OIC is a muslim extremist organization

Origin of islam and an ignorant white Western nun

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo have sharia islam in common

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo have sharia islam in common

God is an escape route from Human Rights

First sophisticated art by the first truly modern humans

Oldest real portrait ever found (>29,000BP Central Europe, dated by the latest space technology)

Finland's lion tramping the islamic scimitar 1583

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Origin of the Vikings

Two slavs and one ex-muslim kick islam in its groin

A victim of rapetivism - and an interfaith messenger of rapetivism

A victim of rapetivism - and an interfaith messenger of rapetivism

Japan 10 yrs ahead of Europe in hybrid/fuelcell cars, space tech etc

Native Brits from Doggerland spoke a proto-Finnish/Uralic language

We non-muslims need to honor racist islam's victims - cause muslims won't

We non-muslims need to honor racist islam's victims - cause muslims won't
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-f4ihemJ34G4/T2yuFzSUqiI/AAAAAAAAA_U/FcGmXfvhkCw/s640/Ms+Lucy+Black+racist+4.jpg

The islamic extermination of Jews

Modern humans originated in Siberia

Alwaleed bin Talal, a rape accused muslim who's never worked & spends oil Billions on sexist Sharia

Alwaleed bin Talal, a rape accused muslim who's never worked & spends oil Billions on sexist Sharia
Klevius is probably now the world's foremost expert on sex segregation, and islam (the worst cime ever) is the foremost expression of sex segregation. By 'islam' Klevius means Sharia as described by Bill Warner and the Saudi based and steered muslim world organization OIC and its Cairo declaration (sharia) imposed on all muslims via UN (meaning basic Human Rights are criminalized).

Burn OIC's islamic anti-Human Rights declaration!

Wednesday, August 26, 2015

How many muslims are extremists comparable with German Nazis? The very showing the question got Curt Schilling sacked! Luckily he wasn't in Saudi Arabia.


Acknowledgement: Islam is here seen as sharia islam i.e. violating the most basic Human Rights, and true muslims are here seen as those who follow this political islam.

 Listening to islam supporters it sound like the more muslims in the world the more sensitive they are and the more understanding and (sharia) compliant we non-muslims ought to be. So truly small minorities must be very strong and hardy then, and can be more easily kicked around. Comes handy for them as they might need their hardiness much more than muslims who can be legally "offended" or "hated" for things no one would even dream of affecting average non-muslims.




 UK's possible PM didn't remember the islamofascist sharia muslim he had invited and sat beside. Worrying? Possibly. But more worrying still is his support for islamofascist blasphemy laws and his racist rant against Human Rights defenders (so called "islamophobes").

How do Jeremy Corbyn's (the socialist who, like Erdogan, thinks islam critics, i.e. so called "islamophobes", are the most "disgusting of terrorists") Jew hating muslim friends fit in the picture?

So what do those "muslims" think who don't approve of sharia but rather stick with Human Rights? And Jews who don't want to submit under islam. Should we just allow spineless bigoted hypocrite politicians like Jeremy Corbyn to assist in their extermination.





Saudi based OIC - and its islamofascist Saudi sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani - constitutes islam today, and it's against the most basic of Human Rights!

Klevius question: Why aren't muslims ashamed of their slave raiding/trading/owning past? And of the Koranic ideology that "justifies" it - instead of excusing islam with cherry picked "new interpretations"


 Curt Schilling, a former star base ball pitcher and a baseball analyst for ESPN, was suspended from his Little League World Series duty after sending a tweet which re-posted a meme that reads: "It's said only 5-10% of muslims are extremists. In 1940, only 7% of Germans were Nazis. How'd that go?"

The text was superimposed of a red-tinted photo of Adolf Hitler.


Schilling added, "The math is staggering when you get to true #'s."



Schilling also shared the photo on Facebook, where the original post links to a video about the end times.

At first Schilling didn't back off from his post, but eventually he was forced to say it was wrong to post the meme.

"I understand and accept my suspension. 100% my fault. Bad choices have bad consequences and this was a bad decision in every way on my part," he wrote.

"Curt's tweet was completely unacceptable, and in no way represents our company's perspective," ESPN said in a written statement. "We made that point very strongly to Curt and have removed him from his current Little League assignment pending further consideration."

Schilling deleted the tweet after individually replying to some of his critics and supporters.

In one he wrote, "needed to actually think a bit before acting on that one, or not acting. On me though."


Klevius comment: More than one third of the Germans who voted voted for the National-socialists (aka Nazis). Later almost all Germans who voted voted in favor of giving Hitler and the National-socialists (aka Nazis) sole leadership for the purpose of hindering splitting party politics at a time of rebuilding the country and its economy.

At least 234,000 UK muslims have a "very favorable" or "somewhat favorable" view on the Islamic State!


Today (2015) approximately 78,000* UK muslims have a "very favorable" view on the Islamic State while some 156,000 have a "somewhat favorable" view. 

* Cautiously estimated on 2.6 million adult UK muslims (2011 census). 


The 25 Points of the National Socialist German Workers' Party (aka "Nazi") programme here compared to islam:


Klevius showed this program to his former* friend Max Scharnberg (a Freud critic like Klevius) after having deleted the parts were Jews and Germans/Germany etc. clear hints were mentioned. Klevius then asked which party program Max thought it could be. Max answered without any hesitation that he thought it was a social-democratic party program.

* Klevius stopped seeing the guy after Max said he could perform suicide attacks against Jews was it not for him being to cowardice to perform it.

        1. We demand the union of all Germans (muslims) in a Great Germany (Ummah) on the basis of the principle of self-determination of all peoples (muslims).

        2. We demand that the German people (muslims) have rights equal to those of other nations; and that the Peace Treaties of Versailles and St. Germain shall be abrogated (Palestine/Zionism).

        3. We demand land and territory (colonies) for the maintenance of our people and the settlement of our surplus population.

        4. Only those who are our fellow countrymen (muslims) can become citizens. Only those who have German blood (are muslims), regardless of creed, can be our countrymen. Hence no Jew (or "infidel") can be a countryman.

        5. Those who are not citizens must live in Germany (Ummah) as foreigners (dhimmis) and must be subject to the law of aliens (sharia).

        6. The right to choose the government and determine the laws of the State shall belong only to citizens (to the caliph). We therefore demand that no public office, of whatever nature, whether in the central government, the province, or the municipality, shall be held by anyone who is not a citizen (muslim).

        We wage war (jihad) against the corrupt parliamentary administration whereby men are appointed to posts by favor of the party without regard to character and fitness.

        7. We demand that the State shall above all undertake to ensure that every citizen (muslim) shall have the possibility of living decently and earning a livelihood. If it should not be possible to feed the whole population, then aliens ("infidels") must be expelled.

        8. Any further immigration of non-Germans ("infidels", Jews, "wrong-muslims" Christians, Atheists etc)) must be prevented. We demand that all non-Germans (infidels) who have entered Germany since August 2, 1914, shall be compelled to leave (compare Saudi Arabia's laws against "infidels", Human Rights etc).

        9. All citizens must possess equal rights and duties.

        10. The first duty of every citizen must be to work mentally or physically (this may not apply to an ideology based on parasitism). No individual shall do any work that offends against the interest of the community to the benefit of all.

        Therefore we demand:

        11. That all unearned income, and all income that does not arise from work, be abolished (this may not apply to an ideology based on parasitism).

        12. Since every war (jihad) imposes on the people fearful sacrifices in blood and treasure, all personal profit arising from the war must be regarded as treason to the people. We therefore demand the total confiscation of all war profits.

        13. We demand the nationalization of all trusts.

        14. We demand profit-sharing in large industries.

        15. We demand a generous increase in old-age pensions.

        16. We demand the creation and maintenance of a sound middle-class, the immediate communalization of large stores which will be rented cheaply to small tradespeople, and the strongest consideration must be given to ensure that small traders shall deliver the supplies needed by the State, the provinces and municipalities.

        17. We demand an agrarian (well, the origin of islam was as far from agrarian you can get) reform in accordance with our national requirements, and the enactment of a law to expropriate the owners without compensation of any land needed for the common purpose. The abolition of ground rents, and the prohibition of all speculation in land (this seems to be as far from "right-wing" you can get).

        18. We demand that ruthless war be waged against those who work to the injury of the common welfare. Traitors, usurers, profiteers, etc., are to be punished with death, regardless of creed or race.

        19. We demand that Roman law, which serves a materialist ordering of the world, be replaced by German common law (sharia).

        20. In order to make it possible for every capable and industrious German (muslim) to obtain higher education, and thus the opportunity to reach into positions of leadership, the State must assume the responsibility of organizing thoroughly the entire cultural (religious) system of the people. The curricula of all educational establishments shall be adapted to practical life (sharia). The conception of the State Idea (Ummah) must be taught in the schools from the very beginning. We demand that specially talented children of poor parents, whatever their station or occupation, be educated at the expense of the State.

