomplices to this. There was a time when naive muslims and Westerners thought one could be a muslim without Human Rights violating Sharia. Not so anymore. So what they now do is to propose "moderate Sharia". However, the violation of the most basic of Human Rights can never be moderate!




The naive urban PC myth that Bush's Iraq war caused islamic terror in Iraq seems  to have at least a 4-10 year deficit - and the real culprits and their disgusting ideology are still at large




Saudi-backed infiltration has been going on since the early 1990s, from the Balkans to the borders of China


ISIS is former Ansar al-Islam.

Mouaz Moustafa, executive director of the Syrian Emergency Task Force, a Syrian-American organization that supports the opposition: '[The extremist groups] are the most well-resourced on the ground…'.



Klevius comment: How come that evil always gets most of the funds?

2008 Klevius wrote:

The root man of Saudi islamofascism was Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahab who, during his studies in Basra in the 18th C, got seriously dazzled by glimpses of the European Enlightenment twinkling through the temporary crack to the West called the "Tulip period". He then retreated back into his medieval islamic darkness & as a result, came to position himself as the very opposite to the British "Glorious revolution" which fought against Catholic papacy, & which ended up in Lancashire's coal fueled textile industries as the beginning of the modern industrialized* world based on technology & rationality rather than on religious superstition & fundamentalism (also compare Shinto vs islam). A major outcome of industrialization was universal suffrage & the idea about negative human rights.
* isn't it an irony then that Britain, who started the series of modern revolutions as well as industrialization, came to deeply embed itself with the most intolerant, racist & sexist constitution, i.e. the Saudi islamofascist state which was incapable of producing anything by itself except hatred & more fanatic muslims!

Together with the criminal "house of Saud" Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahab then confined the Arabs in islamic backwardness &, in addition, the Arab women in an islamic burka of extreme Sharia sex segregation/apartheid.

After having robbed Mecca & Medina, the Sauds/Wahhabis run the stolen country by the help of what they fleeced from visiting pilgrims. This was the main source of income until Westerners found/drilled oil & made the lazy islamist looters even wealthier.


From the beginning of the Iraq liberation, the Kurds expressed fear of Saudi Wahhabi jihadist penetration. They reported Saudi Wahhabi desecration of cemeteries--always an early sign of the Saudi-backed infiltration that has been going on since the early 1990s, from the Balkans to the borders of China.

An individual calling himself Mullah Krekar (aka Najmuddin Faraj Ahmad, born 07/07/1955 in Iraqi Kurdistan), religious mentor of the terrorist group Ansar al-Islam, which first operated in Kurdistan and then moved to the Sunni Triangle, has declared that he was proud to be described as a disciple of Ibn Abd al-Wahhab, founder of Saudi islamofascism.

Mullah Krekar was the original leader of the islamist armed group Ansar al-Islam, which was set up and commenced operations in Kurdistan while he had refugee status in Norway.

In 1991, after the first Gulf War, when Saddam Hussein oppressed, gassed and pursued the Kurds in Northern Iraq, Mullah  Krekar fled to Norway. From there he continued his relations with islamic militants in the Middle East and especially in Jordan and Iraq.

In Iraq Mullah  Krekar founded in 1999 Ansar al Islam organization with Abu Musab al Zarqawi, with whom he had contact since 1994. Through the cell of Abu Musab al Zarqawi in Amman Jordan, Jordanian intelligence found evidence to his involvement in the Jordanian millennium plot scheduled to the 2000 new years eve.

In 2002 Mullah  Krekar visited the Kurdish autonomy in Northern Iraq.

After the arrest of Jamal Zougam, one of the main offenders that carried out the Madrid Trains Bombing on 3/11/2004, Jamal Zougam revealed in his investigation that between 1999 – 2001, he traveled several times to Oslo, Norway, to meet Mullah  Krekar for “spiritual guidance”.

The name of Mullah  Krekar emerged so many times in the activities of Ansar al Islam, the most dangerous islamic network in Europe, and in connection with so many muslim terrorist cells in Europe and the Middle East, that it is impossible to assume that Mullah  Krekar is innocent from harboring terror.

Mullah Krekar is an example of shrewd manipulation of the judicial system by islam supporters.