        21. The State has the duty to help raise the standard of national health by providing maternity welfare centers, by prohibiting juvenile labor, by increasing physical fitness through the introduction of compulsory games and gymnastics, and by the greatest possible encouragement of associations concerned with the physical education of the young.

        22. We demand the abolition of the regular army and the creation of a national (jihad) folk army.

        23. We demand that there be a legal campaign against those ("islamophobes") who propagate deliberate political (religious) lies and disseminate them through the press (blasphemy). In order to make possible the creation of a German (muslim) press, we demand:

        (a) All editors and their assistants on newspapers published in the German (Arabic) language shall be German citizens (Sunni muslims).

        (b) Non-German (infidel) newspapers shall only be published with the express permission of the State (Caliph or his representatives). They must not be published in the German (Arabic) language.

        (c) All financial interests in or in any way affecting German (Sunni muslim) newspapers shall be forbidden to non-Germans (infidels) by law, and we demand that the punishment for transgressing this law be the immediate suppression of the newspaper and the expulsion of the non-Germans (infidel).

        Newspapers transgressing against the common welfare (of the Ummah) shall be suppressed. We demand legal action against those tendencies in art and literature (Muhammad caricatures, caricatures of the Saudi dictator family etc) that have a disruptive influence upon the life of our folk (muslims), and that any organizations that offend against the foregoing demands shall be dissolved.

        24. We demand freedom for all religious faiths in the state (doubtful if this applies to islam in Saudi Arabia - the "custodian of islam"), insofar as they do not endanger its existence or offend the moral and ethical sense of the Germanic race (Sunni muslims).

        The party (OIC) as such represents the point of view of a positive Christianity (islam) without binding itself to any one particular confession (doesn't apply in islamic monotheism). It fights against the Jewish materialist spirit within and without, and is convinced that a lasting recovery of our folk can only come about from within on the pinciple:

        COMMON GOOD BEFORE INDIVIDUAL GOOD

        25. In order to carry out this program we demand: the creation of a strong central authority in the State (Caliphate), the unconditional authority (submission) by the political central parliament of the whole State and all its organizations.

        The formation of professional committees and of committees representing the several estates of the realm, to ensure that the laws (sharia) promulgated by the central authority shall be carried out by the federal states.

        The leaders of the party (OIC) undertake to promote the execution of the foregoing points at all costs, if necessary at the sacrifice of their own lives (may not apply to OIC).
  



The islam Klevius talks about is the one that leaves Human Rights violations,  rapes, blood, suffering and death behind itself. I.e. the very same islam and its consequences that BBC describes as "motivated" by "islamophobia" and "injustice" against muslim jihads. 


Islam was/is evil parasitism - i.e. not something "pure" completely disconnected from humans! Its main expressions today are OIC (UN) and the Islamic State (violence).

They both work for sharia against Human Rights



OIC Fuhrer Iyad Madani and the caliph of the Islamic State



Rapetivism is the foundation and pillar of monotheism



It’s not surprising that the mix of piety and depravity that characterizes this movement would emanate from the soul of its founder. But the followers aren't without guilt either.

OIC's and Islamic State's muslim Umma:


 Islamic state is establishing itself in Europe via Balkan and those very parts that the West opened up for Saudi infiltration.


Islamic State inspired camps in the US




 .
Klevius wrote:

Saturday, December 28, 2013

Klevius history tutorial on the deep perversity of Judaic monotheisms: The chosen people (racism); the genitally mutilated children (abuse); sex apartheid (sexism); and the slave economy


Dear fellow Atheists! You constitute the biggest ideological group on Earth - yet we hear almost nothing about it! Consider all these pompous and extremely racist "monotheist god" agitators whose voices are sprayed all over society without anyone even reflecting over how deeply offending and degrading they are against Atheists, Buddhists, Shintoists etc etc! No, we don't need more religion, we need less. And "freedom of religion" should only be understood as having the right to believe in whatever, yet not having the right to impose it on others. (Negative) Human Rights is pure freedom without imposition. Religion is racism.

Btw, if a random muslim has the right not to serve you because of your beliefs (in atheism, music, wine, pork, dogs or whatever) you should have the right to demand not to be served by muslims at all!

The true history of God - sorry about that, Karen Armstrong


There never was any space for a "first mover". Space has only one dimension (in this context) and that dimension is 'now'. No beginning, no end, just now. Read your Einstein and try to understand the word 'relativity' when gazing the stars. What you (and Hubble) see is 'now'! "Big bang" was invented by a Catholic priest to make "creation" sound cooler. Silly, isn't it! Where should it bang? In front of God? A muslim suicide bomber can't see the bang and the suffering it causes around her/him because s/he is in it.

In a constantly changing world there can never be a "moral base" other than the basis for Human Rights, i.e. that all should be treated as equals - just as in traffic. Not even leftists are offended by giving way for those coming from the right.

God people always (and usually after much resistance, trouble and suffering) have to eventually give up or reform alter their holy hollow tenets - no matter if we're talking gay rights, women's rights, or whatever.

Atheism is the only straight way to Human Rights!


God has always been against Human Rights - that's his very allurement!


The ancient Persian (which is extremely young compared to proto-Uralic) word for god 'khoda' connects to the even more ancient Finnish 'koti' and Finno-Ugric 'kota' (=home/house/seed vessel - see Klevius definition of religion and the Vagina gate), Saami 'goahti'. German Gott (god) and Swedish gott (good) as well as Gotland (pronounced Gottland), the island in the Baltic sea that constituted a (the?) main Viking hub in their slave trade with Jews and muslims. Btw, English is a Scandinavian language and e.g. 'cottage' is a direct derivative from Finnish 'koti' - funny spelling though, especially compared to Finnish which is spelled exactly as it is pronounced).


Origin of islam, a late Judaic sect, focusing on enslavement of others, that became the worst racist/sexist hate crime ever against humanity


Racist monotheism is never good for your moral. How could it possibly be when you tell individuals that their "god" is superior, hence ending up with millions of private "gods" which are then said to be one in collectives defined by this "communal god" which only exists through its political and militaristic expressions.


The true history about the Judaic Penis oppression of the Vagina people


From Sumerian genderless pronouns to Semitic sex apartheid


For most of today's speakers of Indo-European languages the he/she devision seems almost self-evident - until they learn Finnish, Japanese, Mandarin or some other non-Semitic and non later Indo-European languages.

Moreover, linguistic gender divide in third person singular is a relatively recent phenomenon in the history of human languages. It first emerged within Semitic languages. We can only speculate why, but a qualified guess by Klevius would connect it to the same social and environmental factors that caused Judaism.

The civilization process in the Middle east was introduced by the non-Semitic Sumerians. However, when Semitic groups attacked, dissolved and displaced them, a pattern emerged whereby non-Semitic Indo-European related groups begun assimilating a gender divide in third person singular.

Originally, there were only an animate (masculine/feminine) and an inanimate (neuter) gender. This view is supported by the existence of certain classes of Latin and Ancient Greek adjectives which inflect only for two sets of endings, one for masculine and feminine, the other for neuter. Further evidence comes from the Anatolian languages which exhibit only the animate and the inanimate gender.


Judaism, the world’s only “monotheism” and its many Vagina/Penis branches or sects


The Jewish  slave Kingdom of Chazars, in what is now Southern Russia, was one of the absolutely worst slave trading societies - only beaten by islamic caliphates and sultanates (read more on Origin of the Vikings).


Judaism (a late ”branch” of Zoroastrianism) has in different manifestations cursed itself and the world for some Millenniums. It was chiseled out on the bedrock of a racist “chosen people” and sexist rapetivism (i.e. female sex duties) approach. However, a crucial moment was when a particular branch of Judaism introduced the Penis as the sole custodian of one way (apostasy ban) “muslimhood”. This caused an explosion of “muslims”, although this development was paralleled with an even bigger explosion of abused slaves and parasitism in a variety of forms. But the real corner stone of all Judaic tradition, sex apartheid, has reached its peak in islam. To an extent that it now has clashed against Human Rights resulting in a divided UN.  


Look wherever you like now or in the past, and you won't find any peace or equality where Judaic monotheisms have left their marks. 

If anything at all should be taught to our children about religion  it should be its racist and sexist origin and its disastrous consequences!

The only people chosen by the only god - a bedrock formula for sectarianism and disaster - not the least for themselves

Tuesday, August 25, 2015

Klevius hint to UK Labour: Skip your "islamophobia" campaign against critics of islamofascism - and clean your party from islamofascists and their supporters (like Jeremy Corbyn)!


"Islamophobia" or islamofascism?


Of course Labour won't let go of their ties to islamofascism. And that's kind of good because it will alienate British voters even more from this disgusting state party which talks a lot about "vulnerable people" when asking for tax-money, while forgetting all about these "vulnerable people" when it comes to consuming said money (read Angels of Antichrist and Pathological Symbiosis).

Boris Johnson: 'Sharia law in the UK is absolutely unacceptable'.

Klevius: Boris Johnson fulfills the most basic definition of "islamophobia" because islam without sharia is no longer islam! Welcome Boris to Klevius club.


Jeremy Corbyn acts "offended" for being called racist. Yet he's both openly and covertly racist against Human Rights defenders (i.e. most ordinary Brits) almost every day!


Here Jeremy Corbyn sits together with an islamofascist called Dyab Abou Jahjah whom he afterwards said to BBC he had never heard about.


Samuel Westrop: In 2012, Corbyn agreed to speak at a Ramadan celebration with Abdur Raheem Green, a Salafist preacher who has spoken of a "Yehudi [Jewish] ... stench." Green urges Muslims to "push them [Jews] to the side." In addition, Green encourages men to hit their wives to "bring them to goodness," and has called for the killing of homosexuals and adulterers.

In 2014, Corbyn spoke at an event organized by representatives of the Iranian regime, to commemorate the Iranian revolution of 1979. Corbyn's fellow speakers included Hassan al-Sadr, who represents the UK office of Iraqi terrorist Moqtada al-Sadr; and Abdolhossein Moezi, the personal representative of Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Also in 2014, Corbyn hosted an event in parliament that featured the "neo-Nazi" speaker James Thring, who has appeared in a revisionist pro-Nazi documentary and has said that, "the Jewish lobby has so much power."

In the wake of Britain's general election, candidates with ties to anti-Semitic extremists and terror groups are standing for important political positions.


Klevius micro tutorial on the origin of islam: 


The early muslim conquest plundering expeditions consisted of greedy and horny illiterate teenage bedouin boys led by wealthy Jewish/Christians whose way (islam) of recruiting and feeding them via parasitism is a copy of what the Islamic State does today (plus of course today also young muslim women who due to the sex apartheid they have been kept in feel important when serving as sex objects for jihadis and assisting in murdering, torturing, enslaving and raping of "infidel women etc).

Young muslim male asylum migrants coming alone as "child-refugees" to spread sharia islam. Where are the women? Here!


The only muslim women "refugees" are those pregnant or with kids or already married (sharia marriage). So new muslim mothers are usually taken from non-muslims. Moreover, muslim women aren't even allowed, according to sharia, to date or marry non-muslims.



Muslim women in UK have four times more kids than non-muslims. Yet BBC keeps demonizing non-muslim EU migrants, Chinese etc.



"Islamophobic" math based on Human Rightsphobic islam



Most muslims who come as "refugees" are in fact from wealthy middle class, and should therefore be classified as "economical or benefit migrants". The poorer ones could never afford to pay for the travel. Why isn't this cruel fact on Labour's agenda?! The islamic pattern of today is exactly the same as when early muslim jihadis made wealthy non-muslims pay taxes while slaughtering, raping and enslaving the poorer ones. Klevius thinks it's disgusting. What do you reckon, Jeremy Corbyn? "Islamophobia" more disgusting, right.


Swedish asylum muslim migrant stats (it's probably similar elsewhere):




Of these "coming alone child-refugees" most are muslims. 90% are teenage boys and most of these are late teenage youngsters.

According to islam a child fathered by a muslim is always a muslim no matter who the mother is.

So it's not only that muslim mothers have many more children than non-muslim Europeans - non-muslim mothers having children with muslim men inevitably loose their children to islam.




 In Klevius series digusting Human Rights desecrating hypocritical politicians.





Raed Salah (a friend of Jeremy Corbyn): Very soon, Muhammad will be the most popular name in Europe.

Klevius: And most of them are muslim violators of Human Rights! If we don't start educating muslims about Human Rights instead of lying to our children about islam, then these future Muhammads and Muslimas will never understand the very evil origin and nature of Human Rights violating sharia islam.




So what to do?

Simple. Most muslims have a brain and understand logic. So face them with Human Rights logic according to which their system is racist and sexist. Most of these young males will probably abandon sharia islam if seriously challenged at all societal levels with the illogic of this supremacist ideology. And those who don't, then clearly define themselves as hateful and racist supremacists.

UK's former Labour leader Ed Miliband wants to root out "islamophobia" as a hate crime. And according to Jeremy Corbyn "islamophobia" is disgusting and deeply offensive".


Social state socialists* have never defended the rights of the individual because they are rooted in a mass movement (French revolution, Soviet Union, National-socialism, Mao's China, Cuba, DDR, Pol Pot etc.). This is why basic individual Human Rights freedom (the so called negative Human Rights) isn't defended by state socialists. As a consequence, these socialists are wide open for totalitarian systems like sharia islam. 

* The self-evident idea that we need a fairer distribution of wealth shouldn't be allowed to be monopolized by socialists who, in the end, prioritize themselves via the state rather than individuals in general. This is why Klevius throughout his adult life has proposed so called "citizen salary" for everyone. Initially the Green parties seemed to follow the same line of thoughts. However, when they turned out to be supporters of state socialism Klevius had to abandon them (see Klevius paper The Green Dilemma, 1984).



Some voices about Ed Milliband's sharia association


Leo McKinstry: Ed Milliband is far more dangerous than his awkward image suggests. An unprincipled, ruthless, opportunistic left-wing ideologue, he represents a serious menace to Britain’s future. Backed by the ScotsNats and Labour’s trade union paymasters, his regime would be one of debts, bureaucracy, mass immigration and constitutional chaos.

But now an even more sinister aspect to his leadership has emerged, one that threatens our essential freedoms. Miliband says he will make Islamophobia a serious crime to be prosecuted by the full might of the state. Flushed with self-righteous zeal, Miliband wants to ensure that the offence “is marked on people’s records with the police to make sure they root out Islamophobia as a hate crime.”

Anyone who believes in liberty will be truly alarmed. Miliband’s proposal goes against the entire tradition of western democracy, which holds that people should be punished only for their deeds, not their opinions.

In the name of tolerance, Labour wants to impose a form of totalitarianism, making a mockery of the concept of free speech. Like so many socialist policies, Miliband’s plan conjures up the dark, Orwellian world of the Thought Police, where all citizens are required to obey the ruling orthodoxy. I n January Miliband echoed the global outrage at the Charlie Hebdo massacre by Muslim terrorists in Paris, even joining other political leaders in the French capital’s official protest march. But his call for a British law against Islamophobia exposes the hollowness of his indignation.

Under his proposal, most of the Charlie Hebdo staff would have been in prison over their satirical cartoons.

Sunday, August 23, 2015

Young muslim male asylum migrants coming alone as "child-refugees" to spread sharia islam. Where are the women? Here!


"Islamophobic" math based on Human Rightsphobic islam


Swedish asylum muslim migrant stats



Of these "coming alone child-refugees" most are muslims. 90% are teenage boys and most of these are late teenage youngsters.

According to islam a child fathered by a muslim is always a muslim no matter who the mother is.

So it's not only that muslim mothers have many more children than non-muslim Europeans - non-muslim mothers having children with muslim men inevitably loose their children to islam.


So what to do?

Simple. Most muslims have a brain and understand logic. So face them with Human Rights logic according to which their system is racist and sexist. Most of these young males will probably abandon sharia islam if seriously challenged at all societal levels with the illogic of this supremacist ideology. And those who don't, then clearly define themselves as hateful and racist supremacists.

Socialist gate openers for islamofascism in UK


Declaring criticism of islamofascism "islamophobia" seems to be highest on the British socialist agenda.


There's no way to argue that criticism of Human Rights violating sharia muslims and sharia islam (aka "islamophobia") should/could be called a "hate crime" as long as that society adheres to Human Rights. Therefore, the only possible outcome of hate campaigns against "islamophobes" is support for islamofascism.

UK's former Labour leader Ed Miliband wants to root out "islamophobia" as a hate crime. And according to Jeremy Corbyn "islamophobia" is disgusting and deeply offensive".


Social state socialists* have never defended the rights of the individual because they are rooted in a mass movement (French revolution, Soviet Union, National-socialism, Mao's China, Cuba, DDR, Pol Pot etc.). This is why basic individual Human Rights freedom (the so called negative Human Rights) isn't defended by state socialists. As a consequence, these socialists are wide open for totalitarian systems like sharia islam. 

* The self-evident idea that we need a fairer distribution of wealth shouldn't be allowed to be monopolized by socialists who, in the end, prioritize themselves via the state rather than individuals in general. This is why Klevius throughout his adult life has proposed so called "citizen salary" for everyone. Initially the Green parties seemed to follow the same line of thoughts. However, when they turned out to be supporters of state socialism Klevius had to abandon them (see Klevius paper The Green Dilemma, 1984).



Some voices about Ed Milliband's sharia association


Leo McKinstry: Ed Milliband is far more dangerous than his awkward image suggests. An unprincipled, ruthless, opportunistic left-wing ideologue, he represents a serious menace to Britain’s future. Backed by the ScotsNats and Labour’s trade union paymasters, his regime would be one of debts, bureaucracy, mass immigration and constitutional chaos.

But now an even more sinister aspect to his leadership has emerged, one that threatens our essential freedoms. Miliband says he will make Islamophobia a serious crime to be prosecuted by the full might of the state. Flushed with self-righteous zeal, Miliband wants to ensure that the offence “is marked on people’s records with the police to make sure they root out Islamophobia as a hate crime.”