The US had Islamic State of Iraq and al-Shams (ISIS) leader Abu Bakr al Baghdadi in custody at a detention facility in Iraq, but muslim born (apostate?!) Mr X "president" Barry Barack Barakeh Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever) freed him. Al Baghdadi was among the prisoners released in 2009 from the U.S.'s now-closed Camp Bucca near Umm Qasr in Iraq.

But now five years later he is leading the army of ruthless extremists bearing down on Baghdad who want to turn the country into an Islamist state by blazing a bloody trail through towns and cities, executing Iraqi soldiers, beheading police officers and gunning down innocent civilians.

al Baghadadi, aka Abu Duaa, was an islamic fundamentalist long before the U.S. invaded Iraq and he became a leader in al Qaeda's network before he was arrested and detained by American forces in 2005.

'Abu Duaa was connected to the intimidation, torture and murder of local civilians in Qaim,' according to a 2005 U.S. intelligence report.

'He would kidnap individuals or entire families, accuse them, pronounce sentence and then publicly execute them.'

The Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS), act in coordination with Saddam Hussein's former Baathists.

Western and Arab countries have happily supported ISIS and other muslim terrorist groups.

The muslim terrorists have now become owners of a territory.

However, terrorists such as ISIS cannot control large territories on their own but need others supporting them.


ISIS is attempting to take over Sunni-populated regions with the help of local forces so that it can control activities on the border of Syria and Iraq hence facilitating attacks against Iraq and weaken the Shiite-dominated government in Baghdad.

ISIS will probably negotiate similarly as the Taliban have done.

Muslim Wahhabi clerics/muftis in Saudi Arabia have heavily inspired the bloodshed produced by muslim jihadi groups in Iraq and Syria. ISIS islam interpretation is hence a Wahhabi one spiced with the usual inevitable takfirism, i.e. sectarian racism. Islam rests on racism on multiple levels due to its original formula that has nothing to do with good governance but everything to do with being an ideological AK-47 for parasitism.

Islam is therefore all about racist hate and sexism (sex slaves and reproduction of as many muslim males as possible). Except for the default islamic state of eternal hate and contempt of the "infidel" and the takfirs (wrong muslims), Saudi Sunni muslims especially hate Shia muslims, and teach others to hate them as well. This hatred is inherited from the very origin of islam and has to do with islamic (Arabic)language imperialism. So it's not at all just Saudi Arabia vs. Iran but a purely religious feature of islam. In fact, as Klevius has said since 9/11, the very origin and core of islam is tailored for parasitism, greed, looting and rapetivism. After the islamic conquest of the Sassanid Empire, during the reign of the Ummayad dynasty, the Arab muslim attackers/looters tried to impose Arabic as the primary language of the subject peoples throughout their empire.

In 2006, al-Qaeda blew up the al-Askari mosque, sparking a new civil war between Shiites and Sunnis in Iraq.

The only way to stop the spread of islamic terrorism is to stop Saudi Arabia. However, Mr X "president" will never do that. Even now he wants to help the Saudis while talking about giving military aid to the Iraqis.

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family hides its dirty game behind "private donors" etc.

Pictures of Saddam Hussein and his commander Essat al-Douri have been posted in the streets by ISIS.

Khamenei blames Saudi Arabia, Qatar for Iraq insurgents

Armed groups like the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) are leading to a debate on Salafism in Saudi Arabia because although they do Saudi business they also may constitute a threat to the dictatir family itself.

Saudi Salafism shares with ISIS the islamic fanatism of Ibn Taymiyyah, Ibn al-Qaim and Mohammad ibn Abdel Wahhab.


Does the islamic Sharia rule include all people or is it limited to influential muslim figures and muslim dictators (Ahl al-Hal wal Aqad)?

However, political Salafism cannot establish a system of rule that can be held accountable, as it bans and criminalizes all forms of opposition, criticism and protest against authority. Despite the differences among Salafist movements from jihadist Salafism to Saudi government loyalists Jamia Salafism, they all refuse and criminalize opposition to authority.

Salafist political theory is a mess of contradictory sayings of Sharia fanatics from the Middle Ages. Some sayings forbid resistance and protests, while others consider criticizing power a religious duty. What makes either of both opinions prevalent and dominant during a certain era is the power and influence of those who believe in it.