Anyone who believes in liberty will be truly alarmed. Miliband’s proposal goes against the entire tradition of western democracy, which holds that people should be punished only for their deeds, not their opinions.

In the name of tolerance, Labour wants to impose a form of totalitarianism, making a mockery of the concept of free speech. Like so many socialist policies, Miliband’s plan conjures up the dark, Orwellian world of the Thought Police, where all citizens are required to obey the ruling orthodoxy. I n January Miliband echoed the global outrage at the Charlie Hebdo massacre by Muslim terrorists in Paris, even joining other political leaders in the French capital’s official protest march. But his call for a British law against Islamophobia exposes the hollowness of his indignation.

Under his proposal, most of the Charlie Hebdo staff would have been in prison over their satirical cartoons.


Jeremy Corbyn acts "offended" for being called racist. Yet he's openly and covertly racist against Human Rights defender against sharia islamofascism almost every day!


Here together with an islamofascist called Dyab Abou Jahjah whom he said to BBC he had never heard about.



Samuel Westrop: In 2012, Corbyn agreed to speak at a Ramadan celebration with Abdur Raheem Green, a Salafist preacher who has spoken of a "Yehudi [Jewish] ... stench." Green urges Muslims to "push them [Jews] to the side." In addition, Green encourages men to hit their wives to "bring them to goodness," and has called for the killing of homosexuals and adulterers.

In 2014, Corbyn spoke at an event organized by representatives of the Iranian regime, to commemorate the Iranian revolution of 1979. Corbyn's fellow speakers included Hassan al-Sadr, who represents the UK office of Iraqi terrorist Moqtada al-Sadr; and Abdolhossein Moezi, the personal representative of Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Also in 2014, Corbyn hosted an event in parliament that featured the "neo-Nazi" speaker James Thring, who has appeared in a revisionist pro-Nazi documentary and has said that, "the Jewish lobby has so much power."

In the wake of Britain's general election, candidates with ties to anti-Semitic extremists and terror groups are standing for important political positions.


Boris Johnson: 'Sharia law in the UK is absolutely unacceptable'


"That is unacceptable to me. Everybody must be equal under the law, and everybody must obey the same law. That is absolutely cast-iron. The point is that the idea of a parallel system of law, a parallel judicature, people making the laws holding to a different system, is absolutely unacceptable, it's alien to our traditions

"I take grave exception to some of the support I see sometimes - and from clerics in the Church of England who've come out in favour of this, I've noticed, and said we should be a little bit indulgent of this.

"It's an interesting fact that we have some clerical fossils still in our legislature. Don't forget we have bishops sitting by right in our upper house.

"The separation of church and state is not perhaps as thorough-going in this country as you might like to think.

"The point is that the idea of a parallel system of law, a parallel judicature, people making the laws holding to a different system, is absolutely unacceptable, it's alien to our traditions.

"I won't have it in London and I'm worried sometimes by the faint bat-squeaks of support that I hear for that idea even from clerics in the Church of England."

Asked if the Beth Din would "have to go", Mr Johnson replied: "Yes, absolutely. Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander."

He said he accepted that Jewish couples could go to a Beth Din to seek sanction for their divorce, but added: "It cannot substitute for UK civil proceedings.

"They cannot replace the civil proceedings. If they want to have some ceremonial proceeding according to religious ritual or whatever, that is fine. But the actual implementation of the law has got to be done in British courts according to British law, agreed by Parliament.

"That is where the law emanates from. The law emanates in the end from people voting for MPs who enact the statutes which we all obey.

"That gives this country a vital equality."


Bubblegum commented 145 days ago: Bores had better get used to Sharia law on our streets... It will come whether he wants it or not as the Muslim birth rate produces more and more Muslims they will become future voting fodder, What does Boris expect ? That these hoards will not want to change everything to suite themselves ??

Klevius comment: The simple answer is to force politicians etc. to face muslims with the logical choice of Human Rights violating* sharia or apostasy from sharia islam. And, in case of the former, face them with hate, sexism and racism charges! However, the difficult part is to face politicians with this simple logic.

* Meaning truly basic Human Rights - not some silly "rights".

Thursday, August 20, 2015

What's the difference between being anti-muslim and anti-Nazi?


Hey Brits, do you think Jeremy Corbyn will protect your Human Rights against muslims?

 In Klevius series digusting Human Rights desecrating hypocritical politicians.




Raed Salah (a friend of Jeremy Corbyn): Very soon, Muhammad will be the most popular name in Europe.

Klevius: And most of them are muslim violators of Human Rights! If we don't start educating muslims about Human Rights instead of lying to our children about islam, then these future Muhammads and Muslimas will never understand the very evil origin and nature of Human Rights violating sharia islam.



The Bangladesh government led by PM Sheikh Hasina has been criticized for failing to adequately protect Human Rights bloggers. 


Klevius: Why should he be criticized? According to deeply racist and sexist (he supports sharia islam - and if he doesn't, then Klevius challenges him to be honest and dare to say he's an "islamophobe") Jeremy Corbyn, "islamophobia" is "disgusting and deeply offensive". In Europe and the US no one protects "islamophobic" Human Rights bloggers! On the contrary they are seen as "not conducive to the public good" because they offend muslims - who apparently are "conducive to the public good" despite opposing Human Rights - with their "islamophobia", and because many muslims are very sensitive and violent, islam criticism, sorry, "islamophobia" may "disturb cohesion" - or somthing like that.

In other words, muslim Human Rights-phobia is good while defending the most basic of Human Rights equals "islamophobia" - which is very bad.

So what do those "muslims" think who don't approve of sharia but rather stick with Human Rights? And Jews who don't want to submit under islam. Should we just allow spineless bigoted hypocrite politicians like Jeremy Corbyn to assist in their extermination.


Klevius answer to the question in the title of this posting: None! Most Nationalsocialists weren't evil at all - just misled like many "muslims". 

Let's listen to a Jewish voice that differs a lot from Ed Miliband:


Shane Croucher: Jewish Twitter users are routinely attacked and questioned about Israel, despite having no connection to Israel other than being Jewish. Some are, ironically, critics of Israeli policy. A parallel would be demanding British Muslims to condemn Saudi Arabia purely because they share – in the broadest sense – a religion. It would not be tolerated in a way that demanding all Jews answer for the actions of Israel apparently is. These double standards and the emboldening of anti-Semites by Corbynmania are creating legitimate cause for concern among British Jews, many of whom are here because their ancestors sought refuge from the Holocaust.


Klevius: "In the broadest sense share a religion"?! Klevius takes it to mean the unfortunate mixing of Human Rights violating sharia muslims with non-sharia "muslims". The divide is bigger than the diameter of our Universe!


Two dumb voices who should really feel ashamed of, not their dumbness, but because of their support for islamofascism


Jordan Denari and Nathan Lean: "Ayaan Hirsi Ali's message has failed to attract many in the American Muslim community, who believe she misrepresents islam."

Klevius: The desperation among supporters of islamofascism seems to block any remaining capability of logical thinking. How could someone who criticizes something represent what  s/he criticizes?!


Jordan Denari and Nathan Lean: Hirsi Ali doesn't speak from a place of formal expertise on Islam.

Klevius: Expertise on islam! Apart from her experience of islam (which she shares with millions of islam's victims) and what you (and "muslim scholars") know zero about - why "formal"?! How would a "formal" criticism of Nazism in a Nazi country have looked like? And when did you last time knew about an unbiased "muslim scholar" (i.e. someone who builds houses of cards on unhistorical muslim fairy tales in the Arabian sand). The contamination of Western universities with "muslim scholars" is a sad step many hundreds of years back in time.

Jordan Denari and Nathan Lean: It's really not islam she desires to change, as much as the public's perception of it.



Klevius: This must be the intellectual equivalent of the guy driving against the traffic on the wrong side of the motorway. When we all know that the islam that is criticized by "islamophobes" like Ayaan Hirsi Ali, is the one in which name evil (i.e. what is criticized) is produced. The "islamophobic" criticism is directed against evil muslims and evil islam - nothing or no one else!

If "good muslims" have a problem (feeling "offended") with sharing the same name as sharia muslims then its their duty to clearly state it by openly rejecting this evil (i.e. against the most basic Western and Human Rights values) sharia islam - or stop being muslims all together, hence committing the worst crime islam (in every form) knows about, which fact really underlines the evilness in their former ideology.



If you like islam - why don't you also like the Islamic State and Saudi Arabia? They are by far the closest to the origin of islam you can get today!





Wednesday, August 19, 2015

Possible UK Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn: I honour islamofascists but islamophobia is disgusting!


How much do muslims cost the British tax payers - and what effect will they have in the future with Labour's anti "islamophobia" politics? 


Social democrats (called Labour in UK) are best pals with parasitic islamofascism and the parasitic social state that lives on benefit from hard working people and technology, while not wanting to give money to those in real need (see the most important sociological paper from the last century, Angels of Antichrist). As the temporary leader of the Labour so well put it: Let's not give poor people more than what the conservatives give!* Therefore Jeremy Corbyn seems to be the perfect choice for those who happened to share those values. 

* Of course she would happily have given even less had it not been for the possible shame that could have caused her party which is advertised as "for the weak and vulnerable" while being quite the opposite (read Pathological Symbiosis).




 Raed Salah: Very soon, Muhammad will be the most popular name in Europe.

'I say to you who harbor hatred towards the Messenger of Allah that it will not be long before Allah grants us victory over you.'

Last year, Salah was filmed delivering a sermon in Nazareth in which he said, 'Inshallah, Jerusalem will soon become the capital of a global caliphate.

'The caliphate will spread justice throughout the land after it was filled with injustice by America, the Zionist enterprise, the Batiniyya, reactionism, Paganism and the Crusaders,' he said.
James Thring addresses the audience at Parliament at an event hosted by Jeremy Corbyn

And in 2011, Salah gave an interview in which he laughingly recalls drawing a swastika on a blackboard to taunt a Jewish schoolteacher.

Salah also believes that Israel was behind the 9/11 attacks. In a 2001 article for Sawt al-Haq w’al-Huriyya, the journal of the Islamic Movement, he wrote:

'A suitable way was found to warn the 4,000 Jews who work every day at the Twin Towers to be absent from their work on September 11, 2001, and this is really what happened.

'Were 4,000 Jewish clerks absent [from their jobs] by chance, or was there another reason? At the same time, no such warning reached the 2,000 Muslims who worked every day in the Twin Towers, and therefore there were hundreds of Muslim victims.'

When approached by MailOnline, Corbyn declined to comment.

Klevius comment: Today on BBC he still couldn't remember an other of his islamofascist friends, Mr Abou Jahjah!

However, this British female could well be an admirer of Jeremy Corbyn.


Muslim women in UK have four times more kids than non-muslims. Yet BBC keeps demonizing EU migrants.




Klevius wrote:

Wednesday, May 06, 2015


Some "islamophobia" before Ed Milliband introduces sharia compliant "blasphemy" laws against the Brits' Human Rights as in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan


Are the Brits shooting themselves in the foot - again?


Politicians in bed with islamofascism is a disaster for Human Rights

Does it really help Jews to cooperate with the ideology that started with the genocidal slaughtering of all the Jews in Medina?


A vote for Ed Milliband is a vote against children's rights

Ed Miliband is the son of Polish immigrant parents. His mother, Marion Kozak, is a Polish Jew who survived the Holocaust thanks to being protected by Poles. His father, Ralph Miliband, was a Belgian-born Polish Jewish Marxist academic who fled with his father to England during World War II.

Rochdale is notorious for its muslim sex predators abusing white British girls taken into "care" by the social state.

Rochdale Labour councillor Shakil Ahmed is the dad of now freed(?!) terrorist suspect Waheed Ahmed who was arrested and accused of trying to go to Syria with eight of his relatives.



Some voices about Ed Milliband's sharia association


Leo McKinstry: Ed Milliband is far more dangerous than his awkward image suggests. An unprincipled, ruthless, opportunistic left-wing ideologue, he represents a serious menace to Britain’s future. Backed by the ScotsNats and Labour’s trade union paymasters, his regime would be one of debts, bureaucracy, mass immigration and constitutional chaos.

But now an even more sinister aspect to his leadership has emerged, one that threatens our essential freedoms. Miliband says he will make Islamophobia a serious crime to be prosecuted by the full might of the state. Flushed with self-righteous zeal, Miliband wants to ensure that the offence “is marked on people’s records with the police to make sure they root out Islamophobia as a hate crime.”

Anyone who believes in liberty will be truly alarmed. Miliband’s proposal goes against the entire tradition of western democracy, which holds that people should be punished only for their deeds, not their opinions.

In the name of tolerance, Labour wants to impose a form of totalitarianism, making a mockery of the concept of free speech. Like so many socialist policies, Miliband’s plan conjures up the dark, Orwellian world of the Thought Police, where all citizens are required to obey the ruling orthodoxy. I n January Miliband echoed the global outrage at the Charlie Hebdo massacre by Muslim terrorists in Paris, even joining other political leaders in the French capital’s official protest march. But his call for a British law against Islamophobia exposes the hollowness of his indignation.

Under his proposal, most of the Charlie Hebdo staff would have been in prison over their satirical cartoons.
Related articles

    Why aren’t the English allowed to be nationalists? asks LEO MCKINSTRY
    Ed Miliband and Nicola Sturgeon are the George and Mildred of politics says LEO MCKINSTRY
    End to hated inheritance tax that hurts middle income families, says LEO MCKINSTRY

Indeed Winston Churchill, Britain’s greatest statesman, would have ended up behind bars if Miliband’s law had been enacted during his life. In his 1899 book The River War, Churchill wrote that “no stronger retrograde force exists in the world” than the “militant and proselytising faith” of Islam. At a time when the police and courts seem incapable of tackling real lawbreakers effectively, Miliband’s proposal will waste huge resources by creating a whole new class of criminals whose only offence will have been to challenge an ideology that is being used to spread violence and misery across the world. In the new climate of censorship created by Labour, too many Muslims, including extremists, corrupt politicians and predatory paedophiles, will be able to silence their critics or halt investigations just by screeching the word “Islamophobia.”

In fact, that is already happening on an epic scale. Until his trial which concluded on Friday, no action was taken against Lutfur Rahman, the spectacularly corrupt Muslim Mayor of Tower Hamlets in east London, as he maintained his grip on power by constantly playing the race and religious card. In the same way, fears about accusations of Islamophobia meant that the authorities in Labour-run Rotherham did nothing about Pakistani sex gangs who systematically abused around 1,400 vulnerable white girls.

A similar spirit of collusion and cowardice has stopped the state dealing robustly with other Muslim abuses, like forced marriages, female genital mutilation, ballot box fraud or extremism in schools. Miliband’s whole scheme is based on a monstrous fraud.

So-called Islamophobia is not an irrational fear or prejudice but an understandable response to the horrors we see all around us perpetrated in the name of Allah, from the savage persecution of Christians in the Middle East to the beheading of Drummer Lee Rigby and the London bombings at home. As the great radical writer Christopher Hitchens once put it, Islamophobia “is a word created by fascists and used by cowards to manipulate morons.”

    Labour plan will fuel Muslim victimhood

    Leo McKinstry

It is outrageous that the Labour Party, while blathering about the fight against discrimination, effectively wants to shut down any debate about a theocratic doctrine that has provoked such a worldwide, blood-soaked catalogue of tyranny, oppression, terrorism, misogyny, anti-Semitism and homophobia.

In practice, what Miliband really proposes is the introduction of Muslim blasphemy laws, such as exist in the barbaric, failed Islamic-led states of the Middle East and Asia. In Miliband’s Britain, it will become impossible to criticise any aspect of Islamic culture, whether it be the spread of the burka or the establishment of sharia courts or the construction of colossal new mosques. We already live in a society where Mohammed is now the most popular boy’s name and where a child born in Birmingham is more likely to be a Muslim than a Christian. If he wins, Miliband will ensure that the accelerating Islamification of our country will go unchallenged.

He wants to act as the Witchfinder-General in the new Islamic order, hunting down heretics as he is cheered on by his Muslim allies. Driven by his desire for power, he is pandering to identity politics of the worst kind, seeking to gain support in the three million-strong Muslim population to prop up Labour’s urban vote. But such an approach is disastrous, for it fuels social division and Muslim victimhood.

If Miliband were a true leader, he would push for real integration by demanding that all Muslims face up to their responsibilities, accept western democratic values, stop trying to build replicas of Bangladesh and Pakistan here and drop their collusion with violence.

But that would require courage, maturity and patriotism, qualities that he so conspicuously lacks. Instead, at a terrible potential cost to Britain, he aims to give protection to alien bigotry.


Soeren Kern: “In Miliband’s Britain, it will become impossible to criticise any aspect of Islamic culture, whether it be the spread of the burka or the establishment of Sharia courts or the construction of colossal new mosques. … If he wins, Miliband will ensure that the accelerating Islamification of our country will go unchallenged.” — Leo McKinstry, British commentator.

    The report shows that Britain’s Muslim population is overwhelmingly young and will exert increasing political influence as time goes on. The median age of the Muslim population in Britain is 25 years, compared to the overall population’s median age of 40 years.

The leader of Britain’s Labour Party, Ed Miliband, has vowed, if he becomes the next prime minister in general elections on May 7, to outlaw “Islamophobia.”

The move — which one observer has called “utterly frightening” because of its implications for free speech in Britain — is part of an effort by Miliband to pander to Muslim voters in a race that he has described as “the tightest general election for a generation.”

With the ruling Conservatives and the opposition Labour running neck and neck in the polls just days before voters cast their ballots, British Muslims — who voted overwhelmingly for Labour in the 2010 general election — could indeed determine who will be the next prime minister.

In an interview with The Muslim News, Miliband said:

    “We are going to make it [Islamophobia] an aggravated crime. We are going to make sure it is marked on people’s records with the police to make sure they root out Islamophobia as a hate crime.