Issues of Sharia rule and democracy and their relation to islam in the Arab Spring countries worries Saudi Arabia. The Syrian jihad terror and the chance it gave to jihadist Salafism has prompted many questions regarding theories of authority in islam.

Saudi "king" Abdullah, with his policy of delivering blows against Iran by orchestrating the overthrow of Assad in Syria and Malik in Iraq, shows no pity for the bloodshed he causes. Nor do his supporters, including such apart figures as Mr X "president" muslim born (apostate?!) Barry Barakeh Hussein Mohammad Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever) and BBC's muslim Sharia presenter Mishal Husain etc.

Militarily Saudi Arabia's first public display of Chinese missiles capable of hitting Tehran has to be added to Obama's and UK's selling of huge amounts of expensive sophisticated military equipment and weapon systems to this (except for oil/gas) extremely backward and evil nation that in no way could have produced this technology by the hackward islam they embrace for the sake of doing evil and violating Human Rights.

However, ISIS is the ruthless muslim killing machine, that takes Sunni hate of Shiites to its logical, and bloody, extreme.

Saudi "king" Abdullah's main goal is, using his own words, "cutting off the head of the snake" in Tehran.

The Sunni/Shiite divide coincides approximately with the division between Arabs and Persians, now and historically.

Saudi Arabia's dilemma is rooting for muslim ISIS terrorism while avoiding its advances at home.

Already in the 1920s, Muslim Brotherhood fighters were helping Ibn Saud to conquer Arabia for the Saud family (which had come to wealth by using African slaves on their dade plantations in truly islamic tradition). Ibn Saud, the father of Saudi "king" Abdullah, asked the British to use their air force to weaken the the Muslim Brotherhood jihadists who had also attacked the Brits. Ibn Saud then used his own muslim jihadists to massacre them at Sabilla in 1929.


Btw, where are all the world's 1.5 Billion muslims who should need to follow Klevius' blog? What keeps them away?! If they need collected info digested via an unbiased Atheist (not chained by prejudicial "god" thoughts) top brain and interpreted against what we historically know about islam - there seems to be few options.
Stop being a coward muslim! Become a brave ex-muslim! You too Mishal Husain - if your muslim husband allows you to.


Dear reader, sorry for not editing this (and most other) posting properly - but as long as you don't contribute with anything Klevius cannot employ an editor. And you know, Klevius doesn't want to waste his life on editing this - isn't it more than enough that he produces this info for you! And why does Klevius bother doing even this? Well, simply because his Atheist moral is entirely resting on basic Human Rights and equality. And as he continuously sees how stupidity paves the way for evil immoral (Human Rights violation) by racist/sexist elements, he feels morally obliged to do at least this. If not for anything else than his own peace of mind.

Thursday, June 12, 2014

How many lives has the muslim Saudi terrorist "king" destroyed - at home and abroad?

Saudi muslim "king" Abdullah is the world's most evil muslim terrorist - yet BBC and its muslim Sharia presenter Mishal Husain seem to have completely missed this obvious fact - as has muslim born (apostate?!) Mr X "president"! Why?


RT video: Deprived of their basic needs, the four Saudi royal princesses kept in 13-year isolation by their father, King Abdullah, have surpassed 60 days without food.

The monarch’s daughters fell out of their father’s favor for speaking out against the ill treatment of women in the Gulf kingdom. It is also believed that the king was angry at the girls' mother for not giving him a son.

Two of the princesses, Sahar and Jawaher, say they are being kept against their will in two mansions inside a royal compound in the city of Jeddah, along with their other two sisters – Maha and Hala. They say they have been deprived of food for over 60 days and have very little access to water.

“It’s a horrible situation, it’s a forced famine basically. They are confining us, depriving us of food and water, freedom and rights. We are struggling, we are surviving, we are resisting, we are trying our best to stay alive,” the two sisters told RT via Skype.

“How can we continue living like this? We have to take the risk of [speaking out]."

Having spent so much time deprived of freedom, they struggle to understand why they have been locked up.

“The king and his sons need to answer these questions: What are we charged with? What exactly is our crime?”

“What is the crime of 99 percent of women in this country, who are basically suffering under male guardianship? A male guardian can do whatever he wants; he can cut off everything and she is left with nothing,” they said on behalf of the female citizens of the ultraconservative kingdom.