    “We are going to change the law on this so we make it absolutely clear of our abhorrence of hate crime and Islamophobia. It will be the first time that the police will record Islamophobic attacks right across the country.”

Miliband appears to be trying to reopen a long-running debate in Britain over so-called religious hatred. Between 2001 and 2005, the then-Labour government, led by Prime Minister Tony Blair, made two attempts (here and here) to amend Part 3 of the Public Order Act 1986, to extend existing provisions on incitement to racial hatred to cover incitement to religious hatred.

Those efforts ran into opposition from critics who said the measures were too far-reaching and threatened the freedom of speech. At the time, critics argued that the scope of the Labour government’s definition of “religious hatred” was so draconian that it would have made any criticism of Islam a crime.

In January 2006, the House of Lords approved the Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006, after amending the text so that the law would be limited to banning only “threatening” words and not those that are merely abusive or insulting. Lawmakers also said that the offense would require the intention — not just the possibility — of stirring up religious hatred. They added that proselytizing, discussion, criticism, abuse and ridicule of religion, belief or religious practice would not be an offense.

Miliband’s renewed promise to make “Islamophobia” (a term he has not defined) an “aggravated crime” may signal an attempt to turn the 2006 Act — which already stipulates a maximum penalty of seven years in prison for stirring up religious hatred — into a full-blown Muslim blasphemy law.

According to British commentator Leo McKinstry, “Miliband’s proposal goes against the entire tradition of Western democracy, which holds that people should be punished only for their deeds, not their opinions.” In an opinion article, he added:

    “In Miliband’s Britain, it will become impossible to criticise any aspect of Islamic culture, whether it be the spread of the burka or the establishment of Sharia courts or the construction of colossal new mosques. We already live in a society where Mohammed is now the most popular boy’s name and where a child born in Birmingham is more likely to be a Muslim than a Christian. If he wins, Miliband will ensure that the accelerating Islamification of our country will go unchallenged.”

McKinstry says Miliband is currying favor with Britain’s three million-strong Muslim community to “prop up Labour’s urban vote.”

Muslims are emerging as a key voting bloc in British politics and are already poised to determine the outcome of local elections in many parts of the country, according to a report by the Muslim Council of Britain, an umbrella group.

image: http://www.breakingisraelnews.com/wp-content/uploads/useful_banner_manager_banners/142-JewishShepard-600WIDE.jpg

The report shows that Britain’s Muslim population is overwhelmingly young and will exert increasing political influence as time goes on. The median age of the Muslim population in Britain is 25 years, compared to the overall population’s median age of 40 years.

An extrapolation of the available data indicates that one million British Muslims aged 18 and above will be eligible to vote in this year’s election. According to one study, Muslims could determine the outcome of up to 25% of the 573 Parliamentary seats in England and Wales.

Others say that although Britain’s Muslim community is growing, it is also ethnically diverse and unlikely to vote as a single group. One analyst has argued that the potential for Muslim influence in this year’s election “will remain unrealized because the Muslim vote is not organized in any meaningful way on a national level.”

A study produced by Theos, a London-based religious think tank, found that although Muslims consistently vote Labour, they do so based on class and economic considerations, not out of religious motives.

Indeed, a poll conducted by the BBC on April 17 found that nearly one-quarter of “Asian” voters still do not know which party they will support at the general election. Some of those interviewed by the BBC said that economic issues would determine whom they vote for.

In any event, Muslim influence in the 2015 vote will be largely determined by Muslim voter turnout, which has been notoriously low in past elections: Only 47% of British Muslims were estimated to have voted in 2010.

Since then, several grassroots campaigns have been established to encourage British Muslims to go to the polls in 2015, including Get Out & Vote, Muslim Vote and Operation Black Vote. Another group, YouElect, states:

    “A staggering 53% of British Muslims did not vote in the 2010 General Election, such a high figure of Muslim non-voters indicates that many Muslims feel ignored by politicians and disillusioned by the political process.

    “With the rise of Islamophobic rhetoric in politics and an ever increasing amount of anti-terror legislation which specifically targets Muslims, it is now more important than ever that Muslims use the vote to send a message to politicians that their attitudes and policies must change.

    “YouElect wants to get the message across that there is something you can do about the issues you care about. We have launched a new campaign using the hashtag #SortItOut, which calls on Muslims to use the political process to address the issues that concern them most.

    “With 100,000 new young Muslims eligible to vote this year and 26 parliamentary constituencies with a Muslim population of over 20%, the Muslim community has a very real opportunity to make an impact on British politics.”

Not all Muslims agree. The British-born Islamist preacher Anjem Choudary is actively discouraging Muslims from voting. In a stream of Twitter messages using the#StayMuslimDontVote hashtag, Choudary has argued that voting is a “sin” against Islam because Allah is “the only legislator.” He has also said that Muslims who vote or run for public office are “apostates.”

Despite several grassroots campaigns to encourage British Muslims to vote in greater numbers, some prominent Islamists in the UK claim that voting is a “sin.”

Other British Islamists are following Choudary’s lead. Bright yellow posters claiming that democracy “violates the right of Allah” have been spotted in Cardiff, the capital of Wales, and Leicester, as part of a grassroots campaign called #DontVote4ManMadeLaw.

One such poster stated:

    “Democracy is a system whereby man violates the right of Allah and decides what is permissible or impermissible for mankind, based solely on their whims and desires.

    “Islam is the only real, working solution for the UK. It is a comprehensive system of governance where the laws of Allah are implemented and justice is observed.”

A vote for Ed Milliband won't help victims of muslim sexual predators in accordance with the Koran


The social state is much more devastating to children than any private company - and waste much more money!


A UK mother who found 125 names of potential (most/all muslims?) sex abusers on her daughter’s mobile phone claims she was told by police in Rotherham it would be a "breach of the girl’s human rights" if they investigated.

Klevius translation: Note that we are talking about underage girls who would have no Human Rights protection against social state interventions (aided by the police) whatsoever (to understand this and the tiltle see Angels of Antichrist and Pathological Symbiosis). What they really meant was that it would be a breach of the muslims' human rights (read "diversity policy") if they investigated. And this is the dilemma - Human Rights cover all, including muslims, whereas sharia opposes Human Rights - which fact doesn't hinder muslims (and their supporters) from abusing Human Rights when it serves themselves.!

The parasitic social state that feeds itself on behalf of the taxpayers and children while giving a s--t to non-muslim girls abused by muslims. Don't approve a penny before getting rid of the parasites residing in the social state! And one thing is definitive: Ed Milliband will continue supporting these parasites.

Rotherham has been totally dominated by Labour since World War 2. Compare the total dominance of the Swedish social democrats who created the disastrous Swedish social state all the way from Gunnar and Alva Myral's "social hygiene"  in the 1930s and due eugenics to the explosive tax injection in the 1970s and due birth of the modern social state. Some results: The Swedish "girl problem" (which Klevius has written about since 1993), high child/youth criminality, and a school system that 2015 is classified among the worst within OECD and heavily criticized in a recent OECD report. Yet Sweden has compulsory school attendance and doesn't admit homeschooling at all for normal children (alone in Europe together with Germany whose Hitler imposed law is still in power).

Learn more on Angels of Antichrist and Pathological Symbiosis


Joyce Thacker has been a central figure in the responsibility for letting children be abused and even murdered. How much does she get from your tax money, and will she be rewarded in the usual way for defending islam while not defending children.


Islam is the only remaining legal excuse for hateful racism and sexism. If you are a racist or sexist then your only non-criminal option is islam.


Where others have to adapt to goodness (Human Rights) muslims can continue being evil (sharia) because of islam's status as a "religion".

But the troublesome fact remains that islam isn't only incapable of approving of the most basic of Human Rights, islam is also guilty of 1400 years of constant murdering, genocides, slavery and rapetivism. Islam is a Pandora's box and the only hope is the extinction of its main evil message.

BBC's diversion tactics for the purpose of belittling islamic slavery genocides - the worst ideological crime ever against humanity

BBC's aim seems to be to make people believe that "sex slavery was/is all over the place" - i.e. not only islam.

Today islam is the only allowed ideology that approves of sexual violence/rapetivism.

Sexual violence is a weapon and a strategy that is approved by islam and therefore used by muslims to "justify" it. In other words, when non-muslim traffickers know they are criminals, muslim criminals just point to the Koran, hadiths and Muhammad.

As an exemplifying consequence, out of 585 peace treaties since 1990 only 17 mention sexual violence/rape. And out of 300 ceasefire deals only 6 consider such kind of sexual violence a violation of the deal.


Islam started with Muhammad's genocide of all the Jews in Medina 1400 years ago and continued its violent attacks until today. Islam's victims throughout all these years are more than any other evil ideology. What we call Judaism also started with genocide (the slaughtering of the Canaanites) but due to mainly matrilineality  never managed to produce numbers comparable with islam. This is what Klevius calls the Vagina/Penis divide, i.e. that a man can have more "offspring" than a woman. A muslim man makes a muslim - not a "muslim" woman.A "muslim" woman is an "inferior" being according to Muhammad and islam.

The main body of those who today call themselves muslims consists of people whose female ancestors had been enslaved by muslim males thanks to Human Rights violating sharia which makes the muslim man the determinant for muslimhood while apostasy ban makes it impossible to leave islam. A woman married to a muslim man is, according to islamic sharia forced to reproduce only muslims.

BBC has slowly started understanding that islam isn't just a "religion" but a pure sex slave "religion" and in their programs is now busy pushing out whatever they can find of non-muslim examples of slavery and sex abuse for the simple purpose of thereby trying to dilute islam's horrifying ideological essence and history - and islam's contemporary and continuing sex slavery ideology.

Yes, there has been slavery in different forms even before islam. However, only islam made slavery (parasitism) its main ideology, inscribed it in its main book and violently expanded through slavery, and finally always declined  into the deepest misery when the supply was limited - as was the case when the West in the 19th century toppled the Ottoman slave "empire" which was itself created through islamic slavery. Or more than thousand years ago when some half a million black slaves in what is now Iraq revolted against their Sunni muslim slave "owners". Islam's "golden ages" have all rested on unlimited supply of slaves through human trafficking, slave raids etc.


Klevius: OIC, the Islamic State, muslim sharia racism/sexism etc are all around us, indeed. So why do you contribute to this evil?! 



Saudi based OIC - and its islamofascist Saudi sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani - constitutes islam today, and it's against the most basic of Human Rights!

Klevius question: Why aren't muslims ashamed of their slave raiding/trading/owning past? And of the Koranic ideology that "justifies" it - instead of excusing islam with cherry picked "new interpretations"


Muslim hypocrisy like the one expressed by BBC's Mishal Husain could be just a laugh - were it not for its connection to islamic evil. Islam has only one authority and that is muslimhood. So declaring yourself a muslim automatically adds to the "democratic" support of islamic evil.


Mishal Husain: “I don’t think my way of life is under any kind of threat."


Klevius: Well, that's because of Western Human Rights rather than islamic sharia, isn't it!



BBC-s sharia presenter Mishal Husain with her islamofascist muslim pals who share almost identical values with the Islamic State.

British muslim jihadists: Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo

The nearest to a global authority of muslimhood is Saudi based and Saudi steered OIC with its global sharia proclamation via UN against that very Human Rights declaration of 1948 that was supposed to protect us against such evil!


OIC Secretary-General Iyad Amin Madani stressed that the "Saudi governing system is based on islam, which fosters values of justice, compassion, equality, and tolerance."

Klevius: These words from this human scumbag must be some of the most hypocritical ever uttered. According to historical facts islam has been the by far worst crime against humanity throughout 1400 years. And today islam's "guardian" Saudi Arabia is the most intolerant of the world's countries and has even criminalized Human Rights.Moreover. the Saudi regime is the hate mongering mastermind behind islamic terror around the world. And while most people point to islamic "scholars" (aka clerics, imams, etc) as the driving force, Mishal Husain asks these muslim "scholars" to contribute even more.

Ask your muslim friend if s/he supports Saudi based OIC and its Sharia against Human Rights!  If s/he doesn't then s/he is an apostate (i.e. committing the worst "crime" known to islam) and ought to be welcomed by every non-muslim


BBC behaves precisely as those who let muslims continue their sex slavery (aka "grooming") in Rochdale, Rotherham and elsewhere!



Chief Crown Prosecutor for the north-west of England, Nazir Afzal was "removed" due to 'on-going drive for efficiency' after being investigated for allegation he sent a text message to a (muslim?) defendant in a court case.

Nazir Afzal to BBC's (deliberately?) toothless (and therefore useless) presenter Edward Stourton: It has nothing to do with islam. I know that the vast majority of offenders are British white male.

However, although white British men (because most Brits are "white" - "colored" muslims constitute below 3-5% and Pakistani/Bangladesh muslims even less) are the majority of abusers in the British population as a whole, the specific type of grooming offence and especially the very highly organised sex abuse such as we’ve seen in Rotherham and elsewhere, is dominated by muslims and follows Koranic principles from the origin of islam.

Sharia is the religious password for racism and sexism

Tuesday, August 18, 2015

Islam's two evil sharia paths*: OIC (Saudi based/steered UN body) and the Islamic State (Saudi sponsored jihad body)


* Saudi Arabia can't openly attack non-muslims and wrong-muslims with its military outside the Arabian peninsula. Therefore it promotes religious street jihad around the world (e.g. 9/11) - often wrapped as "representatives" of "oppressed" muslims (how many Japanese terrorists are there attacking people around the world?!). Unless islam is criminalized we will continue to see islamic caliphates in one or another form stretching through the gray zone between "moderate" and "radical". This is because the dividing line is Human Rights violating sharia, i.e. the evil part of islam. Only by criminalizing islam a clear distinction can be achieved.

The self-proclaimed prophet's evilness initiated a popular parasitic jihad movement motivated by booty and rapetivism* which is now incorrectly** protected by "freedom of religion"



*  Islamic rapetivism is a one way system of sex slavery where women are obliged to produce new muslim males under the threat of sharia.

** Human Rights can't protect an ideology which is against Human Rights in a society based on Human Rights. By sneaking in islamofascist sharia in UN as "islamic human rights", Saudi based and steered OIC managed to make an "exception" for islamic violations against Human Rights.


Religion paves the way for islamofascism. The more faith the more hate.



Today islamofascism gets much of its momentum via senseless representatives for other religions supporting islam.

Chris Fredd (commentator on What motivated UK teenage girls to become Islamic State brides?): Whatever book of faith these folks are reading, scripture all warn of an evil. An evil that has recognizable signs, and an evil that is inevitable.

Klevius: Like "islamophobia", i.e. the defense of Human Rights? It's considered evil by the evil it criticizes and therefore inevitable.

Chris Fredd: Kids are impressionable. Evident by the very fact that they are of strong faith of any religion.

Klevius: This is why naive young people often start as communists or socialists (aided by propaganda in schools) but end up as conservatives. Too bad that conservatism also conserves religion. Only an anti-totalitarian Atheist can ever fully understand other humans and therefore also the necessity of Human Rights. Instead of having a ghostly "god spirit" underpinning and justifying your own racism and sexism, a true Atheist fully accepts the human condition in an uncertain world. This uncertainty gives the true Atheist the most stable foundation for understanding our shared but frail human existence. It's in fact the only true humanity that can be shared by all.

Redistribution of wealth shouldn't go to a social state out of control but to people in general. For someone like Klevius who has worked as a solicitor defending innocent parents from getting their kids being robbed by the social state for no real reason at all (see Pathological Symbiosis and Angels of Antichrist)  it's really disgusting to hear social workers, foster carers and adoptive parents blaming whatever failure on the original parents. Firstly, there is no such thing as a traumatic childhood cause and effect relation in the sense psychologists and social workers like to paint it. Secondly, according to extensive research on the topic (e.g. B. Vinnerjung 1997) there is no correlation whatsoever between interventions from the social state (i.e. robbing the kid from its parents) and its future outlook compared to control groups. But it surely serves as a handy blame game.

However, when it comes to young muslims becoming jihads or sex slaves/pimps, the parents may well be blamed because they were the ones who tranmitted the islamic evil in the first place. And some of them did it because they feared to be blamed by the muslim community as apostates if they didn't. 



Chris Fredd: It only takes a strong faith, a slight disconnect with parental relations, coinciding with an acquaintance of an extremist.

Klevius: Exactly what I wrote in a thesis called Pathological Symbiosis.

Chris Fredd: I do feel that part of the problem is The West, Capitalism breeds war and corruption. It's sad. But I get it. #fucktheonepercent

Klevius: No, you didn't get it. Captalism and technology are all over the place and there is no sane way of avoiding them. Actually, as Klevius wrote already 1981 (paid debate article in Hufvudstadsbladet called Demand for Resources and published only because G H von Wright - Wittgenstein's predecessor at Cambridge and a good friend to the head editor - liked it) it's a consequence of the underlying uncertainty in our existence and should rather be seen as a privilege. Trying to stop it is like trying to play football without moving the ball. Such systems (aka backwardness) are called totalitarian utopias , and, due to their stiffness, always doomed to fail. Uncertainty is what makes football (real football - American handball comes barely halfway) and life kick.

Religion adds to already existing corruption by contributing an extra dimension of subjectivity which makes it even harder to enforce legislation against it. Moreover, under "freedom of religion" thrives corruption etc made invisible or at least out of reach under the cover of "faith".

You become a true Atheist when you remove all evil (i.e. what is against the negative Human Rights) from your religion. From a Human Rights point of view a really good Christian would then be hard to distinguish from a true Atheist.

Good moral can only emerge out of egoism. However, those who don't understand this simple fact try to appear unselfish. Only when egos interact  

When a loved one dies one doesn't cry the already dead body but the scar the missing of the person causes in oneself.