“We are making these statements right now [in order to] gain our rights, our freedoms.”

Their health is slowly deteriorating. Past appeals by their mother, Alanoud Al-Fayez, for outside assistance - including from Western leaders like US President Barack Obama - have not come to fruition. The administration is turning a blind eye, according to some critics. But the situation cannot be helped by appealing to the Saudi government either, as it maintains that the princesses are in fact perfectly free to move around the city of Jeddah, provided they are accompanied by bodyguards.

The four sisters are between the ages of 38 and 42, with at least one said to be suffering from psychological problems.

Earlier, in rare interviews with foreign media, the sisters said they don’t have any passports or IDs and the king has also forbidden any man to seek his daughters’ hands in marriage. The entire time they have been kept in isolation, both electricity and water have been shut off at random, often for days – even weeks.

The 89-year-old monarch and father of 38 children, given to him by multiple wives, is listed among Forbes magazine's most wealthy and influential men, with a fortune estimated at around US$17 billion.

The princesses' mother, Al-Fayez, divorced King Abdullah in 1980, consequently leaving for London in 2001. The sisters' ordeal then began around 2002. Less than one year after their mother escaped, Abdullah began tormenting his daughters. The sisters told their mother that he drugged their food and water to keep them docile when they openly spoke against women being illegally detained and placed in mental wards.

The director of the Institute for Gulf Affairs, Ali Al-Ahmed, believes the grave human rights situation in the kingdom is compounded by a political strategy from the outside, whose purpose is to keep any negative press at bay, and is a force to either change things for the better or keep them as they are.

“This is the nature of the Saudi monarchy, who are oppressing the people in their country. But now it’s very clear that they’re oppressing their own female members. The king who is portrayed in the international media – in the Western media - as a reformer, is oppressing his own daughters; healthy adult women, who have been held for 13 years…they’re being starved deliberately,” Al-Ahmed told RT.

“People outside the country definitely can speak and hold those people who are responsible for this crime accountable; namely the Saudi king and his sons…who are deliberately doing this.”


The Saudi islamic terror tentacles


Although Qatar and other islamofascist countries try to shed as much blood as possible, Saudi Arabia's dicator family is by far the world's most dangerous terrorist organization. ISIS and Boko Haram are just two names in the islamic Saudi killing and raping machinery.


How many versions are there of islam? And how many versions were there of Nationalsocialism (Nazism)?! And how come that "benign islam" always represents islam while evil Nazism always represents Nationalsocialism? Klevius doesn't approve of any state socialism* but cannot see the logic in this.

* State socialism ia when the state and state officials rather than the citizens benefit from taxes.

According to people who use the oxymoron "islamophobia", Saudi Arabia is both the islamic paradise and not islamic at all.

If we have to believe PC people (fascists) there is actually not any muslim country with "real islam". Their islam is "perverted" by the "infidel colonialists". In short, if you think you can criticize islam then think again because it's not islam's fault but yours! So Klevius has taken these advices seriously and therefore headed to the origin of islam, long before any "Western imperialism". However, what Klevius found there when islam started its own grim 1400 year colonialism campaign turned out to be exactly the very same picture as we see today.

Mr X "president" Barry Barakeh Husein Mohammad Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever) and other leaders in France, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and the UK, should all be held accountable for the destabilization of Iraq, Libya and Syria. Indeed, Egypt, Lebanon, Mali, Tunisia, Nigeria, Malaysia, Thailand, Brunei, etc etc. Islamofascist Gulf and Western powers alongside Turkey have unleashed forces that, guided by islamic original evil, shoot, bomb, behead, slaughter and rape in a stream of terrorist attacks, destroy cultural monuments and commit other barbaric acts.

According to a jihadi source, Baghdadi received 'encouraging signals from a regional agency in a friendly Sunni Muslim country to enter Syria, and promises of financial support toward this goal.' When asked whether it was Saudi Arabia or Qatar, he replied, 'It is one of these two.'

Zaid Alisa: Iraq should name and shame the countries supporting Al-Qaeda and lodge complaints at the United Nations against those countries if it wants to fight Al-Qaeda

Klevius comment: How could you possibly complain to UN when islam and Saudi Arabia have taken over UN?!