When it comes to girls/women and their attraction to islamofascism, it's all about them being injured ("traumatized") by religious sex segregation combined with heterosexual attraction, i.e. that they feel important just because of a biological feature in men's brain added by "God's will" etc. pompous holiness "justifying" sex segregation/apartheid.   Read Klevius sex tutorials (google it) if you have problem with understanding this.


Islam is by far the worst of religions


The islam Klevius talks about is the one that leaves Human Rights violations,  rapes, blood, suffering and death behind itself. I.e. the very same islam and its consequences that BBC describes as "motivated" by "islamophobia" and "injustice" against muslim jihads. 

Islam was/is evil parasitism - i.e. not something "pure" completely disconnected from humans! Its main expressions today are OIC (UN) and the Islamic State (violence).

They both work for sharia against Human Rights



OIC Fuhrer Iyad Madani and the caliph of the Islamic State



Rapetivism is the foundation and pillar of monotheism



It’s not surprising that the mix of piety and depravity that characterizes this movement would emanate from the soul of its founder. But the followers aren't without guilt either.

OIC's and Islamic State's muslim Umma:


 Islamic state is establishing itself in Europe via Balkan and those very parts that the West opened up for Saudi infiltration.


Islamic State inspired camps in the US




 .
Klevius wrote:

Saturday, December 28, 2013

Klevius history tutorial on the deep perversity of Judaic monotheisms: The chosen people (racism); the genitally mutilated children (abuse); sex apartheid (sexism); and the slave economy


Dear fellow Atheists! You constitute the biggest ideological group on Earth - yet we hear almost nothing about it! Consider all these pompous and extremely racist "monotheist god" agitators whose voices are sprayed all over society without anyone even reflecting over how deeply offending and degrading they are against Atheists, Buddhists, Shintoists etc etc! No, we don't need more religion, we need less. And "freedom of religion" should only be understood as having the right to believe in whatever, yet not having the right to impose it on others. (Negative) Human Rights is pure freedom without imposition. Religion is racism.

Btw, if a random muslim has the right not to serve you because of your beliefs (in atheism, music, wine, pork, dogs or whatever) you should have the right to demand not to be served by muslims at all!

The true history of God - sorry about that, Karen Armstrong


There never was any space for a "first mover". Space has only one dimension (in this context) and that dimension is 'now'. No beginning, no end, just now. Read your Einstein and try to understand the word 'relativity' when gazing the stars. What you (and Hubble) see is 'now'! "Big bang" was invented by a Catholic priest to make "creation" sound cooler. Silly, isn't it! Where should it bang? In front of God? A muslim suicide bomber can't see the bang and the suffering it causes around her/him because s/he is in it.

In a constantly changing world there can never be a "moral base" other than the basis for Human Rights, i.e. that all should be treated as equals - just as in traffic. Not even leftists are offended by giving way for those coming from the right.

God people always (and usually after much resistance, trouble and suffering) have to eventually give up or reform alter their holy hollow tenets - no matter if we're talking gay rights, women's rights, or whatever.

Atheism is the only straight way to Human Rights!


God has always been against Human Rights - that's his very allurement!


The ancient Persian (which is extremely young compared to proto-Uralic) word for god 'khoda' connects to the even more ancient Finnish 'koti' and Finno-Ugric 'kota' (=home/house/seed vessel - see Klevius definition of religion and the Vagina gate), Saami 'goahti'. German Gott (god) and Swedish gott (good) as well as Gotland (pronounced Gottland), the island in the Baltic sea that constituted a (the?) main Viking hub in their slave trade with Jews and muslims. Btw, English is a Scandinavian language and e.g. 'cottage' is a direct derivative from Finnish 'koti' - funny spelling though, especially compared to Finnish which is spelled exactly as it is pronounced).


Origin of islam, a late Judaic sect, focusing on enslavement of others, that became the worst racist/sexist hate crime ever against humanity


Racist monotheism is never good for your moral. How could it possibly be when you tell individuals that their "god" is superior, hence ending up with millions of private "gods" which are then said to be one in collectives defined by this "communal god" which only exists through its political and militaristic expressions.


The true history about the Judaic Penis oppression of the Vagina people


From Sumerian genderless pronouns to Semitic sex apartheid


For most of today's speakers of Indo-European languages the he/she devision seems almost self-evident - until they learn Finnish, Japanese, Mandarin or some other non-Semitic and non later Indo-European languages.

Moreover, linguistic gender divide in third person singular is a relatively recent phenomenon in the history of human languages. It first emerged within Semitic languages. We can only speculate why, but a qualified guess by Klevius would connect it to the same social and environmental factors that caused Judaism.

The civilization process in the Middle east was introduced by the non-Semitic Sumerians. However, when Semitic groups attacked, dissolved and displaced them, a pattern emerged whereby non-Semitic Indo-European related groups begun assimilating a gender divide in third person singular.

Originally, there were only an animate (masculine/feminine) and an inanimate (neuter) gender. This view is supported by the existence of certain classes of Latin and Ancient Greek adjectives which inflect only for two sets of endings, one for masculine and feminine, the other for neuter. Further evidence comes from the Anatolian languages which exhibit only the animate and the inanimate gender.


Judaism, the world’s only “monotheism” and its many Vagina/Penis branches or sects


The Jewish  slave Kingdom of Chazars, in what is now Southern Russia, was one of the absolutely worst slave trading societies - only beaten by islamic caliphates and sultanates (read more on Origin of the Vikings).


Judaism (a late ”branch” of Zoroastrianism) has in different manifestations cursed itself and the world for some Millenniums. It was chiseled out on the bedrock of a racist “chosen people” and sexist rapetivism (i.e. female sex duties) approach. However, a crucial moment was when a particular branch of Judaism introduced the Penis as the sole custodian of one way (apostasy ban) “muslimhood”. This caused an explosion of “muslims”, although this development was paralleled with an even bigger explosion of abused slaves and parasitism in a variety of forms. But the real corner stone of all Judaic tradition, sex apartheid, has reached its peak in islam. To an extent that it now has clashed against Human Rights resulting in a divided UN.  


Look wherever you like now or in the past, and you won't find any peace or equality where Judaic monotheisms have left their marks. 

If anything at all should be taught to our children about religion  it should be its racist and sexist origin and its disastrous consequences!

The only people chosen by the only god - a bedrock formula for sectarianism and disaster - no the least for themselves


The Big Bang and the Big Divide







Monotheist religions are now busy coming to terms with the (for them) surprising fact that women can be seen as fully human beings


Adam was made a copy of God and Eve was made out of one of Adam's least important bones (a broken rib usually self heal and you don't necessarily even need all of them).

However, many Eves still strongly oppose the freedom of other women.

Monotheist reformism: A desperate and continuing in vain pursuit in trying to make bad history look good - or accepting the evil as "god's will", i.e. staying ortodox


The Judaic formula:

1   The chosen people

2   Marked by genital mutilation (circumcision) and the condemnation of sex not giving possibility for procreation (compare Onan who "spilled" his semen) and the sanctioning of Homophobia, all for the sole purpose of as effective rapetivism as possible.

3   Extreme sex segregation to a point where even language became affected. There is a direct linguistic connection between sexist language and Judaic monotheisms? Only (later - i.e. affected by Semitic) Indoeuropean and Semitic languages have this silly and unnecessary gender apartheid personal pronouns he/she!

4   Specialization in slave finance due to the handy racist ideology of we and the others, the infidels, who could be murdered, tortured, raped and enslaved (compare Canaanites).



These are some of the human faces of the main threat to Human Rights

Crimes against humanity and violation of the most basic Human Rights in the name of islamofascist Sharia. Rape or accomplice to rape, perverting the course of justice, media and finance manipulation etc etc. Possibilities for indictment may be some or all of these - or maybe more. It may be reasonable to assume that the actions of this scumbag has caused a lot more harm than Rupert Murdoch ever has (you know, the Brit whom BBC has chased for more than a year by now ' that very BBC whose commercial Mideast section functions as a channel for islam propaganda).


This rape accused Saudi islamofascist*, Alwaleed bin Talal, censors what you learn in schools and universities and in most news channels.

Here kissing/hugging Sudan's "president" Bashir who is arrested (although not produced as yet) by ICC. 

 * Definition of islamofascism: The deliberate neglect of the most basic Human Rights. And don't let them lure you by calling islamofascist Sharia "islamic human rights"!
!
Klevius question:  Why is the female person (sex slave under Sharia rapetivism?)  looking down? And what does she see? The origin of islam?!
























 
According to rumors, members of European royalty partied on Turama together with lots of drugs and prostitutes. The Spanish court dismissed the rape case despite witnesses, semen, traces of drugs etc  were available.

Saudi based islamic Sharia organization OIC is the most powerful voting unit in UN and is also the foremost threat to UN's 1948 Human Rights Declaration. It has long since abandoned every Human Right that doesn't comply with Koran based Sharia.












Former OIC Secretary General, the Turk Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, and Alwaleed bin Talal. The other persons on the pic don't count because of their sex - other than if they say the right thing and if that is in accordance with that very Sharia that is so basically different from Human Rights that OIC had to abandon Human Rights altogether!